Summer Seniors Pairs Qualification Multisection Session 1 Section Red Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Fontes & Fontes Carlisle & Marsh
13 12 3S-1 N -50 78.7 15.3 Gritt & Gritt Hoffman & Harper
12 10 3S-1 S -50 78.7 15.3 Heath & Heath Pigott & Heilbron
11 8 3H= W -140 67.4 26.6 Gradus & Glanville Leslie & King-Farlow
10 6 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Charteris & Horlock Herbert & Herbert
9 4 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Dean & Dean Edmonds & Stimson
8 2 3Sx-2 S -300 51.1 42.9 Sitch & Wing Ericson & Wills
7 13 3H= W -140 67.4 26.6 Foley & Foley Bingham & Osmer
6 11 4H-1 E 50 85.8 8.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Jackson & Gordon
5 9 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Keith & Jerrard
4 7 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Friedman & Friedman Smart & Lunn
3 5 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Freedman & Freedman McCready & Dyer
2 3 4H-2 W 100 89.9 4.1 Bainham & Smallwood Rumbelow & Anning
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Fontes & Fontes Carlisle & Marsh
13 12 2NT= N 120 27.6 66.4 Gritt & Gritt Hoffman & Harper
12 10 3NT+1 N 630 94 0 Heath & Heath Pigott & Heilbron
11 8 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Gradus & Glanville Leslie & King-Farlow
10 6 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Charteris & Horlock Herbert & Herbert
9 4 1NT= N 90 0 94 Dean & Dean Edmonds & Stimson
8 2 3C-2 W 100 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Ericson & Wills
7 13 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Foley & Foley Bingham & Osmer
6 11 1NT+3 N 180 84.8 9.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Jackson & Gordon
5 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Huikeshoven & Bell Keith & Jerrard
4 7 2NT= N 120 27.6 66.4 Friedman & Friedman Smart & Lunn
3 5 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Freedman & Freedman McCready & Dyer
2 3 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Bainham & Smallwood Rumbelow & Anning
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Bainham & Smallwood Ericson & Wills
1 13 2D= S 90 45 49 Fontes & Fontes Bingham & Osmer
13 11 4D-2 N -100 16.4 77.6 Gritt & Gritt Jackson & Gordon
12 9 3D= S 110 72.5 21.5 Heath & Heath Keith & Jerrard
11 7 3NT-2 S -100 16.4 77.6 Gradus & Glanville Smart & Lunn
10 5 1NT= S 90 45 49 Charteris & Horlock McCready & Dyer
9 3 2D= S 90 45 49 Dean & Dean Rumbelow & Anning
8 1 3D= S 110 72.5 21.5 Sitch & Wing Carlisle & Marsh
7 12 1NT= S 90 45 49 Foley & Foley Hoffman & Harper
6 10 2D= S 90 45 49 Breslaw & Breslaw Pigott & Heilbron
5 8 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Leslie & King-Farlow
4 6 3H= E -140 7.2 86.8 Friedman & Friedman Herbert & Herbert
3 4 2S= E -110 12.3 81.7 Freedman & Freedman Edmonds & Stimson
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Bainham & Smallwood Ericson & Wills
1 13 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Fontes & Fontes Bingham & Osmer
13 11 4H+1 N 650 51.1 42.9 Gritt & Gritt Jackson & Gordon
12 9 5C+1 N 620 21.5 72.5 Heath & Heath Keith & Jerrard
11 7 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Gradus & Glanville Smart & Lunn
10 5 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Charteris & Horlock McCready & Dyer
9 3 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Dean & Dean Rumbelow & Anning
8 1 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Sitch & Wing Carlisle & Marsh
7 12 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Foley & Foley Hoffman & Harper
6 10 5C+1 N 620 21.5 72.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Pigott & Heilbron
5 8 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Huikeshoven & Bell Leslie & King-Farlow
4 6 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Friedman & Friedman Herbert & Herbert
3 4 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Freedman & Freedman Edmonds & Stimson
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Freedman & Freedman Rumbelow & Anning
2 1 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Bainham & Smallwood Carlisle & Marsh
1 12 2D+1 S 110 68.4 25.6 Fontes & Fontes Hoffman & Harper
13 10 1NT-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Gritt & Gritt Pigott & Heilbron
12 8 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Leslie & King-Farlow
11 6 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Gradus & Glanville Herbert & Herbert
10 4 4D-1 S -100 48 46 Charteris & Horlock Edmonds & Stimson
9 2 4S-3 S -300 3.1 90.9 Dean & Dean Ericson & Wills
8 13 1NT-1 N -100 48 46 Sitch & Wing Bingham & Osmer
7 11 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Foley & Foley Jackson & Gordon
6 9 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Keith & Jerrard
5 7 2C+2 W -130 25.6 68.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Smart & Lunn
4 5 5D-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Friedman & Friedman McCready & Dyer
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT= E -90 49 45 Freedman & Freedman Rumbelow & Anning
2 1 2S= E -110 24.5 69.5 Bainham & Smallwood Carlisle & Marsh
1 12 1NT= E -90 49 45 Fontes & Fontes Hoffman & Harper
13 10 1NT-3 E 300 94 0 Gritt & Gritt Pigott & Heilbron
12 8 2S= E -110 24.5 69.5 Heath & Heath Leslie & King-Farlow
11 6 1NT= E -90 49 45 Gradus & Glanville Herbert & Herbert
10 4 1NT= E -90 49 45 Charteris & Horlock Edmonds & Stimson
9 2 2S-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Dean & Dean Ericson & Wills
8 13 1NT= E -90 49 45 Sitch & Wing Bingham & Osmer
7 11 2NT-1 S -50 70.5 23.5 Foley & Foley Jackson & Gordon
6 9 2H+2 N 170 89.9 4.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Keith & Jerrard
5 7 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Huikeshoven & Bell Smart & Lunn
4 5 1NT= E -90 49 45 Friedman & Friedman McCready & Dyer
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2NT-3 N -300 0 94 Friedman & Friedman Edmonds & Stimson
3 2 2Sx-2 W 500 86.8 7.2 Freedman & Freedman Ericson & Wills
2 13 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Bainham & Smallwood Bingham & Osmer
1 11 3Cx-4 W 1100 94 0 Fontes & Fontes Jackson & Gordon
13 9 2H= N 110 41.9 52.1 Gritt & Gritt Keith & Jerrard
12 7 2NT+1 N 150 75.6 18.4 Heath & Heath Smart & Lunn
11 5 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Gradus & Glanville McCready & Dyer
10 3 2NT-2 N -200 3.1 90.9 Charteris & Horlock Rumbelow & Anning
9 1 3H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Dean & Dean Carlisle & Marsh
8 12 2NT-2 N -200 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Hoffman & Harper
7 10 2NT-1 N -100 15.3 78.7 Foley & Foley Pigott & Heilbron
6 8 2NT-1 N -100 15.3 78.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Leslie & King-Farlow
5 6 2NT= N 120 56.2 37.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Herbert & Herbert
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Friedman & Friedman Edmonds & Stimson
3 2 4D= E -130 18.4 75.6 Freedman & Freedman Ericson & Wills
2 13 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Bainham & Smallwood Bingham & Osmer
1 11 1NT+3 E -180 8.2 85.8 Fontes & Fontes Jackson & Gordon
13 9 2S-2 E 100 93 1 Gritt & Gritt Keith & Jerrard
12 7 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Heath & Heath Smart & Lunn
11 5 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Gradus & Glanville McCready & Dyer
10 3 3NT+2 W -460 1 93 Charteris & Horlock Rumbelow & Anning
9 1 3NT+1 W -430 4.1 89.9 Dean & Dean Carlisle & Marsh
8 12 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Sitch & Wing Hoffman & Harper
7 10 2NT= E -120 35.8 58.2 Foley & Foley Pigott & Heilbron
6 8 2Hx-2 S -300 6.1 87.9 Breslaw & Breslaw Leslie & King-Farlow
5 6 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Huikeshoven & Bell Herbert & Herbert
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Huikeshoven & Bell McCready & Dyer
4 3 4D+1 N 150 24.5 69.5 Friedman & Friedman Rumbelow & Anning
3 1 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Freedman & Freedman Carlisle & Marsh
2 12 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Bainham & Smallwood Hoffman & Harper
1 10 3NT+2 S 460 79.7 14.3 Fontes & Fontes Pigott & Heilbron
13 8 6H-3 N -150 0 94 Gritt & Gritt Leslie & King-Farlow
12 6 3NT+2 N 460 79.7 14.3 Heath & Heath Herbert & Herbert
11 4 3NT+1 S 430 59.3 34.7 Gradus & Glanville Edmonds & Stimson
10 2 6NT-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Charteris & Horlock Ericson & Wills
9 13 5D-1 S -50 13.3 80.7 Dean & Dean Bingham & Osmer
8 11 6NT-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Sitch & Wing Jackson & Gordon
7 9 6D-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Foley & Foley Keith & Jerrard
6 7 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Smart & Lunn
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4C-4 W 400 67.4 26.6 Huikeshoven & Bell McCready & Dyer
4 3 3D+1 N 130 25.6 68.4 Friedman & Friedman Rumbelow & Anning
3 1 2D+2 N 130 25.6 68.4 Freedman & Freedman Carlisle & Marsh
2 12 2S+1 N 140 31.7 62.3 Bainham & Smallwood Hoffman & Harper
1 10 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Fontes & Fontes Pigott & Heilbron
13 8 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Gritt & Gritt Leslie & King-Farlow
12 6 5Cx-6 W 1700 94 0 Heath & Heath Herbert & Herbert
11 4 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Gradus & Glanville Edmonds & Stimson
10 2 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Charteris & Horlock Ericson & Wills
9 13 1NT= W -90 5.1 88.9 Dean & Dean Bingham & Osmer
8 11 1NT-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Sitch & Wing Jackson & Gordon
7 9 3S+1 S 170 48 46 Foley & Foley Keith & Jerrard
6 7 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Breslaw & Breslaw Smart & Lunn
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Breslaw & Breslaw Herbert & Herbert
5 4 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Edmonds & Stimson
4 2 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Friedman & Friedman Ericson & Wills
3 13 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Freedman & Freedman Bingham & Osmer
2 11 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Bainham & Smallwood Jackson & Gordon
1 9 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Fontes & Fontes Keith & Jerrard
13 7 4S+1 N 450 16.4 77.6 Gritt & Gritt Smart & Lunn
12 5 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Heath & Heath McCready & Dyer
11 3 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Gradus & Glanville Rumbelow & Anning
10 1 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Charteris & Horlock Carlisle & Marsh
9 12 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Dean & Dean Hoffman & Harper
8 10 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Sitch & Wing Pigott & Heilbron
7 8 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Foley & Foley Leslie & King-Farlow
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Herbert & Herbert
5 4 3S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Edmonds & Stimson
4 2 3Hx-1 N -200 17.4 76.6 Friedman & Friedman Ericson & Wills
3 13 4S-3 E 150 94 0 Freedman & Freedman Bingham & Osmer
2 11 3S+1 E -170 23.5 70.5 Bainham & Smallwood Jackson & Gordon
1 9 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Fontes & Fontes Keith & Jerrard
13 7 1NT+1 N 120 91.9 2.1 Gritt & Gritt Smart & Lunn
12 5 2S+1 E -140 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath McCready & Dyer
11 3 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Gradus & Glanville Rumbelow & Anning
10 1 3S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Charteris & Horlock Carlisle & Marsh
9 12 4S-2 E 100 85.8 8.2 Dean & Dean Hoffman & Harper
8 10 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Sitch & Wing Pigott & Heilbron
7 8 2H-1 N -100 45 49 Foley & Foley Leslie & King-Farlow
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Foley & Foley Smart & Lunn
6 5 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Breslaw & Breslaw McCready & Dyer
5 3 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Rumbelow & Anning
4 1 2H= N 110 51.1 42.9 Friedman & Friedman Carlisle & Marsh
3 12 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Freedman & Freedman Hoffman & Harper
2 10 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Bainham & Smallwood Pigott & Heilbron
1 8 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Fontes & Fontes Leslie & King-Farlow
13 6 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Gritt & Gritt Herbert & Herbert
12 4 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath Edmonds & Stimson
11 2 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Gradus & Glanville Ericson & Wills
10 13 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Charteris & Horlock Bingham & Osmer
9 11 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Dean & Dean Jackson & Gordon
8 9 3NT+1 N 630 90.9 3.1 Sitch & Wing Keith & Jerrard
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Foley & Foley Smart & Lunn
6 5 3NT-1 S -50 17.4 76.6 Breslaw & Breslaw McCready & Dyer
5 3 4Sx-7 E 1700 94 0 Huikeshoven & Bell Rumbelow & Anning
4 1 4H-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Friedman & Friedman Carlisle & Marsh
3 12 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Freedman & Freedman Hoffman & Harper
2 10 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Bainham & Smallwood Pigott & Heilbron
1 8 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Fontes & Fontes Leslie & King-Farlow
13 6 4S-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Gritt & Gritt Herbert & Herbert
12 4 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Heath & Heath Edmonds & Stimson
11 2 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Gradus & Glanville Ericson & Wills
10 13 4H-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Charteris & Horlock Bingham & Osmer
9 11 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Dean & Dean Jackson & Gordon
8 9 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Sitch & Wing Keith & Jerrard
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 4S= N 620 91.9 2.1 Sitch & Wing Leslie & King-Farlow
7 6 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Foley & Foley Herbert & Herbert
6 4 4D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Edmonds & Stimson
5 2 2S+2 N 170 68.4 25.6 Huikeshoven & Bell Ericson & Wills
4 13 5D-2 W 100 32.7 61.3 Friedman & Friedman Bingham & Osmer
3 11 3H-2 S -200 5.1 88.9 Freedman & Freedman Jackson & Gordon
2 9 5D-2 W 100 32.7 61.3 Bainham & Smallwood Keith & Jerrard
1 7 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Fontes & Fontes Smart & Lunn
13 5 4S= N 620 91.9 2.1 Gritt & Gritt McCready & Dyer
12 3 3S-1 N -100 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Rumbelow & Anning
11 1 2D+1 W -110 13.3 80.7 Gradus & Glanville Carlisle & Marsh
10 12 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Charteris & Horlock Hoffman & Harper
9 10 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Dean & Dean Pigott & Heilbron
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S-2 S -100 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Leslie & King-Farlow
7 6 4C= S 130 62.3 31.7 Foley & Foley Herbert & Herbert
6 4 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Breslaw & Breslaw Edmonds & Stimson
5 2 2S= S 110 43.9 50.1 Huikeshoven & Bell Ericson & Wills
4 13 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Friedman & Friedman Bingham & Osmer
3 11 3C= S 110 43.9 50.1 Freedman & Freedman Jackson & Gordon
2 9 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Bainham & Smallwood Keith & Jerrard
1 7 3C+1 N 130 62.3 31.7 Fontes & Fontes Smart & Lunn
13 5 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Gritt & Gritt McCready & Dyer
12 3 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Heath & Heath Rumbelow & Anning
11 1 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Gradus & Glanville Carlisle & Marsh
10 12 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Charteris & Horlock Hoffman & Harper
9 10 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Dean & Dean Pigott & Heilbron
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT+2 S 460 88.9 5.1 Dean & Dean Keith & Jerrard
8 7 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Sitch & Wing Smart & Lunn
7 5 3NT+1 S 430 67.4 26.6 Foley & Foley McCready & Dyer
6 3 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Breslaw & Breslaw Rumbelow & Anning
5 1 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Carlisle & Marsh
4 12 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Friedman & Friedman Hoffman & Harper
3 10 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Freedman & Freedman Pigott & Heilbron
2 8 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Bainham & Smallwood Leslie & King-Farlow
1 6 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Fontes & Fontes Herbert & Herbert
13 4 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Gritt & Gritt Edmonds & Stimson
12 2 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Heath & Heath Ericson & Wills
11 13 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Gradus & Glanville Bingham & Osmer
10 11 3NT-1 S -50 7.2 86.8 Charteris & Horlock Jackson & Gordon
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Dean & Dean Keith & Jerrard
8 7 4H+1 E -450 16.4 77.6 Sitch & Wing Smart & Lunn
7 5 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Foley & Foley McCready & Dyer
6 3 3H= E -140 91.9 2.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Rumbelow & Anning
5 1 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Carlisle & Marsh
4 12 4H= W -420 53.1 40.9 Friedman & Friedman Hoffman & Harper
3 10 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Freedman & Freedman Pigott & Heilbron
2 8 4H+1 E -450 16.4 77.6 Bainham & Smallwood Leslie & King-Farlow
1 6 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Fontes & Fontes Herbert & Herbert
13 4 4Hx= E -590 7.2 86.8 Gritt & Gritt Edmonds & Stimson
12 2 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Heath & Heath Ericson & Wills
11 13 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Gradus & Glanville Bingham & Osmer
10 11 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Charteris & Horlock Jackson & Gordon
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 3S+1 W -170 16.4 77.6 Charteris & Horlock Pigott & Heilbron
9 8 3H= E -140 45 49 Dean & Dean Leslie & King-Farlow
8 6 3H= E -140 45 49 Sitch & Wing Herbert & Herbert
7 4 3H= E -140 45 49 Foley & Foley Edmonds & Stimson
6 2 3H= E -140 45 49 Breslaw & Breslaw Ericson & Wills
5 13 3H= E -140 45 49 Huikeshoven & Bell Bingham & Osmer
4 11 3S= W -140 45 49 Friedman & Friedman Jackson & Gordon
3 9 3H= E -140 45 49 Freedman & Freedman Keith & Jerrard
2 7 5D-2 N -100 72.5 21.5 Bainham & Smallwood Smart & Lunn
1 5 3H= E -140 45 49 Fontes & Fontes McCready & Dyer
13 3 3H= E -140 45 49 Gritt & Gritt Rumbelow & Anning
12 1 3S+2 E -200 12.3 81.7 Heath & Heath Carlisle & Marsh
11 12 3H= E -140 45 49 Gradus & Glanville Hoffman & Harper
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Charteris & Horlock Pigott & Heilbron
9 8 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Dean & Dean Leslie & King-Farlow
8 6 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Sitch & Wing Herbert & Herbert
7 4 5H= W -650 71.5 22.5 Foley & Foley Edmonds & Stimson
6 2 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Ericson & Wills
5 13 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Huikeshoven & Bell Bingham & Osmer
4 11 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Friedman & Friedman Jackson & Gordon
3 9 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Freedman & Freedman Keith & Jerrard
2 7 5Cx-4 S -1100 12.3 81.7 Bainham & Smallwood Smart & Lunn
1 5 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Fontes & Fontes McCready & Dyer
13 3 5Cx-4 N -1100 12.3 81.7 Gritt & Gritt Rumbelow & Anning
12 1 5Cx-4 S -1100 12.3 81.7 Heath & Heath Carlisle & Marsh
11 12 5H= W -650 71.5 22.5 Gradus & Glanville Hoffman & Harper
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Gradus & Glanville Jackson & Gordon
10 9 5H+1 E -480 37.8 56.2 Charteris & Horlock Keith & Jerrard
9 7 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Dean & Dean Smart & Lunn
8 5 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Sitch & Wing McCready & Dyer
7 3 4H= E -420 90.9 3.1 Foley & Foley Rumbelow & Anning
6 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Carlisle & Marsh
5 12 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Huikeshoven & Bell Hoffman & Harper
4 10 4H= W -420 90.9 3.1 Friedman & Friedman Pigott & Heilbron
3 8 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Freedman & Freedman Leslie & King-Farlow
2 6 3S-1 N -100 94 0 Bainham & Smallwood Herbert & Herbert
1 4 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Fontes & Fontes Edmonds & Stimson
13 2 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Gritt & Gritt Ericson & Wills
12 13 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Heath & Heath Bingham & Osmer
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Gradus & Glanville Jackson & Gordon
10 9 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Charteris & Horlock Keith & Jerrard
9 7 2D+1 W -110 56.2 37.8 Dean & Dean Smart & Lunn
8 5 2H-2 N -100 62.3 31.7 Sitch & Wing McCready & Dyer
7 3 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Foley & Foley Rumbelow & Anning
6 1 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Breslaw & Breslaw Carlisle & Marsh
5 12 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Hoffman & Harper
4 10 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Friedman & Friedman Pigott & Heilbron
3 8 4S-1 W 100 76.6 17.4 Freedman & Freedman Leslie & King-Farlow
2 6 2S+2 W -170 18.4 75.6 Bainham & Smallwood Herbert & Herbert
1 4 2NT= E -120 48.6 45.4 Fontes & Fontes Edmonds & Stimson
13 2 2Hx-1 N -100 62.3 31.7 Gritt & Gritt Ericson & Wills
12 13 3H-3 S -150 25.1 68.9 Heath & Heath Bingham & Osmer
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Hoffman & Harper
11 10 3NT-1 W 100 91.9 2.1 Gradus & Glanville Pigott & Heilbron
10 8 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Charteris & Horlock Leslie & King-Farlow
9 6 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Dean & Dean Herbert & Herbert
8 4 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Sitch & Wing Edmonds & Stimson
7 2 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Foley & Foley Ericson & Wills
6 13 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Breslaw & Breslaw Bingham & Osmer
5 11 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Huikeshoven & Bell Jackson & Gordon
4 9 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Friedman & Friedman Keith & Jerrard
3 7 3NT+2 E -660 10.2 83.8 Freedman & Freedman Smart & Lunn
2 5 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Bainham & Smallwood McCready & Dyer
1 3 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Fontes & Fontes Rumbelow & Anning
13 1 3NT+1 E -630 33.7 60.3 Gritt & Gritt Carlisle & Marsh
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 4S= E -420 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Hoffman & Harper
11 10 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Gradus & Glanville Pigott & Heilbron
10 8 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Charteris & Horlock Leslie & King-Farlow
9 6 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Dean & Dean Herbert & Herbert
8 4 4H-2 N -100 54.1 39.9 Sitch & Wing Edmonds & Stimson
7 2 3H= S 140 94 0 Foley & Foley Ericson & Wills
6 13 5H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Bingham & Osmer
5 11 4S-1 W 50 82.7 11.3 Huikeshoven & Bell Jackson & Gordon
4 9 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Friedman & Friedman Keith & Jerrard
3 7 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Freedman & Freedman Smart & Lunn
2 5 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Bainham & Smallwood McCready & Dyer
1 3 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Fontes & Fontes Rumbelow & Anning
13 1 3Sx+1 E -630 0 94 Gritt & Gritt Carlisle & Marsh
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S= N 110 32 62 Gritt & Gritt Bingham & Osmer
12 11 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Heath & Heath Jackson & Gordon
11 9 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Gradus & Glanville Keith & Jerrard
10 7 4S-2 N -100 3 91 Charteris & Horlock Smart & Lunn
9 5 2S= N 110 32 62 Dean & Dean McCready & Dyer
8 3 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Sitch & Wing Rumbelow & Anning
7 1 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Foley & Foley Carlisle & Marsh
6 12 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Breslaw & Breslaw Hoffman & Harper
5 10 3S= N 140 66 28 Huikeshoven & Bell Pigott & Heilbron
4 8 2H-2 N -100 3 91 Friedman & Friedman Leslie & King-Farlow
3 6 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Freedman & Freedman Herbert & Herbert
2 4 2S-1 N -50 14 80 Bainham & Smallwood Edmonds & Stimson
1 2 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Fontes & Fontes Ericson & Wills
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 3D+2 N 150 58 36 Gritt & Gritt Bingham & Osmer
12 11 5C= W -600 2 92 Heath & Heath Jackson & Gordon
11 9 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Gradus & Glanville Keith & Jerrard
10 7 4H-1 E 100 43 51 Charteris & Horlock Smart & Lunn
9 5 4H-1 W 100 43 51 Dean & Dean McCready & Dyer
8 3 3NT+1 W -630 0 94 Sitch & Wing Rumbelow & Anning
7 1 5H-3 E 300 75 19 Foley & Foley Carlisle & Marsh
6 12 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Breslaw & Breslaw Hoffman & Harper
5 10 4H-2 E 200 65 29 Huikeshoven & Bell Pigott & Heilbron
4 8 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Friedman & Friedman Leslie & King-Farlow
3 6 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Freedman & Freedman Herbert & Herbert
2 4 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Bainham & Smallwood Edmonds & Stimson
1 2 3D+1 N 130 55 39 Fontes & Fontes Ericson & Wills
Session 1 Section White Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Jacobs & Fisher Whiteway & Thornton
14 13 4H= W -420 8.2 85.8 Dias & Hair Dickson & Hill
13 11 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Curtis & Kitchin Cavell & Dean
12 9 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Fess & Landau Bolton & Leach
11 7 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Knights & Dunn Samuels & Sexton
10 5 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Evans & Blackman Stanford & Franklin
9 3 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Lucy & Cooke Tompson & Clare
8 14 3NT+3 W -490 0 94 Parnham & Smith Eddleston & Eddleston
7 12 3H= W -140 67.4 26.6 Fleming & Fleming Farndon & Bond
6 10 3Sx-1 S -100 73.6 20.4 Bentley & Bentley Jeffery & Shilling
5 8 4H-1 E 50 85.8 8.2 Peers & Peers Stanton & Elgin
4 6 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Mascall & Denny Tomkin & Tomkin
3 4 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Moss & Crawford Taylor & Carter
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Jacobs & Fisher Whiteway & Thornton
14 13 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Dias & Hair Dickson & Hill
13 11 1NT-2 E 100 3.1 90.9 Curtis & Kitchin Cavell & Dean
12 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Fess & Landau Bolton & Leach
11 7 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Knights & Dunn Samuels & Sexton
10 5 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Evans & Blackman Stanford & Franklin
9 3 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Lucy & Cooke Tompson & Clare
8 14 3NT= N 600 91.9 2.1 Parnham & Smith Eddleston & Eddleston
7 12 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Fleming & Fleming Farndon & Bond
6 10 3C-3 W 150 59.3 34.7 Bentley & Bentley Jeffery & Shilling
5 8 2Dx+2 N 580 89.9 4.1 Peers & Peers Stanton & Elgin
4 6 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Mascall & Denny Tomkin & Tomkin
3 4 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Moss & Crawford Taylor & Carter
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3H= W -140 7.2 86.8 Serby & Moore Leighton & Dennsion
1 14 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Jacobs & Fisher Eddleston & Eddleston
14 12 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Dias & Hair Farndon & Bond
13 10 2S-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Curtis & Kitchin Jeffery & Shilling
12 8 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Fess & Landau Stanton & Elgin
11 6 2NT-1 N -50 26.6 67.4 Knights & Dunn Tomkin & Tomkin
10 4 2D= S 90 45 49 Evans & Blackman Taylor & Carter
9 1 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Lucy & Cooke Whiteway & Thornton
8 13 3H= E -140 7.2 86.8 Parnham & Smith Dickson & Hill
7 11 3H= W -140 7.2 86.8 Fleming & Fleming Cavell & Dean
6 9 2NT+1 S 150 86.8 7.2 Bentley & Bentley Bolton & Leach
5 7 4H= W -620 0 94 Peers & Peers Samuels & Sexton
4 5 2NT-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Mascall & Denny Stanford & Franklin
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Serby & Moore Leighton & Dennsion
1 14 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Jacobs & Fisher Eddleston & Eddleston
14 12 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Dias & Hair Farndon & Bond
13 10 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Curtis & Kitchin Jeffery & Shilling
12 8 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Fess & Landau Stanton & Elgin
11 6 5C= N 600 12.3 81.7 Knights & Dunn Tomkin & Tomkin
10 4 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Evans & Blackman Taylor & Carter
9 1 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Lucy & Cooke Whiteway & Thornton
8 13 4H= S 620 21.5 72.5 Parnham & Smith Dickson & Hill
7 11 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Fleming & Fleming Cavell & Dean
6 9 4S-3 E 300 6.1 87.9 Bentley & Bentley Bolton & Leach
5 7 6H-1 S -100 0 94 Peers & Peers Samuels & Sexton
4 5 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Mascall & Denny Stanford & Franklin
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT-1 S -100 48 46 Moss & Crawford Tompson & Clare
2 1 4D-1 N -100 48 46 Serby & Moore Whiteway & Thornton
1 13 4D-1 N -100 48 46 Jacobs & Fisher Dickson & Hill
14 11 4D= S 130 85.8 8.2 Dias & Hair Cavell & Dean
13 9 3D= S 110 68.4 25.6 Curtis & Kitchin Bolton & Leach
12 7 4S-3 N -300 3.1 90.9 Fess & Landau Samuels & Sexton
11 5 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Knights & Dunn Stanford & Franklin
10 2 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Evans & Blackman Leighton & Dennsion
9 14 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Lucy & Cooke Eddleston & Eddleston
8 12 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Parnham & Smith Farndon & Bond
7 10 3D+1 S 130 85.8 8.2 Fleming & Fleming Jeffery & Shilling
6 8 3D+2 S 150 94 0 Bentley & Bentley Stanton & Elgin
5 6 4D= S 130 85.8 8.2 Peers & Peers Tomkin & Tomkin
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Moss & Crawford Tompson & Clare
2 1 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Serby & Moore Whiteway & Thornton
1 13 1NT= E -90 49 45 Jacobs & Fisher Dickson & Hill
14 11 1S+1 E -110 24.5 69.5 Dias & Hair Cavell & Dean
13 9 1NT= E -90 49 45 Curtis & Kitchin Bolton & Leach
12 7 2S-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Fess & Landau Samuels & Sexton
11 5 1NT= E -90 49 45 Knights & Dunn Stanford & Franklin
10 2 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Evans & Blackman Leighton & Dennsion
9 14 2H-1 S -50 70.5 23.5 Lucy & Cooke Eddleston & Eddleston
8 12 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Parnham & Smith Farndon & Bond
7 10 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Fleming & Fleming Jeffery & Shilling
6 8 1NT= E -90 49 45 Bentley & Bentley Stanton & Elgin
5 6 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Peers & Peers Tomkin & Tomkin
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2S-1 E 100 27.6 66.4 Mascall & Denny Taylor & Carter
3 2 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Moss & Crawford Leighton & Dennsion
2 14 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Serby & Moore Eddleston & Eddleston
1 12 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Jacobs & Fisher Farndon & Bond
14 10 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Dias & Hair Jeffery & Shilling
13 8 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Curtis & Kitchin Stanton & Elgin
12 6 2NT= N 120 56.2 37.8 Fess & Landau Tomkin & Tomkin
11 3 2Hx= S 670 89.9 4.1 Knights & Dunn Tompson & Clare
10 1 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Evans & Blackman Whiteway & Thornton
9 13 3C-4 W 400 83.8 10.2 Lucy & Cooke Dickson & Hill
8 11 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Parnham & Smith Cavell & Dean
7 9 3C-5 W 500 86.8 7.2 Fleming & Fleming Bolton & Leach
6 7 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Bentley & Bentley Samuels & Sexton
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Mascall & Denny Taylor & Carter
3 2 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Moss & Crawford Leighton & Dennsion
2 14 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Serby & Moore Eddleston & Eddleston
1 12 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Jacobs & Fisher Farndon & Bond
14 10 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Dias & Hair Jeffery & Shilling
13 8 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Curtis & Kitchin Stanton & Elgin
12 6 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Fess & Landau Tomkin & Tomkin
11 3 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Knights & Dunn Tompson & Clare
10 1 3C+1 E -130 18.4 75.6 Evans & Blackman Whiteway & Thornton
9 13 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Lucy & Cooke Dickson & Hill
8 11 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Parnham & Smith Cavell & Dean
7 9 2C+1 E -110 45 49 Fleming & Fleming Bolton & Leach
6 7 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Bentley & Bentley Samuels & Sexton
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Peers & Peers Stanford & Franklin
4 3 4H= S 420 42.9 51.1 Mascall & Denny Tompson & Clare
3 1 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Moss & Crawford Whiteway & Thornton
2 13 3NT+2 S 460 79.7 14.3 Serby & Moore Dickson & Hill
1 11 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Jacobs & Fisher Cavell & Dean
14 9 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Dias & Hair Bolton & Leach
13 7 3D+1 N 130 20.4 73.6 Curtis & Kitchin Samuels & Sexton
12 4 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Fess & Landau Taylor & Carter
11 2 3NT+2 N 460 79.7 14.3 Knights & Dunn Leighton & Dennsion
10 14 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Evans & Blackman Eddleston & Eddleston
9 12 3NT+4 N 520 94 0 Lucy & Cooke Farndon & Bond
8 10 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Parnham & Smith Jeffery & Shilling
7 8 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Fleming & Fleming Stanton & Elgin
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Peers & Peers Stanford & Franklin
4 3 3C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Mascall & Denny Tompson & Clare
3 1 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Moss & Crawford Whiteway & Thornton
2 13 3S+2 N 200 63.3 30.7 Serby & Moore Dickson & Hill
1 11 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Jacobs & Fisher Cavell & Dean
14 9 3C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Dias & Hair Bolton & Leach
13 7 2S+2 N 170 48 46 Curtis & Kitchin Samuels & Sexton
12 4 2C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Fess & Landau Taylor & Carter
11 2 3C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Knights & Dunn Leighton & Dennsion
10 14 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Evans & Blackman Eddleston & Eddleston
9 12 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Lucy & Cooke Farndon & Bond
8 10 2NT-1 E 100 14.3 79.7 Parnham & Smith Jeffery & Shilling
7 8 4S= S 620 79.7 14.3 Fleming & Fleming Stanton & Elgin
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Bentley & Bentley Tomkin & Tomkin
5 4 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Peers & Peers Taylor & Carter
4 2 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Mascall & Denny Leighton & Dennsion
3 14 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Moss & Crawford Eddleston & Eddleston
2 12 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Serby & Moore Farndon & Bond
1 10 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Jacobs & Fisher Jeffery & Shilling
14 8 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Dias & Hair Stanton & Elgin
13 5 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Curtis & Kitchin Stanford & Franklin
12 3 4S+2 N 480 53.1 40.9 Fess & Landau Tompson & Clare
11 1 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Knights & Dunn Whiteway & Thornton
10 13 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Evans & Blackman Dickson & Hill
9 11 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Lucy & Cooke Cavell & Dean
8 9 6S-1 S -50 0 94 Parnham & Smith Bolton & Leach
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 2S+2 E -170 23.5 70.5 Bentley & Bentley Tomkin & Tomkin
5 4 2S= E -110 40.9 53.1 Peers & Peers Taylor & Carter
4 2 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Mascall & Denny Leighton & Dennsion
3 14 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Moss & Crawford Eddleston & Eddleston
2 12 3NT-2 E 100 85.8 8.2 Serby & Moore Farndon & Bond
1 10 2D+1 W -110 40.9 53.1 Jacobs & Fisher Jeffery & Shilling
14 8 4Sx-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Dias & Hair Stanton & Elgin
13 5 3NT-2 W 100 85.8 8.2 Curtis & Kitchin Stanford & Franklin
12 3 2S+1 E -140 32.7 61.3 Fess & Landau Tompson & Clare
11 1 3S= E -140 32.7 61.3 Knights & Dunn Whiteway & Thornton
10 13 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Evans & Blackman Dickson & Hill
9 11 2S+2 E -170 23.5 70.5 Lucy & Cooke Cavell & Dean
8 9 2S= E -110 40.9 53.1 Parnham & Smith Bolton & Leach
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Fleming & Fleming Samuels & Sexton
6 5 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Bentley & Bentley Stanford & Franklin
5 3 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Peers & Peers Tompson & Clare
4 1 1NT+1 N 120 54.1 39.9 Mascall & Denny Whiteway & Thornton
3 13 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Moss & Crawford Dickson & Hill
2 11 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Serby & Moore Cavell & Dean
1 9 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Jacobs & Fisher Bolton & Leach
14 6 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Dias & Hair Tomkin & Tomkin
13 4 3NT+1 N 630 90.9 3.1 Curtis & Kitchin Taylor & Carter
12 2 2NT= N 120 54.1 39.9 Fess & Landau Leighton & Dennsion
11 14 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Knights & Dunn Eddleston & Eddleston
10 12 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Evans & Blackman Farndon & Bond
9 10 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Lucy & Cooke Jeffery & Shilling
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Fleming & Fleming Samuels & Sexton
6 5 4S-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Bentley & Bentley Stanford & Franklin
5 3 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Peers & Peers Tompson & Clare
4 1 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Mascall & Denny Whiteway & Thornton
3 13 4S-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Moss & Crawford Dickson & Hill
2 11 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Serby & Moore Cavell & Dean
1 9 3NT= N 400 33.7 60.3 Jacobs & Fisher Bolton & Leach
14 6 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Dias & Hair Tomkin & Tomkin
13 4 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Curtis & Kitchin Taylor & Carter
12 2 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Fess & Landau Leighton & Dennsion
11 14 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Knights & Dunn Eddleston & Eddleston
10 12 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Evans & Blackman Farndon & Bond
9 10 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Lucy & Cooke Jeffery & Shilling
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3D= W -110 13.3 80.7 Parnham & Smith Stanton & Elgin
7 6 4D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Fleming & Fleming Tomkin & Tomkin
6 4 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Bentley & Bentley Taylor & Carter
5 2 3D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Peers & Peers Leighton & Dennsion
4 14 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Mascall & Denny Eddleston & Eddleston
3 12 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Moss & Crawford Farndon & Bond
2 10 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Serby & Moore Jeffery & Shilling
1 7 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Jacobs & Fisher Samuels & Sexton
14 5 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
13 3 4D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Curtis & Kitchin Tompson & Clare
12 1 3H-2 N -200 5.1 88.9 Fess & Landau Whiteway & Thornton
11 13 2NT= E -120 10.2 83.8 Knights & Dunn Dickson & Hill
10 11 4S= S 620 91.9 2.1 Evans & Blackman Cavell & Dean
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Parnham & Smith Stanton & Elgin
7 6 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Fleming & Fleming Tomkin & Tomkin
6 4 3NT-2 S -100 3.1 90.9 Bentley & Bentley Taylor & Carter
5 2 2S= S 110 43.9 50.1 Peers & Peers Leighton & Dennsion
4 14 3C= S 110 43.9 50.1 Mascall & Denny Eddleston & Eddleston
3 12 3C+1 S 130 62.3 31.7 Moss & Crawford Farndon & Bond
2 10 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Serby & Moore Jeffery & Shilling
1 7 2S-3 E 300 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Samuels & Sexton
14 5 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
13 3 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Curtis & Kitchin Tompson & Clare
12 1 3D-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Fess & Landau Whiteway & Thornton
11 13 1NT+3 N 180 69.5 24.5 Knights & Dunn Dickson & Hill
10 11 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Evans & Blackman Cavell & Dean
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Lucy & Cooke Bolton & Leach
8 7 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Parnham & Smith Samuels & Sexton
7 5 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Fleming & Fleming Stanford & Franklin
6 3 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Bentley & Bentley Tompson & Clare
5 1 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Peers & Peers Whiteway & Thornton
4 13 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Mascall & Denny Dickson & Hill
3 11 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Moss & Crawford Cavell & Dean
2 8 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Serby & Moore Stanton & Elgin
1 6 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Jacobs & Fisher Tomkin & Tomkin
14 4 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Dias & Hair Taylor & Carter
13 2 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Curtis & Kitchin Leighton & Dennsion
12 14 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Fess & Landau Eddleston & Eddleston
11 12 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Knights & Dunn Farndon & Bond
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Lucy & Cooke Bolton & Leach
8 7 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Parnham & Smith Samuels & Sexton
7 5 3NT+2 E -460 12.3 81.7 Fleming & Fleming Stanford & Franklin
6 3 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Bentley & Bentley Tompson & Clare
5 1 6Hx-2 E 300 94 0 Peers & Peers Whiteway & Thornton
4 13 4Hx= W -590 7.2 86.8 Mascall & Denny Dickson & Hill
3 11 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Moss & Crawford Cavell & Dean
2 8 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Serby & Moore Stanton & Elgin
1 6 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Jacobs & Fisher Tomkin & Tomkin
14 4 4Sx-4 N -1100 0 94 Dias & Hair Taylor & Carter
13 2 3NT= E -400 87.9 6.1 Curtis & Kitchin Leighton & Dennsion
12 14 4Hx= E -590 7.2 86.8 Fess & Landau Eddleston & Eddleston
11 12 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Knights & Dunn Farndon & Bond
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Evans & Blackman Jeffery & Shilling
9 8 4S-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Lucy & Cooke Stanton & Elgin
8 6 3H= E -140 45 49 Parnham & Smith Tomkin & Tomkin
7 4 3H+1 E -170 16.4 77.6 Fleming & Fleming Taylor & Carter
6 2 3S= W -140 45 49 Bentley & Bentley Leighton & Dennsion
5 14 3H= E -140 45 49 Peers & Peers Eddleston & Eddleston
4 12 5C-2 N -100 72.5 21.5 Mascall & Denny Farndon & Bond
3 9 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Moss & Crawford Bolton & Leach
2 7 4S-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Serby & Moore Samuels & Sexton
1 5 3S= W -140 45 49 Jacobs & Fisher Stanford & Franklin
14 3 5Cx-2 N -300 10.2 83.8 Dias & Hair Tompson & Clare
13 1 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Curtis & Kitchin Whiteway & Thornton
12 13 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Fess & Landau Dickson & Hill
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Evans & Blackman Jeffery & Shilling
9 8 5Sx-5 S -1400 4.1 89.9 Lucy & Cooke Stanton & Elgin
8 6 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Parnham & Smith Tomkin & Tomkin
7 4 5H= W -650 71.5 22.5 Fleming & Fleming Taylor & Carter
6 2 5Cx-5 S -1400 4.1 89.9 Bentley & Bentley Leighton & Dennsion
5 14 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Peers & Peers Eddleston & Eddleston
4 12 5Cx-5 S -1400 4.1 89.9 Mascall & Denny Farndon & Bond
3 9 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Moss & Crawford Bolton & Leach
2 7 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Serby & Moore Samuels & Sexton
1 5 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Stanford & Franklin
14 3 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Dias & Hair Tompson & Clare
13 1 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Curtis & Kitchin Whiteway & Thornton
12 13 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Fess & Landau Dickson & Hill
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 6D+1 W -940 3.1 90.9 Knights & Dunn Cavell & Dean
10 9 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Evans & Blackman Bolton & Leach
9 7 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Lucy & Cooke Samuels & Sexton
8 5 6D= W -920 6.1 87.9 Parnham & Smith Stanford & Franklin
7 3 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Fleming & Fleming Tompson & Clare
6 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Bentley & Bentley Whiteway & Thornton
5 13 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Peers & Peers Dickson & Hill
4 10 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Mascall & Denny Jeffery & Shilling
3 8 6D+1 W -940 3.1 90.9 Moss & Crawford Stanton & Elgin
2 6 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Serby & Moore Tomkin & Tomkin
1 4 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Taylor & Carter
14 2 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Dias & Hair Leighton & Dennsion
13 14 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Curtis & Kitchin Eddleston & Eddleston
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 3S-1 W 100 76.6 17.4 Knights & Dunn Cavell & Dean
10 9 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Evans & Blackman Bolton & Leach
9 7 2H-3 S -150 25.1 68.9 Lucy & Cooke Samuels & Sexton
8 5 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Parnham & Smith Stanford & Franklin
7 3 Art 34.5 59.5 Fleming & Fleming Tompson & Clare
6 1 2NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Bentley & Bentley Whiteway & Thornton
5 13 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Peers & Peers Dickson & Hill
4 10 3D= W -110 56.2 37.8 Mascall & Denny Jeffery & Shilling
3 8 2NT= E -120 48.6 45.4 Moss & Crawford Stanton & Elgin
2 6 2NT+1 E -150 25.1 68.9 Serby & Moore Tomkin & Tomkin
1 4 2NT= E -120 48.6 45.4 Jacobs & Fisher Taylor & Carter
14 2 3D= W -110 56.2 37.8 Dias & Hair Leighton & Dennsion
13 14 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Curtis & Kitchin Eddleston & Eddleston
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Fess & Landau Farndon & Bond
11 10 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Knights & Dunn Jeffery & Shilling
10 8 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Evans & Blackman Stanton & Elgin
9 6 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Lucy & Cooke Tomkin & Tomkin
8 4 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Parnham & Smith Taylor & Carter
7 2 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Fleming & Fleming Leighton & Dennsion
6 14 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Bentley & Bentley Eddleston & Eddleston
5 11 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Peers & Peers Cavell & Dean
4 9 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Mascall & Denny Bolton & Leach
3 7 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Moss & Crawford Samuels & Sexton
2 5 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
1 3 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Jacobs & Fisher Tompson & Clare
14 1 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Dias & Hair Whiteway & Thornton
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Fess & Landau Farndon & Bond
11 10 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Knights & Dunn Jeffery & Shilling
10 8 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Evans & Blackman Stanton & Elgin
9 6 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Lucy & Cooke Tomkin & Tomkin
8 4 2H= S 110 89.9 4.1 Parnham & Smith Taylor & Carter
7 2 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Fleming & Fleming Leighton & Dennsion
6 14 5H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Bentley & Bentley Eddleston & Eddleston
5 11 5H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Peers & Peers Cavell & Dean
4 9 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Mascall & Denny Bolton & Leach
3 7 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Moss & Crawford Samuels & Sexton
2 5 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
1 3 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Tompson & Clare
14 1 4Sx-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Dias & Hair Whiteway & Thornton
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S= N 110 32 62 Curtis & Kitchin Dickson & Hill
12 11 4H= N 420 94 0 Fess & Landau Cavell & Dean
11 9 4S-2 N -100 3 91 Knights & Dunn Bolton & Leach
10 7 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Evans & Blackman Samuels & Sexton
9 5 3S= N 140 66 28 Lucy & Cooke Stanford & Franklin
8 3 2S= N 110 32 62 Parnham & Smith Tompson & Clare
7 1 2S-1 N -50 14 80 Fleming & Fleming Whiteway & Thornton
6 12 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Bentley & Bentley Farndon & Bond
5 10 2S= N 110 32 62 Peers & Peers Jeffery & Shilling
4 8 3S= N 140 66 28 Mascall & Denny Stanton & Elgin
3 6 2S= N 110 32 62 Moss & Crawford Tomkin & Tomkin
2 4 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Serby & Moore Taylor & Carter
1 2 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Jacobs & Fisher Leighton & Dennsion
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 4H-2 E 200 65 29 Curtis & Kitchin Dickson & Hill
12 11 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Fess & Landau Cavell & Dean
11 9 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Knights & Dunn Bolton & Leach
10 7 4Hx-1 W 200 65 29 Evans & Blackman Samuels & Sexton
9 5 4D= N 130 55 39 Lucy & Cooke Stanford & Franklin
8 3 3C+2 W -150 30 64 Parnham & Smith Tompson & Clare
7 1 5D-1 N -100 32 62 Fleming & Fleming Whiteway & Thornton
6 12 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Bentley & Bentley Farndon & Bond
5 10 5Hx-2 N -500 8 86 Peers & Peers Jeffery & Shilling
4 8 3H-1 E 100 43 51 Mascall & Denny Stanton & Elgin
3 6 4Hx-1 E 200 65 29 Moss & Crawford Tomkin & Tomkin
2 4 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Serby & Moore Taylor & Carter
1 2 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Jacobs & Fisher Leighton & Dennsion
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
14 14 5S= S 450 65.4 28.6 Dias & Hair Eddleston & Eddleston
13 12 4S= S 420 23 71 Curtis & Kitchin Farndon & Bond
12 10 4S+1 N 450 65.4 28.6 Fess & Landau Jeffery & Shilling
11 8 6S-2 S -100 1.8 92.2 Knights & Dunn Stanton & Elgin
10 6 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Evans & Blackman Tomkin & Tomkin
9 4 4S= S 420 23 71 Lucy & Cooke Taylor & Carter
8 2 4S= S 420 23 71 Parnham & Smith Leighton & Dennsion
7 13 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Fleming & Fleming Dickson & Hill
6 11 4S= S 420 23 71 Bentley & Bentley Cavell & Dean
5 9 5S= S 450 65.4 28.6 Peers & Peers Bolton & Leach
4 7 4S= S 420 23 71 Mascall & Denny Samuels & Sexton
3 5 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Moss & Crawford Stanford & Franklin
2 3 5S= S 450 65.4 28.6 Serby & Moore Tompson & Clare
Board 28
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
14 14 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Dias & Hair Eddleston & Eddleston
13 12 2D+2 N 130 8.6 85.4 Curtis & Kitchin Farndon & Bond
12 10 3D+1 N 130 8.6 85.4 Fess & Landau Jeffery & Shilling
11 8 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Knights & Dunn Stanton & Elgin
10 6 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Evans & Blackman Tomkin & Tomkin
9 4 2S+1 S 140 22 72 Lucy & Cooke Taylor & Carter
8 2 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Parnham & Smith Leighton & Dennsion
7 13 2S+1 S 140 22 72 Fleming & Fleming Dickson & Hill
6 11 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Bentley & Bentley Cavell & Dean
5 9 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Peers & Peers Bolton & Leach
4 7 3D+1 N 130 8.6 85.4 Mascall & Denny Samuels & Sexton
3 5 2D+3 N 150 35.5 58.5 Moss & Crawford Stanford & Franklin
2 3 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Serby & Moore Tompson & Clare
Assigned Scores Board 22 NS Pair 7 EW Pair 3 40 % Score = -120 to Both 60 % Score = -150 to Both
Session 1 Section Blue Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 2NT+1 W -150 62.3 31.7 Love & Tapp Thrower & Hope
13 11 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Butler & Butler Ottley & Radford
12 9 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Jones & Martin Gascoyne & Squires
11 7 3C+1 E -130 71.5 22.5 Heath & Heath Langston & Langston
10 5 2NT+1 E -150 62.3 31.7 Cohen & Register le Cocq & Pallot
9 3 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Seaver & Morgan Reader & Brito
8 14 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Poulter & Benjamin Cornell & Beer
7 12 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Turnage & Cruickshank Abbott & Abbott
6 10 6NT-3 W 150 91.9 2.1 Osborn & Osborn Stewart & Lewsey
5 8 3NT= E -400 32.7 61.3 Kennedy & Ditchburn Oram & Oram
4 6 4S-4 W 200 94 0 Crofts & Crofts Hinkin & Concanon
3 4 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Slatcher & Holland Pilcher & Charles
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Love & Tapp Thrower & Hope
13 11 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Butler & Butler Ottley & Radford
12 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Jones & Martin Gascoyne & Squires
11 7 3S-4 E 200 87.9 6.1 Heath & Heath Langston & Langston
10 5 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Cohen & Register le Cocq & Pallot
9 3 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Seaver & Morgan Reader & Brito
8 14 3D+1 N 130 34.7 59.3 Poulter & Benjamin Cornell & Beer
7 12 1NT+3 N 180 84.8 9.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Abbott & Abbott
6 10 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Osborn & Osborn Stewart & Lewsey
5 8 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn Oram & Oram
4 6 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Crofts & Crofts Hinkin & Concanon
3 4 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Slatcher & Holland Pilcher & Charles
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Stebbing & Henry Pitman & Stevens
1 14 3H+1 W -170 2.1 91.9 Love & Tapp Cornell & Beer
13 10 4H-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Butler & Butler Stewart & Lewsey
12 8 2D= S 90 45 49 Jones & Martin Oram & Oram
11 6 3NT= N 400 94 0 Heath & Heath Hinkin & Concanon
10 4 2D+1 N 110 72.5 21.5 Cohen & Register Pilcher & Charles
9 1 4D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Seaver & Morgan Thrower & Hope
8 13 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Poulter & Benjamin Harrison & Talbot
7 11 2NT+1 S 150 86.8 7.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Ottley & Radford
6 9 2D= S 90 45 49 Osborn & Osborn Gascoyne & Squires
5 7 3H-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn Langston & Langston
4 5 1NT+1 N 120 81.7 12.3 Crofts & Crofts le Cocq & Pallot
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4H= S 620 21.5 72.5 Stebbing & Henry Pitman & Stevens
1 14 5C+1 N 620 21.5 72.5 Love & Tapp Cornell & Beer
13 10 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Butler & Butler Stewart & Lewsey
12 8 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Jones & Martin Oram & Oram
11 6 5C= N 600 12.3 81.7 Heath & Heath Hinkin & Concanon
10 4 4C+1 N 150 2.1 91.9 Cohen & Register Pilcher & Charles
9 1 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Seaver & Morgan Thrower & Hope
8 13 5C= N 600 12.3 81.7 Poulter & Benjamin Harrison & Talbot
7 11 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Turnage & Cruickshank Ottley & Radford
6 9 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Osborn & Osborn Gascoyne & Squires
5 7 4H+2 N 680 84.8 9.2 Kennedy & Ditchburn Langston & Langston
4 5 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Crofts & Crofts le Cocq & Pallot
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Slatcher & Holland Reader & Brito
2 1 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Stebbing & Henry Thrower & Hope
1 13 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Love & Tapp Harrison & Talbot
13 9 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Butler & Butler Gascoyne & Squires
12 7 2H= E -110 39.9 54.1 Jones & Martin Langston & Langston
11 5 4D-1 N -100 48 46 Heath & Heath le Cocq & Pallot
10 2 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Cohen & Register Pitman & Stevens
9 14 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Seaver & Morgan Cornell & Beer
8 12 5D-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Poulter & Benjamin Abbott & Abbott
7 10 3D= S 110 68.4 25.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Stewart & Lewsey
6 8 2D+1 S 110 68.4 25.6 Osborn & Osborn Oram & Oram
5 6 4C-1 E 50 56.2 37.8 Kennedy & Ditchburn Hinkin & Concanon
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT= E -90 49 45 Slatcher & Holland Reader & Brito
2 1 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Stebbing & Henry Thrower & Hope
1 13 1NT-2 E 200 91.9 2.1 Love & Tapp Harrison & Talbot
13 9 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Butler & Butler Gascoyne & Squires
12 7 1NT= E -90 49 45 Jones & Martin Langston & Langston
11 5 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Heath & Heath le Cocq & Pallot
10 2 1NT= E -90 49 45 Cohen & Register Pitman & Stevens
9 14 1NT= E -90 49 45 Seaver & Morgan Cornell & Beer
8 12 2H= N 110 87.9 6.1 Poulter & Benjamin Abbott & Abbott
7 10 1NT= E -90 49 45 Turnage & Cruickshank Stewart & Lewsey
6 8 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Osborn & Osborn Oram & Oram
5 6 2S+1 E -140 0 94 Kennedy & Ditchburn Hinkin & Concanon
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Crofts & Crofts Pilcher & Charles
3 2 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Slatcher & Holland Pitman & Stevens
2 14 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Stebbing & Henry Cornell & Beer
1 12 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Love & Tapp Abbott & Abbott
13 8 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Butler & Butler Oram & Oram
12 6 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Jones & Martin Hinkin & Concanon
11 3 2D-2 E 200 78.7 15.3 Heath & Heath Reader & Brito
10 1 2H= N 110 41.9 52.1 Cohen & Register Thrower & Hope
9 13 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Seaver & Morgan Harrison & Talbot
8 11 3Sx-3 W 800 91.9 2.1 Poulter & Benjamin Ottley & Radford
7 9 2NT-1 N -100 15.3 78.7 Turnage & Cruickshank Gascoyne & Squires
6 7 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Osborn & Osborn Langston & Langston
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Crofts & Crofts Pilcher & Charles
3 2 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Slatcher & Holland Pitman & Stevens
2 14 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Stebbing & Henry Cornell & Beer
1 12 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Love & Tapp Abbott & Abbott
13 8 5C-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Butler & Butler Oram & Oram
12 6 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Jones & Martin Hinkin & Concanon
11 3 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Heath & Heath Reader & Brito
10 1 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Cohen & Register Thrower & Hope
9 13 2S-2 W 100 93 1 Seaver & Morgan Harrison & Talbot
8 11 2C= E -90 47 47 Poulter & Benjamin Ottley & Radford
7 9 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Turnage & Cruickshank Gascoyne & Squires
6 7 3NT+2 W -460 1 93 Osborn & Osborn Langston & Langston
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Kennedy & Ditchburn le Cocq & Pallot
4 3 6D-1 N -50 13.3 80.7 Crofts & Crofts Reader & Brito
3 1 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Slatcher & Holland Thrower & Hope
2 13 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Stebbing & Henry Harrison & Talbot
1 11 5C= N 400 33.7 60.3 Love & Tapp Ottley & Radford
13 7 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Butler & Butler Langston & Langston
12 4 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Jones & Martin Pilcher & Charles
11 2 4D= N 130 20.4 73.6 Heath & Heath Pitman & Stevens
10 14 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Cohen & Register Cornell & Beer
9 12 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Seaver & Morgan Abbott & Abbott
8 10 3D+1 N 130 20.4 73.6 Poulter & Benjamin Stewart & Lewsey
7 8 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Turnage & Cruickshank Oram & Oram
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3C-1 E 100 14.3 79.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn le Cocq & Pallot
4 3 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Crofts & Crofts Reader & Brito
3 1 4S+2 N 680 91.9 2.1 Slatcher & Holland Thrower & Hope
2 13 4C-3 W 300 65.4 28.6 Stebbing & Henry Harrison & Talbot
1 11 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Love & Tapp Ottley & Radford
13 7 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Butler & Butler Langston & Langston
12 4 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Jones & Martin Pilcher & Charles
11 2 2S+1 N 140 31.7 62.3 Heath & Heath Pitman & Stevens
10 14 3C= E -110 2.1 91.9 Cohen & Register Cornell & Beer
9 12 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Seaver & Morgan Abbott & Abbott
8 10 4H-2 S -200 0 94 Poulter & Benjamin Stewart & Lewsey
7 8 2S+2 N 170 48 46 Turnage & Cruickshank Oram & Oram
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Osborn & Osborn Hinkin & Concanon
5 4 4S+1 N 450 16.4 77.6 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pilcher & Charles
4 2 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Crofts & Crofts Pitman & Stevens
3 14 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Slatcher & Holland Cornell & Beer
2 12 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Stebbing & Henry Abbott & Abbott
1 10 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Love & Tapp Stewart & Lewsey
13 5 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Butler & Butler le Cocq & Pallot
12 3 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Jones & Martin Reader & Brito
11 1 4S+1 N 450 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Thrower & Hope
10 13 4S+3 N 510 76.6 17.4 Cohen & Register Harrison & Talbot
9 11 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Seaver & Morgan Ottley & Radford
8 9 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Poulter & Benjamin Gascoyne & Squires
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Osborn & Osborn Hinkin & Concanon
5 4 2C= E -90 53.1 40.9 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pilcher & Charles
4 2 4Sx-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Crofts & Crofts Pitman & Stevens
3 14 3S= E -140 32.7 61.3 Slatcher & Holland Cornell & Beer
2 12 2Cx-2 N -500 5.1 88.9 Stebbing & Henry Abbott & Abbott
1 10 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Love & Tapp Stewart & Lewsey
13 5 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Butler & Butler le Cocq & Pallot
12 3 2Sx+1 E -570 2.1 91.9 Jones & Martin Reader & Brito
11 1 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Heath & Heath Thrower & Hope
10 13 3S+1 E -170 23.5 70.5 Cohen & Register Harrison & Talbot
9 11 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Seaver & Morgan Ottley & Radford
8 9 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Poulter & Benjamin Gascoyne & Squires
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Turnage & Cruickshank Langston & Langston
6 5 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Osborn & Osborn le Cocq & Pallot
5 3 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Reader & Brito
4 1 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Crofts & Crofts Thrower & Hope
3 13 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Slatcher & Holland Harrison & Talbot
2 11 2H+1 N 140 57.2 36.8 Stebbing & Henry Ottley & Radford
1 9 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Love & Tapp Gascoyne & Squires
13 4 3NT+2 N 660 94 0 Butler & Butler Pilcher & Charles
12 2 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Jones & Martin Pitman & Stevens
11 14 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath Cornell & Beer
10 12 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Cohen & Register Abbott & Abbott
9 10 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Seaver & Morgan Stewart & Lewsey
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Langston & Langston
6 5 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Osborn & Osborn le Cocq & Pallot
5 3 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn Reader & Brito
4 1 4S-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Crofts & Crofts Thrower & Hope
3 13 4S+1 N 450 79.7 14.3 Slatcher & Holland Harrison & Talbot
2 11 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Stebbing & Henry Ottley & Radford
1 9 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Love & Tapp Gascoyne & Squires
13 4 4C-3 S -150 0 94 Butler & Butler Pilcher & Charles
12 2 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Jones & Martin Pitman & Stevens
11 14 3NT= N 400 33.7 60.3 Heath & Heath Cornell & Beer
10 12 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Cohen & Register Abbott & Abbott
9 10 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Seaver & Morgan Stewart & Lewsey
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Poulter & Benjamin Oram & Oram
7 6 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Hinkin & Concanon
6 4 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Osborn & Osborn Pilcher & Charles
5 2 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pitman & Stevens
4 14 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Crofts & Crofts Cornell & Beer
3 12 5Dx= W -550 0 94 Slatcher & Holland Abbott & Abbott
2 10 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Stebbing & Henry Stewart & Lewsey
1 7 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Love & Tapp Langston & Langston
13 3 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Butler & Butler Reader & Brito
12 1 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Jones & Martin Thrower & Hope
11 13 4D-1 E 50 23.5 70.5 Heath & Heath Harrison & Talbot
10 11 3D+1 E -130 8.2 85.8 Cohen & Register Ottley & Radford
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Poulter & Benjamin Oram & Oram
7 6 3NT+1 S 430 85.8 8.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Hinkin & Concanon
6 4 3NT= N 400 77.6 16.4 Osborn & Osborn Pilcher & Charles
5 2 3NT= N 400 77.6 16.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pitman & Stevens
4 14 2Sx-3 E 800 93 1 Crofts & Crofts Cornell & Beer
3 12 2H-4 E 400 77.6 16.4 Slatcher & Holland Abbott & Abbott
2 10 4C= N 130 62.3 31.7 Stebbing & Henry Stewart & Lewsey
1 7 2Sx-2 E 500 89.9 4.1 Love & Tapp Langston & Langston
13 3 3NT= S 400 77.6 16.4 Butler & Butler Reader & Brito
12 1 2NT+1 N 150 67.4 26.6 Jones & Martin Thrower & Hope
11 13 5C-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Heath & Heath Harrison & Talbot
10 11 2S-2 N -100 3.1 90.9 Cohen & Register Ottley & Radford
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Seaver & Morgan Gascoyne & Squires
8 7 3NT-1 S -50 7.2 86.8 Poulter & Benjamin Langston & Langston
7 5 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Turnage & Cruickshank le Cocq & Pallot
6 3 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Osborn & Osborn Reader & Brito
5 1 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Kennedy & Ditchburn Thrower & Hope
4 13 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Crofts & Crofts Harrison & Talbot
3 11 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Slatcher & Holland Ottley & Radford
2 8 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Stebbing & Henry Oram & Oram
1 6 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Love & Tapp Hinkin & Concanon
13 2 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Butler & Butler Pitman & Stevens
12 14 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Jones & Martin Cornell & Beer
11 12 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath Abbott & Abbott
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Seaver & Morgan Gascoyne & Squires
8 7 4Hx= E -590 7.2 86.8 Poulter & Benjamin Langston & Langston
7 5 4S-3 N -300 89.9 4.1 Turnage & Cruickshank le Cocq & Pallot
6 3 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Osborn & Osborn Reader & Brito
5 1 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Kennedy & Ditchburn Thrower & Hope
4 13 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Crofts & Crofts Harrison & Talbot
3 11 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Slatcher & Holland Ottley & Radford
2 8 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Stebbing & Henry Oram & Oram
1 6 4H+1 E -450 16.4 77.6 Love & Tapp Hinkin & Concanon
13 2 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Butler & Butler Pitman & Stevens
12 14 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Jones & Martin Cornell & Beer
11 12 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Heath & Heath Abbott & Abbott
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4C-1 N -50 76.6 17.4 Cohen & Register Stewart & Lewsey
9 8 3H= E -140 45 49 Seaver & Morgan Oram & Oram
8 6 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Poulter & Benjamin Hinkin & Concanon
7 4 4C+1 N 150 94 0 Turnage & Cruickshank Pilcher & Charles
6 2 3S= W -140 45 49 Osborn & Osborn Pitman & Stevens
5 14 4S= E -620 6.1 87.9 Kennedy & Ditchburn Cornell & Beer
4 12 1S+2 W -140 45 49 Crofts & Crofts Abbott & Abbott
3 9 4S-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Slatcher & Holland Gascoyne & Squires
2 7 3H+1 E -170 16.4 77.6 Stebbing & Henry Langston & Langston
1 5 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Love & Tapp le Cocq & Pallot
13 1 3S= W -140 45 49 Butler & Butler Thrower & Hope
12 13 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Jones & Martin Harrison & Talbot
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 5Dx-4 N -1100 12.3 81.7 Cohen & Register Stewart & Lewsey
9 8 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Seaver & Morgan Oram & Oram
8 6 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Poulter & Benjamin Hinkin & Concanon
7 4 4S-2 S -200 94 0 Turnage & Cruickshank Pilcher & Charles
6 2 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Osborn & Osborn Pitman & Stevens
5 14 4H+2 E -680 33.7 60.3 Kennedy & Ditchburn Cornell & Beer
4 12 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Crofts & Crofts Abbott & Abbott
3 9 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Slatcher & Holland Gascoyne & Squires
2 7 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Stebbing & Henry Langston & Langston
1 5 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Love & Tapp le Cocq & Pallot
13 1 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Butler & Butler Thrower & Hope
12 13 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Jones & Martin Harrison & Talbot
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 6H= E -980 0 94 Heath & Heath Ottley & Radford
10 9 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Cohen & Register Gascoyne & Squires
9 7 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Seaver & Morgan Langston & Langston
8 5 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Poulter & Benjamin le Cocq & Pallot
7 3 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Turnage & Cruickshank Reader & Brito
6 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Osborn & Osborn Thrower & Hope
5 13 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Kennedy & Ditchburn Harrison & Talbot
4 10 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Crofts & Crofts Stewart & Lewsey
3 8 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Slatcher & Holland Oram & Oram
2 6 4Sx-2 N -500 10.2 83.8 Stebbing & Henry Hinkin & Concanon
1 4 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Love & Tapp Pilcher & Charles
13 14 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Butler & Butler Cornell & Beer
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Heath & Heath Ottley & Radford
10 9 2D+2 E -130 38 56 Cohen & Register Gascoyne & Squires
9 7 5S-1 W 100 76.6 17.4 Seaver & Morgan Langston & Langston
8 5 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Poulter & Benjamin le Cocq & Pallot
7 3 3Hx-2 N -300 16.4 77.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Reader & Brito
6 1 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Osborn & Osborn Thrower & Hope
5 13 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Harrison & Talbot
4 10 2NT+1 E -150 25.1 68.9 Crofts & Crofts Stewart & Lewsey
3 8 3D= W -110 56.2 37.8 Slatcher & Holland Oram & Oram
2 6 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Stebbing & Henry Hinkin & Concanon
1 4 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Love & Tapp Pilcher & Charles
13 14 3D+2 W -150 25.1 68.9 Butler & Butler Cornell & Beer
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Jones & Martin Abbott & Abbott
11 10 3NT= E -600 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Stewart & Lewsey
10 8 3NT= E -600 68.4 25.6 Cohen & Register Oram & Oram
9 6 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Seaver & Morgan Hinkin & Concanon
8 4 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Poulter & Benjamin Pilcher & Charles
7 2 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Pitman & Stevens
6 14 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Osborn & Osborn Cornell & Beer
5 11 3NT+2 E -660 10.2 83.8 Kennedy & Ditchburn Ottley & Radford
4 9 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Crofts & Crofts Gascoyne & Squires
3 7 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Slatcher & Holland Langston & Langston
2 5 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Stebbing & Henry le Cocq & Pallot
1 3 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Love & Tapp Reader & Brito
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Jones & Martin Abbott & Abbott
11 10 4S= E -420 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Stewart & Lewsey
10 8 2H= N 110 89.9 4.1 Cohen & Register Oram & Oram
9 6 4H-2 N -100 54.1 39.9 Seaver & Morgan Hinkin & Concanon
8 4 2H= S 110 89.9 4.1 Poulter & Benjamin Pilcher & Charles
7 2 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Turnage & Cruickshank Pitman & Stevens
6 14 4Sx= W -590 3.1 90.9 Osborn & Osborn Cornell & Beer
5 11 3H-1 N -50 71.5 22.5 Kennedy & Ditchburn Ottley & Radford
4 9 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Crofts & Crofts Gascoyne & Squires
3 7 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Slatcher & Holland Langston & Langston
2 5 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Stebbing & Henry le Cocq & Pallot
1 3 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Love & Tapp Reader & Brito
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S+2 N 170 91 3 Butler & Butler Harrison & Talbot
12 11 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Jones & Martin Ottley & Radford
11 9 2S+2 N 170 91 3 Heath & Heath Gascoyne & Squires
10 7 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Cohen & Register Langston & Langston
9 5 2S= N 110 32 62 Seaver & Morgan le Cocq & Pallot
8 3 3S= N 140 66 28 Poulter & Benjamin Reader & Brito
7 1 2S= N 110 32 62 Turnage & Cruickshank Thrower & Hope
6 12 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Osborn & Osborn Abbott & Abbott
5 10 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Kennedy & Ditchburn Stewart & Lewsey
4 8 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Crofts & Crofts Oram & Oram
3 6 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Slatcher & Holland Hinkin & Concanon
2 4 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Stebbing & Henry Pilcher & Charles
1 2 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Love & Tapp Pitman & Stevens
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Butler & Butler Harrison & Talbot
12 11 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Jones & Martin Ottley & Radford
11 9 5H-3 E 300 75 19 Heath & Heath Gascoyne & Squires
10 7 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Cohen & Register Langston & Langston
9 5 5Cx-2 W 500 87 7 Seaver & Morgan le Cocq & Pallot
8 3 4Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Poulter & Benjamin Reader & Brito
7 1 5Hx-1 E 200 65 29 Turnage & Cruickshank Thrower & Hope
6 12 4H-1 W 100 43 51 Osborn & Osborn Abbott & Abbott
5 10 4H-3 E 300 75 19 Kennedy & Ditchburn Stewart & Lewsey
4 8 4H-1 E 100 43 51 Crofts & Crofts Oram & Oram
3 6 5Dx= N 750 94 0 Slatcher & Holland Hinkin & Concanon
2 4 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Stebbing & Henry Pilcher & Charles
1 2 5H-1 E 100 43 51 Love & Tapp Pitman & Stevens
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 12 5S-1 S -50 8.9 85.1 Butler & Butler Abbott & Abbott
12 10 5S-1 S -50 8.9 85.1 Jones & Martin Stewart & Lewsey
11 8 3NT+2 N 460 92.2 1.8 Heath & Heath Oram & Oram
10 6 4S+1 N 450 65.4 28.6 Cohen & Register Hinkin & Concanon
9 4 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Seaver & Morgan Pilcher & Charles
8 2 3NT+1 N 430 37.1 56.9 Poulter & Benjamin Pitman & Stevens
7 13 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Harrison & Talbot
6 11 4S= S 420 23 71 Osborn & Osborn Ottley & Radford
5 9 4S= N 420 23 71 Kennedy & Ditchburn Gascoyne & Squires
4 7 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Crofts & Crofts Langston & Langston
3 5 3NT+2 S 460 92.2 1.8 Slatcher & Holland le Cocq & Pallot
2 3 3NT+1 S 430 37.1 56.9 Stebbing & Henry Reader & Brito
Board 28
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 12 3NT= N 600 62.4 31.6 Butler & Butler Abbott & Abbott
12 10 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Jones & Martin Stewart & Lewsey
11 8 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Heath & Heath Oram & Oram
10 6 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Cohen & Register Hinkin & Concanon
9 4 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Seaver & Morgan Pilcher & Charles
8 2 2D+2 N 130 8.6 85.4 Poulter & Benjamin Pitman & Stevens
7 13 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Turnage & Cruickshank Harrison & Talbot
6 11 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Osborn & Osborn Ottley & Radford
5 9 3D+1 N 130 8.6 85.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Gascoyne & Squires
4 7 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Crofts & Crofts Langston & Langston
3 5 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Slatcher & Holland le Cocq & Pallot
2 3 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Stebbing & Henry Reader & Brito
Session 1 Section Yellow Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Gillespie & Gillespie Harper & Hackett
9 8 5C= W -400 32.7 61.3 Thompson & Thompson Youd & Rankin
8 6 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Griffin & Heatly
7 4 3S-1 S -50 78.7 15.3 Clarke & Blackmore Hedley & Hedley
6 2 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Hart & Wallace Wren & Perryman
5 9 2S-1 S -50 78.7 15.3 Hunt & Vaughan Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 4H-1 E 50 85.8 8.2 Beattie & Connell Prince & Hair
3 5 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 3 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Turpin & Lawson Twyman & Twyman
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Harper & Hackett
9 8 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Thompson & Thompson Youd & Rankin
8 6 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Nurmohamed & Jones Griffin & Heatly
7 4 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Clarke & Blackmore Hedley & Hedley
6 2 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Hart & Wallace Wren & Perryman
5 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Hunt & Vaughan Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Beattie & Connell Prince & Hair
3 5 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 3 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Turpin & Lawson Twyman & Twyman
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 3S-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Harper & Hackett
9 8 1NT+2 S 150 86.8 7.2 Thompson & Thompson Youd & Rankin
8 6 1NT+3 N 180 91.9 2.1 Nurmohamed & Jones Griffin & Heatly
7 4 1NT+2 N 150 86.8 7.2 Clarke & Blackmore Hedley & Hedley
6 2 1NT= N 90 45 49 Hart & Wallace Wren & Perryman
5 9 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Hunt & Vaughan Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 2D= S 90 45 49 Beattie & Connell Prince & Hair
3 5 3NT-2 S -100 16.4 77.6 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 3 2D= S 90 45 49 Turpin & Lawson Twyman & Twyman
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4Sx-2 E 500 8.2 85.8 Turpin & Lawson Wren & Perryman
1 9 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Thompson & Thompson Prince & Hair
8 5 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Nurmohamed & Jones Wright & Watson
7 3 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Clarke & Blackmore Twyman & Twyman
6 1 4C+2 N 170 4.1 89.9 Hart & Wallace Harper & Hackett
5 8 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Hunt & Vaughan Youd & Rankin
4 6 4H= S 620 21.5 72.5 Beattie & Connell Griffin & Heatly
3 4 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Nicolle & Bridge Hedley & Hedley
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Turpin & Lawson Wren & Perryman
1 9 3C= W -110 39.9 54.1 Gillespie & Gillespie Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Thompson & Thompson Prince & Hair
8 5 3H-4 S -400 0 94 Nurmohamed & Jones Wright & Watson
7 3 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Clarke & Blackmore Twyman & Twyman
6 1 2S= S 110 68.4 25.6 Hart & Wallace Harper & Hackett
5 8 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Hunt & Vaughan Youd & Rankin
4 6 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Beattie & Connell Griffin & Heatly
3 4 5C-1 W 50 56.2 37.8 Nicolle & Bridge Hedley & Hedley
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 1NT= E -90 49 45 Turpin & Lawson Wren & Perryman
1 9 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Thompson & Thompson Prince & Hair
8 5 1NT= E -90 49 45 Nurmohamed & Jones Wright & Watson
7 3 1NT= E -90 49 45 Clarke & Blackmore Twyman & Twyman
6 1 1NT= E -90 49 45 Hart & Wallace Harper & Hackett
5 8 1NT= S 90 73.6 20.4 Hunt & Vaughan Youd & Rankin
4 6 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Beattie & Connell Griffin & Heatly
3 4 2H-2 N -100 28.6 65.4 Nicolle & Bridge Hedley & Hedley
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Nicolle & Bridge Twyman & Twyman
2 1 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Turpin & Lawson Harper & Hackett
1 8 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Youd & Rankin
9 6 3C-3 W 300 81.7 12.3 Thompson & Thompson Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3D-2 E 200 78.7 15.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Hedley & Hedley
7 2 3H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Clarke & Blackmore Wren & Perryman
6 9 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Hart & Wallace Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 2S-1 W 100 27.6 66.4 Hunt & Vaughan Prince & Hair
4 5 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Beattie & Connell Wright & Watson
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Nicolle & Bridge Twyman & Twyman
2 1 3NT-1 W 50 69.5 24.5 Turpin & Lawson Harper & Hackett
1 8 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Gillespie & Gillespie Youd & Rankin
9 6 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Thompson & Thompson Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3C+1 E -130 18.4 75.6 Nurmohamed & Jones Hedley & Hedley
7 2 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Clarke & Blackmore Wren & Perryman
6 9 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Hart & Wallace Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Hunt & Vaughan Prince & Hair
4 5 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Beattie & Connell Wright & Watson
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Nicolle & Bridge Twyman & Twyman
2 1 3NT+2 S 460 79.7 14.3 Turpin & Lawson Harper & Hackett
1 8 5D-1 N -50 13.3 80.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Youd & Rankin
9 6 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Thompson & Thompson Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Nurmohamed & Jones Hedley & Hedley
7 2 5D-1 S -50 13.3 80.7 Clarke & Blackmore Wren & Perryman
6 9 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Hart & Wallace Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Hunt & Vaughan Prince & Hair
4 5 6NT-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Beattie & Connell Wright & Watson
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Beattie & Connell Hedley & Hedley
3 2 1NT= W -90 5.1 88.9 Nicolle & Bridge Wren & Perryman
2 9 2S+2 N 170 48 46 Turpin & Lawson Basden-Smith & Parsons
1 7 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Prince & Hair
9 5 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Thompson & Thompson Wright & Watson
8 3 3D+1 S 130 25.6 68.4 Nurmohamed & Jones Twyman & Twyman
7 1 4D= N 130 25.6 68.4 Clarke & Blackmore Harper & Hackett
6 8 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Hart & Wallace Youd & Rankin
5 6 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Hunt & Vaughan Griffin & Heatly
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Beattie & Connell Hedley & Hedley
3 2 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Nicolle & Bridge Wren & Perryman
2 9 4S+3 S 510 76.6 17.4 Turpin & Lawson Basden-Smith & Parsons
1 7 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Gillespie & Gillespie Prince & Hair
9 5 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Thompson & Thompson Wright & Watson
8 3 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Nurmohamed & Jones Twyman & Twyman
7 1 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Clarke & Blackmore Harper & Hackett
6 8 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Hart & Wallace Youd & Rankin
5 6 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Hunt & Vaughan Griffin & Heatly
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Beattie & Connell Hedley & Hedley
3 2 2C-2 N -200 17.4 76.6 Nicolle & Bridge Wren & Perryman
2 9 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Turpin & Lawson Basden-Smith & Parsons
1 7 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Prince & Hair
9 5 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Thompson & Thompson Wright & Watson
8 3 3Sx+1 E -630 0 94 Nurmohamed & Jones Twyman & Twyman
7 1 2Cx-2 N -500 5.1 88.9 Clarke & Blackmore Harper & Hackett
6 8 3S= E -140 32.7 61.3 Hart & Wallace Youd & Rankin
5 6 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Hunt & Vaughan Griffin & Heatly
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Hunt & Vaughan Wright & Watson
4 3 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Beattie & Connell Twyman & Twyman
3 1 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Nicolle & Bridge Harper & Hackett
2 8 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Turpin & Lawson Youd & Rankin
1 6 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Griffin & Heatly
9 4 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Thompson & Thompson Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Wren & Perryman
7 9 2NT+1 N 150 59.3 34.7 Clarke & Blackmore Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Hart & Wallace Prince & Hair
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Hunt & Vaughan Wright & Watson
4 3 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Beattie & Connell Twyman & Twyman
3 1 2Hx-3 E 500 91.9 2.1 Nicolle & Bridge Harper & Hackett
2 8 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Turpin & Lawson Youd & Rankin
1 6 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Griffin & Heatly
9 4 2Dx-1 W 100 26.6 67.4 Thompson & Thompson Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Nurmohamed & Jones Wren & Perryman
7 9 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Clarke & Blackmore Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 4H-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Hart & Wallace Prince & Hair
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT= E -400 2.1 91.9 Hunt & Vaughan Wright & Watson
4 3 2S+2 N 170 68.4 25.6 Beattie & Connell Twyman & Twyman
3 1 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Nicolle & Bridge Harper & Hackett
2 8 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Turpin & Lawson Youd & Rankin
1 6 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Gillespie & Gillespie Griffin & Heatly
9 4 4D-1 E 50 23.5 70.5 Thompson & Thompson Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Nurmohamed & Jones Wren & Perryman
7 9 4Dx-1 W 100 32.7 61.3 Clarke & Blackmore Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 5Dx-2 E 300 87.9 6.1 Hart & Wallace Prince & Hair
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3D-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Hart & Wallace Griffin & Heatly
5 4 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Hunt & Vaughan Hedley & Hedley
4 2 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Beattie & Connell Wren & Perryman
3 9 2Sx-3 E 800 93 1 Nicolle & Bridge Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 3NT+1 N 430 85.8 8.2 Turpin & Lawson Prince & Hair
1 5 3NT-2 S -100 3.1 90.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Wright & Watson
9 3 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Thompson & Thompson Twyman & Twyman
8 1 3NT= S 400 77.6 16.4 Nurmohamed & Jones Harper & Hackett
7 8 3NT+1 S 430 85.8 8.2 Clarke & Blackmore Youd & Rankin
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Hart & Wallace Griffin & Heatly
5 4 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Hunt & Vaughan Hedley & Hedley
4 2 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Beattie & Connell Wren & Perryman
3 9 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Nicolle & Bridge Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Turpin & Lawson Prince & Hair
1 5 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Wright & Watson
9 3 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Thompson & Thompson Twyman & Twyman
8 1 4S-2 S -100 0 94 Nurmohamed & Jones Harper & Hackett
7 8 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Clarke & Blackmore Youd & Rankin
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Hart & Wallace Griffin & Heatly
5 4 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Hunt & Vaughan Hedley & Hedley
4 2 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Beattie & Connell Wren & Perryman
3 9 4S= E -420 53.1 40.9 Nicolle & Bridge Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Turpin & Lawson Prince & Hair
1 5 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Wright & Watson
9 3 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Thompson & Thompson Twyman & Twyman
8 1 2Dx-3 S -800 2.1 91.9 Nurmohamed & Jones Harper & Hackett
7 8 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Clarke & Blackmore Youd & Rankin
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4C-1 N -50 76.6 17.4 Clarke & Blackmore Prince & Hair
6 5 4S+1 W -650 1 93 Hart & Wallace Wright & Watson
5 3 3H= E -140 45 49 Hunt & Vaughan Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4S+1 E -650 1 93 Beattie & Connell Harper & Hackett
3 8 3H= E -140 45 49 Nicolle & Bridge Youd & Rankin
2 6 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Turpin & Lawson Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4S= E -620 6.1 87.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Hedley & Hedley
9 2 4S= E -620 6.1 87.9 Thompson & Thompson Wren & Perryman
8 9 3H= E -140 45 49 Nurmohamed & Jones Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 5Sx-6 S -1700 0 94 Clarke & Blackmore Prince & Hair
6 5 5Sx-4 N -1100 12.3 81.7 Hart & Wallace Wright & Watson
5 3 4H+1 E -650 71.5 22.5 Hunt & Vaughan Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Beattie & Connell Harper & Hackett
3 8 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Nicolle & Bridge Youd & Rankin
2 6 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Turpin & Lawson Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Hedley & Hedley
9 2 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Thompson & Thompson Wren & Perryman
8 9 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Clarke & Blackmore Prince & Hair
6 5 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Hart & Wallace Wright & Watson
5 3 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Hunt & Vaughan Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Beattie & Connell Harper & Hackett
3 8 5D+2 W -440 87.9 6.1 Nicolle & Bridge Youd & Rankin
2 6 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Turpin & Lawson Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Gillespie & Gillespie Hedley & Hedley
9 2 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Thompson & Thompson Wren & Perryman
8 9 4Hx+2 E -790 8.2 85.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Youd & Rankin
7 6 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Clarke & Blackmore Griffin & Heatly
6 4 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Hart & Wallace Hedley & Hedley
5 2 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Hunt & Vaughan Wren & Perryman
4 9 2H-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Beattie & Connell Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Nicolle & Bridge Prince & Hair
2 5 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Turpin & Lawson Wright & Watson
1 3 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Gillespie & Gillespie Twyman & Twyman
9 1 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Thompson & Thompson Harper & Hackett
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Youd & Rankin
7 6 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Clarke & Blackmore Griffin & Heatly
6 4 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Hart & Wallace Hedley & Hedley
5 2 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Hunt & Vaughan Wren & Perryman
4 9 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Beattie & Connell Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Nicolle & Bridge Prince & Hair
2 5 4H-3 W 300 94 0 Turpin & Lawson Wright & Watson
1 3 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Gillespie & Gillespie Twyman & Twyman
9 1 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Thompson & Thompson Harper & Hackett
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S+1 E -170 32.7 61.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Youd & Rankin
7 6 4H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Clarke & Blackmore Griffin & Heatly
6 4 5H-2 N -100 54.1 39.9 Hart & Wallace Hedley & Hedley
5 2 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Hunt & Vaughan Wren & Perryman
4 9 4S-1 W 50 82.7 11.3 Beattie & Connell Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Nicolle & Bridge Prince & Hair
2 5 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Turpin & Lawson Wright & Watson
1 3 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Twyman & Twyman
9 1 4Sx= W -590 3.1 90.9 Thompson & Thompson Harper & Hackett
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Thompson & Thompson Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Nurmohamed & Jones Prince & Hair
7 5 2S= N 110 32 62 Clarke & Blackmore Wright & Watson
6 3 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Hart & Wallace Twyman & Twyman
5 1 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Hunt & Vaughan Harper & Hackett
4 8 2S= N 110 32 62 Beattie & Connell Youd & Rankin
3 6 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Nicolle & Bridge Griffin & Heatly
2 4 2S= N 110 32 62 Turpin & Lawson Hedley & Hedley
1 2 4S-2 N -100 3 91 Gillespie & Gillespie Wren & Perryman
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3S-4 N -400 14 80 Thompson & Thompson Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Nurmohamed & Jones Prince & Hair
7 5 5H-4 E 400 80 14 Clarke & Blackmore Wright & Watson
6 3 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Hart & Wallace Twyman & Twyman
5 1 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Hunt & Vaughan Harper & Hackett
4 8 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Beattie & Connell Youd & Rankin
3 6 4Hx-1 E 200 65 29 Nicolle & Bridge Griffin & Heatly
2 4 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Turpin & Lawson Hedley & Hedley
1 2 5H-3 E 300 75 19 Gillespie & Gillespie Wren & Perryman
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Thompson & Thompson Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 3NT+1 S 430 37.1 56.9 Nurmohamed & Jones Prince & Hair
7 5 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Clarke & Blackmore Wright & Watson
6 3 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Hart & Wallace Twyman & Twyman
5 1 5S-1 S -50 8.9 85.1 Hunt & Vaughan Harper & Hackett
4 8 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Beattie & Connell Youd & Rankin
3 6 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Nicolle & Bridge Griffin & Heatly
2 4 6S-2 S -100 1.8 92.2 Turpin & Lawson Hedley & Hedley
1 2 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Gillespie & Gillespie Wren & Perryman