E B U Life Masters 01/03/2008 Multisection Session 1 Section Purple
Board 1 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 2Sx= E   -470 -11 11 Fleet & Cooper Mcdonald & Caldwell
2 3 2Sxx-1 E   200 5 -5 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Hunt & Featherman
3 5 3S-2 E   100 2 -2 Brito & Reader Webb & Webb
4 7 5D-2 N   -100 -4 4 Watson & Lapzys Downing & Johnstone
5 2 5D-1 S   -50 -2 2 Duddell & Duddell Turnham & Wiles
6 4 3D+1 S   130 3 -3 Walsh & Gardiner Curtis & Seaver
7 6 5D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Town & Hrarcus Gold & Green
Board 2 NS Datum=-350
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 4S+1 E   -450 -3 3 Fleet & Cooper Mcdonald & Caldwell
2 3 3S+1 E   -170 5 -5 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Hunt & Featherman
3 5 4S+1 E   -450 -3 3 Brito & Reader Webb & Webb
4 7 4S+1 E   -450 -3 3 Watson & Lapzys Downing & Johnstone
5 2 2S+2 W   -170 5 -5 Duddell & Duddell Turnham & Wiles
6 4 4S+1 E   -450 -3 3 Walsh & Gardiner Curtis & Seaver
7 6 4S+1 E   -450 -3 3 Town & Hrarcus Gold & Green
Board 3 NS Datum=80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 4S-1 E   100 1 -1 Fleet & Cooper Mcdonald & Caldwell
2 3 4S-1 W   100 1 -1 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Hunt & Featherman
3 5 5Hx-1 N   -100 -5 5 Brito & Reader Webb & Webb
4 7 4H-1 N   -50 -4 4 Watson & Lapzys Downing & Johnstone
5 2 4Hx= N   590 11 -11 Duddell & Duddell Turnham & Wiles
6 4 3S= W   -140 -6 6 Walsh & Gardiner Curtis & Seaver
7 6 4Hx= N   590 11 -11 Town & Hrarcus Gold & Green
Board 4 NS Datum=760
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 3NT+3 N   690 -2 2 Fleet & Cooper Mcdonald & Caldwell
2 3 3NT+3 S   690 -2 2 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Hunt & Featherman
3 5 3NT+2 S   660 -3 3 Brito & Reader Webb & Webb
4 7 3NT+3 S   690 -2 2 Watson & Lapzys Downing & Johnstone
5 2 3NT+3 S   690 -2 2 Duddell & Duddell Turnham & Wiles
6 4 6D= S   1370 12 -12 Walsh & Gardiner Curtis & Seaver
7 6 6D= S   1370 12 -12 Town & Hrarcus Gold & Green
Board 5 NS Datum=150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4D= N   130 -1 1 Fleet & Cooper Downing & Johnstone
2 2 3D+1 S   130 -1 1 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Turnham & Wiles
3 4 1NT+2 S   150 0 0 Brito & Reader Curtis & Seaver
4 6 2H-3 W   150 0 0 Watson & Lapzys Gold & Green
5 1 3NT= N   600 10 -10 Duddell & Duddell Mcdonald & Caldwell
6 3 2S-1 N   -100 -6 6 Walsh & Gardiner Hunt & Featherman
7 5 2H-3 W   150 0 0 Town & Hrarcus Webb & Webb
Board 6 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3C= N   110 2 -2 Fleet & Cooper Downing & Johnstone
2 2 3NT+1 S   430 9 -9 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Turnham & Wiles
3 4 2NT-1 N   -50 -2 2 Brito & Reader Curtis & Seaver
4 6 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Watson & Lapzys Gold & Green
5 1 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Duddell & Duddell Mcdonald & Caldwell
6 3 2S-3 E   300 7 -7 Walsh & Gardiner Hunt & Featherman
7 5 3NT+1 S   430 9 -9 Town & Hrarcus Webb & Webb
Board 7 NS Datum=-60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3D-1 E   100 4 -4 Fleet & Cooper Downing & Johnstone
2 2 2D+1 E   -110 -2 2 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Turnham & Wiles
3 4 3S= N   140 5 -5 Brito & Reader Curtis & Seaver
4 6 3D-1 E   100 4 -4 Watson & Lapzys Gold & Green
5 1 3H-3 N   -300 -6 6 Duddell & Duddell Mcdonald & Caldwell
6 3 3NT= W   -600 -11 11 Walsh & Gardiner Hunt & Featherman
7 5 3D= E   -110 -2 2 Town & Hrarcus Webb & Webb
Board 8 NS Datum=320
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3NT= N   400 2 -2 Fleet & Cooper Downing & Johnstone
2 2 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Turnham & Wiles
3 4 3NT-1 S   -50 -9 9 Brito & Reader Curtis & Seaver
4 6 2NT+1 S   150 -5 5 Watson & Lapzys Gold & Green
5 1 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Duddell & Duddell Mcdonald & Caldwell
6 3 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Walsh & Gardiner Hunt & Featherman
7 5 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Town & Hrarcus Webb & Webb
Board 9 NS Datum=150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 2H= N   110 -1 1 Fleet & Cooper Gold & Green
2 1 2S-1 N   -50 -5 5 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 3 1NT= S   90 -2 2 Brito & Reader Hunt & Featherman
4 5 2S+1 N   140 0 0 Watson & Lapzys Webb & Webb
5 7 2NT+1 N   150 0 0 Duddell & Duddell Downing & Johnstone
6 2 3D-3 W   300 4 -4 Walsh & Gardiner Turnham & Wiles
7 4 2S+1 N   140 0 0 Town & Hrarcus Curtis & Seaver
Board 10 NS Datum=610
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 4H+2 N   680 2 -2 Fleet & Cooper Gold & Green
2 1 7H-2 S   -200 -13 13 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 3 4C+2 N   170 -10 10 Brito & Reader Hunt & Featherman
4 5 4H+2 N   680 2 -2 Watson & Lapzys Webb & Webb
5 7 4H+2 N   680 2 -2 Duddell & Duddell Downing & Johnstone
6 2 3NT+1 S   630 1 -1 Walsh & Gardiner Turnham & Wiles
7 4 5H+1 N   680 2 -2 Town & Hrarcus Curtis & Seaver
Board 11 NS Datum=-60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 4S-1 N   -50 0 0 Fleet & Cooper Gold & Green
2 1 3S-1 S   -50 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 3 3D= W   -110 -2 2 Brito & Reader Hunt & Featherman
4 5 4S-2 S   -100 -1 1 Watson & Lapzys Webb & Webb
5 7 3S-1 S   -50 0 0 Duddell & Duddell Downing & Johnstone
6 2 3S= S   140 5 -5 Walsh & Gardiner Turnham & Wiles
7 4 4Dx-1 W   100 4 -4 Town & Hrarcus Curtis & Seaver
Board 12 NS Datum=-140
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 2D+3 E   -150 0 0 Fleet & Cooper Gold & Green
2 1 2D+2 W   -130 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 3 2D+2 W   -130 0 0 Brito & Reader Hunt & Featherman
4 5 2D+3 W   -150 0 0 Watson & Lapzys Webb & Webb
5 7 2D+2 W   -130 0 0 Duddell & Duddell Downing & Johnstone
6 2 3D+2 W   -150 0 0 Walsh & Gardiner Turnham & Wiles
7 4 2D+2 W   -130 0 0 Town & Hrarcus Curtis & Seaver
Board 13 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 4S+1 E   -650 0 0 Fleet & Cooper Webb & Webb
2 7 4S+1 E   -650 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Downing & Johnstone
3 2 4S+2 E   -680 -1 1 Brito & Reader Turnham & Wiles
4 4 4S+2 E   -680 -1 1 Watson & Lapzys Curtis & Seaver
5 6 3D+2 E   -150 11 -11 Duddell & Duddell Gold & Green
6 1 4S+2 E   -680 -1 1 Walsh & Gardiner Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 3 5D+1 E   -620 1 -1 Town & Hrarcus Hunt & Featherman
Board 14 NS Datum=130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 3H+1 N   170 1 -1 Fleet & Cooper Webb & Webb
2 7 4H= S   420 7 -7 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Downing & Johnstone
3 2 2H= S   110 -1 1 Brito & Reader Turnham & Wiles
4 4 3H= S   140 0 0 Watson & Lapzys Curtis & Seaver
5 6 4S-1 S   -50 -5 5 Duddell & Duddell Gold & Green
6 1 4H-2 S   -100 -6 6 Walsh & Gardiner Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 3 3H= S   140 0 0 Town & Hrarcus Hunt & Featherman
Board 15 NS Datum=680
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 4S+2 N   680 0 0 Fleet & Cooper Webb & Webb
2 7 4S+2 S   680 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Downing & Johnstone
3 2 4S+2 N   680 0 0 Brito & Reader Turnham & Wiles
4 4 4S+2 N   680 0 0 Watson & Lapzys Curtis & Seaver
5 6 4S+2 N   680 0 0 Duddell & Duddell Gold & Green
6 1 4S+2 N   680 0 0 Walsh & Gardiner Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 3 4S+2 N   680 0 0 Town & Hrarcus Hunt & Featherman
Board 16 NS Datum=130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 2H+1 N   140 0 0 Fleet & Cooper Webb & Webb
2 7 1S-1 E   100 -1 1 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Downing & Johnstone
3 2 2H= S   110 -1 1 Brito & Reader Turnham & Wiles
4 4 2H= S   110 -1 1 Watson & Lapzys Curtis & Seaver
5 6 2H-1 N   -50 -5 5 Duddell & Duddell Gold & Green
6 1 1NT-2 E   200 2 -2 Walsh & Gardiner Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 3 1NT-2 E   200 2 -2 Town & Hrarcus Hunt & Featherman
Board 17 NS Datum=290
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 4H-1 N   -50 -8 8 Fleet & Cooper Curtis & Seaver
2 6 4H= N   420 4 -4 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Gold & Green
3 1 4H= N   420 4 -4 Brito & Reader Mcdonald & Caldwell
4 3 4H= N   420 4 -4 Watson & Lapzys Hunt & Featherman
5 5 2S+2 S   170 -3 3 Duddell & Duddell Webb & Webb
6 7 4H= N   420 4 -4 Walsh & Gardiner Downing & Johnstone
7 2 4H-2 N   -100 -9 9 Town & Hrarcus Turnham & Wiles
Board 18 NS Datum=-90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Fleet & Cooper Curtis & Seaver
2 6 3C-1 S   -100 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Gold & Green
3 1 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Brito & Reader Mcdonald & Caldwell
4 3 2S= E   -110 -1 1 Watson & Lapzys Hunt & Featherman
5 5 1NT-2 E   100 5 -5 Duddell & Duddell Webb & Webb
6 7 2S= E   -110 -1 1 Walsh & Gardiner Downing & Johnstone
7 2 1NT+1 E   -120 -1 1 Town & Hrarcus Turnham & Wiles
Board 19 NS Datum=40
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2H= N   110 2 -2 Fleet & Cooper Curtis & Seaver
2 6 2H-1 S   -50 -3 3 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Gold & Green
3 1 PASS N   0 -1 1 Brito & Reader Mcdonald & Caldwell
4 3 1NT= N   90 2 -2 Watson & Lapzys Hunt & Featherman
5 5 3D= N   110 2 -2 Duddell & Duddell Webb & Webb
6 7 3D= N   110 2 -2 Walsh & Gardiner Downing & Johnstone
7 2 2NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Town & Hrarcus Turnham & Wiles
Board 20 NS Datum=220
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 4H-1 N   -100 -8 8 Fleet & Cooper Curtis & Seaver
2 6 2H+1 N   140 -2 2 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Gold & Green
3 1 2H+1 N   140 -2 2 Brito & Reader Mcdonald & Caldwell
4 3 2H+1 N   140 -2 2 Watson & Lapzys Hunt & Featherman
5 5 4H-1 N   -100 -8 8 Duddell & Duddell Webb & Webb
6 7 4S= S   620 9 -9 Walsh & Gardiner Downing & Johnstone
7 2 5Cx-3 E   800 11 -11 Town & Hrarcus Turnham & Wiles
Board 21 NS Datum=-90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 2S= E   -110 -1 1 Fleet & Cooper Hunt & Featherman
2 5 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Webb & Webb
3 7 2S= W   -110 -1 1 Brito & Reader Downing & Johnstone
4 2 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Watson & Lapzys Turnham & Wiles
5 4 2H-1 N   -100 0 0 Duddell & Duddell Curtis & Seaver
6 6 3C-2 N   -200 -3 3 Walsh & Gardiner Gold & Green
7 1 2S= E   -110 -1 1 Town & Hrarcus Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 22 NS Datum=-440
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 5S-2 E   200 12 -12 Fleet & Cooper Hunt & Featherman
2 5 3NT= E   -600 -4 4 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Webb & Webb
3 7 4H+1 E   -650 -5 5 Brito & Reader Downing & Johnstone
4 2 5C= W   -600 -4 4 Watson & Lapzys Turnham & Wiles
5 4 5D= W   -600 -4 4 Duddell & Duddell Curtis & Seaver
6 6 5C= E   -600 -4 4 Walsh & Gardiner Gold & Green
7 1 6C-2 W   200 12 -12 Town & Hrarcus Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 23 NS Datum=-70
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3Sx= N   730 13 -13 Fleet & Cooper Hunt & Featherman
2 5 3S-1 S   -100 -1 1 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Webb & Webb
3 7 3S-1 S   -100 -1 1 Brito & Reader Downing & Johnstone
4 2 3NT-2 W   200 7 -7 Watson & Lapzys Turnham & Wiles
5 4 3Sx-1 S   -200 -4 4 Duddell & Duddell Curtis & Seaver
6 6 3S-1 S   -100 -1 1 Walsh & Gardiner Gold & Green
7 1 3H= E   -140 -2 2 Town & Hrarcus Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 24 NS Datum=-260
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3NT+3 E   -490 -6 6 Fleet & Cooper Hunt & Featherman
2 5 6D-1 W   50 7 -7 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Webb & Webb
3 7 4S-2 E   100 8 -8 Brito & Reader Downing & Johnstone
4 2 3S-1 E   50 7 -7 Watson & Lapzys Turnham & Wiles
5 4 3NT+3 E   -490 -6 6 Duddell & Duddell Curtis & Seaver
6 6 6NT-2 E   100 8 -8 Walsh & Gardiner Gold & Green
7 1 3S-1 E   50 7 -7 Town & Hrarcus Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 25 NS Datum=-700
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 4H+2 E   -680 1 -1 Fleet & Cooper Turnham & Wiles
2 4 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Curtis & Seaver
3 6 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Brito & Reader Gold & Green
4 1 4H+1 E   -650 2 -2 Watson & Lapzys Mcdonald & Caldwell
5 3 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Duddell & Duddell Hunt & Featherman
6 5 4H+2 E   -680 1 -1 Walsh & Gardiner Webb & Webb
7 7 4H+2 W   -680 1 -1 Town & Hrarcus Downing & Johnstone
Board 26 NS Datum=280
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 2S-1 N   -100 -9 9 Fleet & Cooper Turnham & Wiles
2 4 3NT= S   600 8 -8 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Curtis & Seaver
3 6 3NT-1 S   -100 -9 9 Brito & Reader Gold & Green
4 1 2H+1 S   140 -4 4 Watson & Lapzys Mcdonald & Caldwell
5 3 2H+2 S   170 -3 3 Duddell & Duddell Hunt & Featherman
6 5 4H= S   620 8 -8 Walsh & Gardiner Webb & Webb
7 7 2NT+3 N   210 -2 2 Town & Hrarcus Downing & Johnstone
Board 27 NS Datum=340
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 3H+1 N   170 -5 5 Fleet & Cooper Turnham & Wiles
2 4 4H= S   420 2 -2 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Curtis & Seaver
3 6 4H= N   420 2 -2 Brito & Reader Gold & Green
4 1 4H= S   420 2 -2 Watson & Lapzys Mcdonald & Caldwell
5 3 4H= N   420 2 -2 Duddell & Duddell Hunt & Featherman
6 5 3H+2 N   200 -4 4 Walsh & Gardiner Webb & Webb
7 7 4H= S   420 2 -2 Town & Hrarcus Downing & Johnstone
Board 28 NS Datum=150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 3H+1 N   170 1 -1 Fleet & Cooper Turnham & Wiles
2 4 3S= W   -140 -7 7 Nicholson & Kazmierczak Curtis & Seaver
3 6 4S-1 W   50 -3 3 Brito & Reader Gold & Green
4 1 4H= N   620 10 -10 Watson & Lapzys Mcdonald & Caldwell
5 3 3S-1 E   50 -3 3 Duddell & Duddell Hunt & Featherman
6 5 3S-1 E   50 -3 3 Walsh & Gardiner Webb & Webb
7 7 3S= E   -140 -7 7 Town & Hrarcus Downing & Johnstone
Session 1 Section Orange
Board 1 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 2NT= N   120 3 -3 Pollack & Gronau Palmer & Coubrough
3 6 4Sx-3 E   500 10 -10 Lanham & Turpin Hodgson & Bannister
5 7 5D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Millard & Millard Condon & Wilmot
8 4 3NT-1 N   -50 -2 2 Oddie & Robberts Lee & Kaban
Board 2 NS Datum=-350
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 3S+1 E   -170 5 -5 Pollack & Gronau Palmer & Coubrough
3 6 3S+2 E   -200 4 -4 Lanham & Turpin Hodgson & Bannister
5 7 4S= E   -420 -2 2 Millard & Millard Condon & Wilmot
8 4 4S= E   -420 -2 2 Oddie & Robberts Lee & Kaban
Board 3 NS Datum=80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 4S-1 W   100 1 -1 Pollack & Gronau Palmer & Coubrough
3 6 3D= W   -110 -5 5 Lanham & Turpin Hodgson & Bannister
5 7 3S+1 W   -170 -6 6 Millard & Millard Condon & Wilmot
8 4 4Sx-1 W   200 3 -3 Oddie & Robberts Lee & Kaban
Board 4 NS Datum=760
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 3NT+2 S   660 -3 3 Pollack & Gronau Palmer & Coubrough
3 6 3NT+3 S   690 -2 2 Lanham & Turpin Hodgson & Bannister
5 7 3NT+3 S   690 -2 2 Millard & Millard Condon & Wilmot
8 4 3NT+2 S   660 -3 3 Oddie & Robberts Lee & Kaban
Board 5 NS Datum=150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 2S-1 N   -100 -6 6 Lanham & Turpin Pollack & Gronau
4 7 2H-1 W   50 -3 3 Lee & Kaban Condon & Wilmot
6 1 3D= S   110 -1 1 Hodgson & Bannister Palmer & Coubrough
8 5 3NT= N   600 10 -10 Oddie & Robberts Millard & Millard
Board 6 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Lanham & Turpin Pollack & Gronau
4 7 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Lee & Kaban Condon & Wilmot
6 1 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Hodgson & Bannister Palmer & Coubrough
8 5 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Oddie & Robberts Millard & Millard
Board 7 NS Datum=-60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 2NT= W   -120 -2 2 Lanham & Turpin Pollack & Gronau
4 7 3D= E   -110 -2 2 Lee & Kaban Condon & Wilmot
6 1 3D-1 E   100 4 -4 Hodgson & Bannister Palmer & Coubrough
8 5 3D= E   -110 -2 2 Oddie & Robberts Millard & Millard
Board 8 NS Datum=320
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 3NT= N   400 2 -2 Lanham & Turpin Pollack & Gronau
4 7 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Lee & Kaban Condon & Wilmot
6 1 3NT+1 S   430 3 -3 Hodgson & Bannister Palmer & Coubrough
8 5 4H-1 S   -50 -9 9 Oddie & Robberts Millard & Millard
Board 9 NS Datum=150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 1NT+2 S   150 0 0 Lee & Kaban Lanham & Turpin
5 1 1NT+2 S   150 0 0 Millard & Millard Palmer & Coubrough
7 2 2S+1 N   140 0 0 Condon & Wilmot Pollack & Gronau
8 6 3NT= N   400 6 -6 Oddie & Robberts Hodgson & Bannister
Board 10 NS Datum=610
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 4H+1 N   650 1 -1 Lee & Kaban Lanham & Turpin
5 1 4H+2 N   680 2 -2 Millard & Millard Palmer & Coubrough
7 2 5H+1 N   680 2 -2 Condon & Wilmot Pollack & Gronau
8 6 6H= N   1430 13 -13 Oddie & Robberts Hodgson & Bannister
Board 11 NS Datum=-60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 4S-2 S   -100 -1 1 Lee & Kaban Lanham & Turpin
5 1 4S-2 S   -100 -1 1 Millard & Millard Palmer & Coubrough
7 2 4S-1 S   -50 0 0 Condon & Wilmot Pollack & Gronau
8 6 4S-2 S   -100 -1 1 Oddie & Robberts Hodgson & Bannister
Board 12 NS Datum=-140
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 2D+3 W   -150 0 0 Lee & Kaban Lanham & Turpin
5 1 2D+3 W   -150 0 0 Millard & Millard Palmer & Coubrough
7 2 3NT+1 W   -430 -7 7 Condon & Wilmot Pollack & Gronau
8 6 2D+3 W   -150 0 0 Oddie & Robberts Hodgson & Bannister
Board 13 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 5D+1 E   -620 1 -1 Palmer & Coubrough Lanham & Turpin
5 4 4S+2 E   -680 -1 1 Millard & Millard Lee & Kaban
6 2 5S= E   -650 0 0 Hodgson & Bannister Pollack & Gronau
8 7 6S= E   -1430 -13 13 Oddie & Robberts Condon & Wilmot
Board 14 NS Datum=130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3H-1 S   -50 -5 5 Palmer & Coubrough Lanham & Turpin
5 4 4H= S   420 7 -7 Millard & Millard Lee & Kaban
6 2 3H= S   140 0 0 Hodgson & Bannister Pollack & Gronau
8 7 2H+2 S   170 1 -1 Oddie & Robberts Condon & Wilmot
Board 15 NS Datum=680
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 5S+1 N   680 0 0 Palmer & Coubrough Lanham & Turpin
5 4 4S+3 S   710 1 -1 Millard & Millard Lee & Kaban
6 2 5Cx-5 E   1100 9 -9 Hodgson & Bannister Pollack & Gronau
8 7 4S+2 S   680 0 0 Oddie & Robberts Condon & Wilmot
Board 16 NS Datum=130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 1NT-2 E   200 2 -2 Palmer & Coubrough Lanham & Turpin
5 4 1NT+2 N   150 1 -1 Millard & Millard Lee & Kaban
6 2 2D-1 E   100 -1 1 Hodgson & Bannister Pollack & Gronau
8 7 2S-1 E   100 -1 1 Oddie & Robberts Condon & Wilmot
Board 17 NS Datum=290
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 4H-1 N   -50 -8 8 Pollack & Gronau Lee & Kaban
6 5 3NT= N   400 3 -3 Hodgson & Bannister Millard & Millard
7 3 4H= N   420 4 -4 Condon & Wilmot Lanham & Turpin
8 1 4H+1 N   450 4 -4 Oddie & Robberts Palmer & Coubrough
Board 18 NS Datum=-90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 2D+1 W   -110 -1 1 Pollack & Gronau Lee & Kaban
6 5 1NT+2 W   -150 -2 2 Hodgson & Bannister Millard & Millard
7 3 1NT+1 W   -120 -1 1 Condon & Wilmot Lanham & Turpin
8 1 2S-1 E   50 4 -4 Oddie & Robberts Palmer & Coubrough
Board 19 NS Datum=40
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 3NT+1 N   430 9 -9 Pollack & Gronau Lee & Kaban
6 5 4D-1 N   -50 -3 3 Hodgson & Bannister Millard & Millard
7 3 2S= E   -110 -4 4 Condon & Wilmot Lanham & Turpin
8 1 3D+1 N   130 3 -3 Oddie & Robberts Palmer & Coubrough
Board 20 NS Datum=220
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 4H-1 N   -100 -8 8 Pollack & Gronau Lee & Kaban
6 5 4S-1 S   -100 -8 8 Hodgson & Bannister Millard & Millard
7 3 4S+1 S   650 10 -10 Condon & Wilmot Lanham & Turpin
8 1 4H= N   620 9 -9 Oddie & Robberts Palmer & Coubrough
Board 21 NS Datum=-90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2S= E   -110 -1 1 Palmer & Coubrough Lee & Kaban
3 5 2S= E   -110 -1 1 Lanham & Turpin Millard & Millard
7 6 2H= S   110 5 -5 Condon & Wilmot Hodgson & Bannister
8 2 3S-1 E   50 4 -4 Oddie & Robberts Pollack & Gronau
Board 22 NS Datum=-440
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 6NT-1 E   100 11 -11 Palmer & Coubrough Lee & Kaban
3 5 5Dx-4 N   -800 -8 8 Lanham & Turpin Millard & Millard
7 6 3NT= E   -600 -4 4 Condon & Wilmot Hodgson & Bannister
8 2 3NT= E   -600 -4 4 Oddie & Robberts Pollack & Gronau
Board 23 NS Datum=-70
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 3S-4 S   -400 -8 8 Palmer & Coubrough Lee & Kaban
3 5 3S-1 S   -100 -1 1 Lanham & Turpin Millard & Millard
7 6 4H-1 E   100 5 -5 Condon & Wilmot Hodgson & Bannister
8 2 3H+1 E   -170 -3 3 Oddie & Robberts Pollack & Gronau
Board 24 NS Datum=-260
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 6NT= E   -990 -12 12 Palmer & Coubrough Lee & Kaban
3 5 3NT+2 E   -460 -5 5 Lanham & Turpin Millard & Millard
7 6 3S= E   -140 3 -3 Condon & Wilmot Hodgson & Bannister
8 2 6NT= E   -990 -12 12 Oddie & Robberts Pollack & Gronau
Board 25 NS Datum=-700
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Palmer & Coubrough Condon & Wilmot
2 5 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Pollack & Gronau Millard & Millard
4 6 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Lee & Kaban Hodgson & Bannister
8 3 4H+3 E   -710 0 0 Oddie & Robberts Lanham & Turpin
Board 26 NS Datum=280
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3NT+1 N   630 8 -8 Palmer & Coubrough Condon & Wilmot
2 5 2H+2 S   170 -3 3 Pollack & Gronau Millard & Millard
4 6 2H= S   110 -5 5 Lee & Kaban Hodgson & Bannister
8 3 3NT+1 N   630 8 -8 Oddie & Robberts Lanham & Turpin
Board 27 NS Datum=340
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3H+1 N   170 -5 5 Palmer & Coubrough Condon & Wilmot
2 5 4H+1 S   450 3 -3 Pollack & Gronau Millard & Millard
4 6 2H+2 S   170 -5 5 Lee & Kaban Hodgson & Bannister
8 3 4H= S   420 2 -2 Oddie & Robberts Lanham & Turpin
Board 28 NS Datum=150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3S-1 E   50 -3 3 Palmer & Coubrough Condon & Wilmot
2 5 2S+1 W   -140 -7 7 Pollack & Gronau Millard & Millard
4 6 4H= N   620 10 -10 Lee & Kaban Hodgson & Bannister
8 3 4H= N   620 10 -10 Oddie & Robberts Lanham & Turpin