Summer Seniors Pairs Qualification Multisession Session 1 Section Red Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Fontes & Fontes Carlisle & Marsh
13 12 3S-1 N -50 78.7 15.3 Gritt & Gritt Hoffman & Harper
12 10 3S-1 S -50 78.7 15.3 Heath & Heath Pigott & Heilbron
11 8 3H= W -140 67.4 26.6 Gradus & Glanville Leslie & King-Farlow
10 6 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Charteris & Horlock Herbert & Herbert
9 4 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Dean & Dean Edmonds & Stimson
8 2 3Sx-2 S -300 51.1 42.9 Sitch & Wing Ericson & Wills
7 13 3H= W -140 67.4 26.6 Foley & Foley Bingham & Osmer
6 11 4H-1 E 50 85.8 8.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Jackson & Gordon
5 9 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Keith & Jerrard
4 7 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Friedman & Friedman Smart & Lunn
3 5 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Freedman & Freedman McCready & Dyer
2 3 4H-2 W 100 89.9 4.1 Bainham & Smallwood Rumbelow & Anning
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Fontes & Fontes Carlisle & Marsh
13 12 2NT= N 120 27.6 66.4 Gritt & Gritt Hoffman & Harper
12 10 3NT+1 N 630 94 0 Heath & Heath Pigott & Heilbron
11 8 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Gradus & Glanville Leslie & King-Farlow
10 6 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Charteris & Horlock Herbert & Herbert
9 4 1NT= N 90 0 94 Dean & Dean Edmonds & Stimson
8 2 3C-2 W 100 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Ericson & Wills
7 13 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Foley & Foley Bingham & Osmer
6 11 1NT+3 N 180 84.8 9.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Jackson & Gordon
5 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Huikeshoven & Bell Keith & Jerrard
4 7 2NT= N 120 27.6 66.4 Friedman & Friedman Smart & Lunn
3 5 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Freedman & Freedman McCready & Dyer
2 3 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Bainham & Smallwood Rumbelow & Anning
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Bainham & Smallwood Ericson & Wills
1 13 2D= S 90 45 49 Fontes & Fontes Bingham & Osmer
13 11 4D-2 N -100 16.4 77.6 Gritt & Gritt Jackson & Gordon
12 9 3D= S 110 72.5 21.5 Heath & Heath Keith & Jerrard
11 7 3NT-2 S -100 16.4 77.6 Gradus & Glanville Smart & Lunn
10 5 1NT= S 90 45 49 Charteris & Horlock McCready & Dyer
9 3 2D= S 90 45 49 Dean & Dean Rumbelow & Anning
8 1 3D= S 110 72.5 21.5 Sitch & Wing Carlisle & Marsh
7 12 1NT= S 90 45 49 Foley & Foley Hoffman & Harper
6 10 2D= S 90 45 49 Breslaw & Breslaw Pigott & Heilbron
5 8 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Leslie & King-Farlow
4 6 3H= E -140 7.2 86.8 Friedman & Friedman Herbert & Herbert
3 4 2S= E -110 12.3 81.7 Freedman & Freedman Edmonds & Stimson
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Bainham & Smallwood Ericson & Wills
1 13 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Fontes & Fontes Bingham & Osmer
13 11 4H+1 N 650 51.1 42.9 Gritt & Gritt Jackson & Gordon
12 9 5C+1 N 620 21.5 72.5 Heath & Heath Keith & Jerrard
11 7 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Gradus & Glanville Smart & Lunn
10 5 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Charteris & Horlock McCready & Dyer
9 3 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Dean & Dean Rumbelow & Anning
8 1 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Sitch & Wing Carlisle & Marsh
7 12 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Foley & Foley Hoffman & Harper
6 10 5C+1 N 620 21.5 72.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Pigott & Heilbron
5 8 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Huikeshoven & Bell Leslie & King-Farlow
4 6 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Friedman & Friedman Herbert & Herbert
3 4 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Freedman & Freedman Edmonds & Stimson
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Freedman & Freedman Rumbelow & Anning
2 1 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Bainham & Smallwood Carlisle & Marsh
1 12 2D+1 S 110 68.4 25.6 Fontes & Fontes Hoffman & Harper
13 10 1NT-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Gritt & Gritt Pigott & Heilbron
12 8 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Leslie & King-Farlow
11 6 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Gradus & Glanville Herbert & Herbert
10 4 4D-1 S -100 48 46 Charteris & Horlock Edmonds & Stimson
9 2 4S-3 S -300 3.1 90.9 Dean & Dean Ericson & Wills
8 13 1NT-1 N -100 48 46 Sitch & Wing Bingham & Osmer
7 11 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Foley & Foley Jackson & Gordon
6 9 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Keith & Jerrard
5 7 2C+2 W -130 25.6 68.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Smart & Lunn
4 5 5D-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Friedman & Friedman McCready & Dyer
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT= E -90 49 45 Freedman & Freedman Rumbelow & Anning
2 1 2S= E -110 24.5 69.5 Bainham & Smallwood Carlisle & Marsh
1 12 1NT= E -90 49 45 Fontes & Fontes Hoffman & Harper
13 10 1NT-3 E 300 94 0 Gritt & Gritt Pigott & Heilbron
12 8 2S= E -110 24.5 69.5 Heath & Heath Leslie & King-Farlow
11 6 1NT= E -90 49 45 Gradus & Glanville Herbert & Herbert
10 4 1NT= E -90 49 45 Charteris & Horlock Edmonds & Stimson
9 2 2S-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Dean & Dean Ericson & Wills
8 13 1NT= E -90 49 45 Sitch & Wing Bingham & Osmer
7 11 2NT-1 S -50 70.5 23.5 Foley & Foley Jackson & Gordon
6 9 2H+2 N 170 89.9 4.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Keith & Jerrard
5 7 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Huikeshoven & Bell Smart & Lunn
4 5 1NT= E -90 49 45 Friedman & Friedman McCready & Dyer
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2NT-3 N -300 0 94 Friedman & Friedman Edmonds & Stimson
3 2 2Sx-2 W 500 86.8 7.2 Freedman & Freedman Ericson & Wills
2 13 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Bainham & Smallwood Bingham & Osmer
1 11 3Cx-4 W 1100 94 0 Fontes & Fontes Jackson & Gordon
13 9 2H= N 110 41.9 52.1 Gritt & Gritt Keith & Jerrard
12 7 2NT+1 N 150 75.6 18.4 Heath & Heath Smart & Lunn
11 5 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Gradus & Glanville McCready & Dyer
10 3 2NT-2 N -200 3.1 90.9 Charteris & Horlock Rumbelow & Anning
9 1 3H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Dean & Dean Carlisle & Marsh
8 12 2NT-2 N -200 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Hoffman & Harper
7 10 2NT-1 N -100 15.3 78.7 Foley & Foley Pigott & Heilbron
6 8 2NT-1 N -100 15.3 78.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Leslie & King-Farlow
5 6 2NT= N 120 56.2 37.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Herbert & Herbert
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Friedman & Friedman Edmonds & Stimson
3 2 4D= E -130 18.4 75.6 Freedman & Freedman Ericson & Wills
2 13 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Bainham & Smallwood Bingham & Osmer
1 11 1NT+3 E -180 8.2 85.8 Fontes & Fontes Jackson & Gordon
13 9 2S-2 E 100 93 1 Gritt & Gritt Keith & Jerrard
12 7 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Heath & Heath Smart & Lunn
11 5 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Gradus & Glanville McCready & Dyer
10 3 3NT+2 W -460 1 93 Charteris & Horlock Rumbelow & Anning
9 1 3NT+1 W -430 4.1 89.9 Dean & Dean Carlisle & Marsh
8 12 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Sitch & Wing Hoffman & Harper
7 10 2NT= E -120 35.8 58.2 Foley & Foley Pigott & Heilbron
6 8 2Hx-2 S -300 6.1 87.9 Breslaw & Breslaw Leslie & King-Farlow
5 6 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Huikeshoven & Bell Herbert & Herbert
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Huikeshoven & Bell McCready & Dyer
4 3 4D+1 N 150 24.5 69.5 Friedman & Friedman Rumbelow & Anning
3 1 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Freedman & Freedman Carlisle & Marsh
2 12 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Bainham & Smallwood Hoffman & Harper
1 10 3NT+2 S 460 79.7 14.3 Fontes & Fontes Pigott & Heilbron
13 8 6H-3 N -150 0 94 Gritt & Gritt Leslie & King-Farlow
12 6 3NT+2 N 460 79.7 14.3 Heath & Heath Herbert & Herbert
11 4 3NT+1 S 430 59.3 34.7 Gradus & Glanville Edmonds & Stimson
10 2 6NT-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Charteris & Horlock Ericson & Wills
9 13 5D-1 S -50 13.3 80.7 Dean & Dean Bingham & Osmer
8 11 6NT-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Sitch & Wing Jackson & Gordon
7 9 6D-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Foley & Foley Keith & Jerrard
6 7 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Smart & Lunn
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4C-4 W 400 67.4 26.6 Huikeshoven & Bell McCready & Dyer
4 3 3D+1 N 130 25.6 68.4 Friedman & Friedman Rumbelow & Anning
3 1 2D+2 N 130 25.6 68.4 Freedman & Freedman Carlisle & Marsh
2 12 2S+1 N 140 31.7 62.3 Bainham & Smallwood Hoffman & Harper
1 10 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Fontes & Fontes Pigott & Heilbron
13 8 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Gritt & Gritt Leslie & King-Farlow
12 6 5Cx-6 W 1700 94 0 Heath & Heath Herbert & Herbert
11 4 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Gradus & Glanville Edmonds & Stimson
10 2 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Charteris & Horlock Ericson & Wills
9 13 1NT= W -90 5.1 88.9 Dean & Dean Bingham & Osmer
8 11 1NT-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Sitch & Wing Jackson & Gordon
7 9 3S+1 S 170 48 46 Foley & Foley Keith & Jerrard
6 7 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Breslaw & Breslaw Smart & Lunn
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Breslaw & Breslaw Herbert & Herbert
5 4 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Edmonds & Stimson
4 2 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Friedman & Friedman Ericson & Wills
3 13 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Freedman & Freedman Bingham & Osmer
2 11 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Bainham & Smallwood Jackson & Gordon
1 9 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Fontes & Fontes Keith & Jerrard
13 7 4S+1 N 450 16.4 77.6 Gritt & Gritt Smart & Lunn
12 5 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Heath & Heath McCready & Dyer
11 3 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Gradus & Glanville Rumbelow & Anning
10 1 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Charteris & Horlock Carlisle & Marsh
9 12 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Dean & Dean Hoffman & Harper
8 10 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Sitch & Wing Pigott & Heilbron
7 8 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Foley & Foley Leslie & King-Farlow
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Herbert & Herbert
5 4 3S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Edmonds & Stimson
4 2 3Hx-1 N -200 17.4 76.6 Friedman & Friedman Ericson & Wills
3 13 4S-3 E 150 94 0 Freedman & Freedman Bingham & Osmer
2 11 3S+1 E -170 23.5 70.5 Bainham & Smallwood Jackson & Gordon
1 9 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Fontes & Fontes Keith & Jerrard
13 7 1NT+1 N 120 91.9 2.1 Gritt & Gritt Smart & Lunn
12 5 2S+1 E -140 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath McCready & Dyer
11 3 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Gradus & Glanville Rumbelow & Anning
10 1 3S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Charteris & Horlock Carlisle & Marsh
9 12 4S-2 E 100 85.8 8.2 Dean & Dean Hoffman & Harper
8 10 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Sitch & Wing Pigott & Heilbron
7 8 2H-1 N -100 45 49 Foley & Foley Leslie & King-Farlow
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Foley & Foley Smart & Lunn
6 5 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Breslaw & Breslaw McCready & Dyer
5 3 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Rumbelow & Anning
4 1 2H= N 110 51.1 42.9 Friedman & Friedman Carlisle & Marsh
3 12 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Freedman & Freedman Hoffman & Harper
2 10 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Bainham & Smallwood Pigott & Heilbron
1 8 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Fontes & Fontes Leslie & King-Farlow
13 6 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Gritt & Gritt Herbert & Herbert
12 4 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath Edmonds & Stimson
11 2 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Gradus & Glanville Ericson & Wills
10 13 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Charteris & Horlock Bingham & Osmer
9 11 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Dean & Dean Jackson & Gordon
8 9 3NT+1 N 630 90.9 3.1 Sitch & Wing Keith & Jerrard
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Foley & Foley Smart & Lunn
6 5 3NT-1 S -50 17.4 76.6 Breslaw & Breslaw McCready & Dyer
5 3 4Sx-7 E 1700 94 0 Huikeshoven & Bell Rumbelow & Anning
4 1 4H-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Friedman & Friedman Carlisle & Marsh
3 12 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Freedman & Freedman Hoffman & Harper
2 10 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Bainham & Smallwood Pigott & Heilbron
1 8 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Fontes & Fontes Leslie & King-Farlow
13 6 4S-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Gritt & Gritt Herbert & Herbert
12 4 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Heath & Heath Edmonds & Stimson
11 2 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Gradus & Glanville Ericson & Wills
10 13 4H-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Charteris & Horlock Bingham & Osmer
9 11 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Dean & Dean Jackson & Gordon
8 9 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Sitch & Wing Keith & Jerrard
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 4S= N 620 91.9 2.1 Sitch & Wing Leslie & King-Farlow
7 6 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Foley & Foley Herbert & Herbert
6 4 4D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Edmonds & Stimson
5 2 2S+2 N 170 68.4 25.6 Huikeshoven & Bell Ericson & Wills
4 13 5D-2 W 100 32.7 61.3 Friedman & Friedman Bingham & Osmer
3 11 3H-2 S -200 5.1 88.9 Freedman & Freedman Jackson & Gordon
2 9 5D-2 W 100 32.7 61.3 Bainham & Smallwood Keith & Jerrard
1 7 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Fontes & Fontes Smart & Lunn
13 5 4S= N 620 91.9 2.1 Gritt & Gritt McCready & Dyer
12 3 3S-1 N -100 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Rumbelow & Anning
11 1 2D+1 W -110 13.3 80.7 Gradus & Glanville Carlisle & Marsh
10 12 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Charteris & Horlock Hoffman & Harper
9 10 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Dean & Dean Pigott & Heilbron
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S-2 S -100 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Leslie & King-Farlow
7 6 4C= S 130 62.3 31.7 Foley & Foley Herbert & Herbert
6 4 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Breslaw & Breslaw Edmonds & Stimson
5 2 2S= S 110 43.9 50.1 Huikeshoven & Bell Ericson & Wills
4 13 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Friedman & Friedman Bingham & Osmer
3 11 3C= S 110 43.9 50.1 Freedman & Freedman Jackson & Gordon
2 9 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Bainham & Smallwood Keith & Jerrard
1 7 3C+1 N 130 62.3 31.7 Fontes & Fontes Smart & Lunn
13 5 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Gritt & Gritt McCready & Dyer
12 3 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Heath & Heath Rumbelow & Anning
11 1 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Gradus & Glanville Carlisle & Marsh
10 12 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Charteris & Horlock Hoffman & Harper
9 10 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Dean & Dean Pigott & Heilbron
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT+2 S 460 88.9 5.1 Dean & Dean Keith & Jerrard
8 7 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Sitch & Wing Smart & Lunn
7 5 3NT+1 S 430 67.4 26.6 Foley & Foley McCready & Dyer
6 3 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Breslaw & Breslaw Rumbelow & Anning
5 1 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Carlisle & Marsh
4 12 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Friedman & Friedman Hoffman & Harper
3 10 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Freedman & Freedman Pigott & Heilbron
2 8 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Bainham & Smallwood Leslie & King-Farlow
1 6 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Fontes & Fontes Herbert & Herbert
13 4 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Gritt & Gritt Edmonds & Stimson
12 2 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Heath & Heath Ericson & Wills
11 13 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Gradus & Glanville Bingham & Osmer
10 11 3NT-1 S -50 7.2 86.8 Charteris & Horlock Jackson & Gordon
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Dean & Dean Keith & Jerrard
8 7 4H+1 E -450 16.4 77.6 Sitch & Wing Smart & Lunn
7 5 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Foley & Foley McCready & Dyer
6 3 3H= E -140 91.9 2.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Rumbelow & Anning
5 1 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Carlisle & Marsh
4 12 4H= W -420 53.1 40.9 Friedman & Friedman Hoffman & Harper
3 10 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Freedman & Freedman Pigott & Heilbron
2 8 4H+1 E -450 16.4 77.6 Bainham & Smallwood Leslie & King-Farlow
1 6 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Fontes & Fontes Herbert & Herbert
13 4 4Hx= E -590 7.2 86.8 Gritt & Gritt Edmonds & Stimson
12 2 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Heath & Heath Ericson & Wills
11 13 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Gradus & Glanville Bingham & Osmer
10 11 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Charteris & Horlock Jackson & Gordon
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 3S+1 W -170 16.4 77.6 Charteris & Horlock Pigott & Heilbron
9 8 3H= E -140 45 49 Dean & Dean Leslie & King-Farlow
8 6 3H= E -140 45 49 Sitch & Wing Herbert & Herbert
7 4 3H= E -140 45 49 Foley & Foley Edmonds & Stimson
6 2 3H= E -140 45 49 Breslaw & Breslaw Ericson & Wills
5 13 3H= E -140 45 49 Huikeshoven & Bell Bingham & Osmer
4 11 3S= W -140 45 49 Friedman & Friedman Jackson & Gordon
3 9 3H= E -140 45 49 Freedman & Freedman Keith & Jerrard
2 7 5D-2 N -100 72.5 21.5 Bainham & Smallwood Smart & Lunn
1 5 3H= E -140 45 49 Fontes & Fontes McCready & Dyer
13 3 3H= E -140 45 49 Gritt & Gritt Rumbelow & Anning
12 1 3S+2 E -200 12.3 81.7 Heath & Heath Carlisle & Marsh
11 12 3H= E -140 45 49 Gradus & Glanville Hoffman & Harper
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Charteris & Horlock Pigott & Heilbron
9 8 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Dean & Dean Leslie & King-Farlow
8 6 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Sitch & Wing Herbert & Herbert
7 4 5H= W -650 71.5 22.5 Foley & Foley Edmonds & Stimson
6 2 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Ericson & Wills
5 13 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Huikeshoven & Bell Bingham & Osmer
4 11 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Friedman & Friedman Jackson & Gordon
3 9 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Freedman & Freedman Keith & Jerrard
2 7 5Cx-4 S -1100 12.3 81.7 Bainham & Smallwood Smart & Lunn
1 5 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Fontes & Fontes McCready & Dyer
13 3 5Cx-4 N -1100 12.3 81.7 Gritt & Gritt Rumbelow & Anning
12 1 5Cx-4 S -1100 12.3 81.7 Heath & Heath Carlisle & Marsh
11 12 5H= W -650 71.5 22.5 Gradus & Glanville Hoffman & Harper
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Gradus & Glanville Jackson & Gordon
10 9 5H+1 E -480 37.8 56.2 Charteris & Horlock Keith & Jerrard
9 7 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Dean & Dean Smart & Lunn
8 5 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Sitch & Wing McCready & Dyer
7 3 4H= E -420 90.9 3.1 Foley & Foley Rumbelow & Anning
6 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Breslaw & Breslaw Carlisle & Marsh
5 12 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Huikeshoven & Bell Hoffman & Harper
4 10 4H= W -420 90.9 3.1 Friedman & Friedman Pigott & Heilbron
3 8 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Freedman & Freedman Leslie & King-Farlow
2 6 3S-1 N -100 94 0 Bainham & Smallwood Herbert & Herbert
1 4 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Fontes & Fontes Edmonds & Stimson
13 2 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Gritt & Gritt Ericson & Wills
12 13 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Heath & Heath Bingham & Osmer
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Gradus & Glanville Jackson & Gordon
10 9 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Charteris & Horlock Keith & Jerrard
9 7 2D+1 W -110 56.2 37.8 Dean & Dean Smart & Lunn
8 5 2H-2 N -100 62.3 31.7 Sitch & Wing McCready & Dyer
7 3 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Foley & Foley Rumbelow & Anning
6 1 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Breslaw & Breslaw Carlisle & Marsh
5 12 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Hoffman & Harper
4 10 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Friedman & Friedman Pigott & Heilbron
3 8 4S-1 W 100 76.6 17.4 Freedman & Freedman Leslie & King-Farlow
2 6 2S+2 W -170 18.4 75.6 Bainham & Smallwood Herbert & Herbert
1 4 2NT= E -120 48.6 45.4 Fontes & Fontes Edmonds & Stimson
13 2 2Hx-1 N -100 62.3 31.7 Gritt & Gritt Ericson & Wills
12 13 3H-3 S -150 25.1 68.9 Heath & Heath Bingham & Osmer
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Hoffman & Harper
11 10 3NT-1 W 100 91.9 2.1 Gradus & Glanville Pigott & Heilbron
10 8 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Charteris & Horlock Leslie & King-Farlow
9 6 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Dean & Dean Herbert & Herbert
8 4 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Sitch & Wing Edmonds & Stimson
7 2 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Foley & Foley Ericson & Wills
6 13 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Breslaw & Breslaw Bingham & Osmer
5 11 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Huikeshoven & Bell Jackson & Gordon
4 9 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Friedman & Friedman Keith & Jerrard
3 7 3NT+2 E -660 10.2 83.8 Freedman & Freedman Smart & Lunn
2 5 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Bainham & Smallwood McCready & Dyer
1 3 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Fontes & Fontes Rumbelow & Anning
13 1 3NT+1 E -630 33.7 60.3 Gritt & Gritt Carlisle & Marsh
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 4S= E -420 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Hoffman & Harper
11 10 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Gradus & Glanville Pigott & Heilbron
10 8 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Charteris & Horlock Leslie & King-Farlow
9 6 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Dean & Dean Herbert & Herbert
8 4 4H-2 N -100 54.1 39.9 Sitch & Wing Edmonds & Stimson
7 2 3H= S 140 94 0 Foley & Foley Ericson & Wills
6 13 5H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Bingham & Osmer
5 11 4S-1 W 50 82.7 11.3 Huikeshoven & Bell Jackson & Gordon
4 9 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Friedman & Friedman Keith & Jerrard
3 7 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Freedman & Freedman Smart & Lunn
2 5 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Bainham & Smallwood McCready & Dyer
1 3 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Fontes & Fontes Rumbelow & Anning
13 1 3Sx+1 E -630 0 94 Gritt & Gritt Carlisle & Marsh
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S= N 110 32 62 Gritt & Gritt Bingham & Osmer
12 11 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Heath & Heath Jackson & Gordon
11 9 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Gradus & Glanville Keith & Jerrard
10 7 4S-2 N -100 3 91 Charteris & Horlock Smart & Lunn
9 5 2S= N 110 32 62 Dean & Dean McCready & Dyer
8 3 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Sitch & Wing Rumbelow & Anning
7 1 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Foley & Foley Carlisle & Marsh
6 12 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Breslaw & Breslaw Hoffman & Harper
5 10 3S= N 140 66 28 Huikeshoven & Bell Pigott & Heilbron
4 8 2H-2 N -100 3 91 Friedman & Friedman Leslie & King-Farlow
3 6 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Freedman & Freedman Herbert & Herbert
2 4 2S-1 N -50 14 80 Bainham & Smallwood Edmonds & Stimson
1 2 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Fontes & Fontes Ericson & Wills
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 3D+2 N 150 58 36 Gritt & Gritt Bingham & Osmer
12 11 5C= W -600 2 92 Heath & Heath Jackson & Gordon
11 9 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Gradus & Glanville Keith & Jerrard
10 7 4H-1 E 100 43 51 Charteris & Horlock Smart & Lunn
9 5 4H-1 W 100 43 51 Dean & Dean McCready & Dyer
8 3 3NT+1 W -630 0 94 Sitch & Wing Rumbelow & Anning
7 1 5H-3 E 300 75 19 Foley & Foley Carlisle & Marsh
6 12 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Breslaw & Breslaw Hoffman & Harper
5 10 4H-2 E 200 65 29 Huikeshoven & Bell Pigott & Heilbron
4 8 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Friedman & Friedman Leslie & King-Farlow
3 6 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Freedman & Freedman Herbert & Herbert
2 4 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Bainham & Smallwood Edmonds & Stimson
1 2 3D+1 N 130 55 39 Fontes & Fontes Ericson & Wills
Session 1 Section White Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Jacobs & Fisher Whiteway & Thornton
14 13 4H= W -420 8.2 85.8 Dias & Hair Dickson & Hill
13 11 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Curtis & Kitchin Cavell & Dean
12 9 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Fess & Landau Bolton & Leach
11 7 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Knights & Dunn Samuels & Sexton
10 5 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Evans & Blackman Stanford & Franklin
9 3 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Lucy & Cooke Tompson & Clare
8 14 3NT+3 W -490 0 94 Parnham & Smith Eddleston & Eddleston
7 12 3H= W -140 67.4 26.6 Fleming & Fleming Farndon & Bond
6 10 3Sx-1 S -100 73.6 20.4 Bentley & Bentley Jeffery & Shilling
5 8 4H-1 E 50 85.8 8.2 Peers & Peers Stanton & Elgin
4 6 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Mascall & Denny Tomkin & Tomkin
3 4 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Moss & Crawford Taylor & Carter
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Jacobs & Fisher Whiteway & Thornton
14 13 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Dias & Hair Dickson & Hill
13 11 1NT-2 E 100 3.1 90.9 Curtis & Kitchin Cavell & Dean
12 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Fess & Landau Bolton & Leach
11 7 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Knights & Dunn Samuels & Sexton
10 5 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Evans & Blackman Stanford & Franklin
9 3 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Lucy & Cooke Tompson & Clare
8 14 3NT= N 600 91.9 2.1 Parnham & Smith Eddleston & Eddleston
7 12 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Fleming & Fleming Farndon & Bond
6 10 3C-3 W 150 59.3 34.7 Bentley & Bentley Jeffery & Shilling
5 8 2Dx+2 N 580 89.9 4.1 Peers & Peers Stanton & Elgin
4 6 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Mascall & Denny Tomkin & Tomkin
3 4 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Moss & Crawford Taylor & Carter
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3H= W -140 7.2 86.8 Serby & Moore Leighton & Dennsion
1 14 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Jacobs & Fisher Eddleston & Eddleston
14 12 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Dias & Hair Farndon & Bond
13 10 2S-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Curtis & Kitchin Jeffery & Shilling
12 8 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Fess & Landau Stanton & Elgin
11 6 2NT-1 N -50 26.6 67.4 Knights & Dunn Tomkin & Tomkin
10 4 2D= S 90 45 49 Evans & Blackman Taylor & Carter
9 1 3D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Lucy & Cooke Whiteway & Thornton
8 13 3H= E -140 7.2 86.8 Parnham & Smith Dickson & Hill
7 11 3H= W -140 7.2 86.8 Fleming & Fleming Cavell & Dean
6 9 2NT+1 S 150 86.8 7.2 Bentley & Bentley Bolton & Leach
5 7 4H= W -620 0 94 Peers & Peers Samuels & Sexton
4 5 2NT-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Mascall & Denny Stanford & Franklin
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Serby & Moore Leighton & Dennsion
1 14 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Jacobs & Fisher Eddleston & Eddleston
14 12 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Dias & Hair Farndon & Bond
13 10 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Curtis & Kitchin Jeffery & Shilling
12 8 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Fess & Landau Stanton & Elgin
11 6 5C= N 600 12.3 81.7 Knights & Dunn Tomkin & Tomkin
10 4 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Evans & Blackman Taylor & Carter
9 1 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Lucy & Cooke Whiteway & Thornton
8 13 4H= S 620 21.5 72.5 Parnham & Smith Dickson & Hill
7 11 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Fleming & Fleming Cavell & Dean
6 9 4S-3 E 300 6.1 87.9 Bentley & Bentley Bolton & Leach
5 7 6H-1 S -100 0 94 Peers & Peers Samuels & Sexton
4 5 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Mascall & Denny Stanford & Franklin
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT-1 S -100 48 46 Moss & Crawford Tompson & Clare
2 1 4D-1 N -100 48 46 Serby & Moore Whiteway & Thornton
1 13 4D-1 N -100 48 46 Jacobs & Fisher Dickson & Hill
14 11 4D= S 130 85.8 8.2 Dias & Hair Cavell & Dean
13 9 3D= S 110 68.4 25.6 Curtis & Kitchin Bolton & Leach
12 7 4S-3 N -300 3.1 90.9 Fess & Landau Samuels & Sexton
11 5 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Knights & Dunn Stanford & Franklin
10 2 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Evans & Blackman Leighton & Dennsion
9 14 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Lucy & Cooke Eddleston & Eddleston
8 12 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Parnham & Smith Farndon & Bond
7 10 3D+1 S 130 85.8 8.2 Fleming & Fleming Jeffery & Shilling
6 8 3D+2 S 150 94 0 Bentley & Bentley Stanton & Elgin
5 6 4D= S 130 85.8 8.2 Peers & Peers Tomkin & Tomkin
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Moss & Crawford Tompson & Clare
2 1 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Serby & Moore Whiteway & Thornton
1 13 1NT= E -90 49 45 Jacobs & Fisher Dickson & Hill
14 11 1S+1 E -110 24.5 69.5 Dias & Hair Cavell & Dean
13 9 1NT= E -90 49 45 Curtis & Kitchin Bolton & Leach
12 7 2S-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Fess & Landau Samuels & Sexton
11 5 1NT= E -90 49 45 Knights & Dunn Stanford & Franklin
10 2 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Evans & Blackman Leighton & Dennsion
9 14 2H-1 S -50 70.5 23.5 Lucy & Cooke Eddleston & Eddleston
8 12 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Parnham & Smith Farndon & Bond
7 10 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Fleming & Fleming Jeffery & Shilling
6 8 1NT= E -90 49 45 Bentley & Bentley Stanton & Elgin
5 6 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Peers & Peers Tomkin & Tomkin
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2S-1 E 100 27.6 66.4 Mascall & Denny Taylor & Carter
3 2 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Moss & Crawford Leighton & Dennsion
2 14 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Serby & Moore Eddleston & Eddleston
1 12 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Jacobs & Fisher Farndon & Bond
14 10 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Dias & Hair Jeffery & Shilling
13 8 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Curtis & Kitchin Stanton & Elgin
12 6 2NT= N 120 56.2 37.8 Fess & Landau Tomkin & Tomkin
11 3 2Hx= S 670 89.9 4.1 Knights & Dunn Tompson & Clare
10 1 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Evans & Blackman Whiteway & Thornton
9 13 3C-4 W 400 83.8 10.2 Lucy & Cooke Dickson & Hill
8 11 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Parnham & Smith Cavell & Dean
7 9 3C-5 W 500 86.8 7.2 Fleming & Fleming Bolton & Leach
6 7 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Bentley & Bentley Samuels & Sexton
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Mascall & Denny Taylor & Carter
3 2 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Moss & Crawford Leighton & Dennsion
2 14 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Serby & Moore Eddleston & Eddleston
1 12 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Jacobs & Fisher Farndon & Bond
14 10 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Dias & Hair Jeffery & Shilling
13 8 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Curtis & Kitchin Stanton & Elgin
12 6 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Fess & Landau Tomkin & Tomkin
11 3 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Knights & Dunn Tompson & Clare
10 1 3C+1 E -130 18.4 75.6 Evans & Blackman Whiteway & Thornton
9 13 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Lucy & Cooke Dickson & Hill
8 11 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Parnham & Smith Cavell & Dean
7 9 2C+1 E -110 45 49 Fleming & Fleming Bolton & Leach
6 7 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Bentley & Bentley Samuels & Sexton
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Peers & Peers Stanford & Franklin
4 3 4H= S 420 42.9 51.1 Mascall & Denny Tompson & Clare
3 1 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Moss & Crawford Whiteway & Thornton
2 13 3NT+2 S 460 79.7 14.3 Serby & Moore Dickson & Hill
1 11 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Jacobs & Fisher Cavell & Dean
14 9 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Dias & Hair Bolton & Leach
13 7 3D+1 N 130 20.4 73.6 Curtis & Kitchin Samuels & Sexton
12 4 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Fess & Landau Taylor & Carter
11 2 3NT+2 N 460 79.7 14.3 Knights & Dunn Leighton & Dennsion
10 14 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Evans & Blackman Eddleston & Eddleston
9 12 3NT+4 N 520 94 0 Lucy & Cooke Farndon & Bond
8 10 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Parnham & Smith Jeffery & Shilling
7 8 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Fleming & Fleming Stanton & Elgin
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Peers & Peers Stanford & Franklin
4 3 3C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Mascall & Denny Tompson & Clare
3 1 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Moss & Crawford Whiteway & Thornton
2 13 3S+2 N 200 63.3 30.7 Serby & Moore Dickson & Hill
1 11 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Jacobs & Fisher Cavell & Dean
14 9 3C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Dias & Hair Bolton & Leach
13 7 2S+2 N 170 48 46 Curtis & Kitchin Samuels & Sexton
12 4 2C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Fess & Landau Taylor & Carter
11 2 3C-1 W 100 14.3 79.7 Knights & Dunn Leighton & Dennsion
10 14 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Evans & Blackman Eddleston & Eddleston
9 12 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Lucy & Cooke Farndon & Bond
8 10 2NT-1 E 100 14.3 79.7 Parnham & Smith Jeffery & Shilling
7 8 4S= S 620 79.7 14.3 Fleming & Fleming Stanton & Elgin
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Bentley & Bentley Tomkin & Tomkin
5 4 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Peers & Peers Taylor & Carter
4 2 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Mascall & Denny Leighton & Dennsion
3 14 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Moss & Crawford Eddleston & Eddleston
2 12 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Serby & Moore Farndon & Bond
1 10 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Jacobs & Fisher Jeffery & Shilling
14 8 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Dias & Hair Stanton & Elgin
13 5 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Curtis & Kitchin Stanford & Franklin
12 3 4S+2 N 480 53.1 40.9 Fess & Landau Tompson & Clare
11 1 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Knights & Dunn Whiteway & Thornton
10 13 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Evans & Blackman Dickson & Hill
9 11 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Lucy & Cooke Cavell & Dean
8 9 6S-1 S -50 0 94 Parnham & Smith Bolton & Leach
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 2S+2 E -170 23.5 70.5 Bentley & Bentley Tomkin & Tomkin
5 4 2S= E -110 40.9 53.1 Peers & Peers Taylor & Carter
4 2 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Mascall & Denny Leighton & Dennsion
3 14 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Moss & Crawford Eddleston & Eddleston
2 12 3NT-2 E 100 85.8 8.2 Serby & Moore Farndon & Bond
1 10 2D+1 W -110 40.9 53.1 Jacobs & Fisher Jeffery & Shilling
14 8 4Sx-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Dias & Hair Stanton & Elgin
13 5 3NT-2 W 100 85.8 8.2 Curtis & Kitchin Stanford & Franklin
12 3 2S+1 E -140 32.7 61.3 Fess & Landau Tompson & Clare
11 1 3S= E -140 32.7 61.3 Knights & Dunn Whiteway & Thornton
10 13 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Evans & Blackman Dickson & Hill
9 11 2S+2 E -170 23.5 70.5 Lucy & Cooke Cavell & Dean
8 9 2S= E -110 40.9 53.1 Parnham & Smith Bolton & Leach
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Fleming & Fleming Samuels & Sexton
6 5 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Bentley & Bentley Stanford & Franklin
5 3 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Peers & Peers Tompson & Clare
4 1 1NT+1 N 120 54.1 39.9 Mascall & Denny Whiteway & Thornton
3 13 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Moss & Crawford Dickson & Hill
2 11 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Serby & Moore Cavell & Dean
1 9 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Jacobs & Fisher Bolton & Leach
14 6 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Dias & Hair Tomkin & Tomkin
13 4 3NT+1 N 630 90.9 3.1 Curtis & Kitchin Taylor & Carter
12 2 2NT= N 120 54.1 39.9 Fess & Landau Leighton & Dennsion
11 14 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Knights & Dunn Eddleston & Eddleston
10 12 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Evans & Blackman Farndon & Bond
9 10 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Lucy & Cooke Jeffery & Shilling
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Fleming & Fleming Samuels & Sexton
6 5 4S-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Bentley & Bentley Stanford & Franklin
5 3 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Peers & Peers Tompson & Clare
4 1 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Mascall & Denny Whiteway & Thornton
3 13 4S-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Moss & Crawford Dickson & Hill
2 11 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Serby & Moore Cavell & Dean
1 9 3NT= N 400 33.7 60.3 Jacobs & Fisher Bolton & Leach
14 6 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Dias & Hair Tomkin & Tomkin
13 4 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Curtis & Kitchin Taylor & Carter
12 2 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Fess & Landau Leighton & Dennsion
11 14 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Knights & Dunn Eddleston & Eddleston
10 12 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Evans & Blackman Farndon & Bond
9 10 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Lucy & Cooke Jeffery & Shilling
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3D= W -110 13.3 80.7 Parnham & Smith Stanton & Elgin
7 6 4D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Fleming & Fleming Tomkin & Tomkin
6 4 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Bentley & Bentley Taylor & Carter
5 2 3D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Peers & Peers Leighton & Dennsion
4 14 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Mascall & Denny Eddleston & Eddleston
3 12 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Moss & Crawford Farndon & Bond
2 10 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Serby & Moore Jeffery & Shilling
1 7 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Jacobs & Fisher Samuels & Sexton
14 5 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
13 3 4D-1 W 50 23.5 70.5 Curtis & Kitchin Tompson & Clare
12 1 3H-2 N -200 5.1 88.9 Fess & Landau Whiteway & Thornton
11 13 2NT= E -120 10.2 83.8 Knights & Dunn Dickson & Hill
10 11 4S= S 620 91.9 2.1 Evans & Blackman Cavell & Dean
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Parnham & Smith Stanton & Elgin
7 6 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Fleming & Fleming Tomkin & Tomkin
6 4 3NT-2 S -100 3.1 90.9 Bentley & Bentley Taylor & Carter
5 2 2S= S 110 43.9 50.1 Peers & Peers Leighton & Dennsion
4 14 3C= S 110 43.9 50.1 Mascall & Denny Eddleston & Eddleston
3 12 3C+1 S 130 62.3 31.7 Moss & Crawford Farndon & Bond
2 10 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Serby & Moore Jeffery & Shilling
1 7 2S-3 E 300 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Samuels & Sexton
14 5 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Dias & Hair Stanford & Franklin
13 3 2NT= N 120 53.1 40.9 Curtis & Kitchin Tompson & Clare
12 1 3D-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Fess & Landau Whiteway & Thornton
11 13 1NT+3 N 180 69.5 24.5 Knights & Dunn Dickson & Hill
10 11 2S-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Evans & Blackman Cavell & Dean
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Lucy & Cooke Bolton & Leach
8 7 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Parnham & Smith Samuels & Sexton
7 5 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Fleming & Fleming Stanford & Franklin
6 3 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Bentley & Bentley Tompson & Clare
5 1 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Peers & Peers Whiteway & Thornton
4 13 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Mascall & Denny Dickson & Hill
3 11 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Moss & Crawford Cavell & Dean
2 8 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Serby & Moore Stanton & Elgin
1 6 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Jacobs & Fisher Tomkin & Tomkin
14 4 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Dias & Hair Taylor & Carter
13 2 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Curtis & Kitchin Leighton & Dennsion
12 14 3NT-1 N -50 7.2 86.8 Fess & Landau Eddleston & Eddleston
11 12 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Knights & Dunn Farndon & Bond
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Lucy & Cooke Bolton & Leach
8 7 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Parnham & Smith Samuels & Sexton
7 5 3NT+2 E -460 12.3 81.7 Fleming & Fleming Stanford & Franklin
6 3 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Bentley & Bentley Tompson & Clare
5 1 6Hx-2 E 300 94 0 Peers & Peers Whiteway & Thornton
4 13 4Hx= W -590 7.2 86.8 Mascall & Denny Dickson & Hill
3 11 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Moss & Crawford Cavell & Dean
2 8 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Serby & Moore Stanton & Elgin
1 6 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Jacobs & Fisher Tomkin & Tomkin
14 4 4Sx-4 N -1100 0 94 Dias & Hair Taylor & Carter
13 2 3NT= E -400 87.9 6.1 Curtis & Kitchin Leighton & Dennsion
12 14 4Hx= E -590 7.2 86.8 Fess & Landau Eddleston & Eddleston
11 12 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Knights & Dunn Farndon & Bond
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Evans & Blackman Jeffery & Shilling
9 8 4S-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Lucy & Cooke Stanton & Elgin
8 6 3H= E -140 45 49 Parnham & Smith Tomkin & Tomkin
7 4 3H+1 E -170 16.4 77.6 Fleming & Fleming Taylor & Carter
6 2 3S= W -140 45 49 Bentley & Bentley Leighton & Dennsion
5 14 3H= E -140 45 49 Peers & Peers Eddleston & Eddleston
4 12 5C-2 N -100 72.5 21.5 Mascall & Denny Farndon & Bond
3 9 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Moss & Crawford Bolton & Leach
2 7 4S-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Serby & Moore Samuels & Sexton
1 5 3S= W -140 45 49 Jacobs & Fisher Stanford & Franklin
14 3 5Cx-2 N -300 10.2 83.8 Dias & Hair Tompson & Clare
13 1 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Curtis & Kitchin Whiteway & Thornton
12 13 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Fess & Landau Dickson & Hill
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Evans & Blackman Jeffery & Shilling
9 8 5Sx-5 S -1400 4.1 89.9 Lucy & Cooke Stanton & Elgin
8 6 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Parnham & Smith Tomkin & Tomkin
7 4 5H= W -650 71.5 22.5 Fleming & Fleming Taylor & Carter
6 2 5Cx-5 S -1400 4.1 89.9 Bentley & Bentley Leighton & Dennsion
5 14 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Peers & Peers Eddleston & Eddleston
4 12 5Cx-5 S -1400 4.1 89.9 Mascall & Denny Farndon & Bond
3 9 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Moss & Crawford Bolton & Leach
2 7 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Serby & Moore Samuels & Sexton
1 5 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Stanford & Franklin
14 3 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Dias & Hair Tompson & Clare
13 1 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Curtis & Kitchin Whiteway & Thornton
12 13 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Fess & Landau Dickson & Hill
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 6D+1 W -940 3.1 90.9 Knights & Dunn Cavell & Dean
10 9 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Evans & Blackman Bolton & Leach
9 7 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Lucy & Cooke Samuels & Sexton
8 5 6D= W -920 6.1 87.9 Parnham & Smith Stanford & Franklin
7 3 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Fleming & Fleming Tompson & Clare
6 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Bentley & Bentley Whiteway & Thornton
5 13 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Peers & Peers Dickson & Hill
4 10 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Mascall & Denny Jeffery & Shilling
3 8 6D+1 W -940 3.1 90.9 Moss & Crawford Stanton & Elgin
2 6 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Serby & Moore Tomkin & Tomkin
1 4 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Taylor & Carter
14 2 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Dias & Hair Leighton & Dennsion
13 14 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Curtis & Kitchin Eddleston & Eddleston
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 3S-1 W 100 76.6 17.4 Knights & Dunn Cavell & Dean
10 9 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Evans & Blackman Bolton & Leach
9 7 2H-3 S -150 25.1 68.9 Lucy & Cooke Samuels & Sexton
8 5 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Parnham & Smith Stanford & Franklin
7 3 Art 34.5 59.5 Fleming & Fleming Tompson & Clare
6 1 2NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Bentley & Bentley Whiteway & Thornton
5 13 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Peers & Peers Dickson & Hill
4 10 3D= W -110 56.2 37.8 Mascall & Denny Jeffery & Shilling
3 8 2NT= E -120 48.6 45.4 Moss & Crawford Stanton & Elgin
2 6 2NT+1 E -150 25.1 68.9 Serby & Moore Tomkin & Tomkin
1 4 2NT= E -120 48.6 45.4 Jacobs & Fisher Taylor & Carter
14 2 3D= W -110 56.2 37.8 Dias & Hair Leighton & Dennsion
13 14 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Curtis & Kitchin Eddleston & Eddleston
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Fess & Landau Farndon & Bond
11 10 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Knights & Dunn Jeffery & Shilling
10 8 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Evans & Blackman Stanton & Elgin
9 6 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Lucy & Cooke Tomkin & Tomkin
8 4 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Parnham & Smith Taylor & Carter
7 2 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Fleming & Fleming Leighton & Dennsion
6 14 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Bentley & Bentley Eddleston & Eddleston
5 11 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Peers & Peers Cavell & Dean
4 9 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Mascall & Denny Bolton & Leach
3 7 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Moss & Crawford Samuels & Sexton
2 5 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
1 3 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Jacobs & Fisher Tompson & Clare
14 1 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Dias & Hair Whiteway & Thornton
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Fess & Landau Farndon & Bond
11 10 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Knights & Dunn Jeffery & Shilling
10 8 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Evans & Blackman Stanton & Elgin
9 6 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Lucy & Cooke Tomkin & Tomkin
8 4 2H= S 110 89.9 4.1 Parnham & Smith Taylor & Carter
7 2 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Fleming & Fleming Leighton & Dennsion
6 14 5H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Bentley & Bentley Eddleston & Eddleston
5 11 5H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Peers & Peers Cavell & Dean
4 9 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Mascall & Denny Bolton & Leach
3 7 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Moss & Crawford Samuels & Sexton
2 5 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Serby & Moore Stanford & Franklin
1 3 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Jacobs & Fisher Tompson & Clare
14 1 4Sx-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Dias & Hair Whiteway & Thornton
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S= N 110 32 62 Curtis & Kitchin Dickson & Hill
12 11 4H= N 420 94 0 Fess & Landau Cavell & Dean
11 9 4S-2 N -100 3 91 Knights & Dunn Bolton & Leach
10 7 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Evans & Blackman Samuels & Sexton
9 5 3S= N 140 66 28 Lucy & Cooke Stanford & Franklin
8 3 2S= N 110 32 62 Parnham & Smith Tompson & Clare
7 1 2S-1 N -50 14 80 Fleming & Fleming Whiteway & Thornton
6 12 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Bentley & Bentley Farndon & Bond
5 10 2S= N 110 32 62 Peers & Peers Jeffery & Shilling
4 8 3S= N 140 66 28 Mascall & Denny Stanton & Elgin
3 6 2S= N 110 32 62 Moss & Crawford Tomkin & Tomkin
2 4 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Serby & Moore Taylor & Carter
1 2 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Jacobs & Fisher Leighton & Dennsion
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 4H-2 E 200 65 29 Curtis & Kitchin Dickson & Hill
12 11 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Fess & Landau Cavell & Dean
11 9 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Knights & Dunn Bolton & Leach
10 7 4Hx-1 W 200 65 29 Evans & Blackman Samuels & Sexton
9 5 4D= N 130 55 39 Lucy & Cooke Stanford & Franklin
8 3 3C+2 W -150 30 64 Parnham & Smith Tompson & Clare
7 1 5D-1 N -100 32 62 Fleming & Fleming Whiteway & Thornton
6 12 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Bentley & Bentley Farndon & Bond
5 10 5Hx-2 N -500 8 86 Peers & Peers Jeffery & Shilling
4 8 3H-1 E 100 43 51 Mascall & Denny Stanton & Elgin
3 6 4Hx-1 E 200 65 29 Moss & Crawford Tomkin & Tomkin
2 4 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Serby & Moore Taylor & Carter
1 2 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Jacobs & Fisher Leighton & Dennsion
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
14 14 5S= S 450 65.4 28.6 Dias & Hair Eddleston & Eddleston
13 12 4S= S 420 23 71 Curtis & Kitchin Farndon & Bond
12 10 4S+1 N 450 65.4 28.6 Fess & Landau Jeffery & Shilling
11 8 6S-2 S -100 1.8 92.2 Knights & Dunn Stanton & Elgin
10 6 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Evans & Blackman Tomkin & Tomkin
9 4 4S= S 420 23 71 Lucy & Cooke Taylor & Carter
8 2 4S= S 420 23 71 Parnham & Smith Leighton & Dennsion
7 13 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Fleming & Fleming Dickson & Hill
6 11 4S= S 420 23 71 Bentley & Bentley Cavell & Dean
5 9 5S= S 450 65.4 28.6 Peers & Peers Bolton & Leach
4 7 4S= S 420 23 71 Mascall & Denny Samuels & Sexton
3 5 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Moss & Crawford Stanford & Franklin
2 3 5S= S 450 65.4 28.6 Serby & Moore Tompson & Clare
Board 28
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
14 14 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Dias & Hair Eddleston & Eddleston
13 12 2D+2 N 130 8.6 85.4 Curtis & Kitchin Farndon & Bond
12 10 3D+1 N 130 8.6 85.4 Fess & Landau Jeffery & Shilling
11 8 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Knights & Dunn Stanton & Elgin
10 6 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Evans & Blackman Tomkin & Tomkin
9 4 2S+1 S 140 22 72 Lucy & Cooke Taylor & Carter
8 2 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Parnham & Smith Leighton & Dennsion
7 13 2S+1 S 140 22 72 Fleming & Fleming Dickson & Hill
6 11 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Bentley & Bentley Cavell & Dean
5 9 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Peers & Peers Bolton & Leach
4 7 3D+1 N 130 8.6 85.4 Mascall & Denny Samuels & Sexton
3 5 2D+3 N 150 35.5 58.5 Moss & Crawford Stanford & Franklin
2 3 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Serby & Moore Tompson & Clare
Assigned Scores Board 22 NS Pair 7 EW Pair 3 40 % Score = -120 to Both 60 % Score = -150 to Both
Session 1 Section Blue Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 2NT+1 W -150 62.3 31.7 Love & Tapp Thrower & Hope
13 11 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Butler & Butler Ottley & Radford
12 9 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Jones & Martin Gascoyne & Squires
11 7 3C+1 E -130 71.5 22.5 Heath & Heath Langston & Langston
10 5 2NT+1 E -150 62.3 31.7 Cohen & Register le Cocq & Pallot
9 3 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Seaver & Morgan Reader & Brito
8 14 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Poulter & Benjamin Cornell & Beer
7 12 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Turnage & Cruickshank Abbott & Abbott
6 10 6NT-3 W 150 91.9 2.1 Osborn & Osborn Stewart & Lewsey
5 8 3NT= E -400 32.7 61.3 Kennedy & Ditchburn Oram & Oram
4 6 4S-4 W 200 94 0 Crofts & Crofts Hinkin & Concanon
3 4 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Slatcher & Holland Pilcher & Charles
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Love & Tapp Thrower & Hope
13 11 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Butler & Butler Ottley & Radford
12 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Jones & Martin Gascoyne & Squires
11 7 3S-4 E 200 87.9 6.1 Heath & Heath Langston & Langston
10 5 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Cohen & Register le Cocq & Pallot
9 3 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Seaver & Morgan Reader & Brito
8 14 3D+1 N 130 34.7 59.3 Poulter & Benjamin Cornell & Beer
7 12 1NT+3 N 180 84.8 9.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Abbott & Abbott
6 10 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Osborn & Osborn Stewart & Lewsey
5 8 2D+1 N 110 13.3 80.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn Oram & Oram
4 6 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Crofts & Crofts Hinkin & Concanon
3 4 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Slatcher & Holland Pilcher & Charles
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Stebbing & Henry Pitman & Stevens
1 14 3H+1 W -170 2.1 91.9 Love & Tapp Cornell & Beer
13 10 4H-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Butler & Butler Stewart & Lewsey
12 8 2D= S 90 45 49 Jones & Martin Oram & Oram
11 6 3NT= N 400 94 0 Heath & Heath Hinkin & Concanon
10 4 2D+1 N 110 72.5 21.5 Cohen & Register Pilcher & Charles
9 1 4D-1 S -50 26.6 67.4 Seaver & Morgan Thrower & Hope
8 13 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Poulter & Benjamin Harrison & Talbot
7 11 2NT+1 S 150 86.8 7.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Ottley & Radford
6 9 2D= S 90 45 49 Osborn & Osborn Gascoyne & Squires
5 7 3H-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn Langston & Langston
4 5 1NT+1 N 120 81.7 12.3 Crofts & Crofts le Cocq & Pallot
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4H= S 620 21.5 72.5 Stebbing & Henry Pitman & Stevens
1 14 5C+1 N 620 21.5 72.5 Love & Tapp Cornell & Beer
13 10 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Butler & Butler Stewart & Lewsey
12 8 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Jones & Martin Oram & Oram
11 6 5C= N 600 12.3 81.7 Heath & Heath Hinkin & Concanon
10 4 4C+1 N 150 2.1 91.9 Cohen & Register Pilcher & Charles
9 1 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Seaver & Morgan Thrower & Hope
8 13 5C= N 600 12.3 81.7 Poulter & Benjamin Harrison & Talbot
7 11 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Turnage & Cruickshank Ottley & Radford
6 9 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Osborn & Osborn Gascoyne & Squires
5 7 4H+2 N 680 84.8 9.2 Kennedy & Ditchburn Langston & Langston
4 5 5H= S 650 51.1 42.9 Crofts & Crofts le Cocq & Pallot
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Slatcher & Holland Reader & Brito
2 1 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Stebbing & Henry Thrower & Hope
1 13 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Love & Tapp Harrison & Talbot
13 9 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Butler & Butler Gascoyne & Squires
12 7 2H= E -110 39.9 54.1 Jones & Martin Langston & Langston
11 5 4D-1 N -100 48 46 Heath & Heath le Cocq & Pallot
10 2 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Cohen & Register Pitman & Stevens
9 14 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Seaver & Morgan Cornell & Beer
8 12 5D-2 N -200 9.2 84.8 Poulter & Benjamin Abbott & Abbott
7 10 3D= S 110 68.4 25.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Stewart & Lewsey
6 8 2D+1 S 110 68.4 25.6 Osborn & Osborn Oram & Oram
5 6 4C-1 E 50 56.2 37.8 Kennedy & Ditchburn Hinkin & Concanon
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 1NT= E -90 49 45 Slatcher & Holland Reader & Brito
2 1 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Stebbing & Henry Thrower & Hope
1 13 1NT-2 E 200 91.9 2.1 Love & Tapp Harrison & Talbot
13 9 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Butler & Butler Gascoyne & Squires
12 7 1NT= E -90 49 45 Jones & Martin Langston & Langston
11 5 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Heath & Heath le Cocq & Pallot
10 2 1NT= E -90 49 45 Cohen & Register Pitman & Stevens
9 14 1NT= E -90 49 45 Seaver & Morgan Cornell & Beer
8 12 2H= N 110 87.9 6.1 Poulter & Benjamin Abbott & Abbott
7 10 1NT= E -90 49 45 Turnage & Cruickshank Stewart & Lewsey
6 8 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Osborn & Osborn Oram & Oram
5 6 2S+1 E -140 0 94 Kennedy & Ditchburn Hinkin & Concanon
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Crofts & Crofts Pilcher & Charles
3 2 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Slatcher & Holland Pitman & Stevens
2 14 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Stebbing & Henry Cornell & Beer
1 12 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Love & Tapp Abbott & Abbott
13 8 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Butler & Butler Oram & Oram
12 6 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Jones & Martin Hinkin & Concanon
11 3 2D-2 E 200 78.7 15.3 Heath & Heath Reader & Brito
10 1 2H= N 110 41.9 52.1 Cohen & Register Thrower & Hope
9 13 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Seaver & Morgan Harrison & Talbot
8 11 3Sx-3 W 800 91.9 2.1 Poulter & Benjamin Ottley & Radford
7 9 2NT-1 N -100 15.3 78.7 Turnage & Cruickshank Gascoyne & Squires
6 7 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Osborn & Osborn Langston & Langston
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Crofts & Crofts Pilcher & Charles
3 2 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Slatcher & Holland Pitman & Stevens
2 14 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Stebbing & Henry Cornell & Beer
1 12 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Love & Tapp Abbott & Abbott
13 8 5C-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Butler & Butler Oram & Oram
12 6 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Jones & Martin Hinkin & Concanon
11 3 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Heath & Heath Reader & Brito
10 1 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Cohen & Register Thrower & Hope
9 13 2S-2 W 100 93 1 Seaver & Morgan Harrison & Talbot
8 11 2C= E -90 47 47 Poulter & Benjamin Ottley & Radford
7 9 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Turnage & Cruickshank Gascoyne & Squires
6 7 3NT+2 W -460 1 93 Osborn & Osborn Langston & Langston
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Kennedy & Ditchburn le Cocq & Pallot
4 3 6D-1 N -50 13.3 80.7 Crofts & Crofts Reader & Brito
3 1 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Slatcher & Holland Thrower & Hope
2 13 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Stebbing & Henry Harrison & Talbot
1 11 5C= N 400 33.7 60.3 Love & Tapp Ottley & Radford
13 7 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Butler & Butler Langston & Langston
12 4 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Jones & Martin Pilcher & Charles
11 2 4D= N 130 20.4 73.6 Heath & Heath Pitman & Stevens
10 14 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Cohen & Register Cornell & Beer
9 12 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Seaver & Morgan Abbott & Abbott
8 10 3D+1 N 130 20.4 73.6 Poulter & Benjamin Stewart & Lewsey
7 8 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Turnage & Cruickshank Oram & Oram
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3C-1 E 100 14.3 79.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn le Cocq & Pallot
4 3 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Crofts & Crofts Reader & Brito
3 1 4S+2 N 680 91.9 2.1 Slatcher & Holland Thrower & Hope
2 13 4C-3 W 300 65.4 28.6 Stebbing & Henry Harrison & Talbot
1 11 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Love & Tapp Ottley & Radford
13 7 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Butler & Butler Langston & Langston
12 4 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Jones & Martin Pilcher & Charles
11 2 2S+1 N 140 31.7 62.3 Heath & Heath Pitman & Stevens
10 14 3C= E -110 2.1 91.9 Cohen & Register Cornell & Beer
9 12 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Seaver & Morgan Abbott & Abbott
8 10 4H-2 S -200 0 94 Poulter & Benjamin Stewart & Lewsey
7 8 2S+2 N 170 48 46 Turnage & Cruickshank Oram & Oram
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Osborn & Osborn Hinkin & Concanon
5 4 4S+1 N 450 16.4 77.6 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pilcher & Charles
4 2 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Crofts & Crofts Pitman & Stevens
3 14 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Slatcher & Holland Cornell & Beer
2 12 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Stebbing & Henry Abbott & Abbott
1 10 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Love & Tapp Stewart & Lewsey
13 5 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Butler & Butler le Cocq & Pallot
12 3 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Jones & Martin Reader & Brito
11 1 4S+1 N 450 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Thrower & Hope
10 13 4S+3 N 510 76.6 17.4 Cohen & Register Harrison & Talbot
9 11 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Seaver & Morgan Ottley & Radford
8 9 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Poulter & Benjamin Gascoyne & Squires
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Osborn & Osborn Hinkin & Concanon
5 4 2C= E -90 53.1 40.9 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pilcher & Charles
4 2 4Sx-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Crofts & Crofts Pitman & Stevens
3 14 3S= E -140 32.7 61.3 Slatcher & Holland Cornell & Beer
2 12 2Cx-2 N -500 5.1 88.9 Stebbing & Henry Abbott & Abbott
1 10 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Love & Tapp Stewart & Lewsey
13 5 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Butler & Butler le Cocq & Pallot
12 3 2Sx+1 E -570 2.1 91.9 Jones & Martin Reader & Brito
11 1 PASS N 0 64.4 29.6 Heath & Heath Thrower & Hope
10 13 3S+1 E -170 23.5 70.5 Cohen & Register Harrison & Talbot
9 11 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Seaver & Morgan Ottley & Radford
8 9 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Poulter & Benjamin Gascoyne & Squires
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Turnage & Cruickshank Langston & Langston
6 5 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Osborn & Osborn le Cocq & Pallot
5 3 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Reader & Brito
4 1 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Crofts & Crofts Thrower & Hope
3 13 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Slatcher & Holland Harrison & Talbot
2 11 2H+1 N 140 57.2 36.8 Stebbing & Henry Ottley & Radford
1 9 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Love & Tapp Gascoyne & Squires
13 4 3NT+2 N 660 94 0 Butler & Butler Pilcher & Charles
12 2 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Jones & Martin Pitman & Stevens
11 14 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath Cornell & Beer
10 12 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Cohen & Register Abbott & Abbott
9 10 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Seaver & Morgan Stewart & Lewsey
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT+2 S 460 85.8 8.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Langston & Langston
6 5 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Osborn & Osborn le Cocq & Pallot
5 3 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Kennedy & Ditchburn Reader & Brito
4 1 4S-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Crofts & Crofts Thrower & Hope
3 13 4S+1 N 450 79.7 14.3 Slatcher & Holland Harrison & Talbot
2 11 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Stebbing & Henry Ottley & Radford
1 9 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Love & Tapp Gascoyne & Squires
13 4 4C-3 S -150 0 94 Butler & Butler Pilcher & Charles
12 2 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Jones & Martin Pitman & Stevens
11 14 3NT= N 400 33.7 60.3 Heath & Heath Cornell & Beer
10 12 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Cohen & Register Abbott & Abbott
9 10 4H= N 420 43.9 50.1 Seaver & Morgan Stewart & Lewsey
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Poulter & Benjamin Oram & Oram
7 6 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Hinkin & Concanon
6 4 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Osborn & Osborn Pilcher & Charles
5 2 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pitman & Stevens
4 14 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Crofts & Crofts Cornell & Beer
3 12 5Dx= W -550 0 94 Slatcher & Holland Abbott & Abbott
2 10 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Stebbing & Henry Stewart & Lewsey
1 7 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Love & Tapp Langston & Langston
13 3 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Butler & Butler Reader & Brito
12 1 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Jones & Martin Thrower & Hope
11 13 4D-1 E 50 23.5 70.5 Heath & Heath Harrison & Talbot
10 11 3D+1 E -130 8.2 85.8 Cohen & Register Ottley & Radford
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Poulter & Benjamin Oram & Oram
7 6 3NT+1 S 430 85.8 8.2 Turnage & Cruickshank Hinkin & Concanon
6 4 3NT= N 400 77.6 16.4 Osborn & Osborn Pilcher & Charles
5 2 3NT= N 400 77.6 16.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Pitman & Stevens
4 14 2Sx-3 E 800 93 1 Crofts & Crofts Cornell & Beer
3 12 2H-4 E 400 77.6 16.4 Slatcher & Holland Abbott & Abbott
2 10 4C= N 130 62.3 31.7 Stebbing & Henry Stewart & Lewsey
1 7 2Sx-2 E 500 89.9 4.1 Love & Tapp Langston & Langston
13 3 3NT= S 400 77.6 16.4 Butler & Butler Reader & Brito
12 1 2NT+1 N 150 67.4 26.6 Jones & Martin Thrower & Hope
11 13 5C-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Heath & Heath Harrison & Talbot
10 11 2S-2 N -100 3.1 90.9 Cohen & Register Ottley & Radford
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Seaver & Morgan Gascoyne & Squires
8 7 3NT-1 S -50 7.2 86.8 Poulter & Benjamin Langston & Langston
7 5 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Turnage & Cruickshank le Cocq & Pallot
6 3 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Osborn & Osborn Reader & Brito
5 1 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Kennedy & Ditchburn Thrower & Hope
4 13 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Crofts & Crofts Harrison & Talbot
3 11 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Slatcher & Holland Ottley & Radford
2 8 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Stebbing & Henry Oram & Oram
1 6 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Love & Tapp Hinkin & Concanon
13 2 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Butler & Butler Pitman & Stevens
12 14 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Jones & Martin Cornell & Beer
11 12 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Heath & Heath Abbott & Abbott
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Seaver & Morgan Gascoyne & Squires
8 7 4Hx= E -590 7.2 86.8 Poulter & Benjamin Langston & Langston
7 5 4S-3 N -300 89.9 4.1 Turnage & Cruickshank le Cocq & Pallot
6 3 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Osborn & Osborn Reader & Brito
5 1 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Kennedy & Ditchburn Thrower & Hope
4 13 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Crofts & Crofts Harrison & Talbot
3 11 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Slatcher & Holland Ottley & Radford
2 8 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Stebbing & Henry Oram & Oram
1 6 4H+1 E -450 16.4 77.6 Love & Tapp Hinkin & Concanon
13 2 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Butler & Butler Pitman & Stevens
12 14 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Jones & Martin Cornell & Beer
11 12 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Heath & Heath Abbott & Abbott
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4C-1 N -50 76.6 17.4 Cohen & Register Stewart & Lewsey
9 8 3H= E -140 45 49 Seaver & Morgan Oram & Oram
8 6 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Poulter & Benjamin Hinkin & Concanon
7 4 4C+1 N 150 94 0 Turnage & Cruickshank Pilcher & Charles
6 2 3S= W -140 45 49 Osborn & Osborn Pitman & Stevens
5 14 4S= E -620 6.1 87.9 Kennedy & Ditchburn Cornell & Beer
4 12 1S+2 W -140 45 49 Crofts & Crofts Abbott & Abbott
3 9 4S-1 W 100 85.8 8.2 Slatcher & Holland Gascoyne & Squires
2 7 3H+1 E -170 16.4 77.6 Stebbing & Henry Langston & Langston
1 5 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Love & Tapp le Cocq & Pallot
13 1 3S= W -140 45 49 Butler & Butler Thrower & Hope
12 13 4H-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Jones & Martin Harrison & Talbot
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 5Dx-4 N -1100 12.3 81.7 Cohen & Register Stewart & Lewsey
9 8 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Seaver & Morgan Oram & Oram
8 6 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Poulter & Benjamin Hinkin & Concanon
7 4 4S-2 S -200 94 0 Turnage & Cruickshank Pilcher & Charles
6 2 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Osborn & Osborn Pitman & Stevens
5 14 4H+2 E -680 33.7 60.3 Kennedy & Ditchburn Cornell & Beer
4 12 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Crofts & Crofts Abbott & Abbott
3 9 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Slatcher & Holland Gascoyne & Squires
2 7 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Stebbing & Henry Langston & Langston
1 5 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Love & Tapp le Cocq & Pallot
13 1 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Butler & Butler Thrower & Hope
12 13 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Jones & Martin Harrison & Talbot
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 6H= E -980 0 94 Heath & Heath Ottley & Radford
10 9 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Cohen & Register Gascoyne & Squires
9 7 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Seaver & Morgan Langston & Langston
8 5 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Poulter & Benjamin le Cocq & Pallot
7 3 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Turnage & Cruickshank Reader & Brito
6 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Osborn & Osborn Thrower & Hope
5 13 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Kennedy & Ditchburn Harrison & Talbot
4 10 3NT+3 W -490 15.3 78.7 Crofts & Crofts Stewart & Lewsey
3 8 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Slatcher & Holland Oram & Oram
2 6 4Sx-2 N -500 10.2 83.8 Stebbing & Henry Hinkin & Concanon
1 4 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Love & Tapp Pilcher & Charles
13 14 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Butler & Butler Cornell & Beer
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Heath & Heath Ottley & Radford
10 9 2D+2 E -130 38 56 Cohen & Register Gascoyne & Squires
9 7 5S-1 W 100 76.6 17.4 Seaver & Morgan Langston & Langston
8 5 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Poulter & Benjamin le Cocq & Pallot
7 3 3Hx-2 N -300 16.4 77.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Reader & Brito
6 1 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Osborn & Osborn Thrower & Hope
5 13 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Harrison & Talbot
4 10 2NT+1 E -150 25.1 68.9 Crofts & Crofts Stewart & Lewsey
3 8 3D= W -110 56.2 37.8 Slatcher & Holland Oram & Oram
2 6 3NT-1 E 100 76.6 17.4 Stebbing & Henry Hinkin & Concanon
1 4 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Love & Tapp Pilcher & Charles
13 14 3D+2 W -150 25.1 68.9 Butler & Butler Cornell & Beer
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Jones & Martin Abbott & Abbott
11 10 3NT= E -600 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Stewart & Lewsey
10 8 3NT= E -600 68.4 25.6 Cohen & Register Oram & Oram
9 6 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Seaver & Morgan Hinkin & Concanon
8 4 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Poulter & Benjamin Pilcher & Charles
7 2 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Pitman & Stevens
6 14 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Osborn & Osborn Cornell & Beer
5 11 3NT+2 E -660 10.2 83.8 Kennedy & Ditchburn Ottley & Radford
4 9 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Crofts & Crofts Gascoyne & Squires
3 7 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Slatcher & Holland Langston & Langston
2 5 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Stebbing & Henry le Cocq & Pallot
1 3 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Love & Tapp Reader & Brito
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Jones & Martin Abbott & Abbott
11 10 4S= E -420 16.4 77.6 Heath & Heath Stewart & Lewsey
10 8 2H= N 110 89.9 4.1 Cohen & Register Oram & Oram
9 6 4H-2 N -100 54.1 39.9 Seaver & Morgan Hinkin & Concanon
8 4 2H= S 110 89.9 4.1 Poulter & Benjamin Pilcher & Charles
7 2 3H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Turnage & Cruickshank Pitman & Stevens
6 14 4Sx= W -590 3.1 90.9 Osborn & Osborn Cornell & Beer
5 11 3H-1 N -50 71.5 22.5 Kennedy & Ditchburn Ottley & Radford
4 9 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Crofts & Crofts Gascoyne & Squires
3 7 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Slatcher & Holland Langston & Langston
2 5 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Stebbing & Henry le Cocq & Pallot
1 3 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Love & Tapp Reader & Brito
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S+2 N 170 91 3 Butler & Butler Harrison & Talbot
12 11 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Jones & Martin Ottley & Radford
11 9 2S+2 N 170 91 3 Heath & Heath Gascoyne & Squires
10 7 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Cohen & Register Langston & Langston
9 5 2S= N 110 32 62 Seaver & Morgan le Cocq & Pallot
8 3 3S= N 140 66 28 Poulter & Benjamin Reader & Brito
7 1 2S= N 110 32 62 Turnage & Cruickshank Thrower & Hope
6 12 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Osborn & Osborn Abbott & Abbott
5 10 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Kennedy & Ditchburn Stewart & Lewsey
4 8 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Crofts & Crofts Oram & Oram
3 6 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Slatcher & Holland Hinkin & Concanon
2 4 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Stebbing & Henry Pilcher & Charles
1 2 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Love & Tapp Pitman & Stevens
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Butler & Butler Harrison & Talbot
12 11 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Jones & Martin Ottley & Radford
11 9 5H-3 E 300 75 19 Heath & Heath Gascoyne & Squires
10 7 5Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Cohen & Register Langston & Langston
9 5 5Cx-2 W 500 87 7 Seaver & Morgan le Cocq & Pallot
8 3 4Hx-2 E 500 87 7 Poulter & Benjamin Reader & Brito
7 1 5Hx-1 E 200 65 29 Turnage & Cruickshank Thrower & Hope
6 12 4H-1 W 100 43 51 Osborn & Osborn Abbott & Abbott
5 10 4H-3 E 300 75 19 Kennedy & Ditchburn Stewart & Lewsey
4 8 4H-1 E 100 43 51 Crofts & Crofts Oram & Oram
3 6 5Dx= N 750 94 0 Slatcher & Holland Hinkin & Concanon
2 4 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Stebbing & Henry Pilcher & Charles
1 2 5H-1 E 100 43 51 Love & Tapp Pitman & Stevens
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 12 5S-1 S -50 8.9 85.1 Butler & Butler Abbott & Abbott
12 10 5S-1 S -50 8.9 85.1 Jones & Martin Stewart & Lewsey
11 8 3NT+2 N 460 92.2 1.8 Heath & Heath Oram & Oram
10 6 4S+1 N 450 65.4 28.6 Cohen & Register Hinkin & Concanon
9 4 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Seaver & Morgan Pilcher & Charles
8 2 3NT+1 N 430 37.1 56.9 Poulter & Benjamin Pitman & Stevens
7 13 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Turnage & Cruickshank Harrison & Talbot
6 11 4S= S 420 23 71 Osborn & Osborn Ottley & Radford
5 9 4S= N 420 23 71 Kennedy & Ditchburn Gascoyne & Squires
4 7 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Crofts & Crofts Langston & Langston
3 5 3NT+2 S 460 92.2 1.8 Slatcher & Holland le Cocq & Pallot
2 3 3NT+1 S 430 37.1 56.9 Stebbing & Henry Reader & Brito
Board 28
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 12 3NT= N 600 62.4 31.6 Butler & Butler Abbott & Abbott
12 10 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Jones & Martin Stewart & Lewsey
11 8 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Heath & Heath Oram & Oram
10 6 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Cohen & Register Hinkin & Concanon
9 4 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Seaver & Morgan Pilcher & Charles
8 2 2D+2 N 130 8.6 85.4 Poulter & Benjamin Pitman & Stevens
7 13 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Turnage & Cruickshank Harrison & Talbot
6 11 2S+2 S 170 52.8 41.2 Osborn & Osborn Ottley & Radford
5 9 3D+1 N 130 8.6 85.4 Kennedy & Ditchburn Gascoyne & Squires
4 7 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Crofts & Crofts Langston & Langston
3 5 3NT+1 N 630 79.6 14.4 Slatcher & Holland le Cocq & Pallot
2 3 3D+2 N 150 35.5 58.5 Stebbing & Henry Reader & Brito
Session 1 Section Yellow Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Gillespie & Gillespie Harper & Hackett
9 8 5C= W -400 32.7 61.3 Thompson & Thompson Youd & Rankin
8 6 3NT= W -400 32.7 61.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Griffin & Heatly
7 4 3S-1 S -50 78.7 15.3 Clarke & Blackmore Hedley & Hedley
6 2 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Hart & Wallace Wren & Perryman
5 9 2S-1 S -50 78.7 15.3 Hunt & Vaughan Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 4H-1 E 50 85.8 8.2 Beattie & Connell Prince & Hair
3 5 3H+1 W -170 56.2 37.8 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 3 4H= E -420 8.2 85.8 Turpin & Lawson Twyman & Twyman
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Harper & Hackett
9 8 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Thompson & Thompson Youd & Rankin
8 6 1NT+1 N 120 27.6 66.4 Nurmohamed & Jones Griffin & Heatly
7 4 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Clarke & Blackmore Hedley & Hedley
6 2 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Hart & Wallace Wren & Perryman
5 9 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Hunt & Vaughan Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Beattie & Connell Prince & Hair
3 5 1NT+2 N 150 59.3 34.7 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 3 3D= N 110 13.3 80.7 Turpin & Lawson Twyman & Twyman
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 3S-1 E 100 60.3 33.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Harper & Hackett
9 8 1NT+2 S 150 86.8 7.2 Thompson & Thompson Youd & Rankin
8 6 1NT+3 N 180 91.9 2.1 Nurmohamed & Jones Griffin & Heatly
7 4 1NT+2 N 150 86.8 7.2 Clarke & Blackmore Hedley & Hedley
6 2 1NT= N 90 45 49 Hart & Wallace Wren & Perryman
5 9 2D+1 S 110 72.5 21.5 Hunt & Vaughan Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 2D= S 90 45 49 Beattie & Connell Prince & Hair
3 5 3NT-2 S -100 16.4 77.6 Nicolle & Bridge Wright & Watson
2 3 2D= S 90 45 49 Turpin & Lawson Twyman & Twyman
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 4Sx-2 E 500 8.2 85.8 Turpin & Lawson Wren & Perryman
1 9 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Thompson & Thompson Prince & Hair
8 5 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Nurmohamed & Jones Wright & Watson
7 3 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Clarke & Blackmore Twyman & Twyman
6 1 4C+2 N 170 4.1 89.9 Hart & Wallace Harper & Hackett
5 8 4H+2 S 680 84.8 9.2 Hunt & Vaughan Youd & Rankin
4 6 4H= S 620 21.5 72.5 Beattie & Connell Griffin & Heatly
3 4 4H+1 S 650 51.1 42.9 Nicolle & Bridge Hedley & Hedley
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Turpin & Lawson Wren & Perryman
1 9 3C= W -110 39.9 54.1 Gillespie & Gillespie Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 4C= W -130 25.6 68.4 Thompson & Thompson Prince & Hair
8 5 3H-4 S -400 0 94 Nurmohamed & Jones Wright & Watson
7 3 3D= N 110 68.4 25.6 Clarke & Blackmore Twyman & Twyman
6 1 2S= S 110 68.4 25.6 Hart & Wallace Harper & Hackett
5 8 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Hunt & Vaughan Youd & Rankin
4 6 3C+1 W -130 25.6 68.4 Beattie & Connell Griffin & Heatly
3 4 5C-1 W 50 56.2 37.8 Nicolle & Bridge Hedley & Hedley
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 1NT= E -90 49 45 Turpin & Lawson Wren & Perryman
1 9 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 1NT+1 E -120 11.3 82.7 Thompson & Thompson Prince & Hair
8 5 1NT= E -90 49 45 Nurmohamed & Jones Wright & Watson
7 3 1NT= E -90 49 45 Clarke & Blackmore Twyman & Twyman
6 1 1NT= E -90 49 45 Hart & Wallace Harper & Hackett
5 8 1NT= S 90 73.6 20.4 Hunt & Vaughan Youd & Rankin
4 6 1NT-1 E 100 80.7 13.3 Beattie & Connell Griffin & Heatly
3 4 2H-2 N -100 28.6 65.4 Nicolle & Bridge Hedley & Hedley
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Nicolle & Bridge Twyman & Twyman
2 1 2H+1 S 140 66.4 27.6 Turpin & Lawson Harper & Hackett
1 8 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Youd & Rankin
9 6 3C-3 W 300 81.7 12.3 Thompson & Thompson Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3D-2 E 200 78.7 15.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Hedley & Hedley
7 2 3H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Clarke & Blackmore Wren & Perryman
6 9 2H-1 S -100 15.3 78.7 Hart & Wallace Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 2S-1 W 100 27.6 66.4 Hunt & Vaughan Prince & Hair
4 5 2H= S 110 41.9 52.1 Beattie & Connell Wright & Watson
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Nicolle & Bridge Twyman & Twyman
2 1 3NT-1 W 50 69.5 24.5 Turpin & Lawson Harper & Hackett
1 8 2C+2 E -130 18.4 75.6 Gillespie & Gillespie Youd & Rankin
9 6 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Thompson & Thompson Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3C+1 E -130 18.4 75.6 Nurmohamed & Jones Hedley & Hedley
7 2 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Clarke & Blackmore Wren & Perryman
6 9 3NT-1 E 50 69.5 24.5 Hart & Wallace Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Hunt & Vaughan Prince & Hair
4 5 1NT+1 E -120 35.8 58.2 Beattie & Connell Wright & Watson
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3NT+3 N 490 88.9 5.1 Nicolle & Bridge Twyman & Twyman
2 1 3NT+2 S 460 79.7 14.3 Turpin & Lawson Harper & Hackett
1 8 5D-1 N -50 13.3 80.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Youd & Rankin
9 6 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Thompson & Thompson Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3NT+1 N 430 59.3 34.7 Nurmohamed & Jones Hedley & Hedley
7 2 5D-1 S -50 13.3 80.7 Clarke & Blackmore Wren & Perryman
6 9 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Hart & Wallace Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 5D= N 400 33.7 60.3 Hunt & Vaughan Prince & Hair
4 5 6NT-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Beattie & Connell Wright & Watson
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Beattie & Connell Hedley & Hedley
3 2 1NT= W -90 5.1 88.9 Nicolle & Bridge Wren & Perryman
2 9 2S+2 N 170 48 46 Turpin & Lawson Basden-Smith & Parsons
1 7 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Prince & Hair
9 5 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Thompson & Thompson Wright & Watson
8 3 3D+1 S 130 25.6 68.4 Nurmohamed & Jones Twyman & Twyman
7 1 4D= N 130 25.6 68.4 Clarke & Blackmore Harper & Hackett
6 8 4S= N 620 79.7 14.3 Hart & Wallace Youd & Rankin
5 6 3S+1 N 170 48 46 Hunt & Vaughan Griffin & Heatly
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Beattie & Connell Hedley & Hedley
3 2 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Nicolle & Bridge Wren & Perryman
2 9 4S+3 S 510 76.6 17.4 Turpin & Lawson Basden-Smith & Parsons
1 7 6S= S 980 86.8 7.2 Gillespie & Gillespie Prince & Hair
9 5 4S+2 S 480 53.1 40.9 Thompson & Thompson Wright & Watson
8 3 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Nurmohamed & Jones Twyman & Twyman
7 1 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Clarke & Blackmore Harper & Hackett
6 8 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Hart & Wallace Youd & Rankin
5 6 4S+1 S 450 16.4 77.6 Hunt & Vaughan Griffin & Heatly
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Beattie & Connell Hedley & Hedley
3 2 2C-2 N -200 17.4 76.6 Nicolle & Bridge Wren & Perryman
2 9 2D= W -90 53.1 40.9 Turpin & Lawson Basden-Smith & Parsons
1 7 4S= E -420 11.3 82.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Prince & Hair
9 5 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Thompson & Thompson Wright & Watson
8 3 3Sx+1 E -630 0 94 Nurmohamed & Jones Twyman & Twyman
7 1 2Cx-2 N -500 5.1 88.9 Clarke & Blackmore Harper & Hackett
6 8 3S= E -140 32.7 61.3 Hart & Wallace Youd & Rankin
5 6 4S-1 E 50 74.6 19.4 Hunt & Vaughan Griffin & Heatly
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Hunt & Vaughan Wright & Watson
4 3 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Beattie & Connell Twyman & Twyman
3 1 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Nicolle & Bridge Harper & Hackett
2 8 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Turpin & Lawson Youd & Rankin
1 6 3NT-1 N -100 32.7 61.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Griffin & Heatly
9 4 3NT= N 600 74.6 19.4 Thompson & Thompson Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Wren & Perryman
7 9 2NT+1 N 150 59.3 34.7 Clarke & Blackmore Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 3NT-2 N -200 7.2 86.8 Hart & Wallace Prince & Hair
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4H-1 N -50 17.4 76.6 Hunt & Vaughan Wright & Watson
4 3 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Beattie & Connell Twyman & Twyman
3 1 2Hx-3 E 500 91.9 2.1 Nicolle & Bridge Harper & Hackett
2 8 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Turpin & Lawson Youd & Rankin
1 6 3NT+1 S 430 63.3 30.7 Gillespie & Gillespie Griffin & Heatly
9 4 2Dx-1 W 100 26.6 67.4 Thompson & Thompson Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3NT+1 N 430 63.3 30.7 Nurmohamed & Jones Wren & Perryman
7 9 3NT= S 400 33.7 60.3 Clarke & Blackmore Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 4H-2 N -100 5.1 88.9 Hart & Wallace Prince & Hair
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT= E -400 2.1 91.9 Hunt & Vaughan Wright & Watson
4 3 2S+2 N 170 68.4 25.6 Beattie & Connell Twyman & Twyman
3 1 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Nicolle & Bridge Harper & Hackett
2 8 3S= N 140 42.9 51.1 Turpin & Lawson Youd & Rankin
1 6 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Gillespie & Gillespie Griffin & Heatly
9 4 4D-1 E 50 23.5 70.5 Thompson & Thompson Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3S+1 N 170 68.4 25.6 Nurmohamed & Jones Wren & Perryman
7 9 4Dx-1 W 100 32.7 61.3 Clarke & Blackmore Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 5Dx-2 E 300 87.9 6.1 Hart & Wallace Prince & Hair
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3D-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Hart & Wallace Griffin & Heatly
5 4 3NT-1 S -50 23.5 70.5 Hunt & Vaughan Hedley & Hedley
4 2 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Beattie & Connell Wren & Perryman
3 9 2Sx-3 E 800 93 1 Nicolle & Bridge Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 3NT+1 N 430 85.8 8.2 Turpin & Lawson Prince & Hair
1 5 3NT-2 S -100 3.1 90.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Wright & Watson
9 3 3NT-1 N -50 23.5 70.5 Thompson & Thompson Twyman & Twyman
8 1 3NT= S 400 77.6 16.4 Nurmohamed & Jones Harper & Hackett
7 8 3NT+1 S 430 85.8 8.2 Clarke & Blackmore Youd & Rankin
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Hart & Wallace Griffin & Heatly
5 4 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Hunt & Vaughan Hedley & Hedley
4 2 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Beattie & Connell Wren & Perryman
3 9 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Nicolle & Bridge Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 3NT+2 N 460 88.9 5.1 Turpin & Lawson Prince & Hair
1 5 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Wright & Watson
9 3 3NT+1 N 430 67.4 26.6 Thompson & Thompson Twyman & Twyman
8 1 4S-2 S -100 0 94 Nurmohamed & Jones Harper & Hackett
7 8 3NT= N 400 32.7 61.3 Clarke & Blackmore Youd & Rankin
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Hart & Wallace Griffin & Heatly
5 4 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Hunt & Vaughan Hedley & Hedley
4 2 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Beattie & Connell Wren & Perryman
3 9 4S= E -420 53.1 40.9 Nicolle & Bridge Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Turpin & Lawson Prince & Hair
1 5 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Wright & Watson
9 3 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Thompson & Thompson Twyman & Twyman
8 1 2Dx-3 S -800 2.1 91.9 Nurmohamed & Jones Harper & Hackett
7 8 4H= E -420 53.1 40.9 Clarke & Blackmore Youd & Rankin
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4C-1 N -50 76.6 17.4 Clarke & Blackmore Prince & Hair
6 5 4S+1 W -650 1 93 Hart & Wallace Wright & Watson
5 3 3H= E -140 45 49 Hunt & Vaughan Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4S+1 E -650 1 93 Beattie & Connell Harper & Hackett
3 8 3H= E -140 45 49 Nicolle & Bridge Youd & Rankin
2 6 2S+1 W -140 45 49 Turpin & Lawson Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4S= E -620 6.1 87.9 Gillespie & Gillespie Hedley & Hedley
9 2 4S= E -620 6.1 87.9 Thompson & Thompson Wren & Perryman
8 9 3H= E -140 45 49 Nurmohamed & Jones Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 5Sx-6 S -1700 0 94 Clarke & Blackmore Prince & Hair
6 5 5Sx-4 N -1100 12.3 81.7 Hart & Wallace Wright & Watson
5 3 4H+1 E -650 71.5 22.5 Hunt & Vaughan Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Beattie & Connell Harper & Hackett
3 8 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Nicolle & Bridge Youd & Rankin
2 6 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Turpin & Lawson Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Hedley & Hedley
9 2 4H+1 W -650 71.5 22.5 Thompson & Thompson Wren & Perryman
8 9 4H+2 W -680 33.7 60.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Clarke & Blackmore Prince & Hair
6 5 4H+1 E -450 71.5 22.5 Hart & Wallace Wright & Watson
5 3 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Hunt & Vaughan Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Beattie & Connell Harper & Hackett
3 8 5D+2 W -440 87.9 6.1 Nicolle & Bridge Youd & Rankin
2 6 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Turpin & Lawson Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Gillespie & Gillespie Hedley & Hedley
9 2 4H+2 E -480 37.8 56.2 Thompson & Thompson Wren & Perryman
8 9 4Hx+2 E -790 8.2 85.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Youd & Rankin
7 6 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Clarke & Blackmore Griffin & Heatly
6 4 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Hart & Wallace Hedley & Hedley
5 2 2D+2 W -130 38 56 Hunt & Vaughan Wren & Perryman
4 9 2H-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Beattie & Connell Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Nicolle & Bridge Prince & Hair
2 5 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Turpin & Lawson Wright & Watson
1 3 3NT-2 E 200 90.9 3.1 Gillespie & Gillespie Twyman & Twyman
9 1 3NT= E -600 7.2 86.8 Thompson & Thompson Harper & Hackett
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Nurmohamed & Jones Youd & Rankin
7 6 3NT= W -600 68.4 25.6 Clarke & Blackmore Griffin & Heatly
6 4 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Hart & Wallace Hedley & Hedley
5 2 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Hunt & Vaughan Wren & Perryman
4 9 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Beattie & Connell Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Nicolle & Bridge Prince & Hair
2 5 4H-3 W 300 94 0 Turpin & Lawson Wright & Watson
1 3 3NT+2 W -660 10.2 83.8 Gillespie & Gillespie Twyman & Twyman
9 1 3NT+1 W -630 33.7 60.3 Thompson & Thompson Harper & Hackett
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S+1 E -170 32.7 61.3 Nurmohamed & Jones Youd & Rankin
7 6 4H-3 S -150 41.9 52.1 Clarke & Blackmore Griffin & Heatly
6 4 5H-2 N -100 54.1 39.9 Hart & Wallace Hedley & Hedley
5 2 4H-1 S -50 71.5 22.5 Hunt & Vaughan Wren & Perryman
4 9 4S-1 W 50 82.7 11.3 Beattie & Connell Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 4S= W -420 16.4 77.6 Nicolle & Bridge Prince & Hair
2 5 4H-2 S -100 54.1 39.9 Turpin & Lawson Wright & Watson
1 3 3S+1 W -170 32.7 61.3 Gillespie & Gillespie Twyman & Twyman
9 1 4Sx= W -590 3.1 90.9 Thompson & Thompson Harper & Hackett
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Thompson & Thompson Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Nurmohamed & Jones Prince & Hair
7 5 2S= N 110 32 62 Clarke & Blackmore Wright & Watson
6 3 4S-1 N -50 14 80 Hart & Wallace Twyman & Twyman
5 1 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Hunt & Vaughan Harper & Hackett
4 8 2S= N 110 32 62 Beattie & Connell Youd & Rankin
3 6 2S+1 N 140 66 28 Nicolle & Bridge Griffin & Heatly
2 4 2S= N 110 32 62 Turpin & Lawson Hedley & Hedley
1 2 4S-2 N -100 3 91 Gillespie & Gillespie Wren & Perryman
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3S-4 N -400 14 80 Thompson & Thompson Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Nurmohamed & Jones Prince & Hair
7 5 5H-4 E 400 80 14 Clarke & Blackmore Wright & Watson
6 3 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Hart & Wallace Twyman & Twyman
5 1 5Dx-1 N -200 22 72 Hunt & Vaughan Harper & Hackett
4 8 5C-1 W 100 43 51 Beattie & Connell Youd & Rankin
3 6 4Hx-1 E 200 65 29 Nicolle & Bridge Griffin & Heatly
2 4 5Dx-2 N -500 8 86 Turpin & Lawson Hedley & Hedley
1 2 5H-3 E 300 75 19 Gillespie & Gillespie Wren & Perryman
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Thompson & Thompson Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 3NT+1 S 430 37.1 56.9 Nurmohamed & Jones Prince & Hair
7 5 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Clarke & Blackmore Wright & Watson
6 3 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Hart & Wallace Twyman & Twyman
5 1 5S-1 S -50 8.9 85.1 Hunt & Vaughan Harper & Hackett
4 8 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Beattie & Connell Youd & Rankin
3 6 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Nicolle & Bridge Griffin & Heatly
2 4 6S-2 S -100 1.8 92.2 Turpin & Lawson Hedley & Hedley
1 2 4S+1 S 450 65.4 28.6 Gillespie & Gillespie Wren & Perryman
Session 2 Section Red Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H-3 S -150 20.4 73.6 Fontes & Fontes Gillespie & Gillespie
13 12 4H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Gritt & Gritt Farndon & Bond
12 10 4H-1 S -50 75.6 18.4 Heath & Heath Jeffery & Shilling
11 8 4H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Gradus & Glanville Nurmohamed & Jones
10 6 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Charteris & Horlock Hart & Wallace
9 4 4H-2 S -100 50.1 43.9 Dean & Dean Beattie & Connell
8 2 4H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Sitch & Wing Turpin & Lawson
7 13 4Dx-1 E 100 84.8 9.2 Foley & Foley Dickson & Hill
6 11 4Hx-3 S -500 4.1 89.9 Breslaw & Breslaw Cavell & Dean
5 9 4Hx-3 N -500 4.1 89.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Thompson & Thompson
4 7 4H-3 S -150 20.4 73.6 Friedman & Friedman Clarke & Blackmore
3 5 3H-1 N -50 75.6 18.4 Freedman & Freedman Hunt & Vaughan
2 3 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Bainham & Smallwood Nicolle & Bridge
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H+2 E -480 55.2 38.8 Fontes & Fontes Gillespie & Gillespie
13 12 3S+1 N 170 85.8 8.2 Gritt & Gritt Farndon & Bond
12 10 5Hx+1 E -750 24.5 69.5 Heath & Heath Jeffery & Shilling
11 8 5Hx+2 E -850 8.2 85.8 Gradus & Glanville Nurmohamed & Jones
10 6 4H+2 E -480 55.2 38.8 Charteris & Horlock Hart & Wallace
9 4 3H+3 E -230 79.7 14.3 Dean & Dean Beattie & Connell
8 2 5S-3 N -300 75.6 18.4 Sitch & Wing Turpin & Lawson
7 13 5H+2 E -510 42.9 51.1 Foley & Foley Dickson & Hill
6 11 4S= S 620 89.9 4.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Cavell & Dean
5 9 5Hx+2 E -850 8.2 85.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Thompson & Thompson
4 7 4H+1 E -450 65.4 28.6 Friedman & Friedman Clarke & Blackmore
3 5 5Hx+1 E -750 24.5 69.5 Freedman & Freedman Hunt & Vaughan
2 3 5H+2 E -510 42.9 51.1 Bainham & Smallwood Nicolle & Bridge
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 2S= N 110 31.7 62.3 Bainham & Smallwood Turpin & Lawson
1 13 3NT= N 400 51.1 42.9 Fontes & Fontes Dickson & Hill
13 11 3NT-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Gritt & Gritt Cavell & Dean
12 9 3NT-2 N -100 6.1 87.9 Heath & Heath Thompson & Thompson
11 7 1NT+3 N 180 39.9 54.1 Gradus & Glanville Clarke & Blackmore
10 5 2Hx-3 E 800 90.9 3.1 Charteris & Horlock Hunt & Vaughan
9 3 3NT+1 S 430 72.5 21.5 Dean & Dean Nicolle & Bridge
8 1 2Dx-2 W 500 86.8 7.2 Sitch & Wing Gillespie & Gillespie
7 12 3Hx-3 E 800 90.9 3.1 Foley & Foley Farndon & Bond
6 10 1NT+3 N 180 39.9 54.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Jeffery & Shilling
5 8 1NT= N 90 26.6 67.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Nurmohamed & Jones
4 6 3H-3 N -150 1 93 Friedman & Friedman Hart & Wallace
3 4 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Freedman & Freedman Beattie & Connell
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 2S-1 S -100 1 93 Bainham & Smallwood Turpin & Lawson
1 13 1S+1 N 110 60.3 33.7 Fontes & Fontes Dickson & Hill
13 11 2S+2 N 170 86.8 7.2 Gritt & Gritt Cavell & Dean
12 9 2S+2 N 170 86.8 7.2 Heath & Heath Thompson & Thompson
11 7 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Gradus & Glanville Clarke & Blackmore
10 5 1S= N 80 51.1 42.9 Charteris & Horlock Hunt & Vaughan
9 3 1S+2 N 140 72.5 21.5 Dean & Dean Nicolle & Bridge
8 1 1S+2 N 140 72.5 21.5 Sitch & Wing Gillespie & Gillespie
7 12 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Foley & Foley Farndon & Bond
6 10 3D-2 W 200 91.9 2.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Jeffery & Shilling
5 8 2NT-1 W 100 55.2 38.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Nurmohamed & Jones
4 6 2S+1 N 140 72.5 21.5 Friedman & Friedman Hart & Wallace
3 4 1S+2 N 140 72.5 21.5 Freedman & Freedman Beattie & Connell
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 2S-3 E 150 81.7 12.3 Freedman & Freedman Nicolle & Bridge
2 1 3S-3 E 150 81.7 12.3 Bainham & Smallwood Gillespie & Gillespie
1 12 1NT+1 S 120 67.4 26.6 Fontes & Fontes Farndon & Bond
13 10 2NT= N 120 67.4 26.6 Gritt & Gritt Jeffery & Shilling
12 8 2S-1 E 50 29.6 64.4 Heath & Heath Nurmohamed & Jones
11 6 3S-2 E 100 45 49 Gradus & Glanville Hart & Wallace
10 4 2NT= S 120 67.4 26.6 Charteris & Horlock Beattie & Connell
9 2 3D= N 110 58.2 35.8 Dean & Dean Turpin & Lawson
8 13 1NT-1 S -100 19.4 74.6 Sitch & Wing Dickson & Hill
7 11 3D-1 N -100 19.4 74.6 Foley & Foley Cavell & Dean
6 9 3NT-4 S -400 2.1 91.9 Breslaw & Breslaw Thompson & Thompson
5 7 3D= N 110 58.2 35.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Clarke & Blackmore
4 5 2D+1 N 110 58.2 35.8 Friedman & Friedman Hunt & Vaughan
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 5Dx-1 N -100 27.6 66.4 Freedman & Freedman Nicolle & Bridge
2 1 3H= E -140 10.2 83.8 Bainham & Smallwood Gillespie & Gillespie
1 12 3D+1 N 130 85.8 8.2 Fontes & Fontes Farndon & Bond
13 10 5Dx-2 N -300 4.1 89.9 Gritt & Gritt Jeffery & Shilling
12 8 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Heath & Heath Nurmohamed & Jones
11 6 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Gradus & Glanville Hart & Wallace
10 4 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Charteris & Horlock Beattie & Connell
9 2 4C= W -130 13.3 80.7 Dean & Dean Turpin & Lawson
8 13 3Dx= N 470 90.9 3.1 Sitch & Wing Dickson & Hill
7 11 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Foley & Foley Cavell & Dean
6 9 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Breslaw & Breslaw Thompson & Thompson
5 7 5Hx-2 E 500 94 0 Huikeshoven & Bell Clarke & Blackmore
4 5 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Friedman & Friedman Hunt & Vaughan
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Friedman & Friedman Beattie & Connell
3 2 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Freedman & Freedman Turpin & Lawson
2 13 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Bainham & Smallwood Dickson & Hill
1 11 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Fontes & Fontes Cavell & Dean
13 9 3NT+1 N 630 57.2 36.8 Gritt & Gritt Thompson & Thompson
12 7 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Heath & Heath Clarke & Blackmore
11 5 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Gradus & Glanville Hunt & Vaughan
10 3 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Charteris & Horlock Nicolle & Bridge
9 1 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Dean & Dean Gillespie & Gillespie
8 12 2Hx-2 E 500 10.2 83.8 Sitch & Wing Farndon & Bond
7 10 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Foley & Foley Jeffery & Shilling
6 8 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Breslaw & Breslaw Nurmohamed & Jones
5 6 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Huikeshoven & Bell Hart & Wallace
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4H+1 W -450 7.2 86.8 Friedman & Friedman Beattie & Connell
3 2 5H-1 W 50 78.7 15.3 Freedman & Freedman Turpin & Lawson
2 13 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Bainham & Smallwood Dickson & Hill
1 11 5D-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Fontes & Fontes Cavell & Dean
13 9 4D= N 130 90.9 3.1 Gritt & Gritt Thompson & Thompson
12 7 5D-1 S -50 65.4 28.6 Heath & Heath Clarke & Blackmore
11 5 5D-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Gradus & Glanville Hunt & Vaughan
10 3 3S-2 E 100 85.8 8.2 Charteris & Horlock Nicolle & Bridge
9 1 5H-1 E 50 78.7 15.3 Dean & Dean Gillespie & Gillespie
8 12 5D-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Sitch & Wing Farndon & Bond
7 10 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Foley & Foley Jeffery & Shilling
6 8 6Dx-2 N -300 12.3 81.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Nurmohamed & Jones
5 6 5H= W -450 7.2 86.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Hart & Wallace
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT= E -600 2.1 91.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Hunt & Vaughan
4 3 3S+1 W -170 8.2 85.8 Friedman & Friedman Nicolle & Bridge
3 1 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Freedman & Freedman Gillespie & Gillespie
2 12 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Bainham & Smallwood Farndon & Bond
1 10 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Fontes & Fontes Jeffery & Shilling
13 8 5C-3 N -150 12.3 81.7 Gritt & Gritt Nurmohamed & Jones
12 6 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Heath & Heath Hart & Wallace
11 4 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Gradus & Glanville Beattie & Connell
10 2 4Sx-1 W 200 91.9 2.1 Charteris & Horlock Turpin & Lawson
9 13 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Dean & Dean Dickson & Hill
8 11 4Sx-1 W 200 91.9 2.1 Sitch & Wing Cavell & Dean
7 9 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Foley & Foley Thompson & Thompson
6 7 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Breslaw & Breslaw Clarke & Blackmore
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Huikeshoven & Bell Hunt & Vaughan
4 3 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Friedman & Friedman Nicolle & Bridge
3 1 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Freedman & Freedman Gillespie & Gillespie
2 12 4S= E -620 78.7 15.3 Bainham & Smallwood Farndon & Bond
1 10 5S= E -650 41.9 52.1 Fontes & Fontes Jeffery & Shilling
13 8 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Gritt & Gritt Nurmohamed & Jones
12 6 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Heath & Heath Hart & Wallace
11 4 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Gradus & Glanville Beattie & Connell
10 2 3S+2 E -200 84.8 9.2 Charteris & Horlock Turpin & Lawson
9 13 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Dean & Dean Dickson & Hill
8 11 4S+2 E -680 5.1 88.9 Sitch & Wing Cavell & Dean
7 9 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Foley & Foley Thompson & Thompson
6 7 6S= E -1430 0 94 Breslaw & Breslaw Clarke & Blackmore
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Hart & Wallace
5 4 2Sx-3 S -500 4.1 89.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Beattie & Connell
4 2 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Friedman & Friedman Turpin & Lawson
3 13 3NT+1 W -430 84.8 9.2 Freedman & Freedman Dickson & Hill
2 11 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Bainham & Smallwood Cavell & Dean
1 9 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Fontes & Fontes Thompson & Thompson
13 7 3NT+3 E -490 22.5 71.5 Gritt & Gritt Clarke & Blackmore
12 5 3NT+1 W -430 84.8 9.2 Heath & Heath Hunt & Vaughan
11 3 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Gradus & Glanville Nicolle & Bridge
10 1 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Charteris & Horlock Gillespie & Gillespie
9 12 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Dean & Dean Farndon & Bond
8 10 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Sitch & Wing Jeffery & Shilling
7 8 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Foley & Foley Nurmohamed & Jones
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 2S= E -110 17.4 76.6 Breslaw & Breslaw Hart & Wallace
5 4 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Beattie & Connell
4 2 2S-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Friedman & Friedman Turpin & Lawson
3 13 2S-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Freedman & Freedman Dickson & Hill
2 11 2S= E -110 17.4 76.6 Bainham & Smallwood Cavell & Dean
1 9 2S= E -110 17.4 76.6 Fontes & Fontes Thompson & Thompson
13 7 1NT-1 N -100 30.7 63.3 Gritt & Gritt Clarke & Blackmore
12 5 3C-1 N -100 30.7 63.3 Heath & Heath Hunt & Vaughan
11 3 1NT= W -90 40.9 53.1 Gradus & Glanville Nicolle & Bridge
10 1 2S-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Charteris & Horlock Gillespie & Gillespie
9 12 1Dx-1 E 100 85.8 8.2 Dean & Dean Farndon & Bond
8 10 1D-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Sitch & Wing Jeffery & Shilling
7 8 2C= S 90 82.7 11.3 Foley & Foley Nurmohamed & Jones
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 5H= E -650 66.4 27.6 Foley & Foley Clarke & Blackmore
6 5 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Breslaw & Breslaw Hunt & Vaughan
5 3 4Sx-1 N -200 88.9 5.1 Huikeshoven & Bell Nicolle & Bridge
4 1 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Friedman & Friedman Gillespie & Gillespie
3 12 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Freedman & Freedman Farndon & Bond
2 10 4H+2 W -680 34.7 59.3 Bainham & Smallwood Jeffery & Shilling
1 8 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Fontes & Fontes Nurmohamed & Jones
13 6 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Gritt & Gritt Hart & Wallace
12 4 4H+1 E -650 66.4 27.6 Heath & Heath Beattie & Connell
11 2 4Sx-1 N -200 88.9 5.1 Gradus & Glanville Turpin & Lawson
10 13 6H= W -1430 3.1 90.9 Charteris & Horlock Dickson & Hill
9 11 4H+2 W -680 34.7 59.3 Dean & Dean Cavell & Dean
8 9 4H+1 E -650 66.4 27.6 Sitch & Wing Thompson & Thompson
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3NT= N 400 55.2 38.8 Foley & Foley Clarke & Blackmore
6 5 1NT+3 N 180 39.9 54.1 Breslaw & Breslaw Hunt & Vaughan
5 3 2Sx-2 W 300 50.1 43.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Nicolle & Bridge
4 1 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Friedman & Friedman Gillespie & Gillespie
3 12 2Sx-2 E 300 50.1 43.9 Freedman & Freedman Farndon & Bond
2 10 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Bainham & Smallwood Jeffery & Shilling
1 8 2S-2 W 100 20.4 73.6 Fontes & Fontes Nurmohamed & Jones
13 6 3NT+2 N 460 84.8 9.2 Gritt & Gritt Hart & Wallace
12 4 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Heath & Heath Beattie & Connell
11 2 2NT+2 N 180 39.9 54.1 Gradus & Glanville Turpin & Lawson
10 13 2NT+2 N 180 39.9 54.1 Charteris & Horlock Dickson & Hill
9 11 3H-1 N -50 8.2 85.8 Dean & Dean Cavell & Dean
8 9 1NT+3 N 180 39.9 54.1 Sitch & Wing Thompson & Thompson
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Sitch & Wing Nurmohamed & Jones
7 6 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Foley & Foley Hart & Wallace
6 4 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Breslaw & Breslaw Beattie & Connell
5 2 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Huikeshoven & Bell Turpin & Lawson
4 13 3NT-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Friedman & Friedman Dickson & Hill
3 11 2H+2 E -170 55.2 38.8 Freedman & Freedman Cavell & Dean
2 9 3NT-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Bainham & Smallwood Thompson & Thompson
1 7 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Fontes & Fontes Clarke & Blackmore
13 5 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Gritt & Gritt Hunt & Vaughan
12 3 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Heath & Heath Nicolle & Bridge
11 1 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Gradus & Glanville Gillespie & Gillespie
10 12 3NT-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Charteris & Horlock Farndon & Bond
9 10 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Dean & Dean Jeffery & Shilling
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-3 N -150 3.1 90.9 Sitch & Wing Nurmohamed & Jones
7 6 3NT-3 N -150 3.1 90.9 Foley & Foley Hart & Wallace
6 4 3NT-1 S -50 60.3 33.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Beattie & Connell
5 2 2H= N 110 81.7 12.3 Huikeshoven & Bell Turpin & Lawson
4 13 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Friedman & Friedman Dickson & Hill
3 11 4H-2 S -100 24.5 69.5 Freedman & Freedman Cavell & Dean
2 9 2H+1 N 140 91.9 2.1 Bainham & Smallwood Thompson & Thompson
1 7 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Fontes & Fontes Clarke & Blackmore
13 5 3NT-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Gritt & Gritt Hunt & Vaughan
12 3 3NT-1 S -50 60.3 33.7 Heath & Heath Nicolle & Bridge
11 1 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Gradus & Glanville Gillespie & Gillespie
10 12 3NT-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Charteris & Horlock Farndon & Bond
9 10 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Dean & Dean Jeffery & Shilling
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Dean & Dean Thompson & Thompson
8 7 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Sitch & Wing Clarke & Blackmore
7 5 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Foley & Foley Hunt & Vaughan
6 3 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Breslaw & Breslaw Nicolle & Bridge
5 1 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Huikeshoven & Bell Gillespie & Gillespie
4 12 2S+1 S 140 29.6 64.4 Friedman & Friedman Farndon & Bond
3 10 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Freedman & Freedman Jeffery & Shilling
2 8 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Bainham & Smallwood Nurmohamed & Jones
1 6 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Fontes & Fontes Hart & Wallace
13 4 4S= N 420 65.4 28.6 Gritt & Gritt Beattie & Connell
12 2 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Heath & Heath Turpin & Lawson
11 13 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Gradus & Glanville Dickson & Hill
10 11 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Charteris & Horlock Cavell & Dean
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 2H-3 W 150 85.8 8.2 Dean & Dean Thompson & Thompson
8 7 2NT-3 E 150 85.8 8.2 Sitch & Wing Clarke & Blackmore
7 5 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Foley & Foley Hunt & Vaughan
6 3 2C+1 E -110 33.7 60.3 Breslaw & Breslaw Nicolle & Bridge
5 1 1Sx+1 N 360 91.9 2.1 Huikeshoven & Bell Gillespie & Gillespie
4 12 3C-1 E 50 68.4 25.6 Friedman & Friedman Farndon & Bond
3 10 3NT-2 E 100 79.7 14.3 Freedman & Freedman Jeffery & Shilling
2 8 2H= W -110 33.7 60.3 Bainham & Smallwood Nurmohamed & Jones
1 6 2C= E -90 56.2 37.8 Fontes & Fontes Hart & Wallace
13 4 3C-1 E 50 68.4 25.6 Gritt & Gritt Beattie & Connell
12 2 3NT-2 E 100 79.7 14.3 Heath & Heath Turpin & Lawson
11 13 2S-2 E 100 79.7 14.3 Gradus & Glanville Dickson & Hill
10 11 2H-1 E 50 68.4 25.6 Charteris & Horlock Cavell & Dean
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 3S+3 N 230 25.6 68.4 Charteris & Horlock Jeffery & Shilling
9 8 4Hx+2 S 790 94 0 Dean & Dean Nurmohamed & Jones
8 6 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Sitch & Wing Hart & Wallace
7 4 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Foley & Foley Beattie & Connell
6 2 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Breslaw & Breslaw Turpin & Lawson
5 13 3H+2 S 200 8.2 85.8 Huikeshoven & Bell Dickson & Hill
4 11 5Sx= N 650 91.9 2.1 Friedman & Friedman Cavell & Dean
3 9 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Freedman & Freedman Thompson & Thompson
2 7 3H+2 S 200 8.2 85.8 Bainham & Smallwood Clarke & Blackmore
1 5 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Fontes & Fontes Hunt & Vaughan
13 3 3H+3 N 230 25.6 68.4 Gritt & Gritt Nicolle & Bridge
12 1 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Heath & Heath Gillespie & Gillespie
11 12 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Gradus & Glanville Farndon & Bond
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Charteris & Horlock Jeffery & Shilling
9 8 5S-1 N -100 5.1 88.9 Dean & Dean Nurmohamed & Jones
8 6 3S+1 N 170 24.5 69.5 Sitch & Wing Hart & Wallace
7 4 4S-1 N -100 5.1 88.9 Foley & Foley Beattie & Connell
6 2 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Breslaw & Breslaw Turpin & Lawson
5 13 3S+1 N 170 24.5 69.5 Huikeshoven & Bell Dickson & Hill
4 11 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Friedman & Friedman Cavell & Dean
3 9 4S+1 N 650 88.9 5.1 Freedman & Freedman Thompson & Thompson
2 7 3S+1 S 170 24.5 69.5 Bainham & Smallwood Clarke & Blackmore
1 5 4H= N 620 58.2 35.8 Fontes & Fontes Hunt & Vaughan
13 3 4S+1 N 650 88.9 5.1 Gritt & Gritt Nicolle & Bridge
12 1 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Heath & Heath Gillespie & Gillespie
11 12 3S+1 N 170 24.5 69.5 Gradus & Glanville Farndon & Bond
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Gradus & Glanville Cavell & Dean
10 9 3S+1 S 170 81.7 12.3 Charteris & Horlock Thompson & Thompson
9 7 4S-1 S -100 63.3 30.7 Dean & Dean Clarke & Blackmore
8 5 4D+1 E -150 57.2 36.8 Sitch & Wing Hunt & Vaughan
7 3 5Dx= E -550 2.1 91.9 Foley & Foley Nicolle & Bridge
6 1 5S-1 S -100 63.3 30.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Gillespie & Gillespie
5 12 4S= S 620 88.9 5.1 Huikeshoven & Bell Farndon & Bond
4 10 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Friedman & Friedman Jeffery & Shilling
3 8 5S-2 N -200 52.1 41.9 Freedman & Freedman Nurmohamed & Jones
2 6 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Bainham & Smallwood Hart & Wallace
1 4 4S= S 620 88.9 5.1 Fontes & Fontes Beattie & Connell
13 2 5Hx-1 N -200 52.1 41.9 Gritt & Gritt Turpin & Lawson
12 13 5Dx= E -550 2.1 91.9 Heath & Heath Dickson & Hill
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Gradus & Glanville Cavell & Dean
10 9 3NT+1 W -630 83.8 10.2 Charteris & Horlock Thompson & Thompson
9 7 3NT+1 W -630 83.8 10.2 Dean & Dean Clarke & Blackmore
8 5 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Sitch & Wing Hunt & Vaughan
7 3 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Foley & Foley Nicolle & Bridge
6 1 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Breslaw & Breslaw Gillespie & Gillespie
5 12 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Huikeshoven & Bell Farndon & Bond
4 10 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Friedman & Friedman Jeffery & Shilling
3 8 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Freedman & Freedman Nurmohamed & Jones
2 6 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Bainham & Smallwood Hart & Wallace
1 4 4S= W -620 90.9 3.1 Fontes & Fontes Beattie & Connell
13 2 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Gritt & Gritt Turpin & Lawson
12 13 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Heath & Heath Dickson & Hill
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Heath & Heath Farndon & Bond
11 10 3NT+1 E -630 3.1 90.9 Gradus & Glanville Jeffery & Shilling
10 8 4S= E -620 12.3 81.7 Charteris & Horlock Nurmohamed & Jones
9 6 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Dean & Dean Hart & Wallace
8 4 4S-1 E 100 72.5 21.5 Sitch & Wing Beattie & Connell
7 2 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Foley & Foley Turpin & Lawson
6 13 2C+1 W -110 63.3 30.7 Breslaw & Breslaw Dickson & Hill
5 11 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Huikeshoven & Bell Cavell & Dean
4 9 4S= W -620 12.3 81.7 Friedman & Friedman Thompson & Thompson
3 7 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Freedman & Freedman Clarke & Blackmore
2 5 3NT-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Bainham & Smallwood Hunt & Vaughan
1 3 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Fontes & Fontes Nicolle & Bridge
13 1 3NT-2 E 200 83.8 10.2 Gritt & Gritt Gillespie & Gillespie
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 2Sx= S 470 93 1 Heath & Heath Farndon & Bond
11 10 2Sx-1 S -100 45 49 Gradus & Glanville Jeffery & Shilling
10 8 2H+2 W -170 11.8 82.2 Charteris & Horlock Nurmohamed & Jones
9 6 1NT+2 E -150 18.4 75.6 Dean & Dean Hart & Wallace
8 4 2Sx= N 470 93 1 Sitch & Wing Beattie & Connell
7 2 2D-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Foley & Foley Turpin & Lawson
6 13 3Sx-3 S -500 0 94 Breslaw & Breslaw Dickson & Hill
5 11 3H= W -140 29.1 64.9 Huikeshoven & Bell Cavell & Dean
4 9 2S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Friedman & Friedman Thompson & Thompson
3 7 1NT+2 W -150 18.4 75.6 Freedman & Freedman Clarke & Blackmore
2 5 4H-1 W 50 72.5 21.5 Bainham & Smallwood Hunt & Vaughan
1 3 3H-1 W 50 72.5 21.5 Fontes & Fontes Nicolle & Bridge
13 1 3NT-2 E 100 80.7 13.3 Gritt & Gritt Gillespie & Gillespie
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 4H= N 420 62 32 Gritt & Gritt Dickson & Hill
12 11 4H= S 420 62 32 Heath & Heath Cavell & Dean
11 9 2NT+1 N 150 29 65 Gradus & Glanville Thompson & Thompson
10 7 3NT+1 N 430 85 9 Charteris & Horlock Clarke & Blackmore
9 5 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Dean & Dean Hunt & Vaughan
8 3 3NT= N 400 40 54 Sitch & Wing Nicolle & Bridge
7 1 4H-1 N -50 14 80 Foley & Foley Gillespie & Gillespie
6 12 3NT-3 N -150 0 94 Breslaw & Breslaw Farndon & Bond
5 10 2H+2 N 170 34 60 Huikeshoven & Bell Jeffery & Shilling
4 8 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Friedman & Friedman Nurmohamed & Jones
3 6 4H= N 420 62 32 Freedman & Freedman Hart & Wallace
2 4 4H= S 420 62 32 Bainham & Smallwood Beattie & Connell
1 2 4H= S 420 62 32 Fontes & Fontes Turpin & Lawson
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Gritt & Gritt Dickson & Hill
12 11 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Heath & Heath Cavell & Dean
11 9 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Gradus & Glanville Thompson & Thompson
10 7 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Charteris & Horlock Clarke & Blackmore
9 5 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Dean & Dean Hunt & Vaughan
8 3 4S= E -620 40 54 Sitch & Wing Nicolle & Bridge
7 1 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Foley & Foley Gillespie & Gillespie
6 12 3NT+2 W -660 2 92 Breslaw & Breslaw Farndon & Bond
5 10 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Huikeshoven & Bell Jeffery & Shilling
4 8 3S+2 E -200 60 34 Friedman & Friedman Nurmohamed & Jones
3 6 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Freedman & Freedman Hart & Wallace
2 4 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Bainham & Smallwood Beattie & Connell
1 2 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Fontes & Fontes Turpin & Lawson
Session 2 Section White Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4Hx-3 N -500 4.1 89.9 Carlisle & Marsh Harper & Hackett
13 11 4H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Bingham & Osmer Heath & Heath
12 9 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Hoffman & Harper Basden-Smith & Parsons
11 7 4Sx-2 E 300 89.9 4.1 Jackson & Gordon Prince & Hair
10 5 4Sx-1 E 100 84.8 9.2 Pigott & Heilbron Wright & Watson
9 3 4H-1 N -50 75.6 18.4 Keith & Jerrard Twyman & Twyman
8 14 4H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Leslie & King-Farlow Eddleston & Eddleston
7 12 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Smart & Lunn Jones & Martin
6 10 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Herbert & Herbert Cohen & Register
5 8 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 McCready & Dyer Youd & Rankin
4 6 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Edmonds & Stimson Griffin & Heatly
3 4 4H-4 N -200 9.2 84.8 Rumbelow & Anning Hedley & Hedley
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4Sx= N 790 94 0 Carlisle & Marsh Harper & Hackett
13 11 4H+1 E -450 65.4 28.6 Bingham & Osmer Heath & Heath
12 9 4Hx+2 E -790 16.4 77.6 Hoffman & Harper Basden-Smith & Parsons
11 7 4S-1 N -100 83.8 10.2 Jackson & Gordon Prince & Hair
10 5 4H+2 E -480 55.2 38.8 Pigott & Heilbron Wright & Watson
9 3 4H+2 W -480 55.2 38.8 Keith & Jerrard Twyman & Twyman
8 14 4H+3 E -510 42.9 51.1 Leslie & King-Farlow Eddleston & Eddleston
7 12 4S-2 N -200 81.7 12.3 Smart & Lunn Jones & Martin
6 10 5Hx+1 E -750 24.5 69.5 Herbert & Herbert Cohen & Register
5 8 6Hx= E -1210 0 94 McCready & Dyer Youd & Rankin
4 6 4Hx+1 E -690 31.7 62.3 Edmonds & Stimson Griffin & Heatly
3 4 5S-3 N -300 75.6 18.4 Rumbelow & Anning Hedley & Hedley
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3NT= N 400 51.1 42.9 Ericson & Wills Wren & Perryman
1 14 3NT-2 S -100 6.1 87.9 Carlisle & Marsh Eddleston & Eddleston
13 10 3NT-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Bingham & Osmer Cohen & Register
12 8 3NT= N 400 51.1 42.9 Hoffman & Harper Youd & Rankin
11 6 1Sxx-3 E 1600 94 0 Jackson & Gordon Griffin & Heatly
10 4 3NT-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Pigott & Heilbron Hedley & Hedley
9 1 2C+1 S 110 31.7 62.3 Keith & Jerrard Harper & Hackett
8 13 1S-4 E 400 51.1 42.9 Leslie & King-Farlow Butler & Butler
7 11 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Smart & Lunn Heath & Heath
6 9 1NT+2 S 150 35.8 58.2 Herbert & Herbert Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 McCready & Dyer Prince & Hair
4 5 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Edmonds & Stimson Wright & Watson
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 2S+2 N 170 86.8 7.2 Ericson & Wills Wren & Perryman
1 14 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Carlisle & Marsh Eddleston & Eddleston
13 10 1NT-3 W 300 94 0 Bingham & Osmer Cohen & Register
12 8 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Hoffman & Harper Youd & Rankin
11 6 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Jackson & Gordon Griffin & Heatly
10 4 1NT-1 W 100 55.2 38.8 Pigott & Heilbron Hedley & Hedley
9 1 3S= N 140 72.5 21.5 Keith & Jerrard Harper & Hackett
8 13 3S-1 N -100 1 93 Leslie & King-Farlow Butler & Butler
7 11 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Smart & Lunn Heath & Heath
6 9 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Herbert & Herbert Basden-Smith & Parsons
5 7 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 McCready & Dyer Prince & Hair
4 5 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Edmonds & Stimson Wright & Watson
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3D-1 N -100 19.4 74.6 Rumbelow & Anning Twyman & Twyman
2 1 3S-3 E 150 81.7 12.3 Ericson & Wills Harper & Hackett
1 13 2Sx-2 E 300 90.9 3.1 Carlisle & Marsh Butler & Butler
13 9 3S-3 E 150 81.7 12.3 Bingham & Osmer Basden-Smith & Parsons
12 7 1NT+2 S 150 81.7 12.3 Hoffman & Harper Prince & Hair
11 5 3S-2 E 100 45 49 Jackson & Gordon Wright & Watson
10 2 3D-2 N -200 6.1 87.9 Pigott & Heilbron Wren & Perryman
9 14 2NT-2 S -200 6.1 87.9 Keith & Jerrard Eddleston & Eddleston
8 12 2C-1 S -100 19.4 74.6 Leslie & King-Farlow Jones & Martin
7 10 2S-2 E 100 45 49 Smart & Lunn Cohen & Register
6 8 2S-1 E 50 29.6 64.4 Herbert & Herbert Youd & Rankin
5 6 2Sx-2 E 300 90.9 3.1 McCready & Dyer Griffin & Heatly
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Rumbelow & Anning Twyman & Twyman
2 1 3D= N 110 79.7 14.3 Ericson & Wills Harper & Hackett
1 13 5H-3 E 300 87.9 6.1 Carlisle & Marsh Butler & Butler
13 9 3S+1 E -170 8.2 85.8 Bingham & Osmer Basden-Smith & Parsons
12 7 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Hoffman & Harper Prince & Hair
11 5 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Jackson & Gordon Wright & Watson
10 2 3Dx= N 470 90.9 3.1 Pigott & Heilbron Wren & Perryman
9 14 5Dx-2 N -300 4.1 89.9 Keith & Jerrard Eddleston & Eddleston
8 12 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Leslie & King-Farlow Jones & Martin
7 10 3D= N 110 79.7 14.3 Smart & Lunn Cohen & Register
6 8 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Herbert & Herbert Youd & Rankin
5 6 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 McCready & Dyer Griffin & Heatly
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S+1 N 650 76.6 17.4 Edmonds & Stimson Hedley & Hedley
3 2 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Rumbelow & Anning Wren & Perryman
2 14 3NT-1 S -100 4.1 89.9 Ericson & Wills Eddleston & Eddleston
1 12 4S+1 N 650 76.6 17.4 Carlisle & Marsh Jones & Martin
13 8 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Bingham & Osmer Youd & Rankin
12 6 3NT+1 S 630 57.2 36.8 Hoffman & Harper Griffin & Heatly
11 3 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Jackson & Gordon Twyman & Twyman
10 1 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Pigott & Heilbron Harper & Hackett
9 13 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Keith & Jerrard Butler & Butler
8 11 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Leslie & King-Farlow Heath & Heath
7 9 3NT+1 S 630 57.2 36.8 Smart & Lunn Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 4S-1 S -100 4.1 89.9 Herbert & Herbert Prince & Hair
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 5H-2 W 100 85.8 8.2 Edmonds & Stimson Hedley & Hedley
3 2 4H+1 W -450 7.2 86.8 Rumbelow & Anning Wren & Perryman
2 14 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Ericson & Wills Eddleston & Eddleston
1 12 6Dx-3 N -500 2.1 91.9 Carlisle & Marsh Jones & Martin
13 8 5D-2 S -100 39.9 54.1 Bingham & Osmer Youd & Rankin
12 6 2H+1 W -140 21.5 72.5 Hoffman & Harper Griffin & Heatly
11 3 5D-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Jackson & Gordon Twyman & Twyman
10 1 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Pigott & Heilbron Harper & Hackett
9 13 2H+3 W -200 15.3 78.7 Keith & Jerrard Butler & Butler
8 11 5D-1 N -50 65.4 28.6 Leslie & King-Farlow Heath & Heath
7 9 2H+1 W -140 21.5 72.5 Smart & Lunn Basden-Smith & Parsons
6 7 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Herbert & Herbert Prince & Hair
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 McCready & Dyer Wright & Watson
4 3 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Edmonds & Stimson Twyman & Twyman
3 1 4S= W -620 0 94 Rumbelow & Anning Harper & Hackett
2 13 3S+1 W -170 8.2 85.8 Ericson & Wills Butler & Butler
1 11 2S+1 W -140 34.7 59.3 Carlisle & Marsh Heath & Heath
13 7 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Bingham & Osmer Prince & Hair
12 4 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Hoffman & Harper Hedley & Hedley
11 2 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Jackson & Gordon Wren & Perryman
10 14 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Pigott & Heilbron Eddleston & Eddleston
9 12 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Keith & Jerrard Jones & Martin
8 10 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Leslie & King-Farlow Cohen & Register
7 8 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Smart & Lunn Youd & Rankin
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4S-1 E 100 90.9 3.1 McCready & Dyer Wright & Watson
4 3 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Edmonds & Stimson Twyman & Twyman
3 1 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Rumbelow & Anning Harper & Hackett
2 13 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Ericson & Wills Butler & Butler
1 11 5S+1 E -680 5.1 88.9 Carlisle & Marsh Heath & Heath
13 7 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Bingham & Osmer Prince & Hair
12 4 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Hoffman & Harper Hedley & Hedley
11 2 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Jackson & Gordon Wren & Perryman
10 14 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Pigott & Heilbron Eddleston & Eddleston
9 12 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Keith & Jerrard Jones & Martin
8 10 4S+2 E -680 5.1 88.9 Leslie & King-Farlow Cohen & Register
7 8 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Smart & Lunn Youd & Rankin
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Herbert & Herbert Griffin & Heatly
5 4 4H= E -420 89.9 4.1 McCready & Dyer Hedley & Hedley
4 2 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Edmonds & Stimson Wren & Perryman
3 14 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Rumbelow & Anning Eddleston & Eddleston
2 12 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Ericson & Wills Jones & Martin
1 10 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Carlisle & Marsh Cohen & Register
13 5 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Bingham & Osmer Wright & Watson
12 3 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Hoffman & Harper Twyman & Twyman
11 1 3NT+3 E -490 22.5 71.5 Jackson & Gordon Harper & Hackett
10 13 4S-2 W 100 94 0 Pigott & Heilbron Butler & Butler
9 11 3NT+1 W -430 84.8 9.2 Keith & Jerrard Heath & Heath
8 9 2NT+4 W -240 91.9 2.1 Leslie & King-Farlow Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3C-1 N -100 30.7 63.3 Herbert & Herbert Griffin & Heatly
5 4 1NT= E -90 40.9 53.1 McCready & Dyer Hedley & Hedley
4 2 1D+1 E -90 40.9 53.1 Edmonds & Stimson Wren & Perryman
3 14 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Rumbelow & Anning Eddleston & Eddleston
2 12 2C= N 90 82.7 11.3 Ericson & Wills Jones & Martin
1 10 1S+2 E -140 7.2 86.8 Carlisle & Marsh Cohen & Register
13 5 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Bingham & Osmer Wright & Watson
12 3 1NT-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Hoffman & Harper Twyman & Twyman
11 1 2S+2 W -170 4.1 89.9 Jackson & Gordon Harper & Hackett
10 13 1D-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Pigott & Heilbron Butler & Butler
9 11 2C+1 N 110 88.9 5.1 Keith & Jerrard Heath & Heath
8 9 3D-3 E 150 91.9 2.1 Leslie & King-Farlow Basden-Smith & Parsons
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Smart & Lunn Prince & Hair
6 5 4H+2 W -680 34.7 59.3 Herbert & Herbert Wright & Watson
5 3 4Sx-1 N -200 88.9 5.1 McCready & Dyer Twyman & Twyman
4 1 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Edmonds & Stimson Harper & Hackett
3 13 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Rumbelow & Anning Butler & Butler
2 11 4Sx-2 N -500 74.6 19.4 Ericson & Wills Heath & Heath
1 9 4Sx-1 N -200 88.9 5.1 Carlisle & Marsh Basden-Smith & Parsons
13 4 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Bingham & Osmer Hedley & Hedley
12 2 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Hoffman & Harper Wren & Perryman
11 14 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Jackson & Gordon Eddleston & Eddleston
10 12 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Pigott & Heilbron Jones & Martin
9 10 4Sx-2 N -500 74.6 19.4 Keith & Jerrard Cohen & Register
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 2Sx-2 E 300 50.1 43.9 Smart & Lunn Prince & Hair
6 5 4H-2 S -100 2.1 91.9 Herbert & Herbert Wright & Watson
5 3 3NT+2 N 460 84.8 9.2 McCready & Dyer Twyman & Twyman
4 1 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Edmonds & Stimson Harper & Hackett
3 13 2S-2 E 100 20.4 73.6 Rumbelow & Anning Butler & Butler
2 11 2S-1 E 50 12.3 81.7 Ericson & Wills Heath & Heath
1 9 4H-1 S -50 8.2 85.8 Carlisle & Marsh Basden-Smith & Parsons
13 4 1NT+3 N 180 39.9 54.1 Bingham & Osmer Hedley & Hedley
12 2 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Hoffman & Harper Wren & Perryman
11 14 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Jackson & Gordon Eddleston & Eddleston
10 12 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Pigott & Heilbron Jones & Martin
9 10 3Sx-2 E 300 50.1 43.9 Keith & Jerrard Cohen & Register
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 4H-1 E 50 76.6 17.4 Leslie & King-Farlow Youd & Rankin
7 6 3NT-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Smart & Lunn Griffin & Heatly
6 4 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Herbert & Herbert Hedley & Hedley
5 2 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 McCready & Dyer Wren & Perryman
4 14 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Edmonds & Stimson Eddleston & Eddleston
3 12 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Rumbelow & Anning Jones & Martin
2 10 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Ericson & Wills Cohen & Register
1 7 3NT= W -400 50.1 43.9 Carlisle & Marsh Prince & Hair
13 3 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Bingham & Osmer Twyman & Twyman
12 1 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Hoffman & Harper Harper & Hackett
11 13 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Jackson & Gordon Butler & Butler
10 11 3H= W -140 58.2 35.8 Pigott & Heilbron Heath & Heath
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 2H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Leslie & King-Farlow Youd & Rankin
7 6 2H+1 N 140 91.9 2.1 Smart & Lunn Griffin & Heatly
6 4 2H= N 110 81.7 12.3 Herbert & Herbert Hedley & Hedley
5 2 3NT-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 McCready & Dyer Wren & Perryman
4 14 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Edmonds & Stimson Eddleston & Eddleston
3 12 3NT-2 S -100 24.5 69.5 Rumbelow & Anning Jones & Martin
2 10 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Ericson & Wills Cohen & Register
1 7 3NT-2 S -100 24.5 69.5 Carlisle & Marsh Prince & Hair
13 3 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Bingham & Osmer Twyman & Twyman
12 1 3NT-2 S -100 24.5 69.5 Hoffman & Harper Harper & Hackett
11 13 4H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Jackson & Gordon Butler & Butler
10 11 2S-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Pigott & Heilbron Heath & Heath
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT= N 400 37.8 56.2 Keith & Jerrard Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Leslie & King-Farlow Prince & Hair
7 5 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Smart & Lunn Wright & Watson
6 3 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Herbert & Herbert Twyman & Twyman
5 1 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 McCready & Dyer Harper & Hackett
4 13 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Edmonds & Stimson Butler & Butler
3 11 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Rumbelow & Anning Heath & Heath
2 8 1S+3 S 170 32.7 61.3 Ericson & Wills Youd & Rankin
1 6 3NT+2 N 460 94 0 Carlisle & Marsh Griffin & Heatly
13 2 4S-2 S -100 0 94 Bingham & Osmer Wren & Perryman
12 14 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Hoffman & Harper Eddleston & Eddleston
11 12 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Jackson & Gordon Jones & Martin
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3H+1 W -170 6.1 87.9 Keith & Jerrard Basden-Smith & Parsons
8 7 2C+1 E -110 33.7 60.3 Leslie & King-Farlow Prince & Hair
7 5 2C= S 90 75.6 18.4 Smart & Lunn Wright & Watson
6 3 2NT-1 E 50 68.4 25.6 Herbert & Herbert Twyman & Twyman
5 1 3NT-4 E 200 89.9 4.1 McCready & Dyer Harper & Hackett
4 13 3H= W -140 11.3 82.7 Edmonds & Stimson Butler & Butler
3 11 2C= E -90 56.2 37.8 Rumbelow & Anning Heath & Heath
2 8 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Ericson & Wills Youd & Rankin
1 6 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Carlisle & Marsh Griffin & Heatly
13 2 2Sx+1 N 870 94 0 Bingham & Osmer Wren & Perryman
12 14 2NT= E -120 16.4 77.6 Hoffman & Harper Eddleston & Eddleston
11 12 2NT-1 E 50 68.4 25.6 Jackson & Gordon Jones & Martin
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 3H+3 N 230 25.6 68.4 Pigott & Heilbron Cohen & Register
9 8 4H+1 S 450 57.2 36.8 Keith & Jerrard Youd & Rankin
8 6 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Leslie & King-Farlow Griffin & Heatly
7 4 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Smart & Lunn Hedley & Hedley
6 2 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Herbert & Herbert Wren & Perryman
5 14 4H+1 S 450 57.2 36.8 McCready & Dyer Eddleston & Eddleston
4 12 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Edmonds & Stimson Jones & Martin
3 9 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Rumbelow & Anning Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 5C-4 E 400 40.9 53.1 Ericson & Wills Prince & Hair
1 5 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Carlisle & Marsh Wright & Watson
13 1 4H= S 420 42.9 51.1 Bingham & Osmer Harper & Hackett
12 13 4H+1 S 450 57.2 36.8 Hoffman & Harper Butler & Butler
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Pigott & Heilbron Cohen & Register
9 8 2S+2 N 170 24.5 69.5 Keith & Jerrard Youd & Rankin
8 6 4S+1 N 650 88.9 5.1 Leslie & King-Farlow Griffin & Heatly
7 4 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Smart & Lunn Hedley & Hedley
6 2 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Herbert & Herbert Wren & Perryman
5 14 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 McCready & Dyer Eddleston & Eddleston
4 12 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Edmonds & Stimson Jones & Martin
3 9 4S-1 N -100 5.1 88.9 Rumbelow & Anning Basden-Smith & Parsons
2 7 3S+1 N 170 24.5 69.5 Ericson & Wills Prince & Hair
1 5 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Carlisle & Marsh Wright & Watson
13 1 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Bingham & Osmer Harper & Hackett
12 13 4S+1 N 650 88.9 5.1 Hoffman & Harper Butler & Butler
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 6Dx-1 E 100 74.6 19.4 Jackson & Gordon Heath & Heath
10 9 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Pigott & Heilbron Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 6Dx-1 E 100 74.6 19.4 Keith & Jerrard Prince & Hair
8 5 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Leslie & King-Farlow Wright & Watson
7 3 5S-1 S -100 63.3 30.7 Smart & Lunn Twyman & Twyman
6 1 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Herbert & Herbert Harper & Hackett
5 13 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 McCready & Dyer Butler & Butler
4 10 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Edmonds & Stimson Cohen & Register
3 8 6D-1 W 50 69.5 24.5 Rumbelow & Anning Youd & Rankin
2 6 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Ericson & Wills Griffin & Heatly
1 4 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Carlisle & Marsh Hedley & Hedley
13 14 4Sx= S 790 94 0 Bingham & Osmer Eddleston & Eddleston
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Jackson & Gordon Heath & Heath
10 9 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Pigott & Heilbron Basden-Smith & Parsons
9 7 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Keith & Jerrard Prince & Hair
8 5 4S= W -620 90.9 3.1 Leslie & King-Farlow Wright & Watson
7 3 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Smart & Lunn Twyman & Twyman
6 1 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Herbert & Herbert Harper & Hackett
5 13 4S+1 E -650 47 47 McCready & Dyer Butler & Butler
4 10 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Edmonds & Stimson Cohen & Register
3 8 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Rumbelow & Anning Youd & Rankin
2 6 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Ericson & Wills Griffin & Heatly
1 4 4S= E -620 90.9 3.1 Carlisle & Marsh Hedley & Hedley
13 14 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Bingham & Osmer Eddleston & Eddleston
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Hoffman & Harper Jones & Martin
11 10 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Jackson & Gordon Cohen & Register
10 8 2C+3 W -150 54.1 39.9 Pigott & Heilbron Youd & Rankin
9 6 3NT+1 E -630 3.1 90.9 Keith & Jerrard Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3NT+1 E -630 3.1 90.9 Leslie & King-Farlow Hedley & Hedley
7 2 4S= E -620 12.3 81.7 Smart & Lunn Wren & Perryman
6 14 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Herbert & Herbert Eddleston & Eddleston
5 11 2NT+1 W -150 54.1 39.9 McCready & Dyer Heath & Heath
4 9 2S+1 E -140 61.3 32.7 Edmonds & Stimson Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 2NT+2 W -180 42.9 51.1 Rumbelow & Anning Prince & Hair
2 5 3NT-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Ericson & Wills Wright & Watson
1 3 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Carlisle & Marsh Twyman & Twyman
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 2S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Hoffman & Harper Jones & Martin
11 10 2S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Jackson & Gordon Cohen & Register
10 8 Art 20.4 73.6 Pigott & Heilbron Youd & Rankin
9 6 3H= W -140 29.1 64.9 Keith & Jerrard Griffin & Heatly
8 4 3H= E -140 29.1 64.9 Leslie & King-Farlow Hedley & Hedley
7 2 4H-2 W 100 80.7 13.3 Smart & Lunn Wren & Perryman
6 14 4H-1 W 50 72.5 21.5 Herbert & Herbert Eddleston & Eddleston
5 11 4H-2 W 100 80.7 13.3 McCready & Dyer Heath & Heath
4 9 2S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Edmonds & Stimson Basden-Smith & Parsons
3 7 3H+1 E -170 11.8 82.2 Rumbelow & Anning Prince & Hair
2 5 2S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Ericson & Wills Wright & Watson
1 3 2H= E -110 39.9 54.1 Carlisle & Marsh Twyman & Twyman
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 4H= N 420 62 32 Bingham & Osmer Butler & Butler
12 11 3NT+1 N 430 85 9 Hoffman & Harper Heath & Heath
11 9 4H= S 420 62 32 Jackson & Gordon Basden-Smith & Parsons
10 7 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Pigott & Heilbron Prince & Hair
9 5 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Keith & Jerrard Wright & Watson
8 3 2H+2 N 170 34 60 Leslie & King-Farlow Twyman & Twyman
7 1 4H= S 420 62 32 Smart & Lunn Harper & Hackett
6 12 3NT= N 400 40 54 Herbert & Herbert Jones & Martin
5 10 4H-1 S -50 14 80 McCready & Dyer Cohen & Register
4 8 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Edmonds & Stimson Youd & Rankin
3 6 4H= S 420 62 32 Rumbelow & Anning Griffin & Heatly
2 4 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Ericson & Wills Hedley & Hedley
1 2 4H= N 420 62 32 Carlisle & Marsh Wren & Perryman
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Bingham & Osmer Butler & Butler
12 11 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Hoffman & Harper Heath & Heath
11 9 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Jackson & Gordon Basden-Smith & Parsons
10 7 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Pigott & Heilbron Prince & Hair
9 5 4S+1 W -650 21 73 Keith & Jerrard Wright & Watson
8 3 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Leslie & King-Farlow Twyman & Twyman
7 1 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Smart & Lunn Harper & Hackett
6 12 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Herbert & Herbert Jones & Martin
5 10 3S+2 E -200 60 34 McCready & Dyer Cohen & Register
4 8 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Edmonds & Stimson Youd & Rankin
3 6 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Rumbelow & Anning Griffin & Heatly
2 4 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Ericson & Wills Hedley & Hedley
1 2 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Carlisle & Marsh Wren & Perryman
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 12 3NT= S 400 13.1 80.9 Bingham & Osmer Jones & Martin
12 10 3NT+4 S 520 89.4 4.6 Hoffman & Harper Cohen & Register
11 8 3NT+3 S 490 72.4 21.6 Jackson & Gordon Youd & Rankin
10 6 3NT+2 N 460 56.9 37.1 Pigott & Heilbron Griffin & Heatly
9 4 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Keith & Jerrard Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Leslie & King-Farlow Wren & Perryman
7 13 3NT+3 N 490 72.4 21.6 Smart & Lunn Butler & Butler
6 11 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Herbert & Herbert Heath & Heath
5 9 3NT= N 400 13.1 80.9 McCready & Dyer Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 3NT= N 400 13.1 80.9 Edmonds & Stimson Prince & Hair
3 5 3NT= S 400 13.1 80.9 Rumbelow & Anning Wright & Watson
2 3 3NT+2 N 460 56.9 37.1 Ericson & Wills Twyman & Twyman
Board 28
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 12 3S= N 140 81.6 12.4 Bingham & Osmer Jones & Martin
12 10 3S= N 140 81.6 12.4 Hoffman & Harper Cohen & Register
11 8 4H-2 W 100 62.4 31.6 Jackson & Gordon Youd & Rankin
10 6 3H-1 W 50 45.1 48.9 Pigott & Heilbron Griffin & Heatly
9 4 5H-1 E 50 45.1 48.9 Keith & Jerrard Hedley & Hedley
8 2 3S= N 140 81.6 12.4 Leslie & King-Farlow Wren & Perryman
7 13 4H-2 W 100 62.4 31.6 Smart & Lunn Butler & Butler
6 11 4S-2 N -200 16.3 77.7 Herbert & Herbert Heath & Heath
5 9 3H-1 W 50 45.1 48.9 McCready & Dyer Basden-Smith & Parsons
4 7 5Sx-2 N -500 0.9 93.1 Edmonds & Stimson Prince & Hair
3 5 4S-1 N -100 29.7 64.3 Rumbelow & Anning Wright & Watson
2 3 4H-2 W 100 62.4 31.6 Ericson & Wills Twyman & Twyman
Assigned Scores Board 24 NS Pair 10 EW Pair 8 50 % Score = -140 to Both 50 % Score = -170 to Both
Session 2 Section Blue Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 3Sx+1 E -630 0 94 Thrower & Hope Jacobs & Fisher
14 13 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Cornell & Beer Curtis & Kitchin
13 11 4H-2 S -100 50.1 43.9 Harrison & Talbot Knights & Dunn
12 9 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Abbott & Abbott Lucy & Cooke
11 7 4H-2 S -100 50.1 43.9 Ottley & Radford Fleming & Fleming
10 5 5Dx-1 E 100 84.8 9.2 Stewart & Lewsey Peers & Peers
9 3 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Gascoyne & Squires Moss & Crawford
8 14 3H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Oram & Oram Dias & Hair
7 12 4Hx-1 N -100 50.1 43.9 Langston & Langston Fess & Landau
6 10 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Hinkin & Concanon Evans & Blackman
5 8 2H-1 S -50 75.6 18.4 le Cocq & Pallot Parnham & Smith
4 6 3NT-1 S -50 75.6 18.4 Pilcher & Charles Bentley & Bentley
3 4 2Hx= S 470 91.9 2.1 Reader & Brito Mascall & Denny
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4S= N 620 89.9 4.1 Thrower & Hope Jacobs & Fisher
14 13 4S-3 N -300 75.6 18.4 Cornell & Beer Curtis & Kitchin
13 11 4H+1 E -450 65.4 28.6 Harrison & Talbot Knights & Dunn
12 9 4Hx+2 E -790 16.4 77.6 Abbott & Abbott Lucy & Cooke
11 7 4S= N 620 89.9 4.1 Ottley & Radford Fleming & Fleming
10 5 5Hx= E -650 34.7 59.3 Stewart & Lewsey Peers & Peers
9 3 5Hx+2 E -850 8.2 85.8 Gascoyne & Squires Moss & Crawford
8 14 5Hx+1 W -750 24.5 69.5 Oram & Oram Dias & Hair
7 12 4H+1 E -450 65.4 28.6 Langston & Langston Fess & Landau
6 10 5S-4 N -400 71.5 22.5 Hinkin & Concanon Evans & Blackman
5 8 4Hx+1 E -690 31.7 62.3 le Cocq & Pallot Parnham & Smith
4 6 5Hx+2 E -850 8.2 85.8 Pilcher & Charles Bentley & Bentley
3 4 4H+2 E -480 55.2 38.8 Reader & Brito Mascall & Denny
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 1NT= S 90 26.6 67.4 Pitman & Stevens Serby & Moore
1 14 3NT-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Thrower & Hope Dias & Hair
14 12 4S= S 420 61.3 32.7 Cornell & Beer Fess & Landau
13 10 1NT= S 90 26.6 67.4 Harrison & Talbot Evans & Blackman
12 8 3C-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Abbott & Abbott Parnham & Smith
11 6 3NT= S 400 51.1 42.9 Ottley & Radford Bentley & Bentley
10 4 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Stewart & Lewsey Mascall & Denny
9 1 1NT+2 S 150 35.8 58.2 Gascoyne & Squires Jacobs & Fisher
8 13 3NT+2 N 460 83.8 10.2 Oram & Oram Curtis & Kitchin
7 11 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Langston & Langston Knights & Dunn
6 9 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Hinkin & Concanon Lucy & Cooke
5 7 4S-3 S -150 1 93 le Cocq & Pallot Fleming & Fleming
4 5 3S-2 S -100 6.1 87.9 Pilcher & Charles Peers & Peers
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Pitman & Stevens Serby & Moore
1 14 2S+1 N 140 72.5 21.5 Thrower & Hope Dias & Hair
14 12 2S+2 N 170 86.8 7.2 Cornell & Beer Fess & Landau
13 10 2H+1 N 140 72.5 21.5 Harrison & Talbot Evans & Blackman
12 8 2S+1 N 140 72.5 21.5 Abbott & Abbott Parnham & Smith
11 6 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Ottley & Radford Bentley & Bentley
10 4 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Stewart & Lewsey Mascall & Denny
9 1 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Gascoyne & Squires Jacobs & Fisher
8 13 1S+1 N 110 60.3 33.7 Oram & Oram Curtis & Kitchin
7 11 2S+1 N 140 72.5 21.5 Langston & Langston Knights & Dunn
6 9 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Hinkin & Concanon Lucy & Cooke
5 7 3D-1 W 100 55.2 38.8 le Cocq & Pallot Fleming & Fleming
4 5 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Pilcher & Charles Peers & Peers
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3D-1 N -100 19.4 74.6 Reader & Brito Moss & Crawford
2 1 3S-2 E 100 45 49 Pitman & Stevens Jacobs & Fisher
1 13 1NT-2 S -200 6.1 87.9 Thrower & Hope Curtis & Kitchin
14 11 3D+1 N 130 74.6 19.4 Cornell & Beer Knights & Dunn
13 9 3S-2 E 100 45 49 Harrison & Talbot Lucy & Cooke
12 7 1NT+1 S 120 67.4 26.6 Abbott & Abbott Fleming & Fleming
11 5 4Sx-3 N -800 0 94 Ottley & Radford Peers & Peers
10 2 1NT= S 90 33.7 60.3 Stewart & Lewsey Serby & Moore
9 14 3D-1 N -100 19.4 74.6 Gascoyne & Squires Dias & Hair
8 12 3D-1 N -100 19.4 74.6 Oram & Oram Fess & Landau
7 10 3S-2 E 100 45 49 Langston & Langston Evans & Blackman
6 8 4S-5 E 250 87.9 6.1 Hinkin & Concanon Parnham & Smith
5 6 2Sx-1 E 100 45 49 le Cocq & Pallot Bentley & Bentley
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Reader & Brito Moss & Crawford
2 1 5D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Pitman & Stevens Jacobs & Fisher
1 13 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Thrower & Hope Curtis & Kitchin
14 11 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Cornell & Beer Knights & Dunn
13 9 5Sx-2 N -300 4.1 89.9 Harrison & Talbot Lucy & Cooke
12 7 4C= W -130 13.3 80.7 Abbott & Abbott Fleming & Fleming
11 5 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Ottley & Radford Peers & Peers
10 2 4H= E -620 0 94 Stewart & Lewsey Serby & Moore
9 14 4D-1 S -50 55.2 38.8 Gascoyne & Squires Dias & Hair
8 12 4S-1 E 100 72.5 21.5 Oram & Oram Fess & Landau
7 10 3NT-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Langston & Langston Evans & Blackman
6 8 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Hinkin & Concanon Parnham & Smith
5 6 4H-1 E 100 72.5 21.5 le Cocq & Pallot Bentley & Bentley
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S-1 N -100 4.1 89.9 Pilcher & Charles Mascall & Denny
3 2 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Reader & Brito Serby & Moore
2 14 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Pitman & Stevens Dias & Hair
1 12 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Thrower & Hope Fess & Landau
14 10 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Cornell & Beer Evans & Blackman
13 8 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Harrison & Talbot Parnham & Smith
12 6 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Abbott & Abbott Bentley & Bentley
11 3 4S-1 N -100 4.1 89.9 Ottley & Radford Moss & Crawford
10 1 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Stewart & Lewsey Jacobs & Fisher
9 13 4S= N 620 32.7 61.3 Gascoyne & Squires Curtis & Kitchin
8 11 4S+2 N 680 93 1 Oram & Oram Knights & Dunn
7 9 4S-1 N -100 4.1 89.9 Langston & Langston Lucy & Cooke
6 7 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Hinkin & Concanon Fleming & Fleming
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 5H-2 W 100 85.8 8.2 Pilcher & Charles Mascall & Denny
3 2 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Reader & Brito Serby & Moore
2 14 5D-2 S -100 39.9 54.1 Pitman & Stevens Dias & Hair
1 12 5H= W -450 7.2 86.8 Thrower & Hope Fess & Landau
14 10 4D-1 S -50 65.4 28.6 Cornell & Beer Evans & Blackman
13 8 5D-2 S -100 39.9 54.1 Harrison & Talbot Parnham & Smith
12 6 5S-1 E 50 78.7 15.3 Abbott & Abbott Bentley & Bentley
11 3 4H-1 W 50 78.7 15.3 Ottley & Radford Moss & Crawford
10 1 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Stewart & Lewsey Jacobs & Fisher
9 13 3H+1 W -170 18.4 75.6 Gascoyne & Squires Curtis & Kitchin
8 11 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Oram & Oram Knights & Dunn
7 9 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Langston & Langston Lucy & Cooke
6 7 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Hinkin & Concanon Fleming & Fleming
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4Cx-3 S -500 4.1 89.9 le Cocq & Pallot Peers & Peers
4 3 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Pilcher & Charles Moss & Crawford
3 1 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Reader & Brito Jacobs & Fisher
2 13 2S+1 W -140 34.7 59.3 Pitman & Stevens Curtis & Kitchin
1 11 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Thrower & Hope Knights & Dunn
14 9 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Cornell & Beer Lucy & Cooke
13 7 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Harrison & Talbot Fleming & Fleming
12 4 3S+1 W -170 8.2 85.8 Abbott & Abbott Mascall & Denny
11 2 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Ottley & Radford Serby & Moore
10 14 2S+1 W -140 34.7 59.3 Stewart & Lewsey Dias & Hair
9 12 4Sx-1 W 200 91.9 2.1 Gascoyne & Squires Fess & Landau
8 10 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Oram & Oram Evans & Blackman
7 8 2S+1 W -140 34.7 59.3 Langston & Langston Parnham & Smith
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 le Cocq & Pallot Peers & Peers
4 3 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Pilcher & Charles Moss & Crawford
3 1 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Reader & Brito Jacobs & Fisher
2 13 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Pitman & Stevens Curtis & Kitchin
1 11 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Thrower & Hope Knights & Dunn
14 9 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Cornell & Beer Lucy & Cooke
13 7 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Harrison & Talbot Fleming & Fleming
12 4 3NT-1 W 100 90.9 3.1 Abbott & Abbott Mascall & Denny
11 2 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Ottley & Radford Serby & Moore
10 14 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Stewart & Lewsey Dias & Hair
9 12 3S+2 E -200 84.8 9.2 Gascoyne & Squires Fess & Landau
8 10 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Oram & Oram Evans & Blackman
7 8 4S= E -620 78.7 15.3 Langston & Langston Parnham & Smith
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Hinkin & Concanon Bentley & Bentley
5 4 2Sx-4 N -800 1 93 le Cocq & Pallot Mascall & Denny
4 2 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Pilcher & Charles Serby & Moore
3 14 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Reader & Brito Dias & Hair
2 12 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Pitman & Stevens Fess & Landau
1 10 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Thrower & Hope Evans & Blackman
14 8 3NT+1 W -430 84.8 9.2 Cornell & Beer Parnham & Smith
13 5 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Harrison & Talbot Peers & Peers
12 3 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Abbott & Abbott Moss & Crawford
11 1 2Sx-4 N -800 1 93 Ottley & Radford Jacobs & Fisher
10 13 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Stewart & Lewsey Curtis & Kitchin
9 11 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Gascoyne & Squires Knights & Dunn
8 9 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Oram & Oram Lucy & Cooke
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 2Hx= N 670 94 0 Hinkin & Concanon Bentley & Bentley
5 4 1S+1 E -110 17.4 76.6 le Cocq & Pallot Mascall & Denny
4 2 1H-1 N -100 30.7 63.3 Pilcher & Charles Serby & Moore
3 14 1D-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Reader & Brito Dias & Hair
2 12 2S= W -110 17.4 76.6 Pitman & Stevens Fess & Landau
1 10 1S= E -80 47 47 Thrower & Hope Evans & Blackman
14 8 2S= E -110 17.4 76.6 Cornell & Beer Parnham & Smith
13 5 3S= E -140 7.2 86.8 Harrison & Talbot Peers & Peers
12 3 2C+1 S 110 88.9 5.1 Abbott & Abbott Moss & Crawford
11 1 2S-1 E 50 71.5 22.5 Ottley & Radford Jacobs & Fisher
10 13 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Stewart & Lewsey Curtis & Kitchin
9 11 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Gascoyne & Squires Knights & Dunn
8 9 1NT= E -90 40.9 53.1 Oram & Oram Lucy & Cooke
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 4S+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Langston & Langston Fleming & Fleming
6 5 6H= W -1430 3.1 90.9 Hinkin & Concanon Peers & Peers
5 3 4Sx-2 N -500 74.6 19.4 le Cocq & Pallot Moss & Crawford
4 1 4Sx-1 N -200 88.9 5.1 Pilcher & Charles Jacobs & Fisher
3 13 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Reader & Brito Curtis & Kitchin
2 11 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Pitman & Stevens Knights & Dunn
1 9 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Thrower & Hope Lucy & Cooke
14 6 5Sx-2 N -500 74.6 19.4 Cornell & Beer Bentley & Bentley
13 4 5S-3 N -300 80.7 13.3 Harrison & Talbot Mascall & Denny
12 2 6H= E -1430 3.1 90.9 Abbott & Abbott Serby & Moore
11 14 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Ottley & Radford Dias & Hair
10 12 6H= E -1430 3.1 90.9 Stewart & Lewsey Fess & Landau
9 10 4Sx-1 N -200 88.9 5.1 Gascoyne & Squires Evans & Blackman
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 2S-2 E 100 20.4 73.6 Langston & Langston Fleming & Fleming
6 5 3C= S 110 28.6 65.4 Hinkin & Concanon Peers & Peers
5 3 3S-2 E 100 20.4 73.6 le Cocq & Pallot Moss & Crawford
4 1 2Sx-1 E 100 20.4 73.6 Pilcher & Charles Jacobs & Fisher
3 13 3NT+2 N 460 84.8 9.2 Reader & Brito Curtis & Kitchin
2 11 2Sx-3 W 500 90.9 3.1 Pitman & Stevens Knights & Dunn
1 9 2S-3 E 150 31.7 62.3 Thrower & Hope Lucy & Cooke
14 6 4H-2 S -100 2.1 91.9 Cornell & Beer Bentley & Bentley
13 4 2S-2 E 100 20.4 73.6 Harrison & Talbot Mascall & Denny
12 2 3C-1 S -50 8.2 85.8 Abbott & Abbott Serby & Moore
11 14 2Sx-1 E 100 20.4 73.6 Ottley & Radford Dias & Hair
10 12 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Stewart & Lewsey Fess & Landau
9 10 3Hx-3 E 500 90.9 3.1 Gascoyne & Squires Evans & Blackman
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT= W -400 50.1 43.9 Oram & Oram Parnham & Smith
7 6 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Langston & Langston Bentley & Bentley
6 4 4H-2 E 100 94 0 Hinkin & Concanon Mascall & Denny
5 2 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 le Cocq & Pallot Serby & Moore
4 14 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Pilcher & Charles Dias & Hair
3 12 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Reader & Brito Fess & Landau
2 10 3H= W -140 58.2 35.8 Pitman & Stevens Evans & Blackman
1 7 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Thrower & Hope Fleming & Fleming
14 5 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Cornell & Beer Peers & Peers
13 3 4H= E -420 22.5 71.5 Harrison & Talbot Moss & Crawford
12 1 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Abbott & Abbott Jacobs & Fisher
11 13 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Ottley & Radford Curtis & Kitchin
10 11 3NT= W -400 50.1 43.9 Stewart & Lewsey Knights & Dunn
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3NT-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Oram & Oram Parnham & Smith
7 6 2H= N 110 81.7 12.3 Langston & Langston Bentley & Bentley
6 4 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Hinkin & Concanon Mascall & Denny
5 2 2H= N 110 81.7 12.3 le Cocq & Pallot Serby & Moore
4 14 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Pilcher & Charles Dias & Hair
3 12 4H-4 N -200 0 94 Reader & Brito Fess & Landau
2 10 3NT-2 S -100 24.5 69.5 Pitman & Stevens Evans & Blackman
1 7 2NT-1 S -50 60.3 33.7 Thrower & Hope Fleming & Fleming
14 5 2NT= S 120 87.9 6.1 Cornell & Beer Peers & Peers
13 3 2H= N 110 81.7 12.3 Harrison & Talbot Moss & Crawford
12 1 2NT-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Abbott & Abbott Jacobs & Fisher
11 13 3NT-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Ottley & Radford Curtis & Kitchin
10 11 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Stewart & Lewsey Knights & Dunn
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Gascoyne & Squires Lucy & Cooke
8 7 3NT= N 400 37.8 56.2 Oram & Oram Fleming & Fleming
7 5 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Langston & Langston Peers & Peers
6 3 4H= S 420 65.4 28.6 Hinkin & Concanon Moss & Crawford
5 1 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 le Cocq & Pallot Jacobs & Fisher
4 13 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Pilcher & Charles Curtis & Kitchin
3 11 3S= S 140 29.6 64.4 Reader & Brito Knights & Dunn
2 8 3NT+1 N 430 90.9 3.1 Pitman & Stevens Parnham & Smith
1 6 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Thrower & Hope Bentley & Bentley
14 4 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Cornell & Beer Mascall & Denny
13 2 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Harrison & Talbot Serby & Moore
12 14 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Abbott & Abbott Dias & Hair
11 12 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Ottley & Radford Fess & Landau
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 1NT= E -90 56.2 37.8 Gascoyne & Squires Lucy & Cooke
8 7 2H-3 W 150 85.8 8.2 Oram & Oram Fleming & Fleming
7 5 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Langston & Langston Peers & Peers
6 3 2C= E -90 56.2 37.8 Hinkin & Concanon Moss & Crawford
5 1 2C+1 E -110 33.7 60.3 le Cocq & Pallot Jacobs & Fisher
4 13 2C+1 E -110 33.7 60.3 Pilcher & Charles Curtis & Kitchin
3 11 3H= W -140 11.3 82.7 Reader & Brito Knights & Dunn
2 8 2NT= E -120 16.4 77.6 Pitman & Stevens Parnham & Smith
1 6 2NT+1 E -150 8.2 85.8 Thrower & Hope Bentley & Bentley
14 4 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Cornell & Beer Mascall & Denny
13 2 2S-1 N -100 49 45 Harrison & Talbot Serby & Moore
12 14 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Abbott & Abbott Dias & Hair
11 12 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Ottley & Radford Fess & Landau
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 3H+2 S 200 8.2 85.8 Stewart & Lewsey Evans & Blackman
9 8 5H+1 S 480 80.7 13.3 Gascoyne & Squires Parnham & Smith
8 6 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Oram & Oram Bentley & Bentley
7 4 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Langston & Langston Mascall & Denny
6 2 3H+2 S 200 8.2 85.8 Hinkin & Concanon Serby & Moore
5 14 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 le Cocq & Pallot Dias & Hair
4 12 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Pilcher & Charles Fess & Landau
3 9 4H-1 S -50 0 94 Reader & Brito Lucy & Cooke
2 7 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Pitman & Stevens Fleming & Fleming
1 5 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Thrower & Hope Peers & Peers
14 3 5H+1 S 480 80.7 13.3 Cornell & Beer Moss & Crawford
13 1 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Harrison & Talbot Jacobs & Fisher
12 13 4C-3 E 300 38.8 55.2 Abbott & Abbott Curtis & Kitchin
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 10 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Stewart & Lewsey Evans & Blackman
9 8 4S+1 N 650 88.9 5.1 Gascoyne & Squires Parnham & Smith
8 6 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Oram & Oram Bentley & Bentley
7 4 4S-1 N -100 5.1 88.9 Langston & Langston Mascall & Denny
6 2 4S+1 N 650 88.9 5.1 Hinkin & Concanon Serby & Moore
5 14 2S+1 N 140 14.3 79.7 le Cocq & Pallot Dias & Hair
4 12 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Pilcher & Charles Fess & Landau
3 9 2S+2 N 170 24.5 69.5 Reader & Brito Lucy & Cooke
2 7 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Pitman & Stevens Fleming & Fleming
1 5 3S+1 N 170 24.5 69.5 Thrower & Hope Peers & Peers
14 3 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Cornell & Beer Moss & Crawford
13 1 4S-1 N -100 5.1 88.9 Harrison & Talbot Jacobs & Fisher
12 13 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Abbott & Abbott Curtis & Kitchin
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Ottley & Radford Knights & Dunn
10 9 5S-1 S -100 63.3 30.7 Stewart & Lewsey Lucy & Cooke
9 7 5Dx= E -550 2.1 91.9 Gascoyne & Squires Fleming & Fleming
8 5 5S-1 S -100 63.3 30.7 Oram & Oram Peers & Peers
7 3 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Langston & Langston Moss & Crawford
6 1 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Hinkin & Concanon Jacobs & Fisher
5 13 3S+1 S 170 81.7 12.3 le Cocq & Pallot Curtis & Kitchin
4 10 3S+1 S 170 81.7 12.3 Pilcher & Charles Evans & Blackman
3 8 4S= S 620 88.9 5.1 Reader & Brito Parnham & Smith
2 6 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Pitman & Stevens Bentley & Bentley
1 4 6S-2 S -200 52.1 41.9 Thrower & Hope Mascall & Denny
14 2 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Cornell & Beer Serby & Moore
13 14 6Dx-1 E 100 74.6 19.4 Harrison & Talbot Dias & Hair
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
11 11 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Ottley & Radford Knights & Dunn
10 9 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Stewart & Lewsey Lucy & Cooke
9 7 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Gascoyne & Squires Fleming & Fleming
8 5 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Oram & Oram Peers & Peers
7 3 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Langston & Langston Moss & Crawford
6 1 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Hinkin & Concanon Jacobs & Fisher
5 13 4S+1 W -650 47 47 le Cocq & Pallot Curtis & Kitchin
4 10 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Pilcher & Charles Evans & Blackman
3 8 4S= E -620 90.9 3.1 Reader & Brito Parnham & Smith
2 6 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Pitman & Stevens Bentley & Bentley
1 4 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Thrower & Hope Mascall & Denny
14 2 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Cornell & Beer Serby & Moore
13 14 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Harrison & Talbot Dias & Hair
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 2NT+1 W -150 54.1 39.9 Abbott & Abbott Fess & Landau
11 10 2S+2 E -170 47 47 Ottley & Radford Evans & Blackman
10 8 3NT-3 W 300 90.9 3.1 Stewart & Lewsey Parnham & Smith
9 6 3NT-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Gascoyne & Squires Bentley & Bentley
8 4 4S= E -620 12.3 81.7 Oram & Oram Mascall & Denny
7 2 2NT+1 W -150 54.1 39.9 Langston & Langston Serby & Moore
6 14 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Hinkin & Concanon Dias & Hair
5 11 3NT-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 le Cocq & Pallot Knights & Dunn
4 9 2NT+2 W -180 42.9 51.1 Pilcher & Charles Lucy & Cooke
3 7 3NT-3 W 300 90.9 3.1 Reader & Brito Fleming & Fleming
2 5 2NT+2 E -180 42.9 51.1 Pitman & Stevens Peers & Peers
1 3 4S= E -620 12.3 81.7 Thrower & Hope Moss & Crawford
14 1 3NT-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Cornell & Beer Jacobs & Fisher
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
12 12 2S= S 110 86.8 7.2 Abbott & Abbott Fess & Landau
11 10 2H+1 W -140 29.1 64.9 Ottley & Radford Evans & Blackman
10 8 2S-1 N -50 58.2 35.8 Stewart & Lewsey Parnham & Smith
9 6 2H+1 W -140 29.1 64.9 Gascoyne & Squires Bentley & Bentley
8 4 3H= W -140 29.1 64.9 Oram & Oram Mascall & Denny
7 2 4C-1 E 50 72.5 21.5 Langston & Langston Serby & Moore
6 14 2H= W -110 39.9 54.1 Hinkin & Concanon Dias & Hair
5 11 4S-2 S -100 45 49 le Cocq & Pallot Knights & Dunn
4 9 2H+2 E -170 11.8 82.2 Pilcher & Charles Lucy & Cooke
3 7 2Sx-1 S -100 45 49 Reader & Brito Fleming & Fleming
2 5 2H+2 W -170 11.8 82.2 Pitman & Stevens Peers & Peers
1 3 2S-1 N -50 58.2 35.8 Thrower & Hope Moss & Crawford
14 1 2S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Cornell & Beer Jacobs & Fisher
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 4H= S 420 62 32 Harrison & Talbot Curtis & Kitchin
12 11 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Abbott & Abbott Knights & Dunn
11 9 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Ottley & Radford Lucy & Cooke
10 7 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Stewart & Lewsey Fleming & Fleming
9 5 4H= S 420 62 32 Gascoyne & Squires Peers & Peers
8 3 4H+1 N 450 91 3 Oram & Oram Moss & Crawford
7 1 3NT+1 N 430 85 9 Langston & Langston Jacobs & Fisher
6 12 4H= S 420 62 32 Hinkin & Concanon Fess & Landau
5 10 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 le Cocq & Pallot Evans & Blackman
4 8 3NT= N 400 40 54 Pilcher & Charles Parnham & Smith
3 6 1NT+2 N 150 29 65 Reader & Brito Bentley & Bentley
2 4 4H= S 420 62 32 Pitman & Stevens Mascall & Denny
1 2 2H+2 S 170 34 60 Thrower & Hope Serby & Moore
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
13 13 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Harrison & Talbot Curtis & Kitchin
12 11 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Abbott & Abbott Knights & Dunn
11 9 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Ottley & Radford Lucy & Cooke
10 7 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Stewart & Lewsey Fleming & Fleming
9 5 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Gascoyne & Squires Peers & Peers
8 3 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Oram & Oram Moss & Crawford
7 1 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Langston & Langston Jacobs & Fisher
6 12 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Hinkin & Concanon Fess & Landau
5 10 4S+1 E -650 21 73 le Cocq & Pallot Evans & Blackman
4 8 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Pilcher & Charles Parnham & Smith
3 6 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Reader & Brito Bentley & Bentley
2 4 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Pitman & Stevens Mascall & Denny
1 2 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Thrower & Hope Serby & Moore
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
14 14 3NT= S 400 13.1 80.9 Cornell & Beer Dias & Hair
13 12 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Harrison & Talbot Fess & Landau
12 10 3NT+3 N 490 72.4 21.6 Abbott & Abbott Evans & Blackman
11 8 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Ottley & Radford Parnham & Smith
10 6 3NT+3 N 490 72.4 21.6 Stewart & Lewsey Bentley & Bentley
9 4 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Gascoyne & Squires Mascall & Denny
8 2 3NT= S 400 13.1 80.9 Oram & Oram Serby & Moore
7 13 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Langston & Langston Curtis & Kitchin
6 11 3NT+3 N 490 72.4 21.6 Hinkin & Concanon Knights & Dunn
5 9 3NT= N 400 13.1 80.9 le Cocq & Pallot Lucy & Cooke
4 7 3NT= S 400 13.1 80.9 Pilcher & Charles Fleming & Fleming
3 5 3NT+4 S 520 89.4 4.6 Reader & Brito Peers & Peers
2 3 3NT+3 N 490 72.4 21.6 Pitman & Stevens Moss & Crawford
Board 28
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
14 14 4S-1 N -100 29.7 64.3 Cornell & Beer Dias & Hair
13 12 4S-1 N -100 29.7 64.3 Harrison & Talbot Fess & Landau
12 10 4Hx-2 W 300 93.1 0.9 Abbott & Abbott Evans & Blackman
11 8 3S-1 N -100 29.7 64.3 Ottley & Radford Parnham & Smith
10 6 4H= W -420 6.7 87.3 Stewart & Lewsey Bentley & Bentley
9 4 4H-2 W 100 62.4 31.6 Gascoyne & Squires Mascall & Denny
8 2 5Hx-1 W 100 62.4 31.6 Oram & Oram Serby & Moore
7 13 4S-2 N -200 16.3 77.7 Langston & Langston Curtis & Kitchin
6 11 4H= W -420 6.7 87.3 Hinkin & Concanon Knights & Dunn
5 9 5H-1 W 50 45.1 48.9 le Cocq & Pallot Lucy & Cooke
4 7 2S+1 N 140 81.6 12.4 Pilcher & Charles Fleming & Fleming
3 5 3S= N 140 81.6 12.4 Reader & Brito Peers & Peers
2 3 4S-2 S -200 16.3 77.7 Pitman & Stevens Moss & Crawford
Session 2 Section Yellow Top = 94
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H-4 N -200 9.2 84.8 Whiteway & Thornton Love & Tapp
9 8 4H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Bolton & Leach Poulter & Benjamin
8 6 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Stanton & Elgin Osborn & Osborn
7 4 4Sx-3 E 500 94 0 Samuels & Sexton Crofts & Crofts
6 2 4Dx-1 E 100 84.8 9.2 Tomkin & Tomkin Stebbing & Henry
5 9 3Hx-1 N -100 50.1 43.9 Stanford & Franklin Seaver & Morgan
4 7 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Taylor & Carter Turnage & Cruickshank
3 5 4H-2 N -100 50.1 43.9 Tompson & Clare Kennedy & Ditchburn
2 3 3H-3 N -150 20.4 73.6 Leighton & Dennsion Slatcher & Holland
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H+1 E -450 65.4 28.6 Whiteway & Thornton Love & Tapp
9 8 5Hx+1 E -750 24.5 69.5 Bolton & Leach Poulter & Benjamin
8 6 4Hx+2 E -790 16.4 77.6 Stanton & Elgin Osborn & Osborn
7 4 5H+2 E -510 42.9 51.1 Samuels & Sexton Crofts & Crofts
6 2 4Hx+3 E -890 2.1 91.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Stebbing & Henry
5 9 5H+2 E -510 42.9 51.1 Stanford & Franklin Seaver & Morgan
4 7 5Hx+2 E -850 8.2 85.8 Taylor & Carter Turnage & Cruickshank
3 5 5H+2 E -510 42.9 51.1 Tompson & Clare Kennedy & Ditchburn
2 3 5H+2 E -510 42.9 51.1 Leighton & Dennsion Slatcher & Holland
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 3NT= S 400 51.1 42.9 Whiteway & Thornton Love & Tapp
9 8 3NT-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Bolton & Leach Poulter & Benjamin
8 6 3NT+1 S 430 72.5 21.5 Stanton & Elgin Osborn & Osborn
7 4 3NT-1 N -50 16.4 77.6 Samuels & Sexton Crofts & Crofts
6 2 3NT= N 400 51.1 42.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Stebbing & Henry
5 9 3NT+1 N 430 72.5 21.5 Stanford & Franklin Seaver & Morgan
4 7 1Sx-2 E 500 86.8 7.2 Taylor & Carter Turnage & Cruickshank
3 5 3NT= S 400 51.1 42.9 Tompson & Clare Kennedy & Ditchburn
2 3 3NT= N 400 51.1 42.9 Leighton & Dennsion Slatcher & Holland
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Leighton & Dennsion Stebbing & Henry
1 9 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Whiteway & Thornton Seaver & Morgan
9 7 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Bolton & Leach Turnage & Cruickshank
8 5 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Stanton & Elgin Kennedy & Ditchburn
7 3 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Samuels & Sexton Slatcher & Holland
6 1 2S+1 N 140 72.5 21.5 Tomkin & Tomkin Love & Tapp
5 8 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Stanford & Franklin Poulter & Benjamin
4 6 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Taylor & Carter Osborn & Osborn
3 4 PASS N 0 26.6 67.4 Tompson & Clare Crofts & Crofts
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 3D= N 110 58.2 35.8 Leighton & Dennsion Stebbing & Henry
1 9 3Sx-1 E 100 45 49 Whiteway & Thornton Seaver & Morgan
9 7 2S= E -110 10.2 83.8 Bolton & Leach Turnage & Cruickshank
8 5 3NT= S 600 94 0 Stanton & Elgin Kennedy & Ditchburn
7 3 2S-2 E 100 45 49 Samuels & Sexton Slatcher & Holland
6 1 1NT= S 90 33.7 60.3 Tomkin & Tomkin Love & Tapp
5 8 1NT+1 S 120 67.4 26.6 Stanford & Franklin Poulter & Benjamin
4 6 3D-1 N -100 19.4 74.6 Taylor & Carter Osborn & Osborn
3 4 3D+1 N 130 74.6 19.4 Tompson & Clare Crofts & Crofts
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 2 5D-2 N -100 27.6 66.4 Leighton & Dennsion Stebbing & Henry
1 9 3D= N 110 79.7 14.3 Whiteway & Thornton Seaver & Morgan
9 7 5Dx-1 N -100 27.6 66.4 Bolton & Leach Turnage & Cruickshank
8 5 5D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Stanton & Elgin Kennedy & Ditchburn
7 3 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Samuels & Sexton Slatcher & Holland
6 1 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Tomkin & Tomkin Love & Tapp
5 8 3D= N 110 79.7 14.3 Stanford & Franklin Poulter & Benjamin
4 6 3D= N 110 79.7 14.3 Taylor & Carter Osborn & Osborn
3 4 4D-1 N -50 55.2 38.8 Tompson & Clare Crofts & Crofts
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 3NT+1 S 630 57.2 36.8 Tompson & Clare Slatcher & Holland
2 1 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Leighton & Dennsion Love & Tapp
1 8 4S+1 S 650 76.6 17.4 Whiteway & Thornton Poulter & Benjamin
9 6 4S+1 N 650 76.6 17.4 Bolton & Leach Osborn & Osborn
8 4 3NT= S 600 12.3 81.7 Stanton & Elgin Crofts & Crofts
7 2 4S+2 N 680 93 1 Samuels & Sexton Stebbing & Henry
6 9 4S= S 620 32.7 61.3 Tomkin & Tomkin Seaver & Morgan
5 7 3NT+1 S 630 57.2 36.8 Stanford & Franklin Turnage & Cruickshank
4 5 4S+1 N 650 76.6 17.4 Taylor & Carter Kennedy & Ditchburn
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 5D-2 S -100 39.9 54.1 Tompson & Clare Slatcher & Holland
2 1 5D-1 S -50 65.4 28.6 Leighton & Dennsion Love & Tapp
1 8 4D= N 130 90.9 3.1 Whiteway & Thornton Poulter & Benjamin
9 6 5S-3 E 150 94 0 Bolton & Leach Osborn & Osborn
8 4 3H+2 W -200 15.3 78.7 Stanton & Elgin Crofts & Crofts
7 2 5D-1 S -50 65.4 28.6 Samuels & Sexton Stebbing & Henry
6 9 5D-2 N -100 39.9 54.1 Tomkin & Tomkin Seaver & Morgan
5 7 4Sx= W -590 0 94 Stanford & Franklin Turnage & Cruickshank
4 5 5Dx-1 S -100 39.9 54.1 Taylor & Carter Kennedy & Ditchburn
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 3 2S+1 W -140 34.7 59.3 Tompson & Clare Slatcher & Holland
2 1 3S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Leighton & Dennsion Love & Tapp
1 8 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Whiteway & Thornton Poulter & Benjamin
9 6 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Bolton & Leach Osborn & Osborn
8 4 4S-1 W 100 72.5 21.5 Stanton & Elgin Crofts & Crofts
7 2 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Samuels & Sexton Stebbing & Henry
6 9 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Tomkin & Tomkin Seaver & Morgan
5 7 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Stanford & Franklin Turnage & Cruickshank
4 5 3S= W -140 34.7 59.3 Taylor & Carter Kennedy & Ditchburn
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 4S-1 E 100 90.9 3.1 Taylor & Carter Crofts & Crofts
3 2 4S= E -620 78.7 15.3 Tompson & Clare Stebbing & Henry
2 9 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Leighton & Dennsion Seaver & Morgan
1 7 4S+2 E -680 5.1 88.9 Whiteway & Thornton Turnage & Cruickshank
9 5 4S= E -620 78.7 15.3 Bolton & Leach Kennedy & Ditchburn
8 3 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Stanton & Elgin Slatcher & Holland
7 1 6S-1 E 100 90.9 3.1 Samuels & Sexton Love & Tapp
6 8 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Tomkin & Tomkin Poulter & Benjamin
5 6 4S+1 E -650 41.9 52.1 Stanford & Franklin Osborn & Osborn
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Taylor & Carter Crofts & Crofts
3 2 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Tompson & Clare Stebbing & Henry
2 9 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Leighton & Dennsion Seaver & Morgan
1 7 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Whiteway & Thornton Turnage & Cruickshank
9 5 3NT+3 E -490 22.5 71.5 Bolton & Leach Kennedy & Ditchburn
8 3 3NT+3 W -490 22.5 71.5 Stanton & Elgin Slatcher & Holland
7 1 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Samuels & Sexton Love & Tapp
6 8 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Tomkin & Tomkin Poulter & Benjamin
5 6 3NT+2 W -460 60.3 33.7 Stanford & Franklin Osborn & Osborn
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 4 1D+1 E -90 40.9 53.1 Taylor & Carter Crofts & Crofts
3 2 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Tompson & Clare Stebbing & Henry
2 9 3S-1 W 50 71.5 22.5 Leighton & Dennsion Seaver & Morgan
1 7 2H-1 N -100 30.7 63.3 Whiteway & Thornton Turnage & Cruickshank
9 5 2H-2 N -200 1 93 Bolton & Leach Kennedy & Ditchburn
8 3 3C-2 N -200 1 93 Stanton & Elgin Slatcher & Holland
7 1 2S= E -110 17.4 76.6 Samuels & Sexton Love & Tapp
6 8 1D= E -70 55.2 38.8 Tomkin & Tomkin Poulter & Benjamin
5 6 2S= E -110 17.4 76.6 Stanford & Franklin Osborn & Osborn
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 5H= E -650 66.4 27.6 Stanford & Franklin Kennedy & Ditchburn
4 3 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Taylor & Carter Slatcher & Holland
3 1 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Tompson & Clare Love & Tapp
2 8 5H+1 W -680 34.7 59.3 Leighton & Dennsion Poulter & Benjamin
1 6 5H+1 E -680 34.7 59.3 Whiteway & Thornton Osborn & Osborn
9 4 4H+2 W -680 34.7 59.3 Bolton & Leach Crofts & Crofts
8 2 4S-3 N -300 80.7 13.3 Stanton & Elgin Stebbing & Henry
7 9 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Samuels & Sexton Seaver & Morgan
6 7 4H+2 E -680 34.7 59.3 Tomkin & Tomkin Turnage & Cruickshank
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Stanford & Franklin Kennedy & Ditchburn
4 3 3NT+2 N 460 84.8 9.2 Taylor & Carter Slatcher & Holland
3 1 4Sx-4 E 800 94 0 Tompson & Clare Love & Tapp
2 8 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Leighton & Dennsion Poulter & Benjamin
1 6 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Whiteway & Thornton Osborn & Osborn
9 4 4H-2 S -100 2.1 91.9 Bolton & Leach Crofts & Crofts
8 2 2NT+2 N 180 39.9 54.1 Stanton & Elgin Stebbing & Henry
7 9 3S-3 E 150 31.7 62.3 Samuels & Sexton Seaver & Morgan
6 7 3NT+1 N 430 68.4 25.6 Tomkin & Tomkin Turnage & Cruickshank
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 5 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Stanford & Franklin Kennedy & Ditchburn
4 3 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Taylor & Carter Slatcher & Holland
3 1 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Tompson & Clare Love & Tapp
2 8 4H= W -420 22.5 71.5 Leighton & Dennsion Poulter & Benjamin
1 6 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Whiteway & Thornton Osborn & Osborn
9 4 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Bolton & Leach Crofts & Crofts
8 2 4H-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Stanton & Elgin Stebbing & Henry
7 9 3NT= E -400 50.1 43.9 Samuels & Sexton Seaver & Morgan
6 7 3NT-1 W 50 76.6 17.4 Tomkin & Tomkin Turnage & Cruickshank
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 2H+1 N 140 91.9 2.1 Tomkin & Tomkin Osborn & Osborn
5 4 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Stanford & Franklin Crofts & Crofts
4 2 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Taylor & Carter Stebbing & Henry
3 9 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Tompson & Clare Seaver & Morgan
2 7 3H-1 N -50 60.3 33.7 Leighton & Dennsion Turnage & Cruickshank
1 5 2NT-1 S -50 60.3 33.7 Whiteway & Thornton Kennedy & Ditchburn
9 3 3NT-2 S -100 24.5 69.5 Bolton & Leach Slatcher & Holland
8 1 4H-2 N -100 24.5 69.5 Stanton & Elgin Love & Tapp
7 8 3C-1 S -50 60.3 33.7 Samuels & Sexton Poulter & Benjamin
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 3NT= N 400 37.8 56.2 Tomkin & Tomkin Osborn & Osborn
5 4 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Stanford & Franklin Crofts & Crofts
4 2 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Taylor & Carter Stebbing & Henry
3 9 3NT= N 400 37.8 56.2 Tompson & Clare Seaver & Morgan
2 7 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Leighton & Dennsion Turnage & Cruickshank
1 5 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Whiteway & Thornton Kennedy & Ditchburn
9 3 4S-1 S -50 14.3 79.7 Bolton & Leach Slatcher & Holland
8 1 3NT+1 S 430 90.9 3.1 Stanton & Elgin Love & Tapp
7 8 4S= S 420 65.4 28.6 Samuels & Sexton Poulter & Benjamin
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 6 2C= E -90 56.2 37.8 Tomkin & Tomkin Osborn & Osborn
5 4 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Stanford & Franklin Crofts & Crofts
4 2 3S-3 N -300 4.1 89.9 Taylor & Carter Stebbing & Henry
3 9 1NT= E -90 56.2 37.8 Tompson & Clare Seaver & Morgan
2 7 2NT= E -120 16.4 77.6 Leighton & Dennsion Turnage & Cruickshank
1 5 2H-1 W 50 68.4 25.6 Whiteway & Thornton Kennedy & Ditchburn
9 3 3Sx-2 N -500 1 93 Bolton & Leach Slatcher & Holland
8 1 3Sx-2 N -500 1 93 Stanton & Elgin Love & Tapp
7 8 3C= E -110 33.7 60.3 Samuels & Sexton Poulter & Benjamin
Board 19
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3H+1 S 170 2.1 91.9 Samuels & Sexton Turnage & Cruickshank
6 5 3H+2 S 200 8.2 85.8 Tomkin & Tomkin Kennedy & Ditchburn
5 3 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Stanford & Franklin Slatcher & Holland
4 1 4S+1 N 450 57.2 36.8 Taylor & Carter Love & Tapp
3 8 3S+3 N 230 25.6 68.4 Tompson & Clare Poulter & Benjamin
2 6 4S+1 S 450 57.2 36.8 Leighton & Dennsion Osborn & Osborn
1 4 3H+3 S 230 25.6 68.4 Whiteway & Thornton Crofts & Crofts
9 2 4H+2 S 480 80.7 13.3 Bolton & Leach Stebbing & Henry
8 9 4H+1 S 450 57.2 36.8 Stanton & Elgin Seaver & Morgan
Board 20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 3H-1 W 100 12.3 81.7 Samuels & Sexton Turnage & Cruickshank
6 5 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Tomkin & Tomkin Kennedy & Ditchburn
5 3 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Stanford & Franklin Slatcher & Holland
4 1 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Taylor & Carter Love & Tapp
3 8 2S+2 N 170 24.5 69.5 Tompson & Clare Poulter & Benjamin
2 6 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Leighton & Dennsion Osborn & Osborn
1 4 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Whiteway & Thornton Crofts & Crofts
9 2 2NT-1 N -100 5.1 88.9 Bolton & Leach Stebbing & Henry
8 9 4S= N 620 58.2 35.8 Stanton & Elgin Seaver & Morgan
Board 21
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 7 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Samuels & Sexton Turnage & Cruickshank
6 5 4Sx-1 S -200 52.1 41.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Kennedy & Ditchburn
5 3 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Stanford & Franklin Slatcher & Holland
4 1 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Taylor & Carter Love & Tapp
3 8 5D= E -400 26.6 67.4 Tompson & Clare Poulter & Benjamin
2 6 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Leighton & Dennsion Osborn & Osborn
1 4 6Dx-1 E 100 74.6 19.4 Whiteway & Thornton Crofts & Crofts
9 2 4S= S 620 88.9 5.1 Bolton & Leach Stebbing & Henry
8 9 5D= W -400 26.6 67.4 Stanton & Elgin Seaver & Morgan
Board 22
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Stanton & Elgin Poulter & Benjamin
7 6 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Samuels & Sexton Osborn & Osborn
6 4 4S+2 E -680 6.1 87.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Crofts & Crofts
5 2 3NT+1 W -630 83.8 10.2 Stanford & Franklin Stebbing & Henry
4 9 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Taylor & Carter Seaver & Morgan
3 7 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Tompson & Clare Turnage & Cruickshank
2 5 4S+1 E -650 47 47 Leighton & Dennsion Kennedy & Ditchburn
1 3 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Whiteway & Thornton Slatcher & Holland
9 1 4S+1 W -650 47 47 Bolton & Leach Love & Tapp
Board 23
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 5D-3 E 300 90.9 3.1 Stanton & Elgin Poulter & Benjamin
7 6 2NT+1 W -150 54.1 39.9 Samuels & Sexton Osborn & Osborn
6 4 2NT+1 W -150 54.1 39.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Crofts & Crofts
5 2 2NT-2 W 200 83.8 10.2 Stanford & Franklin Stebbing & Henry
4 9 4S-3 E 300 90.9 3.1 Taylor & Carter Seaver & Morgan
3 7 3NT+1 E -630 3.1 90.9 Tompson & Clare Turnage & Cruickshank
2 5 3NT-2 E 200 83.8 10.2 Leighton & Dennsion Kennedy & Ditchburn
1 3 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Whiteway & Thornton Slatcher & Holland
9 1 3NT= W -600 28.6 65.4 Bolton & Leach Love & Tapp
Board 24
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 8 3S-1 S -50 58.2 35.8 Stanton & Elgin Poulter & Benjamin
7 6 3Sx-2 S -300 4.1 89.9 Samuels & Sexton Osborn & Osborn
6 4 2H+1 W -140 29.1 64.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Crofts & Crofts
5 2 2S= S 110 86.8 7.2 Stanford & Franklin Stebbing & Henry
4 9 4H= W -420 2.1 91.9 Taylor & Carter Seaver & Morgan
3 7 3H= W -140 29.1 64.9 Tompson & Clare Turnage & Cruickshank
2 5 2H-4 S -200 6.1 87.9 Leighton & Dennsion Kennedy & Ditchburn
1 3 3NT-3 E 150 89.9 4.1 Whiteway & Thornton Slatcher & Holland
9 1 4H-2 E 100 80.7 13.3 Bolton & Leach Love & Tapp
Board 25
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 4H= S 420 62 32 Bolton & Leach Seaver & Morgan
8 7 3NT-1 N -50 14 80 Stanton & Elgin Turnage & Cruickshank
7 5 4H= S 420 62 32 Samuels & Sexton Kennedy & Ditchburn
6 3 4H= S 420 62 32 Tomkin & Tomkin Slatcher & Holland
5 1 3NT+2 N 460 94 0 Stanford & Franklin Love & Tapp
4 8 4H= S 420 62 32 Taylor & Carter Poulter & Benjamin
3 6 3NT+1 N 430 85 9 Tompson & Clare Osborn & Osborn
2 4 4S+1 N 450 91 3 Leighton & Dennsion Crofts & Crofts
1 2 4H= S 420 62 32 Whiteway & Thornton Stebbing & Henry
Board 26
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 2S+2 E -170 87 7 Bolton & Leach Seaver & Morgan
8 7 3NT+2 W -660 2 92 Stanton & Elgin Turnage & Cruickshank
7 5 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Samuels & Sexton Kennedy & Ditchburn
6 3 3NT+1 W -630 38 56 Tomkin & Tomkin Slatcher & Holland
5 1 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Stanford & Franklin Love & Tapp
4 8 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Taylor & Carter Poulter & Benjamin
3 6 3NT+2 E -660 2 92 Tompson & Clare Osborn & Osborn
2 4 2S+3 E -200 60 34 Leighton & Dennsion Crofts & Crofts
1 2 4S+1 E -650 21 73 Whiteway & Thornton Stebbing & Henry
Board 27
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 9 3NT+4 S 520 89.4 4.6 Bolton & Leach Seaver & Morgan
8 7 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Stanton & Elgin Turnage & Cruickshank
7 5 3NT+3 N 490 72.4 21.6 Samuels & Sexton Kennedy & Ditchburn
6 3 3NT= N 400 13.1 80.9 Tomkin & Tomkin Slatcher & Holland
5 1 3NT+4 S 520 89.4 4.6 Stanford & Franklin Love & Tapp
4 8 3NT+2 S 460 56.9 37.1 Taylor & Carter Poulter & Benjamin
3 6 3NT+3 S 490 72.4 21.6 Tompson & Clare Osborn & Osborn
2 4 3NT= S 400 13.1 80.9 Leighton & Dennsion Crofts & Crofts
1 2 3NT+1 N 430 39.9 54.1 Whiteway & Thornton Stebbing & Henry