E B U Life Masters 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 3 Section Purple

---

Board 1 NS Datum=-490
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	1	5H+1	W		-480	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Palmer & Coubrough
2	3	5H+2	W		-510	-1	1	Turnham & Wiles	Lanham & Turpin
3	5	4H+3	W		-510	-1	1	Hunt & Featherman	Millard & Millard
4	7	3D+3	E		-170	8	-8	Curtis & Seaver	Condon & Wilmot
5	2	3NT-1	E		50	11	-11	Webb & Webb	Pollack & Gronau
6	4	4H+2	E		-480	0	0	Gold & Green	Lee & Kaban
7	6	4Sx-4	S		-800	-7	7	Downing & Johnstone	Hodgson & Bannister
Board 2 NS Datum=-30
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	1	1NT+1	S		120	4	-4	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Palmer & Coubrough
2	3	3Hx-1	N		-200	-5	5	Turnham & Wiles	Lanham & Turpin
3	5	2S+1	E		-140	-3	3	Hunt & Featherman	Millard & Millard
4	7	3C-3	W		150	5	-5	Curtis & Seaver	Condon & Wilmot
5	2	3H-1	N		-100	-2	2	Webb & Webb	Pollack & Gronau
6	4	2S=	E		-110	-2	2	Gold & Green	Lee & Kaban
7	6	2S=	E		-110	-2	2	Downing & Johnstone	Hodgson & Bannister
Board 3 NS Datum=-220
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	1	4S=	W		-620	-9	9	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Palmer & Coubrough
2	3	4S-1	E		100	8	-8	Turnham & Wiles	Lanham & Turpin
3	5	3S+1	E		-170	2	-2	Hunt & Featherman	Millard & Millard
4	7	3D=	N		110	8	-8	Curtis & Seaver	Condon & Wilmot
5	2	3S+1	E		-170	2	-2	Webb & Webb	Pollack & Gronau
6	4	3NT-1	E		100	8	-8	Gold & Green	Lee & Kaban
7	6	3S+2	E		-200	1	-1	Downing & Johnstone	Hodgson & Bannister
Board 4 NS Datum=-650
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	1	3NT=	W		-600	2	-2	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Palmer & Coubrough
2	3	3NT+2	E		-660	0	0	Turnham & Wiles	Lanham & Turpin
3	5	3NT+1	W		-630	1	-1	Hunt & Featherman	Millard & Millard
4	7	3NT+2	E		-660	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Condon & Wilmot
5	2	3NT+1	W		-630	1	-1	Webb & Webb	Pollack & Gronau
6	4	4S+1	E		-650	0	0	Gold & Green	Lee & Kaban
7	6	3NT+2	E		-660	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Hodgson & Bannister
Board 5 NS Datum=-440
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	3NT=	E		-400	1	-1	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Condon & Wilmot
2	2	3NT=	E		-400	1	-1	Turnham & Wiles	Pollack & Gronau
3	4	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Hunt & Featherman	Lee & Kaban
4	6	3NT+2	E		-460	-1	1	Curtis & Seaver	Hodgson & Bannister
5	1	3NT+2	E		-460	-1	1	Webb & Webb	Palmer & Coubrough
6	3	3NT+2	E		-460	-1	1	Gold & Green	Lanham & Turpin
7	5	3NT+2	E		-460	-1	1	Downing & Johnstone	Millard & Millard
Board 6 NS Datum=-30
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	5S-2	N		-100	-2	2	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Condon & Wilmot
2	2	4S=	N		420	10	-10	Turnham & Wiles	Pollack & Gronau
3	4	4S-1	N		-50	-1	1	Hunt & Featherman	Lee & Kaban
4	6	4Sx-1	N		-100	-2	2	Curtis & Seaver	Hodgson & Bannister
5	1	4S-1	N		-50	-1	1	Webb & Webb	Palmer & Coubrough
6	3	4Sx-1	N		-100	-2	2	Gold & Green	Lanham & Turpin
7	5	5H-2	W		200	6	-6	Downing & Johnstone	Millard & Millard
Board 7 NS Datum=-20
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	2H-3	W		300	8	-8	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Condon & Wilmot
2	2	2H-2	W		200	6	-6	Turnham & Wiles	Pollack & Gronau
3	4	1NT=	E		-90	-2	2	Hunt & Featherman	Lee & Kaban
4	6	1NTxx-1	N		-400	-9	9	Curtis & Seaver	Hodgson & Bannister
5	1	2S=	W		-110	-3	3	Webb & Webb	Palmer & Coubrough
6	3	2H-2	E		200	6	-6	Gold & Green	Lanham & Turpin
7	5	2S=	E		-110	-3	3	Downing & Johnstone	Millard & Millard
Board 8 NS Datum=-200
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	4S-3	W		150	8	-8	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Condon & Wilmot
2	2	3NT=	E		-400	-5	5	Turnham & Wiles	Pollack & Gronau
3	4	4Sx-4	W		800	14	-14	Hunt & Featherman	Lee & Kaban
4	6	3NT=	E		-400	-5	5	Curtis & Seaver	Hodgson & Bannister
5	1	3NT=	E		-400	-5	5	Webb & Webb	Palmer & Coubrough
6	3	2S-1	N		-50	4	-4	Gold & Green	Lanham & Turpin
7	5	4Hx-4	N		-800	-12	12	Downing & Johnstone	Millard & Millard
Board 9 NS Datum=290
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	6	4S=	N		420	4	-4	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Hodgson & Bannister
2	1	4S-1	N		-50	-8	8	Turnham & Wiles	Palmer & Coubrough
3	3	4S=	N		420	4	-4	Hunt & Featherman	Lanham & Turpin
4	5	4S=	N		420	4	-4	Curtis & Seaver	Millard & Millard
5	7	4S=	N		420	4	-4	Webb & Webb	Condon & Wilmot
6	2	3S+2	N		200	-3	3	Gold & Green	Pollack & Gronau
7	4	4S-1	N		-50	-8	8	Downing & Johnstone	Lee & Kaban
Board 10 NS Datum=230
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	6	3H=	N		140	-3	3	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Hodgson & Bannister
2	1	5C-1	W		100	-4	4	Turnham & Wiles	Palmer & Coubrough
3	3	5Cx-2	W		500	7	-7	Hunt & Featherman	Lanham & Turpin
4	5	4S-3	S		-300	-11	11	Curtis & Seaver	Millard & Millard
5	7	4S=	S		620	9	-9	Webb & Webb	Condon & Wilmot
6	2	5S-1	N		-100	-8	8	Gold & Green	Pollack & Gronau
7	4	4S=	S		620	9	-9	Downing & Johnstone	Lee & Kaban
Board 11 NS Datum=390
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	6	4H+1	S		450	2	-2	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Hodgson & Bannister
2	1	4H+1	N		450	2	-2	Turnham & Wiles	Palmer & Coubrough
3	3	5H-1	S		-50	-10	10	Hunt & Featherman	Lanham & Turpin
4	5	4H+1	N		450	2	-2	Curtis & Seaver	Millard & Millard
5	7	4H+1	S		450	2	-2	Webb & Webb	Condon & Wilmot
6	2	4H=	N		420	1	-1	Gold & Green	Pollack & Gronau
7	4	4H+1	S		450	2	-2	Downing & Johnstone	Lee & Kaban
Board 12 NS Datum=130
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	6	3NT-1	N		-100	-6	6	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Hodgson & Bannister
2	1	4H=	S		620	10	-10	Turnham & Wiles	Palmer & Coubrough
3	3	3NT-1	N		-100	-6	6	Hunt & Featherman	Lanham & Turpin
4	5	4H=	S		620	10	-10	Curtis & Seaver	Millard & Millard
5	7	4H-1	N		-100	-6	6	Webb & Webb	Condon & Wilmot
6	2	4H=	N		620	10	-10	Gold & Green	Pollack & Gronau
7	4	4H=	S		620	10	-10	Downing & Johnstone	Lee & Kaban
Board 13 NS Datum=-110
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	5	3S-1	N		-100	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Millard & Millard
2	7	3NT-2	E		200	7	-7	Turnham & Wiles	Condon & Wilmot
3	2	3S-1	N		-100	0	0	Hunt & Featherman	Pollack & Gronau
4	4	4Sx-2	S		-500	-9	9	Curtis & Seaver	Lee & Kaban
5	6	2S=	S		110	6	-6	Webb & Webb	Hodgson & Bannister
6	1	3C-1	E		100	5	-5	Gold & Green	Palmer & Coubrough
7	3	3S-3	N		-300	-5	5	Downing & Johnstone	Lanham & Turpin
Board 14 NS Datum=-470
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	5	3NT+2	E		-460	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Millard & Millard
2	7	3NT+2	W		-460	0	0	Turnham & Wiles	Condon & Wilmot
3	2	3NT+3	E		-490	-1	1	Hunt & Featherman	Pollack & Gronau
4	4	3NT+2	W		-460	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Lee & Kaban
5	6	3NT+2	W		-460	0	0	Webb & Webb	Hodgson & Bannister
6	1	3NT+2	E		-460	0	0	Gold & Green	Palmer & Coubrough
7	3	3NT+2	W		-460	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Lanham & Turpin
Board 15 NS Datum=450
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	5	3H+1	N		170	-7	7	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Millard & Millard
2	7	4C=	N		130	-8	8	Turnham & Wiles	Condon & Wilmot
3	2	3NT+1	N		630	5	-5	Hunt & Featherman	Pollack & Gronau
4	4	3NT-1	N		-100	-11	11	Curtis & Seaver	Lee & Kaban
5	6	3NT=	N		600	4	-4	Webb & Webb	Hodgson & Bannister
6	1	2S-2	E		100	-8	8	Gold & Green	Palmer & Coubrough
7	3	3NT=	N		600	4	-4	Downing & Johnstone	Lanham & Turpin
Board 16 NS Datum=420
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	5	2H+3	N		200	-6	6	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Millard & Millard
2	7	4H+1	S		450	1	-1	Turnham & Wiles	Condon & Wilmot
3	2	4H+1	S		450	1	-1	Hunt & Featherman	Pollack & Gronau
4	4	4H+2	S		480	2	-2	Curtis & Seaver	Lee & Kaban
5	6	4H+2	N		480	2	-2	Webb & Webb	Hodgson & Bannister
6	1	4H+2	N		480	2	-2	Gold & Green	Palmer & Coubrough
7	3	4H=	N		420	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Lanham & Turpin
Board 17 NS Datum=200
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	4C+1	S		150	-2	2	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lee & Kaban
2	6	4D-2	E		100	-3	3	Turnham & Wiles	Hodgson & Bannister
3	1	4S-3	W		150	-2	2	Hunt & Featherman	Palmer & Coubrough
4	3	5C=	S		400	5	-5	Curtis & Seaver	Lanham & Turpin
5	5	5Sx-3	W		500	7	-7	Webb & Webb	Millard & Millard
6	7	5D-1	E		50	-4	4	Gold & Green	Condon & Wilmot
7	2	4D-4	E		200	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Pollack & Gronau
Board 18 NS Datum=20
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	2S-1	E		50	1	-1	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lee & Kaban
2	6	3C-1	S		-100	-3	3	Turnham & Wiles	Hodgson & Bannister
3	1	3C=	N		110	3	-3	Hunt & Featherman	Palmer & Coubrough
4	3	1NT-2	N		-200	-6	6	Curtis & Seaver	Lanham & Turpin
5	5	2S-3	E		150	4	-4	Webb & Webb	Millard & Millard
6	7	3D-2	E		100	2	-2	Gold & Green	Condon & Wilmot
7	2	3C-1	N		-100	-3	3	Downing & Johnstone	Pollack & Gronau
Board 19 NS Datum=-650
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	4H+1	E		-650	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lee & Kaban
2	6	4H+1	W		-650	0	0	Turnham & Wiles	Hodgson & Bannister
3	1	4H+1	W		-650	0	0	Hunt & Featherman	Palmer & Coubrough
4	3	4H+1	W		-650	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Lanham & Turpin
5	5	4H+1	W		-650	0	0	Webb & Webb	Millard & Millard
6	7	4H+1	E		-650	0	0	Gold & Green	Condon & Wilmot
7	2	4H=	E		-620	1	-1	Downing & Johnstone	Pollack & Gronau
Board 20 NS Datum=-100
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	2S=	E		-110	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lee & Kaban
2	6	3S-1	E		100	5	-5	Turnham & Wiles	Hodgson & Bannister
3	1	4S-2	E		200	7	-7	Hunt & Featherman	Palmer & Coubrough
4	3	2S=	E		-110	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Lanham & Turpin
5	5	2S+1	E		-140	-1	1	Webb & Webb	Millard & Millard
6	7	2S=	E		-110	0	0	Gold & Green	Condon & Wilmot
7	2	2S=	E		-110	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Pollack & Gronau
Board 21 NS Datum=-430
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lanham & Turpin
2	5	4H+1	W		-450	-1	1	Turnham & Wiles	Millard & Millard
3	7	3Sx-4	N		-1100	-12	12	Hunt & Featherman	Condon & Wilmot
4	2	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Pollack & Gronau
5	4	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Webb & Webb	Lee & Kaban
6	6	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Gold & Green	Hodgson & Bannister
7	1	3NT=	W		-400	1	-1	Downing & Johnstone	Palmer & Coubrough
Board 22 NS Datum=-80
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	2H+1	E		-140	-2	2	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lanham & Turpin
2	5	2NT-1	E		100	5	-5	Turnham & Wiles	Millard & Millard
3	7	2H+1	E		-140	-2	2	Hunt & Featherman	Condon & Wilmot
4	2	2H=	E		-110	-1	1	Curtis & Seaver	Pollack & Gronau
5	4	3D-2	N		-100	-1	1	Webb & Webb	Lee & Kaban
6	6	2H+2	E		-170	-3	3	Gold & Green	Hodgson & Bannister
7	1	2NT-1	W		100	5	-5	Downing & Johnstone	Palmer & Coubrough
Board 23 NS Datum=380
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	4H-1	N		-100	-10	10	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lanham & Turpin
2	5	2H+1	N		140	-6	6	Turnham & Wiles	Millard & Millard
3	7	4H-1	N		-100	-10	10	Hunt & Featherman	Condon & Wilmot
4	2	2D+1	S		110	-7	7	Curtis & Seaver	Pollack & Gronau
5	4	4H=	N		620	6	-6	Webb & Webb	Lee & Kaban
6	6	4H=	N		620	6	-6	Gold & Green	Hodgson & Bannister
7	1	2H+1	N		140	-6	6	Downing & Johnstone	Palmer & Coubrough
Board 24 NS Datum=140
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	2S+1	S		140	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Lanham & Turpin
2	5	2H-2	E		100	-1	1	Turnham & Wiles	Millard & Millard
3	7	3Cx-3	E		500	8	-8	Hunt & Featherman	Condon & Wilmot
4	2	2S+1	S		140	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Pollack & Gronau
5	4	4S-1	S		-50	-5	5	Webb & Webb	Lee & Kaban
6	6	2S+1	N		140	0	0	Gold & Green	Hodgson & Bannister
7	1	2S+1	S		140	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Palmer & Coubrough
Board 25 NS Datum=860
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	2	6H+1	N		1010	4	-4	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Pollack & Gronau
2	4	6H+1	N		1010	4	-4	Turnham & Wiles	Lee & Kaban
3	6	7H=	N		1510	12	-12	Hunt & Featherman	Hodgson & Bannister
4	1	5H+2	N		510	-8	8	Curtis & Seaver	Palmer & Coubrough
5	3	4H+3	N		510	-8	8	Webb & Webb	Lanham & Turpin
6	5	6H+1	N		1010	4	-4	Gold & Green	Millard & Millard
7	7	6S+1	S		1010	4	-4	Downing & Johnstone	Condon & Wilmot
Board 26 NS Datum=450
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	2	2H+3	S		200	-6	6	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Pollack & Gronau
2	4	4H=	S		620	5	-5	Turnham & Wiles	Lee & Kaban
3	6	4H=	S		620	5	-5	Hunt & Featherman	Hodgson & Bannister
4	1	3NT-2	S		-200	-12	12	Curtis & Seaver	Palmer & Coubrough
5	3	3NT-1	S		-100	-11	11	Webb & Webb	Lanham & Turpin
6	5	2H+2	N		170	-7	7	Gold & Green	Millard & Millard
7	7	4H=	N		620	5	-5	Downing & Johnstone	Condon & Wilmot
Board 27 NS Datum=-10
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	2	3NT-1	S		-50	-1	1	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Pollack & Gronau
2	4	3NT-1	S		-50	-1	1	Turnham & Wiles	Lee & Kaban
3	6	3NT-1	S		-50	-1	1	Hunt & Featherman	Hodgson & Bannister
4	1	3NT-1	S		-50	-1	1	Curtis & Seaver	Palmer & Coubrough
5	3	3NT-1	S		-50	-1	1	Webb & Webb	Lanham & Turpin
6	5	3NT-1	N		-50	-1	1	Gold & Green	Millard & Millard
7	7	3NT=	N		400	9	-9	Downing & Johnstone	Condon & Wilmot
Board 28 NS Datum=650
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	2	4H+1	N		650	0	0	Mcdonald & Caldwell	Pollack & Gronau
2	4	4H+1	N		650	0	0	Turnham & Wiles	Lee & Kaban
3	6	4H+1	N		650	0	0	Hunt & Featherman	Hodgson & Bannister
4	1	4H+1	N		650	0	0	Curtis & Seaver	Palmer & Coubrough
5	3	3NT+2	N		660	0	0	Webb & Webb	Lanham & Turpin
6	5	4H+1	N		650	0	0	Gold & Green	Millard & Millard
7	7	4H+1	S		650	0	0	Downing & Johnstone	Condon & Wilmot

Session 3 Section Orange Howell

---

Board 1 NS Datum=-490
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	1	4H+3	W		-510	-1	1	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Fleet & Cooper
3	6				60/40	2	-2	Brito & Reader	Walsh & Gardiner
5	7	5C+1	E		-420	2	-2	Duddell & Duddell	Town & Harcus
8	4	6H+1	W		-1010	-11	11	Oddie & Roberts	Watson & Lapzys
Board 2 NS Datum=-30
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	1	2H=	N		110	4	-4	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Fleet & Cooper
3	6				60/40	2	-2	Brito & Reader	Walsh & Gardiner
5	7	2H-1	S		-100	-2	2	Duddell & Duddell	Town & Harcus
8	4	2H=	N		110	4	-4	Oddie & Roberts	Watson & Lapzys
Board 3 NS Datum=-220
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	1	4S+1	W		-650	-10	10	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Fleet & Cooper
3	6				60/40	2	-2	Brito & Reader	Walsh & Gardiner
5	7	4S+1	W		-650	-10	10	Duddell & Duddell	Town & Harcus
8	4	2S+2	E		-170	2	-2	Oddie & Roberts	Watson & Lapzys
Board 4 NS Datum=-650
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	1	3NT+2	W		-660	0	0	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Fleet & Cooper
3	6				60/40	2	-2	Brito & Reader	Walsh & Gardiner
5	7	4S+1	E		-650	0	0	Duddell & Duddell	Town & Harcus
8	4	4S+1	E		-650	0	0	Oddie & Roberts	Watson & Lapzys
Board 5 NS Datum=-440
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
3	2	3NT+2	E		-460	-1	1	Brito & Reader	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4	7	3NT+2	E		-460	-1	1	Watson & Lapzys	Town & Harcus
6	1	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Walsh & Gardiner	Fleet & Cooper
8	5	6NT-3	W		150	11	-11	Oddie & Roberts	Duddell & Duddell
Board 6 NS Datum=-30
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
3	2	4S-1	N		-50	-1	1	Brito & Reader	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4	7	4S-1	N		-50	-1	1	Watson & Lapzys	Town & Harcus
6	1	4S-1	N		-50	-1	1	Walsh & Gardiner	Fleet & Cooper
8	5	4S-1	N		-50	-1	1	Oddie & Roberts	Duddell & Duddell
Board 7 NS Datum=-20
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
3	2	2H-2	W		200	6	-6	Brito & Reader	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4	7	3C-2	N		-200	-5	5	Watson & Lapzys	Town & Harcus
6	1	1NTx-1	N		-200	-5	5	Walsh & Gardiner	Fleet & Cooper
8	5	2S=	E		-110	-3	3	Oddie & Roberts	Duddell & Duddell
Board 8 NS Datum=-200
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
3	2	3NT=	E		-400	-5	5	Brito & Reader	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4	7	2H-1	S		-50	4	-4	Watson & Lapzys	Town & Harcus
6	1	3NT+1	E		-430	-6	6	Walsh & Gardiner	Fleet & Cooper
8	5	5D-3	W		150	8	-8	Oddie & Roberts	Duddell & Duddell
Board 9 NS Datum=290
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
4	3	4S=	N		420	4	-4	Watson & Lapzys	Brito & Reader
5	1	4S-2	N		-100	-9	9	Duddell & Duddell	Fleet & Cooper
7	2	4Dx-2	W		500	5	-5	Town & Harcus	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	6	3NT-4	E		400	3	-3	Oddie & Roberts	Walsh & Gardiner
Board 10 NS Datum=230
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
4	3	4H=	N		620	9	-9	Watson & Lapzys	Brito & Reader
5	1	4S=	N		620	9	-9	Duddell & Duddell	Fleet & Cooper
7	2	4D-5	N		-500	-12	12	Town & Harcus	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	6	4H-1	N		-100	-8	8	Oddie & Roberts	Walsh & Gardiner
Board 11 NS Datum=390
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
4	3	2Sx-3	E		500	3	-3	Watson & Lapzys	Brito & Reader
5	1	6H-2	N		-100	-10	10	Duddell & Duddell	Fleet & Cooper
7	2	4H+1	S		450	2	-2	Town & Harcus	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	6	4H+1	S		450	2	-2	Oddie & Roberts	Walsh & Gardiner
Board 12 NS Datum=130
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
4	3	5Hx-3	S		-800	-14	14	Watson & Lapzys	Brito & Reader
5	1	4H-2	N		-200	-8	8	Duddell & Duddell	Fleet & Cooper
7	2	4H-1	S		-100	-6	6	Town & Harcus	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	6	4H-1	N		-100	-6	6	Oddie & Roberts	Walsh & Gardiner
Board 13 NS Datum=-110
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	4S-2	N		-200	-3	3	Fleet & Cooper	Brito & Reader
5	4	4S-2	N		-200	-3	3	Duddell & Duddell	Watson & Lapzys
6	2	2H-1	S		-100	0	0	Walsh & Gardiner	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	7	4S-2	N		-200	-3	3	Oddie & Roberts	Town & Harcus
Board 14 NS Datum=-470
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	6NT=	E		-990	-11	11	Fleet & Cooper	Brito & Reader
5	4	3NT+2	E		-460	0	0	Duddell & Duddell	Watson & Lapzys
6	2	3NT+2	W		-460	0	0	Walsh & Gardiner	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	7	3NT+3	E		-490	-1	1	Oddie & Roberts	Town & Harcus
Board 15 NS Datum=450
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	3NT+1	N		630	5	-5	Fleet & Cooper	Brito & Reader
5	4	3NT=	N		600	4	-4	Duddell & Duddell	Watson & Lapzys
6	2	3NT=	N		600	4	-4	Walsh & Gardiner	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	7	3NT=	N		600	4	-4	Oddie & Roberts	Town & Harcus
Board 16 NS Datum=420
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	3	3NT=	N		400	-1	1	Fleet & Cooper	Brito & Reader
5	4	1NT+2	S		150	-7	7	Duddell & Duddell	Watson & Lapzys
6	2	4H+1	S		450	1	-1	Walsh & Gardiner	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
8	7	4H+1	S		450	1	-1	Oddie & Roberts	Town & Harcus
Board 17 NS Datum=200
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	4	4Cx=	S		510	7	-7	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Watson & Lapzys
6	5	4S-3	W		150	-2	2	Walsh & Gardiner	Duddell & Duddell
7	3	3D=	E		-110	-7	7	Town & Harcus	Brito & Reader
8	1	4C=	S		130	-2	2	Oddie & Roberts	Fleet & Cooper
Board 18 NS Datum=20
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	4	2S-3	E		150	4	-4	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Watson & Lapzys
6	5	2NT-1	E		50	1	-1	Walsh & Gardiner	Duddell & Duddell
7	3	2D-1	E		50	1	-1	Town & Harcus	Brito & Reader
8	1	3C-1	N		-100	-3	3	Oddie & Roberts	Fleet & Cooper
Board 19 NS Datum=-650
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	4	4Sx-4	S		-800	-4	4	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Watson & Lapzys
6	5	4H+1	W		-650	0	0	Walsh & Gardiner	Duddell & Duddell
7	3	4H+1	W		-650	0	0	Town & Harcus	Brito & Reader
8	1	2H+3	W		-200	10	-10	Oddie & Roberts	Fleet & Cooper
Board 20 NS Datum=-100
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
2	4	2S=	E		-110	0	0	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Watson & Lapzys
6	5	2S+1	E		-140	-1	1	Walsh & Gardiner	Duddell & Duddell
7	3	3S=	E		-140	-1	1	Town & Harcus	Brito & Reader
8	1	3S=	E		-140	-1	1	Oddie & Roberts	Fleet & Cooper
Board 21 NS Datum=-430
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	6C-1	W		50	10	-10	Fleet & Cooper	Watson & Lapzys
3	5	3NT+1	E		-430	0	0	Brito & Reader	Duddell & Duddell
6	7	4H+1	W		-450	-1	1	Walsh & Gardiner	Town & Harcus
8	2	5C=	W		-400	1	-1	Oddie & Roberts	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 22 NS Datum=-80
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	2H+1	E		-140	-2	2	Fleet & Cooper	Watson & Lapzys
3	5	2H+1	E		-140	-2	2	Brito & Reader	Duddell & Duddell
7	6	1NT=	S		90	5	-5	Town & Harcus	Walsh & Gardiner
8	2	2H=	E		-110	-1	1	Oddie & Roberts	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 23 NS Datum=380
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	4H+1	N		650	7	-7	Fleet & Cooper	Watson & Lapzys
3	5	4H=	N		620	6	-6	Brito & Reader	Duddell & Duddell
7	6	4H+1	N		650	7	-7	Town & Harcus	Walsh & Gardiner
8	2	4H=	N		620	6	-6	Oddie & Roberts	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 24 NS Datum=140
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	4	2S+1	S		140	0	0	Fleet & Cooper	Watson & Lapzys
3	5	2S+1	S		140	0	0	Brito & Reader	Duddell & Duddell
7	6	2S+2	N		170	1	-1	Town & Harcus	Walsh & Gardiner
8	2	2S+1	N		140	0	0	Oddie & Roberts	Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 25 NS Datum=860
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	7H=	N		1510	12	-12	Fleet & Cooper	Town & Harcus
2	5	6H+1	N		1010	4	-4	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Duddell & Duddell
4	6	6C-1	N		-50	-14	14	Watson & Lapzys	Walsh & Gardiner
8	3	4Dx-1	E		200	-12	12	Oddie & Roberts	Brito & Reader
Board 26 NS Datum=450
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	4H+1	S		650	5	-5	Fleet & Cooper	Town & Harcus
2	5	4H=	S		620	5	-5	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Duddell & Duddell
4	6	3NT+1	S		630	5	-5	Watson & Lapzys	Walsh & Gardiner
8	3	4H+1	S		650	5	-5	Oddie & Roberts	Brito & Reader
Board 27 NS Datum=-10
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	3NT-2	S		-100	-3	3	Fleet & Cooper	Town & Harcus
2	5	3NT=	S		400	9	-9	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Duddell & Duddell
4	6	3NT-2	N		-100	-3	3	Watson & Lapzys	Walsh & Gardiner
8	3	3NT-1	S		-50	-1	1	Oddie & Roberts	Brito & Reader
Board 28 NS Datum=650
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	Score	IMP	IMP	NS	EW
1	7	4H-1	N		-100	-13	13	Fleet & Cooper	Town & Harcus
2	5	4H=	S		620	-1	1	Nicholson & Kazmierczak	Duddell & Duddell
4	6	5H=	S		650	0	0	Watson & Lapzys	Walsh & Gardiner
8	3	4H+1	S		650	0	0	Oddie & Roberts	Brito & Reader