Summer Seniors Pairs - A Final 07/07/2007 Session 3 Section Red Top = 18
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 1 4H-2 E 100 12 6 Freedman & Freedman (v) Sitch & Wing
9 2 5C-4 W 200 18 0 Slatcher & Holland Carlisle & Marsh (v)
8 3 3H-2 E 100 12 6 Jacobs & Fisher Nicolle & Bridge
4 7 2S-1 N -50 2 16 Crofts & Crofts (v) Bingham & Osmer (v)
6 5 4H-1 E 50 5 13 Smart & Lunn Wright & Watson
20 11 3C-2 W 100 12 6 Dias & Hair Harper & Hackett
19 12 3D-1 E 50 5 13 Hedley & Hedley Cornell & Beer
18 13 3D+1 E -130 0 18 Jackson & Gordon Serby & Moore
14 17 4H-2 E 100 12 6 Cooke & Lucy Heath & Heath (v)
16 15 4H-2 E 100 12 6 Stanford & Franklin Turnage & Cruickshank
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 1 5D= S 600 14 4 Freedman & Freedman (v) Sitch & Wing
9 2 3NT-1 S -100 8 10 Slatcher & Holland Carlisle & Marsh (v)
8 3 3NT-1 S -100 8 10 Jacobs & Fisher Nicolle & Bridge
4 7 2D+2 S 130 12 6 Crofts & Crofts (v) Bingham & Osmer (v)
6 5 3NT-2 S -200 2 16 Smart & Lunn Wright & Watson
20 11 3NT-2 S -200 2 16 Dias & Hair Harper & Hackett
19 12 3NT+1 S 630 17 1 Hedley & Hedley Cornell & Beer
18 13 3NT-1 S -100 8 10 Jackson & Gordon Serby & Moore
14 17 3NT+1 S 630 17 1 Cooke & Lucy Heath & Heath (v)
16 15 3NT-2 S -200 2 16 Stanford & Franklin Turnage & Cruickshank
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 1 2H-2 S -100 9 9 Freedman & Freedman (v) Sitch & Wing
9 2 2H= S 110 16 2 Slatcher & Holland Carlisle & Marsh (v)
8 3 3S= W -140 4 14 Jacobs & Fisher Nicolle & Bridge
4 7 3H-3 S -150 2 16 Crofts & Crofts (v) Bingham & Osmer (v)
6 5 4Hx-2 S -300 0 18 Smart & Lunn Wright & Watson
20 11 4S-3 W 300 18 0 Dias & Hair Harper & Hackett
19 12 3H-2 S -100 9 9 Hedley & Hedley Cornell & Beer
18 13 3H-2 S -100 9 9 Jackson & Gordon Serby & Moore
14 17 4H-1 S -50 14 4 Cooke & Lucy Heath & Heath (v)
16 15 3H-2 S -100 9 9 Stanford & Franklin Turnage & Cruickshank
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 2 2D= W -90 4 14 Freedman & Freedman (v) Carlisle & Marsh (v)
1 3 4H-2 N -200 1 17 Sitch & Wing Nicolle & Bridge
9 4 3H= N 140 6 12 Slatcher & Holland Crofts & Crofts (v)
5 8 4H+1 N 650 17 1 Wright & Watson Jacobs & Fisher
7 6 3H+2 N 200 8 10 Bingham & Osmer (v) Smart & Lunn
20 12 5H= N 650 17 1 Dias & Hair Cornell & Beer
11 13 4H= N 620 12 6 Harper & Hackett Serby & Moore
19 14 4H= N 620 12 6 Hedley & Hedley Cooke & Lucy
15 18 4S= S 620 12 6 Turnage & Cruickshank Jackson & Gordon
17 16 4H-2 N -200 1 17 Heath & Heath (v) Stanford & Franklin
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 2 3NT= S 600 9 9 Freedman & Freedman (v) Carlisle & Marsh (v)
1 3 3NT= S 600 9 9 Sitch & Wing Nicolle & Bridge
9 4 3NT+1 S 630 15 3 Slatcher & Holland Crofts & Crofts (v)
5 8 3NT+2 S 660 18 0 Wright & Watson Jacobs & Fisher
7 6 3NT-1 S -100 2 16 Bingham & Osmer (v) Smart & Lunn
20 12 3NT-1 S -100 2 16 Dias & Hair Cornell & Beer
11 13 3NT-1 S -100 2 16 Harper & Hackett Serby & Moore
19 14 3NT= N 600 9 9 Hedley & Hedley Cooke & Lucy
15 18 3NT= S 600 9 9 Turnage & Cruickshank Jackson & Gordon
17 16 3NT+1 S 630 15 3 Heath & Heath (v) Stanford & Franklin
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 2 4S+2 N 480 15 3 Freedman & Freedman (v) Carlisle & Marsh (v)
1 3 4S+1 S 450 5 13 Sitch & Wing Nicolle & Bridge
9 4 4S+2 N 480 15 3 Slatcher & Holland Crofts & Crofts (v)
5 8 4H+1 S 450 5 13 Wright & Watson Jacobs & Fisher
7 6 4S+2 N 480 15 3 Bingham & Osmer (v) Smart & Lunn
20 12 4H+1 S 450 5 13 Dias & Hair Cornell & Beer
11 13 4S+1 S 450 5 13 Harper & Hackett Serby & Moore
19 14 3NT+2 S 460 10 8 Hedley & Hedley Cooke & Lucy
15 18 4S+2 N 480 15 3 Turnage & Cruickshank Jackson & Gordon
17 16 4H= S 420 0 18 Heath & Heath (v) Stanford & Franklin
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 3 4D-2 W 200 18 0 Freedman & Freedman (v) Nicolle & Bridge
2 4 2S+3 E -200 4 14 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Crofts & Crofts (v)
1 5 3S+1 E -170 8 10 Sitch & Wing Wright & Watson
6 9 3S+2 E -200 4 14 Smart & Lunn Slatcher & Holland
8 7 4H-4 N -400 0 18 Jacobs & Fisher Bingham & Osmer (v)
20 13 1NT= S 90 16 2 Dias & Hair Serby & Moore
12 14 1NT-2 S -200 4 14 Cornell & Beer Cooke & Lucy
11 15 2S+1 E -140 10 8 Harper & Hackett Turnage & Cruickshank
16 19 3C= E -110 13 5 Stanford & Franklin Hedley & Hedley
18 17 2S= E -110 13 5 Jackson & Gordon Heath & Heath (v)
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 3 4H-2 W 100 11 7 Freedman & Freedman (v) Nicolle & Bridge
2 4 4H-1 W 50 3 15 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Crofts & Crofts (v)
1 5 4Hx-2 W 300 18 0 Sitch & Wing Wright & Watson
6 9 4H-1 W 50 3 15 Smart & Lunn Slatcher & Holland
8 7 4H-2 W 100 11 7 Jacobs & Fisher Bingham & Osmer (v)
20 13 4H-2 W 100 11 7 Dias & Hair Serby & Moore
12 14 4H-2 W 100 11 7 Cornell & Beer Cooke & Lucy
11 15 4H-2 W 100 11 7 Harper & Hackett Turnage & Cruickshank
16 19 4H-2 W 100 11 7 Stanford & Franklin Hedley & Hedley
18 17 3S= E -140 0 18 Jackson & Gordon Heath & Heath (v)
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 3 4S-1 N -50 6 12 Freedman & Freedman (v) Nicolle & Bridge
2 4 2S+2 N 170 14 4 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Crofts & Crofts (v)
1 5 4S= N 420 17 1 Sitch & Wing Wright & Watson
6 9 4S-1 N -50 6 12 Smart & Lunn Slatcher & Holland
8 7 4S= N 420 17 1 Jacobs & Fisher Bingham & Osmer (v)
20 13 4S-1 N -50 6 12 Dias & Hair Serby & Moore
12 14 3NT-1 S -50 6 12 Cornell & Beer Cooke & Lucy
11 15 3NT-1 N -50 6 12 Harper & Hackett Turnage & Cruickshank
16 19 4S-1 N -50 6 12 Stanford & Franklin Hedley & Hedley
18 17 4S-1 N -50 6 12 Jackson & Gordon Heath & Heath (v)
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 4 3NT+1 S 630 3 15 Freedman & Freedman (v) Crofts & Crofts (v)
3 5 3NT+3 S 690 17 1 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 6 3NT+3 S 690 17 1 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Smart & Lunn
7 1 3NT+1 S 630 3 15 Bingham & Osmer (v) Sitch & Wing
9 8 3NT+1 S 630 3 15 Slatcher & Holland Jacobs & Fisher
20 14 3NT+2 S 660 11 7 Dias & Hair Cooke & Lucy
13 15 3NT+2 S 660 11 7 Serby & Moore Turnage & Cruickshank
12 16 3NT+1 S 630 3 15 Cornell & Beer Stanford & Franklin
17 11 3NT+2 S 660 11 7 Heath & Heath (v) Harper & Hackett
19 18 3NT+2 S 660 11 7 Hedley & Hedley Jackson & Gordon
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 4 3NT+3 W -490 2 16 Freedman & Freedman (v) Crofts & Crofts (v)
3 5 3NT+3 W -490 2 16 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 6 2S-7 S -350 18 0 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Smart & Lunn
7 1 3NT+2 W -460 8 10 Bingham & Osmer (v) Sitch & Wing
9 8 3NT+1 W -430 15 3 Slatcher & Holland Jacobs & Fisher
20 14 3NT+1 W -430 15 3 Dias & Hair Cooke & Lucy
13 15 3NT+3 W -490 2 16 Serby & Moore Turnage & Cruickshank
12 16 4S+1 E -450 12 6 Cornell & Beer Stanford & Franklin
17 11 3NT+2 W -460 8 10 Heath & Heath (v) Harper & Hackett
19 18 3NT+2 W -460 8 10 Hedley & Hedley Jackson & Gordon
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 4 1NT-2 E 100 11 7 Freedman & Freedman (v) Crofts & Crofts (v)
3 5 4S-1 W 50 8 10 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 6 3H-4 S -400 2 16 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Smart & Lunn
7 1 1NT+1 N 120 15 3 Bingham & Osmer (v) Sitch & Wing
9 8 1NT+2 N 150 18 0 Slatcher & Holland Jacobs & Fisher
20 14 2S= E -110 5 13 Dias & Hair Cooke & Lucy
13 15 2C-2 E 100 11 7 Serby & Moore Turnage & Cruickshank
12 16 2S= E -110 5 13 Cornell & Beer Stanford & Franklin
17 11 4S= W -420 0 18 Heath & Heath (v) Harper & Hackett
19 18 1NT+1 N 120 15 3 Hedley & Hedley Jackson & Gordon
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 5 2C-1 N -100 4 14 Freedman & Freedman (v) Wright & Watson
4 6 2NT+1 S 150 14 4 Crofts & Crofts (v) Smart & Lunn
3 7 3NT-2 N -200 2 16 Nicolle & Bridge Bingham & Osmer (v)
8 2 2NT= S 120 9 9 Jacobs & Fisher Carlisle & Marsh (v)
1 9 3Cx-2 S -500 0 18 Sitch & Wing Slatcher & Holland
20 15 2NT= S 120 9 9 Dias & Hair Turnage & Cruickshank
14 16 2NT= S 120 9 9 Cooke & Lucy Stanford & Franklin
13 17 2D-2 E 200 16 2 Serby & Moore Heath & Heath (v)
18 12 2Dx-2 E 500 18 0 Jackson & Gordon Cornell & Beer
11 19 2NT= S 120 9 9 Harper & Hackett Hedley & Hedley
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 5 4S+2 S 480 15 3 Freedman & Freedman (v) Wright & Watson
4 6 4S+2 S 480 15 3 Crofts & Crofts (v) Smart & Lunn
3 7 3D+3 N 170 0 18 Nicolle & Bridge Bingham & Osmer (v)
8 2 4S+2 S 480 15 3 Jacobs & Fisher Carlisle & Marsh (v)
1 9 4S+1 S 450 7 11 Sitch & Wing Slatcher & Holland
20 15 4S+2 N 480 15 3 Dias & Hair Turnage & Cruickshank
14 16 4S+1 S 450 7 11 Cooke & Lucy Stanford & Franklin
13 17 4S+1 S 450 7 11 Serby & Moore Heath & Heath (v)
18 12 5D+1 N 420 2 16 Jackson & Gordon Cornell & Beer
11 19 4S+1 S 450 7 11 Harper & Hackett Hedley & Hedley
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 5 4S+2 W -480 4 14 Freedman & Freedman (v) Wright & Watson
4 6 3NT+1 E -430 11 7 Crofts & Crofts (v) Smart & Lunn
3 7 3S+1 W -170 17 1 Nicolle & Bridge Bingham & Osmer (v)
8 2 4S+1 W -450 7 11 Jacobs & Fisher Carlisle & Marsh (v)
1 9 3NT+3 W -490 2 16 Sitch & Wing Slatcher & Holland
20 15 4S+1 W -450 7 11 Dias & Hair Turnage & Cruickshank
14 16 3C+3 E -170 17 1 Cooke & Lucy Stanford & Franklin
13 17 3NT= E -400 14 4 Serby & Moore Heath & Heath (v)
18 12 3NT+1 E -430 11 7 Jackson & Gordon Cornell & Beer
11 19 2Dx-3 S -800 0 18 Harper & Hackett Hedley & Hedley
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 6 2S= S 110 13 5 Freedman & Freedman (v) Smart & Lunn
5 7 2S-1 S -50 4 14 Wright & Watson Bingham & Osmer (v)
4 8 2S= S 110 13 5 Crofts & Crofts (v) Jacobs & Fisher
9 3 3NT-1 S -50 4 14 Slatcher & Holland Nicolle & Bridge
2 1 4D-1 N -50 4 14 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Sitch & Wing
20 16 3D= N 110 13 5 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
15 17 3NT= N 400 18 0 Turnage & Cruickshank Heath & Heath (v)
14 18 2NT-1 N -50 4 14 Cooke & Lucy Jackson & Gordon
19 13 2S-1 S -50 4 14 Hedley & Hedley Serby & Moore
12 11 3D= N 110 13 5 Cornell & Beer Harper & Hackett
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 6 3NT-1 W 50 16 2 Freedman & Freedman (v) Smart & Lunn
5 7 3NT-1 W 50 16 2 Wright & Watson Bingham & Osmer (v)
4 8 3NT+2 W -460 6 12 Crofts & Crofts (v) Jacobs & Fisher
9 3 3NT-1 W 50 16 2 Slatcher & Holland Nicolle & Bridge
2 1 5C+1 E -420 10 8 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Sitch & Wing
20 16 6C= E -920 1 17 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
15 17 5C+1 E -420 10 8 Turnage & Cruickshank Heath & Heath (v)
14 18 3NT+4 W -520 4 14 Cooke & Lucy Jackson & Gordon
19 13 5C+1 E -420 10 8 Hedley & Hedley Serby & Moore
12 11 6C= E -920 1 17 Cornell & Beer Harper & Hackett
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 6 6D-2 N -200 1 17 Freedman & Freedman (v) Smart & Lunn
5 7 3NT+2 S 660 9 9 Wright & Watson Bingham & Osmer (v)
4 8 6D= N 1370 18 0 Crofts & Crofts (v) Jacobs & Fisher
9 3 3NT+2 S 660 9 9 Slatcher & Holland Nicolle & Bridge
2 1 3NT+3 S 690 14 4 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Sitch & Wing
20 16 6NTx-1 S -200 1 17 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
15 17 3NT+3 S 690 14 4 Turnage & Cruickshank Heath & Heath (v)
14 18 3NT+3 S 690 14 4 Cooke & Lucy Jackson & Gordon
19 13 6D-1 S -100 5 13 Hedley & Hedley Serby & Moore
12 11 6D-1 N -100 5 13 Cornell & Beer Harper & Hackett
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 7 3D-2 N -100 18 0 Freedman & Freedman (v) Bingham & Osmer (v)
6 8 4S= E -620 3 15 Smart & Lunn Jacobs & Fisher
5 9 3S+1 E -170 7 11 Wright & Watson Slatcher & Holland
1 4 3S= E -140 12 6 Sitch & Wing Crofts & Crofts (v)
3 2 3S= E -140 12 6 Nicolle & Bridge Carlisle & Marsh (v)
20 17 2S+2 E -170 7 11 Dias & Hair Heath & Heath (v)
16 18 2C+1 W -110 16 2 Stanford & Franklin Jackson & Gordon
15 19 3S= E -140 12 6 Turnage & Cruickshank Hedley & Hedley
11 14 4S= E -620 3 15 Harper & Hackett Cooke & Lucy
13 12 3NT+2 E -660 0 18 Serby & Moore Cornell & Beer
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 7 5D-1 N -100 1 17 Freedman & Freedman (v) Bingham & Osmer (v)
6 8 4S-3 W 300 15 3 Smart & Lunn Jacobs & Fisher
5 9 3NT-3 W 300 15 3 Wright & Watson Slatcher & Holland
1 4 4D= N 130 9 9 Sitch & Wing Crofts & Crofts (v)
3 2 4D= N 130 9 9 Nicolle & Bridge Carlisle & Marsh (v)
20 17 5D-1 S -100 1 17 Dias & Hair Heath & Heath (v)
16 18 4Dx= N 710 18 0 Stanford & Franklin Jackson & Gordon
15 19 4D= S 130 9 9 Turnage & Cruickshank Hedley & Hedley
11 14 4D= S 130 9 9 Harper & Hackett Cooke & Lucy
13 12 3S-1 W 100 4 14 Serby & Moore Cornell & Beer
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 7 3NT= W -400 0 18 Freedman & Freedman (v) Bingham & Osmer (v)
6 8 3NT-1 W 50 14 4 Smart & Lunn Jacobs & Fisher
5 9 3NT-1 W 50 14 4 Wright & Watson Slatcher & Holland
1 4 1NT+1 W -120 5 13 Sitch & Wing Crofts & Crofts (v)
3 2 2NT= W -120 5 13 Nicolle & Bridge Carlisle & Marsh (v)
20 17 3NT-1 W 50 14 4 Dias & Hair Heath & Heath (v)
16 18 3NT-1 W 50 14 4 Stanford & Franklin Jackson & Gordon
15 19 2NT= W -120 5 13 Turnage & Cruickshank Hedley & Hedley
11 14 2NT= W -120 5 13 Harper & Hackett Cooke & Lucy
13 12 3NT-1 W 50 14 4 Serby & Moore Cornell & Beer
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 8 4H+3 S 510 13 5 Freedman & Freedman (v) Jacobs & Fisher
7 9 3NT+3 S 490 6 12 Bingham & Osmer (v) Slatcher & Holland
6 1 4H+3 S 510 13 5 Smart & Lunn Sitch & Wing
2 5 4H+1 N 450 2 16 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Wright & Watson
4 3 4H+3 S 510 13 5 Crofts & Crofts (v) Nicolle & Bridge
20 18 4H+3 S 510 13 5 Dias & Hair Jackson & Gordon
17 19 4H+1 S 450 2 16 Heath & Heath (v) Hedley & Hedley
16 11 4H+3 N 510 13 5 Stanford & Franklin Harper & Hackett
12 15 4H+3 S 510 13 5 Cornell & Beer Turnage & Cruickshank
14 13 4H+1 S 450 2 16 Cooke & Lucy Serby & Moore
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 8 3H-1 N -100 5 13 Freedman & Freedman (v) Jacobs & Fisher
7 9 3C-1 W 100 17 1 Bingham & Osmer (v) Slatcher & Holland
6 1 3C-1 W 100 17 1 Smart & Lunn Sitch & Wing
2 5 3H-1 N -100 5 13 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Wright & Watson
4 3 3S-2 N -200 1 17 Crofts & Crofts (v) Nicolle & Bridge
20 18 1NT= W -90 11 7 Dias & Hair Jackson & Gordon
17 19 1NT= W -90 11 7 Heath & Heath (v) Hedley & Hedley
16 11 1NT= W -90 11 7 Stanford & Franklin Harper & Hackett
12 15 1NT= E -90 11 7 Cornell & Beer Turnage & Cruickshank
14 13 3H-2 N -200 1 17 Cooke & Lucy Serby & Moore
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 8 5C-1 E 50 13 5 Freedman & Freedman (v) Jacobs & Fisher
7 9 5C-1 E 50 13 5 Bingham & Osmer (v) Slatcher & Holland
6 1 5C-2 W 100 18 0 Smart & Lunn Sitch & Wing
2 5 4C= W -130 4 14 Carlisle & Marsh (v) Wright & Watson
4 3 4C= E -130 4 14 Crofts & Crofts (v) Nicolle & Bridge
20 18 3D+1 W -130 4 14 Dias & Hair Jackson & Gordon
17 19 2H-1 W 50 13 5 Heath & Heath (v) Hedley & Hedley
16 11 4C= E -130 4 14 Stanford & Franklin Harper & Hackett
12 15 4C= E -130 4 14 Cornell & Beer Turnage & Cruickshank
14 13 5C-1 W 50 13 5 Cooke & Lucy Serby & Moore
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 9 2Cx-1 W 200 3 15 Freedman & Freedman (v) Slatcher & Holland
8 1 4S= N 420 6 12 Jacobs & Fisher Sitch & Wing
7 2 4S+1 N 450 12 6 Bingham & Osmer (v) Carlisle & Marsh (v)
3 6 4S+1 N 450 12 6 Nicolle & Bridge Smart & Lunn
5 4 2Hx-1 W 200 3 15 Wright & Watson Crofts & Crofts (v)
20 19 3NT+1 S 430 8 10 Dias & Hair Hedley & Hedley
18 11 4S+1 N 450 12 6 Jackson & Gordon Harper & Hackett
17 12 3NT+2 N 460 17 1 Heath & Heath (v) Cornell & Beer
13 16 3NT-1 N -50 0 18 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
15 14 3NT+2 N 460 17 1 Turnage & Cruickshank Cooke & Lucy
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 9 3NT+1 W -630 12 6 Freedman & Freedman (v) Slatcher & Holland
8 1 1NT+4 W -210 18 0 Jacobs & Fisher Sitch & Wing
7 2 3NT+1 E -630 12 6 Bingham & Osmer (v) Carlisle & Marsh (v)
3 6 3NT+1 W -630 12 6 Nicolle & Bridge Smart & Lunn
5 4 3NT+2 W -660 3 15 Wright & Watson Crofts & Crofts (v)
20 19 3NT+1 W -630 12 6 Dias & Hair Hedley & Hedley
18 11 3NT+2 E -660 3 15 Jackson & Gordon Harper & Hackett
17 12 3NT+2 W -660 3 15 Heath & Heath (v) Cornell & Beer
13 16 3NT+1 W -630 12 6 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
15 14 3NT+2 W -660 3 15 Turnage & Cruickshank Cooke & Lucy
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 9 3NT= S 400 9 9 Freedman & Freedman (v) Slatcher & Holland
8 1 3NT+1 N 430 18 0 Jacobs & Fisher Sitch & Wing
7 2 4H= S 420 14 4 Bingham & Osmer (v) Carlisle & Marsh (v)
3 6 3NT= N 400 9 9 Nicolle & Bridge Smart & Lunn
5 4 4H= S 420 14 4 Wright & Watson Crofts & Crofts (v)
20 19 3NT-1 N -50 1 17 Dias & Hair Hedley & Hedley
18 11 2H+2 S 170 6 12 Jackson & Gordon Harper & Hackett
17 12 4H= S 420 14 4 Heath & Heath (v) Cornell & Beer
13 16 5C-1 S -50 1 17 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
15 14 3C+1 S 130 4 14 Turnage & Cruickshank Cooke & Lucy