English Bridge Union Grand Masters 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 2 Section Yellow
Board 1 NS Datum=210
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 15 2S+1 S   140 -2 2 Pike & Barton Squibb & Hall
2 14 4H-2 W   100 -3 3 Pike & Waxman Capal & Semp
3 13 4D+1 S   150 -2 2 Keable & Keable Scerri & Palmer
4 12 2Hx-2 W   300 3 -3 Davis & Pearce Blakey & Blakey
7 9 5D= S   400 5 -5 Willans & Draper Davies & Gisborne
10 6 2D+3 S   150 -2 2 Porch & Cherry Guthrie & Barnes
11 5 3D+2 S   150 -2 2 Crofts & Lucioni Hyett & Wolfarth
16 21 4D= S   130 -2 2 Littlewood & Musson Hogg & Kelly
18 19 5C= S   400 5 -5 Auchterlonie & Nelson Garthwaite & Hobson
20 17 2S= S   110 -3 3 Procter & Sanis Teshome & Jagger
22 8 5D= S   400 5 -5 Solomon & Solomon Hedley & Hedley
Board 2 NS Datum=-30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 15 3H-1 S   -100 -2 2 Pike & Barton Squibb & Hall
2 14 3H-1 S   -100 -2 2 Pike & Waxman Capal & Semp
3 13 2H= S   110 4 -4 Keable & Keable Scerri & Palmer
4 12 4H-1 N   -100 -2 2 Davis & Pearce Blakey & Blakey
7 9 3H-1 S   -100 -2 2 Willans & Draper Davies & Gisborne
10 6 4H-2 N   -200 -5 5 Porch & Cherry Guthrie & Barnes
11 5 1NT+2 S   150 5 -5 Crofts & Lucioni Hyett & Wolfarth
16 21 4H-1 N   -100 -2 2 Littlewood & Musson Hogg & Kelly
18 19 1NT+1 S   120 4 -4 Auchterlonie & Nelson Garthwaite & Hobson
20 17 3H= S   140 5 -5 Procter & Sanis Teshome & Jagger
22 8 3H-1 S   -100 -2 2 Solomon & Solomon Hedley & Hedley
Board 3 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 15 4H+2 E   -680 -1 1 Pike & Barton Squibb & Hall
2 14 4H= W   -620 1 -1 Pike & Waxman Capal & Semp
3 13 3NT+3 W   -690 -1 1 Keable & Keable Scerri & Palmer
4 12 4H+2 E   -680 -1 1 Davis & Pearce Blakey & Blakey
7 9 3NT+2 W   -660 0 0 Willans & Draper Davies & Gisborne
10 6 3NT+2 W   -660 0 0 Porch & Cherry Guthrie & Barnes
11 5 4H= W   -620 1 -1 Crofts & Lucioni Hyett & Wolfarth
16 21 4H+1 W   -650 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Hogg & Kelly
18 19 4H+1 E   -650 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Garthwaite & Hobson
20 17 4H+1 E   -650 0 0 Procter & Sanis Teshome & Jagger
22 8 4H+1 E   -650 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Hedley & Hedley
Board 4 NS Datum=40
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 15 4H-2 N   -200 -6 6 Pike & Barton Squibb & Hall
2 14 2H+2 N   170 4 -4 Pike & Waxman Capal & Semp
3 13 1NT+1 S   120 2 -2 Keable & Keable Scerri & Palmer
4 12 2H+1 N   140 3 -3 Davis & Pearce Blakey & Blakey
7 9 2H+1 N   140 3 -3 Willans & Draper Davies & Gisborne
10 6 2H-1 N   -100 -4 4 Porch & Cherry Guthrie & Barnes
11 5 2S-2 W   200 4 -4 Crofts & Lucioni Hyett & Wolfarth
16 21 2NT-1 N   -100 -4 4 Littlewood & Musson Hogg & Kelly
18 19 2NT-2 S   -200 -6 6 Auchterlonie & Nelson Garthwaite & Hobson
20 17 1NT+1 S   120 2 -2 Procter & Sanis Teshome & Jagger
22 8 2H= N   110 2 -2 Solomon & Solomon Hedley & Hedley
Board 5 NS Datum=-410
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 16 6H-2 W   100 11 -11 Pike & Waxman Littlewood & Musson
3 15 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Keable & Keable Squibb & Hall
4 14 3C+1 E   -130 7 -7 Davis & Pearce Capal & Semp
5 13 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Hyett & Wolfarth Scerri & Palmer
8 10 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Hedley & Hedley Porch & Cherry
11 7 4H= W   -420 0 0 Crofts & Lucioni Willans & Draper
12 6 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Blakey & Blakey Guthrie & Barnes
17 1 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Teshome & Jagger Pike & Barton
19 20 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Garthwaite & Hobson Procter & Sanis
21 18 4H= W   -420 0 0 Hogg & Kelly Auchterlonie & Nelson
22 9 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Davies & Gisborne
Board 6 NS Datum=100
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 16 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Pike & Waxman Littlewood & Musson
3 15 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Keable & Keable Squibb & Hall
4 14 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Davis & Pearce Capal & Semp
5 13 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Scerri & Palmer
8 10 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Porch & Cherry
11 7 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Crofts & Lucioni Willans & Draper
12 6 4H-1 W   100 0 0 Blakey & Blakey Guthrie & Barnes
17 1 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Pike & Barton
19 20 4H-2 E   200 3 -3 Garthwaite & Hobson Procter & Sanis
21 18 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Hogg & Kelly Auchterlonie & Nelson
22 9 4H-1 E   100 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Davies & Gisborne
Board 7 NS Datum=-40
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 16 2D= W   -90 -2 2 Pike & Waxman Littlewood & Musson
3 15 3NT-3 W   300 8 -8 Keable & Keable Squibb & Hall
4 14 2H= S   110 4 -4 Davis & Pearce Capal & Semp
5 13 3C-3 N   -300 -6 6 Hyett & Wolfarth Scerri & Palmer
8 10 2D-1 W   100 4 -4 Hedley & Hedley Porch & Cherry
11 7 2NT= W   -120 -2 2 Crofts & Lucioni Willans & Draper
12 6 1NT+1 W   -120 -2 2 Blakey & Blakey Guthrie & Barnes
17 1 2NT= W   -120 -2 2 Teshome & Jagger Pike & Barton
19 20 2D= W   -90 -2 2 Garthwaite & Hobson Procter & Sanis
21 18 1Sx= N   160 5 -5 Hogg & Kelly Auchterlonie & Nelson
22 9 1NT+2 W   -150 -3 3 Solomon & Solomon Davies & Gisborne
Board 8 NS Datum=450
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 16 4H+2 N   480 1 -1 Pike & Waxman Littlewood & Musson
3 15 3NT+1 S   430 -1 1 Keable & Keable Squibb & Hall
4 14 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Davis & Pearce Capal & Semp
5 13 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Scerri & Palmer
8 10 4H+1 N   450 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Porch & Cherry
11 7 3NT+1 S   430 -1 1 Crofts & Lucioni Willans & Draper
12 6 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Blakey & Blakey Guthrie & Barnes
17 1 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Pike & Barton
19 20 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Garthwaite & Hobson Procter & Sanis
21 18 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Hogg & Kelly Auchterlonie & Nelson
22 9 4H+1 S   450 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Davies & Gisborne
Board 9 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 19 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Pike & Barton Garthwaite & Hobson
3 17 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Keable & Keable Teshome & Jagger
4 16 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Davis & Pearce Littlewood & Musson
5 15 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Squibb & Hall
6 14 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Guthrie & Barnes Capal & Semp
9 11 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Davies & Gisborne Crofts & Lucioni
12 8 3NT-3 N   -150 11 -11 Blakey & Blakey Hedley & Hedley
13 7 3NT= W   -600 2 -2 Scerri & Palmer Willans & Draper
18 2 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Auchterlonie & Nelson Pike & Waxman
20 21 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Procter & Sanis Hogg & Kelly
22 10 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Porch & Cherry
Board 10 NS Datum=-130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 19 3C-2 N   -200 -2 2 Pike & Barton Garthwaite & Hobson
3 17 2NT-1 W   100 6 -6 Keable & Keable Teshome & Jagger
4 16 1H+2 W   -140 0 0 Davis & Pearce Littlewood & Musson
5 15 4S= E   -620 -10 10 Hyett & Wolfarth Squibb & Hall
6 14 1NT+2 W   -150 -1 1 Guthrie & Barnes Capal & Semp
9 11 1NT= W   -90 1 -1 Davies & Gisborne Crofts & Lucioni
12 8 1NT= W   -90 1 -1 Blakey & Blakey Hedley & Hedley
13 7 1NT= W   -90 1 -1 Scerri & Palmer Willans & Draper
18 2 3H= W   -140 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Pike & Waxman
20 21 1H= W   -80 2 -2 Procter & Sanis Hogg & Kelly
22 10 3S+1 E   -170 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Porch & Cherry
Board 11 NS Datum=-390
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 19 4H= W   -420 -1 1 Pike & Barton Garthwaite & Hobson
3 17 4H-1 E   50 10 -10 Keable & Keable Teshome & Jagger
4 16 4H+1 E   -450 -2 2 Davis & Pearce Littlewood & Musson
5 15 4H+1 E   -450 -2 2 Hyett & Wolfarth Squibb & Hall
6 14 4Sx-2 S   -300 3 -3 Guthrie & Barnes Capal & Semp
9 11 4Sx-3 S   -500 -3 3 Davies & Gisborne Crofts & Lucioni
12 8 4Sx-4 S   -800 -9 9 Blakey & Blakey Hedley & Hedley
13 7 3S-2 S   -100 7 -7 Scerri & Palmer Willans & Draper
18 2 4S-2 S   -100 7 -7 Auchterlonie & Nelson Pike & Waxman
20 21 4Sx-4 S   -800 -9 9 Procter & Sanis Hogg & Kelly
22 10 4H= E   -420 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Porch & Cherry
Board 12 NS Datum=-590
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 19 4S+2 W   -480 3 -3 Pike & Barton Garthwaite & Hobson
3 17 4H+2 W   -480 3 -3 Keable & Keable Teshome & Jagger
4 16 5H+1 W   -480 3 -3 Davis & Pearce Littlewood & Musson
5 15 4S+2 W   -480 3 -3 Hyett & Wolfarth Squibb & Hall
6 14 6H= W   -980 -9 9 Guthrie & Barnes Capal & Semp
9 11 4H+2 W   -480 3 -3 Davies & Gisborne Crofts & Lucioni
12 8 6H= W   -980 -9 9 Blakey & Blakey Hedley & Hedley
13 7 4H+2 W   -480 3 -3 Scerri & Palmer Willans & Draper
18 2 4H+2 W   -480 3 -3 Auchterlonie & Nelson Pike & Waxman
20 21 6S= W   -980 -9 9 Procter & Sanis Hogg & Kelly
22 10 4H+2 W   -480 3 -3 Solomon & Solomon Porch & Cherry
Board 13 NS Datum=-120
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 20 2D= S   90 5 -5 Pike & Waxman Procter & Sanis
4 18 3C-1 N   -100 1 -1 Davis & Pearce Auchterlonie & Nelson
5 17 3C-1 N   -100 1 -1 Hyett & Wolfarth Teshome & Jagger
6 16 3C-2 N   -200 -2 2 Guthrie & Barnes Littlewood & Musson
7 15 3C-2 N   -200 -2 2 Willans & Draper Squibb & Hall
10 12 3C-2 N   -200 -2 2 Porch & Cherry Blakey & Blakey
13 9 1NT-2 N   -200 -2 2 Scerri & Palmer Davies & Gisborne
14 8 2D+1 S   110 6 -6 Capal & Semp Hedley & Hedley
19 3 3C-1 N   -100 1 -1 Garthwaite & Hobson Keable & Keable
21 1 3C-1 N   -100 1 -1 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Barton
22 11 3C-2 N   -200 -2 2 Solomon & Solomon Crofts & Lucioni
Board 14 NS Datum=250
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 20 3NT+1 N   430 5 -5 Pike & Waxman Procter & Sanis
4 18 3NT= N   400 4 -4 Davis & Pearce Auchterlonie & Nelson
5 17 1Hx= E   -160 -9 9 Hyett & Wolfarth Teshome & Jagger
6 16 3NT+1 S   430 5 -5 Guthrie & Barnes Littlewood & Musson
7 15 3NT= N   400 4 -4 Willans & Draper Squibb & Hall
10 12 3NT= N   400 4 -4 Porch & Cherry Blakey & Blakey
13 9 3NT+1 N   430 5 -5 Scerri & Palmer Davies & Gisborne
14 8 2H-2 N   -100 -8 8 Capal & Semp Hedley & Hedley
19 3 5C-1 S   -50 -7 7 Garthwaite & Hobson Keable & Keable
21 1 5C-2 S   -100 -8 8 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Barton
22 11 3NT+2 N   460 5 -5 Solomon & Solomon Crofts & Lucioni
Board 15 NS Datum=-30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 20 2H+1 N   140 5 -5 Pike & Waxman Procter & Sanis
4 18 3H-1 N   -100 -2 2 Davis & Pearce Auchterlonie & Nelson
5 17 3NT-1 N   -100 -2 2 Hyett & Wolfarth Teshome & Jagger
6 16 2S-1 E   50 2 -2 Guthrie & Barnes Littlewood & Musson
7 15 3NT-1 N   -100 -2 2 Willans & Draper Squibb & Hall
10 12 2H= N   110 4 -4 Porch & Cherry Blakey & Blakey
13 9 3NT-1 S   -100 -2 2 Scerri & Palmer Davies & Gisborne
14 8 3NT-1 N   -100 -2 2 Capal & Semp Hedley & Hedley
19 3 4H-2 N   -200 -5 5 Garthwaite & Hobson Keable & Keable
21 1 3NT-1 N   -100 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Barton
22 11 4C-3 W   150 5 -5 Solomon & Solomon Crofts & Lucioni
Board 16 NS Datum=-130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 20 3NT= E   -600 -10 10 Pike & Waxman Procter & Sanis
4 18 3C+1 W   -130 0 0 Davis & Pearce Auchterlonie & Nelson
5 17 1NT= W   -90 1 -1 Hyett & Wolfarth Teshome & Jagger
6 16 2D+1 E   -110 1 -1 Guthrie & Barnes Littlewood & Musson
7 15 3C+1 W   -130 0 0 Willans & Draper Squibb & Hall
10 12 1NT+1 W   -120 0 0 Porch & Cherry Blakey & Blakey
13 9 2S-2 N   -100 1 -1 Scerri & Palmer Davies & Gisborne
14 8 3NT-2 E   200 8 -8 Capal & Semp Hedley & Hedley
19 3 2NT+1 E   -150 -1 1 Garthwaite & Hobson Keable & Keable
21 1 1NT+4 W   -210 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Barton
22 11 1NT+2 W   -150 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Crofts & Lucioni
Board 17 NS Datum=-270
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 4Dx-3 N   -500 -6 6 Pike & Barton Pike & Waxman
3 21 4S+1 W   -450 -5 5 Keable & Keable Hogg & Kelly
5 19 5S-1 W   50 8 -8 Hyett & Wolfarth Garthwaite & Hobson
6 18 3Cx-4 S   -800 -11 11 Guthrie & Barnes Auchterlonie & Nelson
7 17 4Dx-2 N   -300 -1 1 Willans & Draper Teshome & Jagger
8 16 4S= W   -420 -4 4 Hedley & Hedley Littlewood & Musson
11 13 4Dx-2 N   -300 -1 1 Crofts & Lucioni Scerri & Palmer
14 10 4H-1 E   50 8 -8 Capal & Semp Porch & Cherry
15 9 4H= W   -420 -4 4 Squibb & Hall Davies & Gisborne
20 4 3Dx-1 N   -100 5 -5 Procter & Sanis Davis & Pearce
22 12 4H-1 E   50 8 -8 Solomon & Solomon Blakey & Blakey
Board 18 NS Datum=-790
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Pike & Barton Pike & Waxman
3 21 4NT+2 E   -490 7 -7 Keable & Keable Hogg & Kelly
5 19 3NT+3 W   -490 7 -7 Hyett & Wolfarth Garthwaite & Hobson
6 18 6C= E   -920 -4 4 Guthrie & Barnes Auchterlonie & Nelson
7 17 6C= E   -920 -4 4 Willans & Draper Teshome & Jagger
8 16 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Hedley & Hedley Littlewood & Musson
11 13 6C= E   -920 -4 4 Crofts & Lucioni Scerri & Palmer
14 10 7C-1 E   50 13 -13 Capal & Semp Porch & Cherry
15 9 3NT+3 E   -490 7 -7 Squibb & Hall Davies & Gisborne
20 4 6C+1 E   -940 -4 4 Procter & Sanis Davis & Pearce
22 12 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Solomon & Solomon Blakey & Blakey
Board 19 NS Datum=-480
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 3H+1 E   -170 7 -7 Pike & Barton Pike & Waxman
3 21 2NTx+1 E   -890 -9 9 Keable & Keable Hogg & Kelly
5 19 4H= E   -620 -4 4 Hyett & Wolfarth Garthwaite & Hobson
6 18 4H+1 E   -650 -5 5 Guthrie & Barnes Auchterlonie & Nelson
7 17 3NT= E   -600 -3 3 Willans & Draper Teshome & Jagger
8 16 4H= E   -620 -4 4 Hedley & Hedley Littlewood & Musson
11 13 2H+3 E   -200 7 -7 Crofts & Lucioni Scerri & Palmer
14 10 4H= E   -620 -4 4 Capal & Semp Porch & Cherry
15 9 4H= E   -620 -4 4 Squibb & Hall Davies & Gisborne
20 4 2H+2 E   -170 7 -7 Procter & Sanis Davis & Pearce
22 12 3H+2 E   -200 7 -7 Solomon & Solomon Blakey & Blakey
Board 20 NS Datum=180
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 3NT= N   600 9 -9 Pike & Barton Pike & Waxman
3 21 4H-1 N   -100 -7 7 Keable & Keable Hogg & Kelly
5 19 6H-3 N   -300 -10 10 Hyett & Wolfarth Garthwaite & Hobson
6 18 3NT= N   600 9 -9 Guthrie & Barnes Auchterlonie & Nelson
7 17 5H-1 N   -100 -7 7 Willans & Draper Teshome & Jagger
8 16 5H-2 N   -200 -9 9 Hedley & Hedley Littlewood & Musson
11 13 5H-1 N   -100 -7 7 Crofts & Lucioni Scerri & Palmer
14 10 3NT+1 N   630 10 -10 Capal & Semp Porch & Cherry
15 9 3NT= S   600 9 -9 Squibb & Hall Davies & Gisborne
20 4 6H-3 N   -300 -10 10 Procter & Sanis Davis & Pearce
22 12 3NT+1 N   630 10 -10 Solomon & Solomon Blakey & Blakey
Board 21 NS Datum=-100
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 3 1H= S   80 5 -5 Pike & Waxman Keable & Keable
4 1 3H-2 S   -200 -3 3 Davis & Pearce Pike & Barton
6 20 3H-1 S   -100 0 0 Guthrie & Barnes Procter & Sanis
7 19 1H= N   80 5 -5 Willans & Draper Garthwaite & Hobson
8 18 2H-1 N   -100 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Auchterlonie & Nelson
9 17 2D+1 W   -110 0 0 Davies & Gisborne Teshome & Jagger
12 14 2NT-2 S   -200 -3 3 Blakey & Blakey Capal & Semp
15 11 3H-2 S   -200 -3 3 Squibb & Hall Crofts & Lucioni
16 10 3D-1 W   50 4 -4 Littlewood & Musson Porch & Cherry
21 5 2NT-3 S   -300 -5 5 Hogg & Kelly Hyett & Wolfarth
22 13 2H-1 S   -100 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Scerri & Palmer
Board 22 NS Datum=-620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 3 4H= E   -620 0 0 Pike & Waxman Keable & Keable
4 1 4H= E   -620 0 0 Davis & Pearce Pike & Barton
6 20 6H-2 E   200 13 -13 Guthrie & Barnes Procter & Sanis
7 19 4H= E   -620 0 0 Willans & Draper Garthwaite & Hobson
8 18 4H= E   -620 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Auchterlonie & Nelson
9 17 4H= W   -620 0 0 Davies & Gisborne Teshome & Jagger
12 14 4H= W   -620 0 0 Blakey & Blakey Capal & Semp
15 11 4H= E   -620 0 0 Squibb & Hall Crofts & Lucioni
16 10 4H= W   -620 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Porch & Cherry
21 5 4H= E   -620 0 0 Hogg & Kelly Hyett & Wolfarth
22 13 4H= W   -620 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Scerri & Palmer
Board 23 NS Datum=-580
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 3 2S+3 W   -200 9 -9 Pike & Waxman Keable & Keable
4 1 4S= W   -620 -1 1 Davis & Pearce Pike & Barton
6 20 1NT+1 E   -120 10 -10 Guthrie & Barnes Procter & Sanis
7 19 4S= W   -620 -1 1 Willans & Draper Garthwaite & Hobson
8 18 4S+1 W   -650 -2 2 Hedley & Hedley Auchterlonie & Nelson
9 17 4S= W   -620 -1 1 Davies & Gisborne Teshome & Jagger
12 14 4S+1 W   -650 -2 2 Blakey & Blakey Capal & Semp
15 11 4S+1 E   -650 -2 2 Squibb & Hall Crofts & Lucioni
16 10 4S= W   -620 -1 1 Littlewood & Musson Porch & Cherry
21 5 4S+1 W   -650 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Hyett & Wolfarth
22 13 4S= W   -620 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Scerri & Palmer
Board 24 NS Datum=-130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 3 3NT-1 N   -50 2 -2 Pike & Waxman Keable & Keable
4 1 2S= E   -110 1 -1 Davis & Pearce Pike & Barton
6 20 2NT-1 W   50 5 -5 Guthrie & Barnes Procter & Sanis
7 19 3S-5 N   -250 -3 3 Willans & Draper Garthwaite & Hobson
8 18 2S= E   -110 1 -1 Hedley & Hedley Auchterlonie & Nelson
9 17 2H-2 S   -100 1 -1 Davies & Gisborne Teshome & Jagger
12 14 2NT-1 W   50 5 -5 Blakey & Blakey Capal & Semp
15 11 3NT-3 N   -150 -1 1 Squibb & Hall Crofts & Lucioni
16 10 2S= E   -110 1 -1 Littlewood & Musson Porch & Cherry
21 5 2Hx-2 S   -300 -5 5 Hogg & Kelly Hyett & Wolfarth
22 13 3Dx-3 N   -500 -9 9 Solomon & Solomon Scerri & Palmer
Board 25 NS Datum=450
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 4H+1 N   450 0 0 Pike & Barton Guthrie & Barnes
3 4 6H= S   980 11 -11 Keable & Keable Davis & Pearce
5 2 5C= S   400 -2 2 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Waxman
7 21 5H= N   450 0 0 Willans & Draper Hogg & Kelly
8 20 4H+1 N   450 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Procter & Sanis
9 19 5H= N   450 0 0 Davies & Gisborne Garthwaite & Hobson
10 18 5H= N   450 0 0 Porch & Cherry Auchterlonie & Nelson
13 15 5H= N   450 0 0 Scerri & Palmer Squibb & Hall
16 12 5H= N   450 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Blakey & Blakey
17 11 4H+1 N   450 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Crofts & Lucioni
22 14 5H+1 S   480 1 -1 Solomon & Solomon Capal & Semp
Board 26 NS Datum=-190
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 4H= N   620 13 -13 Pike & Barton Guthrie & Barnes
3 4 2S+1 W   -140 2 -2 Keable & Keable Davis & Pearce
5 2 5D-2 S   -200 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Waxman
7 21 4H-1 N   -100 3 -3 Willans & Draper Hogg & Kelly
8 20 5Hx-2 N   -500 -7 7 Hedley & Hedley Procter & Sanis
9 19 2S+2 W   -170 1 -1 Davies & Gisborne Garthwaite & Hobson
10 18 4H-2 N   -200 0 0 Porch & Cherry Auchterlonie & Nelson
13 15 4Sx= E   -790 -12 12 Scerri & Palmer Squibb & Hall
16 12 4H-1 N   -100 3 -3 Littlewood & Musson Blakey & Blakey
17 11 2S+2 W   -170 1 -1 Teshome & Jagger Crofts & Lucioni
22 14 2S+2 W   -170 1 -1 Solomon & Solomon Capal & Semp
Board 27 NS Datum=-420
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 4S+1 W   -450 -1 1 Pike & Barton Guthrie & Barnes
3 4 4S= W   -420 0 0 Keable & Keable Davis & Pearce
5 2 4S= W   -420 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Waxman
7 21 4S= W   -420 0 0 Willans & Draper Hogg & Kelly
8 20 4S= W   -420 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Procter & Sanis
9 19 4S= W   -420 0 0 Davies & Gisborne Garthwaite & Hobson
10 18 4S= W   -420 0 0 Porch & Cherry Auchterlonie & Nelson
13 15 4S= W   -420 0 0 Scerri & Palmer Squibb & Hall
16 12 3D+1 E   -130 7 -7 Littlewood & Musson Blakey & Blakey
17 11 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Crofts & Lucioni
22 14 4H= W   -420 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Capal & Semp
Board 28 NS Datum=-100
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 2NT+3 S   210 7 -7 Pike & Barton Guthrie & Barnes
3 4 2C+2 E   -130 -1 1 Keable & Keable Davis & Pearce
5 2 2C= E   -90 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Waxman
7 21 2S= E   -110 0 0 Willans & Draper Hogg & Kelly
8 20 1H-2 E   100 5 -5 Hedley & Hedley Procter & Sanis
9 19 2D-2 N   -200 -3 3 Davies & Gisborne Garthwaite & Hobson
10 18 2D-3 N   -300 -5 5 Porch & Cherry Auchterlonie & Nelson
13 15 2C+1 E   -110 0 0 Scerri & Palmer Squibb & Hall
16 12 2C+3 E   -150 -2 2 Littlewood & Musson Blakey & Blakey
17 11 1S+2 W   -140 -1 1 Teshome & Jagger Crofts & Lucioni
22 14 1NT-1 S   -100 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Capal & Semp