English Bridge Union National Masters 01/03/2008 Multisession
Session 2 Section Green
Board 1 NS Datum=-250
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
1 |
1 |
5C= |
E |
|
-400 |
-4 |
4 |
Foster & Prior |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
9 |
8 |
3C+2 |
E |
|
-150 |
3 |
-3 |
Downing & Stretch |
Abisch & De Mercur |
8 |
6 |
4S+2 |
W |
|
-480 |
-6 |
6 |
Rowe & Peters |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
7 |
4 |
4S= |
W |
|
-420 |
-5 |
5 |
Smith & Willis |
Goldman & Wernick |
6 |
2 |
4S= |
E |
|
-420 |
-5 |
5 |
Feldman & Murray |
Hillyard & Smith |
5 |
9 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-450 |
-5 |
5 |
Ottley & Radford |
Taylor & Taylor |
4 |
7 |
4S-2 |
W |
|
100 |
8 |
-8 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Griffiths & Pryor |
3 |
5 |
4H-3 |
W |
|
150 |
9 |
-9 |
Gold & Sharff |
Boss & Johnson |
2 |
3 |
3S+3 |
W |
|
-230 |
1 |
-1 |
Lee & Poole |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
Board 2 NS Datum=520
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
1 |
1 |
3NT+1 |
N |
|
630 |
3 |
-3 |
Foster & Prior |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
9 |
8 |
4NT+1 |
S |
|
660 |
4 |
-4 |
Downing & Stretch |
Abisch & De Mercur |
8 |
6 |
3NT+2 |
S |
|
660 |
4 |
-4 |
Rowe & Peters |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
7 |
4 |
3NT= |
N |
|
600 |
2 |
-2 |
Smith & Willis |
Goldman & Wernick |
6 |
2 |
6D-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
-12 |
12 |
Feldman & Murray |
Hillyard & Smith |
5 |
9 |
4NT-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
-12 |
12 |
Ottley & Radford |
Taylor & Taylor |
4 |
7 |
3NT+1 |
S |
|
630 |
3 |
-3 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Griffiths & Pryor |
3 |
5 |
4NT+1 |
S |
|
660 |
4 |
-4 |
Gold & Sharff |
Boss & Johnson |
2 |
3 |
3NT+1 |
S |
|
630 |
3 |
-3 |
Lee & Poole |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
Board 3 NS Datum=10
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
1 |
1 |
1NTx-1 |
W |
|
200 |
5 |
-5 |
Foster & Prior |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
9 |
8 |
3C+1 |
N |
|
130 |
3 |
-3 |
Downing & Stretch |
Abisch & De Mercur |
8 |
6 |
3D= |
N |
|
110 |
3 |
-3 |
Rowe & Peters |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
7 |
4 |
3D= |
N |
|
110 |
3 |
-3 |
Smith & Willis |
Goldman & Wernick |
6 |
2 |
5Cx-2 |
S |
|
-300 |
-7 |
7 |
Feldman & Murray |
Hillyard & Smith |
5 |
9 |
4D-2 |
N |
|
-100 |
-3 |
3 |
Ottley & Radford |
Taylor & Taylor |
4 |
7 |
3D-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Griffiths & Pryor |
3 |
5 |
3D-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Gold & Sharff |
Boss & Johnson |
2 |
3 |
3D= |
N |
|
110 |
3 |
-3 |
Lee & Poole |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
Board 4 NS Datum=-1410
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
2 |
6NT+1 |
E |
|
-1470 |
-2 |
2 |
Lee & Poole |
Hillyard & Smith |
1 |
9 |
6NT+1 |
E |
|
-1470 |
-2 |
2 |
Foster & Prior |
Taylor & Taylor |
9 |
7 |
6C= |
W |
|
-1370 |
1 |
-1 |
Downing & Stretch |
Griffiths & Pryor |
8 |
5 |
6NT= |
E |
|
-1440 |
-1 |
1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Boss & Johnson |
7 |
3 |
6C= |
W |
|
-1370 |
1 |
-1 |
Smith & Willis |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
6 |
1 |
6D= |
W |
|
-1370 |
1 |
-1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
5 |
8 |
6C= |
W |
|
-1370 |
1 |
-1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Abisch & De Mercur |
4 |
6 |
6NT+1 |
E |
|
-1470 |
-2 |
2 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
3 |
4 |
6C+1 |
W |
|
-1390 |
1 |
-1 |
Gold & Sharff |
Goldman & Wernick |
Board 5 NS Datum=-770
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
2 |
6NT= |
W |
|
-990 |
-6 |
6 |
Lee & Poole |
Hillyard & Smith |
1 |
9 |
6NT= |
W |
|
-990 |
-6 |
6 |
Foster & Prior |
Taylor & Taylor |
9 |
7 |
3NT+4 |
W |
|
-520 |
6 |
-6 |
Downing & Stretch |
Griffiths & Pryor |
8 |
5 |
4H+2 |
E |
|
-480 |
7 |
-7 |
Rowe & Peters |
Boss & Johnson |
7 |
3 |
6NT= |
W |
|
-990 |
-6 |
6 |
Smith & Willis |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
6 |
1 |
3NT+3 |
W |
|
-490 |
7 |
-7 |
Feldman & Murray |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
5 |
8 |
6NT+1 |
W |
|
-1020 |
-6 |
6 |
Ottley & Radford |
Abisch & De Mercur |
4 |
6 |
6D= |
E |
|
-920 |
-4 |
4 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
3 |
4 |
7NTx-1 |
W |
|
100 |
13 |
-13 |
Gold & Sharff |
Goldman & Wernick |
Board 6 NS Datum=-330
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
2 |
4Dx-5 |
N |
|
-1100 |
-13 |
13 |
Lee & Poole |
Hillyard & Smith |
1 |
9 |
4S-2 |
E |
|
200 |
11 |
-11 |
Foster & Prior |
Taylor & Taylor |
9 |
7 |
4S-1 |
E |
|
100 |
10 |
-10 |
Downing & Stretch |
Griffiths & Pryor |
8 |
5 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-8 |
8 |
Rowe & Peters |
Boss & Johnson |
7 |
3 |
4S-2 |
E |
|
200 |
11 |
-11 |
Smith & Willis |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
6 |
1 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-7 |
7 |
Feldman & Murray |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
5 |
8 |
3NT-2 |
E |
|
200 |
11 |
-11 |
Ottley & Radford |
Abisch & De Mercur |
4 |
6 |
3NT= |
E |
|
-600 |
-7 |
7 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
3 |
4 |
4Cx-4 |
S |
|
-800 |
-10 |
10 |
Gold & Sharff |
Goldman & Wernick |
Board 7 NS Datum=-460
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
3 |
3 |
5Hx-2 |
S |
|
-500 |
-1 |
1 |
Gold & Sharff |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
2 |
1 |
5S-1 |
E |
|
100 |
11 |
-11 |
Lee & Poole |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
1 |
8 |
4H-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
8 |
-8 |
Foster & Prior |
Abisch & De Mercur |
9 |
6 |
6S-1 |
W |
|
100 |
11 |
-11 |
Downing & Stretch |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
8 |
4 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-5 |
5 |
Rowe & Peters |
Goldman & Wernick |
7 |
2 |
4Sx+1 |
W |
|
-990 |
-11 |
11 |
Smith & Willis |
Hillyard & Smith |
6 |
9 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Feldman & Murray |
Taylor & Taylor |
5 |
7 |
4S= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Ottley & Radford |
Griffiths & Pryor |
4 |
5 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-5 |
5 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Boss & Johnson |
Board 8 NS Datum=440
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
3 |
3 |
5S+1 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Gold & Sharff |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
2 |
1 |
5S= |
N |
|
450 |
0 |
0 |
Lee & Poole |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
1 |
8 |
6H-1 |
S |
|
-50 |
-10 |
10 |
Foster & Prior |
Abisch & De Mercur |
9 |
6 |
6D-4 |
E |
|
200 |
-6 |
6 |
Downing & Stretch |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
8 |
4 |
4S+2 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Goldman & Wernick |
7 |
2 |
5S+1 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Smith & Willis |
Hillyard & Smith |
6 |
9 |
4S+2 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Taylor & Taylor |
5 |
7 |
5S+1 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Griffiths & Pryor |
4 |
5 |
5Dx-2 |
W |
|
300 |
-4 |
4 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Boss & Johnson |
Board 9 NS Datum=0
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
3 |
3 |
2S-1 |
S |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Gold & Sharff |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
2 |
1 |
2Sx-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
-3 |
3 |
Lee & Poole |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
1 |
8 |
3NT-1 |
E |
|
100 |
3 |
-3 |
Foster & Prior |
Abisch & De Mercur |
9 |
6 |
PASS |
N |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
Downing & Stretch |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
8 |
4 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Rowe & Peters |
Goldman & Wernick |
7 |
2 |
3NT-2 |
E |
|
200 |
5 |
-5 |
Smith & Willis |
Hillyard & Smith |
6 |
9 |
3NT-2 |
E |
|
200 |
5 |
-5 |
Feldman & Murray |
Taylor & Taylor |
5 |
7 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Ottley & Radford |
Griffiths & Pryor |
4 |
5 |
1NT+1 |
E |
|
-120 |
-3 |
3 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Boss & Johnson |
Board 10 NS Datum=-620
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
4 |
4 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Goldman & Wernick |
3 |
2 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Gold & Sharff |
Hillyard & Smith |
2 |
9 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-600 |
1 |
-1 |
Lee & Poole |
Taylor & Taylor |
1 |
7 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Foster & Prior |
Griffiths & Pryor |
9 |
5 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-600 |
1 |
-1 |
Downing & Stretch |
Boss & Johnson |
8 |
3 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Rowe & Peters |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
7 |
1 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-660 |
-1 |
1 |
Smith & Willis |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
6 |
8 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-600 |
1 |
-1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Abisch & De Mercur |
5 |
6 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-660 |
-1 |
1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
Board 11 NS Datum=50
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
4 |
4 |
4S-4 |
E |
|
200 |
4 |
-4 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Goldman & Wernick |
3 |
2 |
3NT-2 |
E |
|
100 |
2 |
-2 |
Gold & Sharff |
Hillyard & Smith |
2 |
9 |
2S= |
N |
|
110 |
2 |
-2 |
Lee & Poole |
Taylor & Taylor |
1 |
7 |
3D-2 |
S |
|
-100 |
-4 |
4 |
Foster & Prior |
Griffiths & Pryor |
9 |
5 |
3NT-1 |
E |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
Downing & Stretch |
Boss & Johnson |
8 |
3 |
3H-1 |
E |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
Rowe & Peters |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
7 |
1 |
3S-2 |
E |
|
100 |
2 |
-2 |
Smith & Willis |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
6 |
8 |
3S-2 |
E |
|
100 |
2 |
-2 |
Feldman & Murray |
Abisch & De Mercur |
5 |
6 |
3D-2 |
S |
|
-100 |
-4 |
4 |
Ottley & Radford |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
Board 12 NS Datum=-430
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
4 |
4 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
0 |
0 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Goldman & Wernick |
3 |
2 |
2Sx-4 |
S |
|
-1100 |
-12 |
12 |
Gold & Sharff |
Hillyard & Smith |
2 |
9 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
0 |
0 |
Lee & Poole |
Taylor & Taylor |
1 |
7 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
0 |
0 |
Foster & Prior |
Griffiths & Pryor |
9 |
5 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-460 |
-1 |
1 |
Downing & Stretch |
Boss & Johnson |
8 |
3 |
3NT= |
E |
|
-400 |
1 |
-1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
7 |
1 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-400 |
1 |
-1 |
Smith & Willis |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
6 |
8 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-400 |
1 |
-1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Abisch & De Mercur |
5 |
6 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-460 |
-1 |
1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
Board 13 NS Datum=-460
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
5 |
5 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Ottley & Radford |
Boss & Johnson |
4 |
3 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
3 |
1 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Gold & Sharff |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
2 |
8 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Lee & Poole |
Abisch & De Mercur |
1 |
6 |
3S= |
E |
|
-140 |
8 |
-8 |
Foster & Prior |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
9 |
4 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
11 |
-11 |
Downing & Stretch |
Goldman & Wernick |
8 |
2 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Rowe & Peters |
Hillyard & Smith |
7 |
9 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Smith & Willis |
Taylor & Taylor |
6 |
7 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
11 |
-11 |
Feldman & Murray |
Griffiths & Pryor |
Board 14 NS Datum=560
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
5 |
5 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Ottley & Radford |
Boss & Johnson |
4 |
3 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
3 |
1 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Gold & Sharff |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
2 |
8 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Lee & Poole |
Abisch & De Mercur |
1 |
6 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Foster & Prior |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
9 |
4 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Downing & Stretch |
Goldman & Wernick |
8 |
2 |
6S= |
S |
|
980 |
9 |
-9 |
Rowe & Peters |
Hillyard & Smith |
7 |
9 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Smith & Willis |
Taylor & Taylor |
6 |
7 |
2Dx-2 |
W |
|
300 |
-6 |
6 |
Feldman & Murray |
Griffiths & Pryor |
Board 15 NS Datum=-400
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
5 |
5 |
3NT+1 |
E |
|
-430 |
-1 |
1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Boss & Johnson |
4 |
3 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
-1 |
1 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
3 |
1 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-460 |
-2 |
2 |
Gold & Sharff |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
2 |
8 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-460 |
-2 |
2 |
Lee & Poole |
Abisch & De Mercur |
1 |
6 |
2Sx-3 |
N |
|
-800 |
-9 |
9 |
Foster & Prior |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
9 |
4 |
1NT+3 |
E |
|
-180 |
6 |
-6 |
Downing & Stretch |
Goldman & Wernick |
8 |
2 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-460 |
-2 |
2 |
Rowe & Peters |
Hillyard & Smith |
7 |
9 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-400 |
0 |
0 |
Smith & Willis |
Taylor & Taylor |
6 |
7 |
1NT+4 |
E |
|
-210 |
5 |
-5 |
Feldman & Murray |
Griffiths & Pryor |
Board 16 NS Datum=-100
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
6 |
6 |
1NT+2 |
W |
|
-150 |
-2 |
2 |
Feldman & Murray |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
5 |
4 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
5 |
-5 |
Ottley & Radford |
Goldman & Wernick |
4 |
2 |
1NT+3 |
W |
|
-180 |
-2 |
2 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Hillyard & Smith |
3 |
9 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-11 |
11 |
Gold & Sharff |
Taylor & Taylor |
2 |
7 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
5 |
-5 |
Lee & Poole |
Griffiths & Pryor |
1 |
5 |
3NT= |
E |
|
-600 |
-11 |
11 |
Foster & Prior |
Boss & Johnson |
9 |
3 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
5 |
-5 |
Downing & Stretch |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
8 |
1 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-600 |
-11 |
11 |
Rowe & Peters |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
7 |
8 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
5 |
-5 |
Smith & Willis |
Abisch & De Mercur |
Board 17 NS Datum=30
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
6 |
6 |
2NT-2 |
E |
|
100 |
2 |
-2 |
Feldman & Murray |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
5 |
4 |
1H-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Ottley & Radford |
Goldman & Wernick |
4 |
2 |
2S-1 |
E |
|
50 |
1 |
-1 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Hillyard & Smith |
3 |
9 |
2S= |
E |
|
-110 |
-4 |
4 |
Gold & Sharff |
Taylor & Taylor |
2 |
7 |
2H-2 |
N |
|
-100 |
-4 |
4 |
Lee & Poole |
Griffiths & Pryor |
1 |
5 |
2D-2 |
W |
|
100 |
2 |
-2 |
Foster & Prior |
Boss & Johnson |
9 |
3 |
1Sx= |
E |
|
-160 |
-5 |
5 |
Downing & Stretch |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
8 |
1 |
3S-3 |
E |
|
150 |
3 |
-3 |
Rowe & Peters |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
7 |
8 |
2S-1 |
E |
|
50 |
1 |
-1 |
Smith & Willis |
Abisch & De Mercur |
Board 18 NS Datum=420
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
6 |
6 |
6H-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
-11 |
11 |
Feldman & Murray |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
5 |
4 |
6C-2 |
N |
|
-200 |
-12 |
12 |
Ottley & Radford |
Goldman & Wernick |
4 |
2 |
2Sx-5 |
E |
|
1100 |
12 |
-12 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Hillyard & Smith |
3 |
9 |
3NT+3 |
S |
|
690 |
7 |
-7 |
Gold & Sharff |
Taylor & Taylor |
2 |
7 |
6H= |
S |
|
1430 |
14 |
-14 |
Lee & Poole |
Griffiths & Pryor |
1 |
5 |
2Sx-6 |
E |
|
1400 |
14 |
-14 |
Foster & Prior |
Boss & Johnson |
9 |
3 |
6H-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
-11 |
11 |
Downing & Stretch |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
8 |
1 |
6S-3 |
S |
|
-300 |
-12 |
12 |
Rowe & Peters |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
7 |
8 |
6H-2 |
N |
|
-200 |
-12 |
12 |
Smith & Willis |
Abisch & De Mercur |
Board 19 NS Datum=-30
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
7 |
7 |
3H= |
W |
|
-140 |
-3 |
3 |
Smith & Willis |
Griffiths & Pryor |
6 |
5 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-1 |
1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Boss & Johnson |
5 |
3 |
2S= |
N |
|
110 |
4 |
-4 |
Ottley & Radford |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
4 |
1 |
3H= |
W |
|
-140 |
-3 |
3 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
3 |
8 |
3H= |
W |
|
-140 |
-3 |
3 |
Gold & Sharff |
Abisch & De Mercur |
2 |
6 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-1 |
1 |
Lee & Poole |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
1 |
4 |
3H= |
W |
|
-140 |
-3 |
3 |
Foster & Prior |
Goldman & Wernick |
9 |
2 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-1 |
1 |
Downing & Stretch |
Hillyard & Smith |
8 |
9 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-1 |
1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Taylor & Taylor |
Board 20 NS Datum=-60
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
7 |
7 |
1NT+1 |
E |
|
-120 |
-2 |
2 |
Smith & Willis |
Griffiths & Pryor |
6 |
5 |
1NT= |
W |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Boss & Johnson |
5 |
3 |
1NT-1 |
E |
|
100 |
4 |
-4 |
Ottley & Radford |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
4 |
1 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
3 |
8 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Gold & Sharff |
Abisch & De Mercur |
2 |
6 |
1NT+1 |
E |
|
-120 |
-2 |
2 |
Lee & Poole |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
1 |
4 |
2S= |
S |
|
110 |
5 |
-5 |
Foster & Prior |
Goldman & Wernick |
9 |
2 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Downing & Stretch |
Hillyard & Smith |
8 |
9 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Taylor & Taylor |
Board 21 NS Datum=-20
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
7 |
7 |
2H-1 |
W |
|
50 |
2 |
-2 |
Smith & Willis |
Griffiths & Pryor |
6 |
5 |
2H-1 |
W |
|
50 |
2 |
-2 |
Feldman & Murray |
Boss & Johnson |
5 |
3 |
2H-1 |
W |
|
50 |
2 |
-2 |
Ottley & Radford |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
4 |
1 |
2H-1 |
W |
|
50 |
2 |
-2 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
3 |
8 |
2H-1 |
E |
|
50 |
2 |
-2 |
Gold & Sharff |
Abisch & De Mercur |
2 |
6 |
1NT-3 |
W |
|
150 |
5 |
-5 |
Lee & Poole |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
1 |
4 |
2H= |
E |
|
-110 |
-3 |
3 |
Foster & Prior |
Goldman & Wernick |
9 |
2 |
2H= |
W |
|
-110 |
-3 |
3 |
Downing & Stretch |
Hillyard & Smith |
8 |
9 |
1H= |
E |
|
-80 |
-2 |
2 |
Rowe & Peters |
Taylor & Taylor |
Board 22 NS Datum=-650
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
8 |
8 |
3NT+1 |
E |
|
-630 |
1 |
-1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Abisch & De Mercur |
7 |
6 |
3NT+1 |
E |
|
-630 |
1 |
-1 |
Smith & Willis |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
6 |
4 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
1 |
-1 |
Feldman & Murray |
Goldman & Wernick |
5 |
2 |
3NT+3 |
E |
|
-690 |
-1 |
1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Hillyard & Smith |
4 |
9 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Taylor & Taylor |
3 |
7 |
4H-1 |
E |
|
100 |
13 |
-13 |
Gold & Sharff |
Griffiths & Pryor |
2 |
5 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Lee & Poole |
Boss & Johnson |
1 |
3 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Foster & Prior |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
9 |
1 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Downing & Stretch |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
Board 23 NS Datum=-140
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
8 |
8 |
2NT-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
1 |
-1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Abisch & De Mercur |
7 |
6 |
3D-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
1 |
-1 |
Smith & Willis |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
6 |
4 |
3D-2 |
N |
|
-200 |
-2 |
2 |
Feldman & Murray |
Goldman & Wernick |
5 |
2 |
2NT-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
1 |
-1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Hillyard & Smith |
4 |
9 |
2NT-4 |
S |
|
-400 |
-6 |
6 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Taylor & Taylor |
3 |
7 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
6 |
-6 |
Gold & Sharff |
Griffiths & Pryor |
2 |
5 |
3D-2 |
N |
|
-200 |
-2 |
2 |
Lee & Poole |
Boss & Johnson |
1 |
3 |
1NT= |
W |
|
-90 |
2 |
-2 |
Foster & Prior |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
9 |
1 |
2NT-3 |
S |
|
-300 |
-4 |
4 |
Downing & Stretch |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
Board 24 NS Datum=430
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
8 |
8 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Rowe & Peters |
Abisch & De Mercur |
7 |
6 |
4Hx= |
S |
|
590 |
4 |
-4 |
Smith & Willis |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
6 |
4 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Feldman & Murray |
Goldman & Wernick |
5 |
2 |
4Hx= |
S |
|
590 |
4 |
-4 |
Ottley & Radford |
Hillyard & Smith |
4 |
9 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Taylor & Taylor |
3 |
7 |
2H+3 |
N |
|
200 |
-6 |
6 |
Gold & Sharff |
Griffiths & Pryor |
2 |
5 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Lee & Poole |
Boss & Johnson |
1 |
3 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Foster & Prior |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
9 |
1 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Downing & Stretch |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
Board 25 NS Datum=-630
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
9 |
9 |
2S+2 |
E |
|
-170 |
10 |
-10 |
Downing & Stretch |
Taylor & Taylor |
8 |
7 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-1 |
1 |
Rowe & Peters |
Griffiths & Pryor |
7 |
5 |
4S= |
W |
|
-620 |
0 |
0 |
Smith & Willis |
Boss & Johnson |
6 |
3 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
0 |
0 |
Feldman & Murray |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
5 |
1 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-1 |
1 |
Ottley & Radford |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
4 |
8 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Abisch & De Mercur |
3 |
6 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-600 |
1 |
-1 |
Gold & Sharff |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
2 |
4 |
5Dx-5 |
N |
|
-1100 |
-10 |
10 |
Lee & Poole |
Goldman & Wernick |
1 |
2 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-1 |
1 |
Foster & Prior |
Hillyard & Smith |
Board 26 NS Datum=-340
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
9 |
9 |
5D= |
E |
|
-600 |
-6 |
6 |
Downing & Stretch |
Taylor & Taylor |
8 |
7 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-7 |
7 |
Rowe & Peters |
Griffiths & Pryor |
7 |
5 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-7 |
7 |
Smith & Willis |
Boss & Johnson |
6 |
3 |
2D+3 |
E |
|
-150 |
5 |
-5 |
Feldman & Murray |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
5 |
1 |
3S+1 |
E |
|
-170 |
5 |
-5 |
Ottley & Radford |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
4 |
8 |
3D+1 |
E |
|
-130 |
5 |
-5 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Abisch & De Mercur |
3 |
6 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-7 |
7 |
Gold & Sharff |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
2 |
4 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-7 |
7 |
Lee & Poole |
Goldman & Wernick |
1 |
2 |
3D+1 |
E |
|
-130 |
5 |
-5 |
Foster & Prior |
Hillyard & Smith |
Board 27 NS Datum=60
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
9 |
9 |
3S-1 |
W |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
Downing & Stretch |
Taylor & Taylor |
8 |
7 |
3S-1 |
W |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
Rowe & Peters |
Griffiths & Pryor |
7 |
5 |
4C= |
N |
|
130 |
2 |
-2 |
Smith & Willis |
Boss & Johnson |
6 |
3 |
3C= |
N |
|
110 |
2 |
-2 |
Feldman & Murray |
Bainbridge & Larkin |
5 |
1 |
3C+1 |
N |
|
130 |
2 |
-2 |
Ottley & Radford |
Hoffman & Hoffman |
4 |
8 |
2S= |
W |
|
-110 |
-5 |
5 |
Howarth & Howarth |
Abisch & De Mercur |
3 |
6 |
3C-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-3 |
3 |
Gold & Sharff |
Foster & Liebeschuetz |
2 |
4 |
2S= |
W |
|
-110 |
-5 |
5 |
Lee & Poole |
Goldman & Wernick |
1 |
2 |
3S-3 |
W |
|
150 |
3 |
-3 |
Foster & Prior |
Hillyard & Smith |
|
Session 2 Section Blue Howell
Board 1 NS Datum=-250
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
4 |
3C+2 |
E |
|
-150 |
3 |
-3 |
Lang & Lang |
Clarke & White |
5 |
1 |
3C+1 |
E |
|
-130 |
3 |
-3 |
Moss & Moss |
Barker & Wing |
3 |
9 |
4S-2 |
W |
|
100 |
8 |
-8 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Doran & Thompson |
10 |
8 |
4S= |
E |
|
-420 |
-5 |
5 |
Gurney & Harden |
Lee & Paul |
7 |
6 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-450 |
-5 |
5 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Love & Tapp |
Board 2 NS Datum=520
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
4 |
6NT= |
S |
|
1440 |
14 |
-14 |
Lang & Lang |
Clarke & White |
5 |
1 |
3NT+2 |
S |
|
660 |
4 |
-4 |
Moss & Moss |
Barker & Wing |
3 |
9 |
3NT+2 |
S |
|
660 |
4 |
-4 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Doran & Thompson |
10 |
8 |
3NT= |
S |
|
600 |
2 |
-2 |
Gurney & Harden |
Lee & Paul |
7 |
6 |
6NT-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
-12 |
12 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Love & Tapp |
Board 3 NS Datum=10
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
4 |
2H-1 |
E |
|
100 |
3 |
-3 |
Lang & Lang |
Clarke & White |
5 |
1 |
3D+3 |
N |
|
170 |
4 |
-4 |
Moss & Moss |
Barker & Wing |
3 |
9 |
1NT= |
W |
|
-90 |
-3 |
3 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Doran & Thompson |
10 |
8 |
1NTx= |
W |
|
-180 |
-5 |
5 |
Gurney & Harden |
Lee & Paul |
7 |
6 |
5C-2 |
S |
|
-100 |
-3 |
3 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Love & Tapp |
Board 4 NS Datum=-1410
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
8 |
7 |
6NT= |
E |
|
-1440 |
-1 |
1 |
Lee & Paul |
Cambery & Courtney |
3 |
5 |
6D+1 |
W |
|
-1390 |
1 |
-1 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Moss & Moss |
6 |
2 |
6C+1 |
W |
|
-1390 |
1 |
-1 |
Love & Tapp |
Lang & Lang |
4 |
1 |
6NT= |
E |
|
-1440 |
-1 |
1 |
Clarke & White |
Barker & Wing |
10 |
9 |
3NT+3 |
W |
|
-690 |
12 |
-12 |
Gurney & Harden |
Doran & Thompson |
Board 5 NS Datum=-770
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
8 |
7 |
6NT= |
W |
|
-990 |
-6 |
6 |
Lee & Paul |
Cambery & Courtney |
3 |
5 |
6NT= |
W |
|
-990 |
-6 |
6 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Moss & Moss |
6 |
2 |
6NT+1 |
W |
|
-1020 |
-6 |
6 |
Love & Tapp |
Lang & Lang |
4 |
1 |
7NTx-1 |
E |
|
100 |
13 |
-13 |
Clarke & White |
Barker & Wing |
10 |
9 |
6NT= |
W |
|
-990 |
-6 |
6 |
Gurney & Harden |
Doran & Thompson |
Board 6 NS Datum=-330
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
8 |
7 |
5Cx-5 |
S |
|
-1100 |
-13 |
13 |
Lee & Paul |
Cambery & Courtney |
3 |
5 |
4S-1 |
E |
|
100 |
10 |
-10 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Moss & Moss |
6 |
2 |
4S-1 |
E |
|
100 |
10 |
-10 |
Love & Tapp |
Lang & Lang |
4 |
1 |
5Dx-5 |
N |
|
-1100 |
-13 |
13 |
Clarke & White |
Barker & Wing |
10 |
9 |
4Sx-2 |
W |
|
500 |
13 |
-13 |
Gurney & Harden |
Doran & Thompson |
Board 7 NS Datum=-460
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
10 |
1 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-5 |
5 |
Gurney & Harden |
Barker & Wing |
9 |
8 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-5 |
5 |
Doran & Thompson |
Lee & Paul |
4 |
6 |
3H= |
S |
|
140 |
12 |
-12 |
Clarke & White |
Love & Tapp |
7 |
3 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-5 |
5 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
5 |
2 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Moss & Moss |
Lang & Lang |
Board 8 NS Datum=440
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
10 |
1 |
6S= |
N |
|
980 |
11 |
-11 |
Gurney & Harden |
Barker & Wing |
9 |
8 |
4S+1 |
N |
|
450 |
0 |
0 |
Doran & Thompson |
Lee & Paul |
4 |
6 |
4S+2 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Clarke & White |
Love & Tapp |
7 |
3 |
4S+2 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
5 |
2 |
5S+1 |
N |
|
480 |
1 |
-1 |
Moss & Moss |
Lang & Lang |
Board 9 NS Datum=0
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
10 |
1 |
2S-1 |
S |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Gurney & Harden |
Barker & Wing |
9 |
8 |
3NT-1 |
E |
|
100 |
3 |
-3 |
Doran & Thompson |
Lee & Paul |
4 |
6 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-2 |
2 |
Clarke & White |
Love & Tapp |
7 |
3 |
2C-2 |
N |
|
-100 |
-3 |
3 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
5 |
2 |
3NT-1 |
E |
|
100 |
3 |
-3 |
Moss & Moss |
Lang & Lang |
Board 10 NS Datum=-620
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
6 |
3 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Love & Tapp |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
10 |
2 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Gurney & Harden |
Lang & Lang |
1 |
9 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-600 |
1 |
-1 |
Barker & Wing |
Doran & Thompson |
5 |
7 |
2Hx-2 |
N |
|
-500 |
3 |
-3 |
Moss & Moss |
Cambery & Courtney |
8 |
4 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-630 |
0 |
0 |
Lee & Paul |
Clarke & White |
Board 11 NS Datum=50
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
6 |
3 |
1NT-1 |
S |
|
-50 |
-3 |
3 |
Love & Tapp |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
10 |
2 |
3D= |
N |
|
110 |
2 |
-2 |
Gurney & Harden |
Lang & Lang |
1 |
9 |
3NT-3 |
E |
|
150 |
3 |
-3 |
Barker & Wing |
Doran & Thompson |
5 |
7 |
3H= |
E |
|
-140 |
-5 |
5 |
Moss & Moss |
Cambery & Courtney |
8 |
4 |
4H-1 |
E |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
Lee & Paul |
Clarke & White |
Board 12 NS Datum=-430
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
6 |
3 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-460 |
-1 |
1 |
Love & Tapp |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
10 |
2 |
3NT+2 |
W |
|
-460 |
-1 |
1 |
Gurney & Harden |
Lang & Lang |
1 |
9 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-400 |
1 |
-1 |
Barker & Wing |
Doran & Thompson |
5 |
7 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
0 |
0 |
Moss & Moss |
Cambery & Courtney |
8 |
4 |
3NT= |
W |
|
-400 |
1 |
-1 |
Lee & Paul |
Clarke & White |
Board 13 NS Datum=-460
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
9 |
5 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Doran & Thompson |
Moss & Moss |
7 |
4 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Clarke & White |
10 |
3 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Gurney & Harden |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
2 |
1 |
4H= |
W |
|
-620 |
-4 |
4 |
Lang & Lang |
Barker & Wing |
6 |
8 |
5Sx-1 |
E |
|
200 |
12 |
-12 |
Love & Tapp |
Lee & Paul |
Board 14 NS Datum=560
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
9 |
5 |
6S= |
S |
|
980 |
9 |
-9 |
Doran & Thompson |
Moss & Moss |
7 |
4 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Clarke & White |
10 |
3 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Gurney & Harden |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
2 |
1 |
4S+2 |
S |
|
480 |
-2 |
2 |
Lang & Lang |
Barker & Wing |
6 |
8 |
6S= |
S |
|
980 |
9 |
-9 |
Love & Tapp |
Lee & Paul |
Board 15 NS Datum=-400
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
9 |
5 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
-1 |
1 |
Doran & Thompson |
Moss & Moss |
7 |
4 |
5D-1 |
E |
|
50 |
10 |
-10 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Clarke & White |
10 |
3 |
3NT+1 |
E |
|
-430 |
-1 |
1 |
Gurney & Harden |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
2 |
1 |
3NT+3 |
W |
|
-490 |
-3 |
3 |
Lang & Lang |
Barker & Wing |
6 |
8 |
3NT+1 |
W |
|
-430 |
-1 |
1 |
Love & Tapp |
Lee & Paul |
Board 16 NS Datum=-100
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
1 |
6 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
5 |
-5 |
Barker & Wing |
Love & Tapp |
8 |
5 |
1NT+1 |
W |
|
-120 |
-1 |
1 |
Lee & Paul |
Moss & Moss |
10 |
4 |
4H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
5 |
-5 |
Gurney & Harden |
Clarke & White |
3 |
2 |
4H-2 |
E |
|
200 |
7 |
-7 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Lang & Lang |
7 |
9 |
1NT+2 |
W |
|
-150 |
-2 |
2 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Doran & Thompson |
Board 17 NS Datum=30
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
1 |
6 |
2S-1 |
E |
|
50 |
1 |
-1 |
Barker & Wing |
Love & Tapp |
8 |
5 |
1NT+1 |
S |
|
120 |
3 |
-3 |
Lee & Paul |
Moss & Moss |
10 |
4 |
2S-1 |
E |
|
50 |
1 |
-1 |
Gurney & Harden |
Clarke & White |
3 |
2 |
3S-1 |
E |
|
50 |
1 |
-1 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Lang & Lang |
7 |
9 |
2S-2 |
E |
|
100 |
2 |
-2 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Doran & Thompson |
Board 18 NS Datum=420
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
1 |
6 |
6H-2 |
S |
|
-200 |
-12 |
12 |
Barker & Wing |
Love & Tapp |
8 |
5 |
7H-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
-11 |
11 |
Lee & Paul |
Moss & Moss |
10 |
4 |
6H= |
S |
|
1430 |
14 |
-14 |
Gurney & Harden |
Clarke & White |
3 |
2 |
6H-1 |
S |
|
-100 |
-11 |
11 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Lang & Lang |
7 |
9 |
6H= |
S |
|
1430 |
14 |
-14 |
Cambery & Courtney |
Doran & Thompson |
Board 19 NS Datum=-30
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
7 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-1 |
1 |
Lang & Lang |
Cambery & Courtney |
9 |
6 |
3H-1 |
W |
|
100 |
4 |
-4 |
Doran & Thompson |
Love & Tapp |
10 |
5 |
2S= |
S |
|
110 |
4 |
-4 |
Gurney & Harden |
Moss & Moss |
4 |
3 |
2S-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-1 |
1 |
Clarke & White |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
8 |
1 |
2S= |
N |
|
110 |
4 |
-4 |
Lee & Paul |
Barker & Wing |
Board 20 NS Datum=-60
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
7 |
3H-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
-1 |
1 |
Lang & Lang |
Cambery & Courtney |
9 |
6 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Doran & Thompson |
Love & Tapp |
10 |
5 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Gurney & Harden |
Moss & Moss |
4 |
3 |
1NT-1 |
E |
|
100 |
4 |
-4 |
Clarke & White |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
8 |
1 |
1NT= |
E |
|
-90 |
-1 |
1 |
Lee & Paul |
Barker & Wing |
Board 21 NS Datum=-20
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
2 |
7 |
2H= |
E |
|
-110 |
-3 |
3 |
Lang & Lang |
Cambery & Courtney |
9 |
6 |
2H-1 |
E |
|
50 |
2 |
-2 |
Doran & Thompson |
Love & Tapp |
10 |
5 |
2H= |
W |
|
-110 |
-3 |
3 |
Gurney & Harden |
Moss & Moss |
4 |
3 |
PASS |
N |
|
0 |
1 |
-1 |
Clarke & White |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
8 |
1 |
2C-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
-2 |
2 |
Lee & Paul |
Barker & Wing |
Board 22 NS Datum=-650
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
3 |
8 |
3NT+1 |
E |
|
-630 |
1 |
-1 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Lee & Paul |
1 |
7 |
3NT+1 |
E |
|
-630 |
1 |
-1 |
Barker & Wing |
Cambery & Courtney |
10 |
6 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Gurney & Harden |
Love & Tapp |
5 |
4 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Moss & Moss |
Clarke & White |
9 |
2 |
3NT+2 |
E |
|
-660 |
0 |
0 |
Doran & Thompson |
Lang & Lang |
Board 23 NS Datum=-140
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
3 |
8 |
3D-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
1 |
-1 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Lee & Paul |
1 |
7 |
2D-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
1 |
-1 |
Barker & Wing |
Cambery & Courtney |
10 |
6 |
3D-1 |
N |
|
-100 |
1 |
-1 |
Gurney & Harden |
Love & Tapp |
5 |
4 |
3H+1 |
E |
|
-170 |
-1 |
1 |
Moss & Moss |
Clarke & White |
9 |
2 |
1C+3 |
W |
|
-130 |
0 |
0 |
Doran & Thompson |
Lang & Lang |
Board 24 NS Datum=430
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
3 |
8 |
4H= |
N |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Lee & Paul |
1 |
7 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Barker & Wing |
Cambery & Courtney |
10 |
6 |
4H= |
N |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Gurney & Harden |
Love & Tapp |
5 |
4 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Moss & Moss |
Clarke & White |
9 |
2 |
4H= |
S |
|
420 |
0 |
0 |
Doran & Thompson |
Lang & Lang |
Board 25 NS Datum=-630
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
4 |
9 |
4S+1 |
E |
|
-650 |
-1 |
1 |
Clarke & White |
Doran & Thompson |
2 |
8 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
0 |
0 |
Lang & Lang |
Lee & Paul |
10 |
7 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
0 |
0 |
Gurney & Harden |
Cambery & Courtney |
6 |
5 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
0 |
0 |
Love & Tapp |
Moss & Moss |
1 |
3 |
4S= |
E |
|
-620 |
0 |
0 |
Barker & Wing |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Board 26 NS Datum=-340
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
4 |
9 |
5D= |
E |
|
-600 |
-6 |
6 |
Clarke & White |
Doran & Thompson |
2 |
8 |
3NT-1 |
E |
|
100 |
10 |
-10 |
Lang & Lang |
Lee & Paul |
10 |
7 |
3Hx+1 |
N |
|
930 |
15 |
-15 |
Gurney & Harden |
Cambery & Courtney |
6 |
5 |
4S+1 |
W |
|
-650 |
-7 |
7 |
Love & Tapp |
Moss & Moss |
1 |
3 |
3H+1 |
N |
|
170 |
11 |
-11 |
Barker & Wing |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
Board 27 NS Datum=60
|
NS |
EW |
Contract |
Dec |
Lead |
Score |
IMP |
IMP |
NS |
EW |
4 |
9 |
3C+1 |
N |
|
130 |
2 |
-2 |
Clarke & White |
Doran & Thompson |
2 |
8 |
4C-1 |
N |
|
-50 |
-3 |
3 |
Lang & Lang |
Lee & Paul |
10 |
7 |
3NT= |
S |
|
400 |
8 |
-8 |
Gurney & Harden |
Cambery & Courtney |
6 |
5 |
3S-2 |
W |
|
100 |
1 |
-1 |
Love & Tapp |
Moss & Moss |
1 |
3 |
3C+1 |
N |
|
130 |
2 |
-2 |
Barker & Wing |
Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh |
|