E B U Premier Life 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 3 Section Green
Board 1 NS Datum=-110
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 9 4S= E   -420 -7 7 Bradley & Norman Irwin & Kime
4 7 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Milman & Stelmashenko Wren & Davies
5 6 3H-1 S   -50 2 -2 Eddleston & Abley Blackman & Evans
8 3 1NTx-2 N   -300 -5 5 Woodcock & Woodcock Oake & Cornell
10 1 4H-2 S   -100 0 0 Brain & Stevens Harding & Harding
11 15 5Sx-1 E   100 5 -5 Brook & Ackroyd Pyner & Jones
12 14 2S+2 E   -170 -2 2 Dannell & Darby Reece & Knight
16 13 4Sx-1 E   100 5 -5 Rainsford & Goodwin Jones & Crack
Board 2 NS Datum=250
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 9 4Sx-2 E   300 2 -2 Bradley & Norman Irwin & Kime
4 7 4Sx-3 E   500 6 -6 Milman & Stelmashenko Wren & Davies
5 6 2S-1 W   50 -5 5 Eddleston & Abley Blackman & Evans
8 3 3NT+2 S   660 9 -9 Woodcock & Woodcock Oake & Cornell
10 1 3C= N   110 -4 4 Brain & Stevens Harding & Harding
11 15 4H-1 S   -100 -8 8 Brook & Ackroyd Pyner & Jones
12 14 4H= S   620 9 -9 Dannell & Darby Reece & Knight
16 13 4H-1 S   -100 -8 8 Rainsford & Goodwin Jones & Crack
Board 3 NS Datum=-220
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 9 2D+3 E   -150 2 -2 Bradley & Norman Irwin & Kime
4 7 3D+2 E   -150 2 -2 Milman & Stelmashenko Wren & Davies
5 6 3D+2 E   -150 2 -2 Eddleston & Abley Blackman & Evans
8 3 3Cx-1 S   -100 3 -3 Woodcock & Woodcock Oake & Cornell
10 1 3NT+2 E   -660 -10 10 Brain & Stevens Harding & Harding
11 15 3D+2 E   -150 2 -2 Brook & Ackroyd Pyner & Jones
12 14 1H+1 S   110 8 -8 Dannell & Darby Reece & Knight
16 13 3NT= E   -600 -9 9 Rainsford & Goodwin Jones & Crack
Board 4 NS Datum=-400
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 9 4S+1 E   -650 -6 6 Bradley & Norman Irwin & Kime
4 7 4S+1 E   -650 -6 6 Milman & Stelmashenko Wren & Davies
5 6 4S+1 E   -650 -6 6 Eddleston & Abley Blackman & Evans
8 3 4S+1 W   -650 -6 6 Woodcock & Woodcock Oake & Cornell
10 1 6S-1 E   100 11 -11 Brain & Stevens Harding & Harding
11 15 4S+1 W   -650 -6 6 Brook & Ackroyd Pyner & Jones
12 14 6S-1 E   100 11 -11 Dannell & Darby Reece & Knight
16 13 6S-1 E   100 11 -11 Rainsford & Goodwin Jones & Crack
Board 5 NS Datum=280
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 9 4S= N   620 8 -8 Bradley & Norman Irwin & Kime
4 7 4S-1 N   -100 -9 9 Milman & Stelmashenko Wren & Davies
5 6 3S+2 N   200 -2 2 Eddleston & Abley Blackman & Evans
8 3 3S+1 N   170 -3 3 Woodcock & Woodcock Oake & Cornell
10 1 4S= N   620 8 -8 Brain & Stevens Harding & Harding
11 15 4S= N   620 8 -8 Brook & Ackroyd Pyner & Jones
12 14 4S-1 N   -100 -9 9 Dannell & Darby Reece & Knight
16 13 3S= N   140 -4 4 Rainsford & Goodwin Jones & Crack
Board 6 NS Datum=-50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 10 3C= W   -110 -2 2 Oake & Cornell Brain & Stevens
5 8 3NT+2 E   -660 -12 12 Eddleston & Abley Woodcock & Woodcock
6 7 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Blackman & Evans Wren & Davies
9 4 3NT-1 E   100 4 -4 Irwin & Kime Milman & Stelmashenko
11 2 3NT-3 W   300 8 -8 Brook & Ackroyd Bradley & Norman
12 1 3NT= E   -600 -11 11 Dannell & Darby Harding & Harding
13 15 3NT-2 E   200 6 -6 Jones & Crack Pyner & Jones
16 14 3NT-2 E   200 6 -6 Rainsford & Goodwin Reece & Knight
Board 7 NS Datum=-120
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 10 1NT-1 N   -100 1 -1 Oake & Cornell Brain & Stevens
5 8 2C-2 N   -200 -2 2 Eddleston & Abley Woodcock & Woodcock
6 7 2S-2 N   -200 -2 2 Blackman & Evans Wren & Davies
9 4 2S-1 S   -100 1 -1 Irwin & Kime Milman & Stelmashenko
11 2 2D-1 N   -100 1 -1 Brook & Ackroyd Bradley & Norman
12 1 2H= S   110 6 -6 Dannell & Darby Harding & Harding
13 15 2C-1 N   -100 1 -1 Jones & Crack Pyner & Jones
16 14 2NT-1 S   -100 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Reece & Knight
Board 8 NS Datum=-360
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 10 4H+1 W   -450 -3 3 Oake & Cornell Brain & Stevens
5 8 5C+1 E   -420 -2 2 Eddleston & Abley Woodcock & Woodcock
6 7 2C+3 W   -150 5 -5 Blackman & Evans Wren & Davies
9 4 4H+1 W   -450 -3 3 Irwin & Kime Milman & Stelmashenko
11 2 2C+4 E   -170 5 -5 Brook & Ackroyd Bradley & Norman
12 1 4H+2 W   -480 -3 3 Dannell & Darby Harding & Harding
13 15 3H+2 W   -200 4 -4 Jones & Crack Pyner & Jones
16 14 4H+1 W   -450 -3 3 Rainsford & Goodwin Reece & Knight
Board 9 NS Datum=210
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 10 4H= N   420 5 -5 Oake & Cornell Brain & Stevens
5 8 4H= N   420 5 -5 Eddleston & Abley Woodcock & Woodcock
6 7 4H-2 N   -100 -7 7 Blackman & Evans Wren & Davies
9 4 3H= N   140 -2 2 Irwin & Kime Milman & Stelmashenko
11 2 4H= N   420 5 -5 Brook & Ackroyd Bradley & Norman
12 1 3D= E   -110 -8 8 Dannell & Darby Harding & Harding
13 15 4H-1 N   -50 -6 6 Jones & Crack Pyner & Jones
16 14 4H= N   420 5 -5 Rainsford & Goodwin Reece & Knight
Board 10 NS Datum=390
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 10 4S= S   620 6 -6 Oake & Cornell Brain & Stevens
5 8 3NT= N   600 5 -5 Eddleston & Abley Woodcock & Woodcock
6 7 2S+2 S   170 -6 6 Blackman & Evans Wren & Davies
9 4 2S+2 S   170 -6 6 Irwin & Kime Milman & Stelmashenko
11 2 3NT= N   600 5 -5 Brook & Ackroyd Bradley & Norman
12 1 2S+2 S   170 -6 6 Dannell & Darby Harding & Harding
13 15 3S+1 S   170 -6 6 Jones & Crack Pyner & Jones
16 14 4S= S   620 6 -6 Rainsford & Goodwin Reece & Knight
Board 11 NS Datum=10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 11 4S= S   420 9 -9 Milman & Stelmashenko Brook & Ackroyd
6 9 4S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Blackman & Evans Irwin & Kime
7 8 4S-2 S   -100 -3 3 Wren & Davies Woodcock & Woodcock
10 5 5S-2 S   -100 -3 3 Brain & Stevens Eddleston & Abley
12 3 4S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Dannell & Darby Oake & Cornell
13 2 4S= S   420 9 -9 Jones & Crack Bradley & Norman
14 1 4S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Reece & Knight Harding & Harding
16 15 5S-2 S   -100 -3 3 Rainsford & Goodwin Pyner & Jones
Board 12 NS Datum=620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 11 3NT= N   600 -1 1 Milman & Stelmashenko Brook & Ackroyd
6 9 3NT= N   600 -1 1 Blackman & Evans Irwin & Kime
7 8 3NT+2 S   660 1 -1 Wren & Davies Woodcock & Woodcock
10 5 3NT+1 S   630 0 0 Brain & Stevens Eddleston & Abley
12 3 3NT= N   600 -1 1 Dannell & Darby Oake & Cornell
13 2 3NT+2 N   660 1 -1 Jones & Crack Bradley & Norman
14 1 3NT= N   600 -1 1 Reece & Knight Harding & Harding
16 15 3NT+1 N   630 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Pyner & Jones
Board 13 NS Datum=1050
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 11 4H+2 S   680 -9 9 Milman & Stelmashenko Brook & Ackroyd
6 9 6H= S   1430 9 -9 Blackman & Evans Irwin & Kime
7 8 7C= N   2140 14 -14 Wren & Davies Woodcock & Woodcock
10 5 7H-1 N   -100 -15 15 Brain & Stevens Eddleston & Abley
12 3 6C= N   1370 8 -8 Dannell & Darby Oake & Cornell
13 2 3NT+3 S   690 -8 8 Jones & Crack Bradley & Norman
14 1 3NT+3 S   690 -8 8 Reece & Knight Harding & Harding
16 15 6H+1 S   1460 9 -9 Rainsford & Goodwin Pyner & Jones
Board 14 NS Datum=-110
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 11 3S+2 E   -200 -3 3 Milman & Stelmashenko Brook & Ackroyd
6 9 3S+1 E   -170 -2 2 Blackman & Evans Irwin & Kime
7 8 3S+1 W   -170 -2 2 Wren & Davies Woodcock & Woodcock
10 5 1NT-1 N   -50 2 -2 Brain & Stevens Eddleston & Abley
12 3 3S-1 E   50 4 -4 Dannell & Darby Oake & Cornell
13 2 1NT= E   -90 1 -1 Jones & Crack Bradley & Norman
14 1 1NT= N   90 5 -5 Reece & Knight Harding & Harding
16 15 4Sx+1 E   -690 -11 11 Rainsford & Goodwin Pyner & Jones
Board 15 NS Datum=190
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 11 4H-1 N   -100 -7 7 Milman & Stelmashenko Brook & Ackroyd
6 9 4H-1 N   -100 -7 7 Blackman & Evans Irwin & Kime
7 8 3H+1 S   170 -1 1 Wren & Davies Woodcock & Woodcock
10 5 4H-1 N   -100 -7 7 Brain & Stevens Eddleston & Abley
12 3 1D-3 S   -300 -10 10 Dannell & Darby Oake & Cornell
13 2 4H= S   620 10 -10 Jones & Crack Bradley & Norman
14 1 4H= S   620 10 -10 Reece & Knight Harding & Harding
16 15 4H+1 N   650 10 -10 Rainsford & Goodwin Pyner & Jones
Board 16 NS Datum=160
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 1NT+2 S   150 0 0 Harding & Harding Milman & Stelmashenko
2 3 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Bradley & Norman Oake & Cornell
5 15 2S+1 S   140 -1 1 Eddleston & Abley Pyner & Jones
7 13 2S+1 S   140 -1 1 Wren & Davies Jones & Crack
8 12 2S+2 N   170 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Dannell & Darby
9 11 3S+1 N   170 0 0 Irwin & Kime Brook & Ackroyd
14 6 4S-1 N   -50 -5 5 Reece & Knight Blackman & Evans
16 10 2Dx-2 W   500 8 -8 Rainsford & Goodwin Brain & Stevens
Board 17 NS Datum=440
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 3NT+1 N   430 0 0 Harding & Harding Milman & Stelmashenko
2 3 3NT+2 N   460 1 -1 Bradley & Norman Oake & Cornell
5 15 3NT+1 N   430 0 0 Eddleston & Abley Pyner & Jones
7 13 3NT+1 N   430 0 0 Wren & Davies Jones & Crack
8 12 3NT+2 N   460 1 -1 Woodcock & Woodcock Dannell & Darby
9 11 3NT+1 N   430 0 0 Irwin & Kime Brook & Ackroyd
14 6 3NT+1 N   430 0 0 Reece & Knight Blackman & Evans
16 10 3NT+1 N   430 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Brain & Stevens
Board 18 NS Datum=680
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2H+4 S   230 -10 10 Harding & Harding Milman & Stelmashenko
2 3 5Dx-5 E   1100 9 -9 Bradley & Norman Oake & Cornell
5 15 4H+2 N   680 0 0 Eddleston & Abley Pyner & Jones
7 13 5H+1 S   680 0 0 Wren & Davies Jones & Crack
8 12 4H+2 S   680 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Dannell & Darby
9 11 4H+2 N   680 0 0 Irwin & Kime Brook & Ackroyd
14 6 4H+2 N   680 0 0 Reece & Knight Blackman & Evans
16 10 5H+1 N   680 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Brain & Stevens
Board 19 NS Datum=-260
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2Sx= N   470 12 -12 Harding & Harding Milman & Stelmashenko
2 3 5D= W   -600 -8 8 Bradley & Norman Oake & Cornell
5 15 5H-2 W   200 10 -10 Eddleston & Abley Pyner & Jones
7 13 5D+1 W   -620 -8 8 Wren & Davies Jones & Crack
8 12 5D= W   -600 -8 8 Woodcock & Woodcock Dannell & Darby
9 11 5D= W   -600 -8 8 Irwin & Kime Brook & Ackroyd
14 6 4C+1 W   -150 3 -3 Reece & Knight Blackman & Evans
16 10 5D-2 W   200 10 -10 Rainsford & Goodwin Brain & Stevens
Board 20 NS Datum=10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 5Hx-1 N   -200 -5 5 Harding & Harding Milman & Stelmashenko
2 3 5Hx-1 N   -200 -5 5 Bradley & Norman Oake & Cornell
5 15 3S= W   -140 -4 4 Eddleston & Abley Pyner & Jones
7 13 5Hx-1 S   -200 -5 5 Wren & Davies Jones & Crack
8 12 5Cx-1 W   200 5 -5 Woodcock & Woodcock Dannell & Darby
9 11 4S= E   -620 -12 12 Irwin & Kime Brook & Ackroyd
14 6 4H= N   620 12 -12 Reece & Knight Blackman & Evans
16 10 4H= S   620 12 -12 Rainsford & Goodwin Brain & Stevens
Board 21 NS Datum=630
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 5 4S+1 S   650 1 -1 Bradley & Norman Eddleston & Abley
3 4 6S-2 S   -200 -13 13 Oake & Cornell Milman & Stelmashenko
6 1 4S+1 S   650 1 -1 Blackman & Evans Harding & Harding
8 14 7Hx-4 W   800 5 -5 Woodcock & Woodcock Reece & Knight
9 13 4S= S   620 0 0 Irwin & Kime Jones & Crack
10 12 5Hx-3 W   500 -4 4 Brain & Stevens Dannell & Darby
15 7 4S+2 S   680 2 -2 Pyner & Jones Wren & Davies
16 11 4S+1 S   650 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Brook & Ackroyd
Board 22 NS Datum=-600
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 5 3NT= E   -600 0 0 Bradley & Norman Eddleston & Abley
3 4 3NT= E   -600 0 0 Oake & Cornell Milman & Stelmashenko
6 1 3NT+1 E   -630 -1 1 Blackman & Evans Harding & Harding
8 14 3NT= E   -600 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Reece & Knight
9 13 3NT= E   -600 0 0 Irwin & Kime Jones & Crack
10 12 3NT= W   -600 0 0 Brain & Stevens Dannell & Darby
15 7 3NT= E   -600 0 0 Pyner & Jones Wren & Davies
16 11 3NT= E   -600 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Brook & Ackroyd
Board 23 NS Datum=110
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 5 2C+1 N   110 0 0 Bradley & Norman Eddleston & Abley
3 4 3NT-1 S   -100 -5 5 Oake & Cornell Milman & Stelmashenko
6 1 2D-1 E   100 0 0 Blackman & Evans Harding & Harding
8 14 2NT= N   120 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Reece & Knight
9 13 1NTx+1 N   380 7 -7 Irwin & Kime Jones & Crack
10 12 2NT= N   120 0 0 Brain & Stevens Dannell & Darby
15 7 1NT+1 N   120 0 0 Pyner & Jones Wren & Davies
16 11 3C= S   110 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Brook & Ackroyd
Board 24 NS Datum=10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 5 1NT+2 W   -150 -4 4 Bradley & Norman Eddleston & Abley
3 4 2S+1 S   140 4 -4 Oake & Cornell Milman & Stelmashenko
6 1 1NT= W   -90 -3 3 Blackman & Evans Harding & Harding
8 14 1NT-1 S   -50 -2 2 Woodcock & Woodcock Reece & Knight
9 13 2C= S   90 2 -2 Irwin & Kime Jones & Crack
10 12 1NTx+1 W   -280 -7 7 Brain & Stevens Dannell & Darby
15 7 1Sx-2 W   300 7 -7 Pyner & Jones Wren & Davies
16 11 2NT= N   120 3 -3 Rainsford & Goodwin Brook & Ackroyd
Board 25 NS Datum=-690
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 5 3NT+3 E   -690 0 0 Bradley & Norman Eddleston & Abley
3 4 3NT+4 E   -720 -1 1 Oake & Cornell Milman & Stelmashenko
6 1 2H-3 S   -150 11 -11 Blackman & Evans Harding & Harding
8 14 3NT+3 E   -690 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Reece & Knight
9 13 3NT+3 E   -690 0 0 Irwin & Kime Jones & Crack
10 12 3NT+3 E   -690 0 0 Brain & Stevens Dannell & Darby
15 7 3NT+3 W   -690 0 0 Pyner & Jones Wren & Davies
16 11 4NT+1 W   -660 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Brook & Ackroyd
Board 26 NS Datum=-640
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 8 4S= W   -620 1 -1 Harding & Harding Woodcock & Woodcock
3 6 4S= E   -620 1 -1 Oake & Cornell Blackman & Evans
4 5 4S= W   -620 1 -1 Milman & Stelmashenko Eddleston & Abley
7 2 4S+2 W   -680 -1 1 Wren & Davies Bradley & Norman
9 15 4S= W   -620 1 -1 Irwin & Kime Pyner & Jones
10 14 4S+1 W   -650 0 0 Brain & Stevens Reece & Knight
11 13 4S= W   -620 1 -1 Brook & Ackroyd Jones & Crack
16 12 4Sx= W   -790 -4 4 Rainsford & Goodwin Dannell & Darby
Board 27 NS Datum=370
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 8 4H= N   420 2 -2 Harding & Harding Woodcock & Woodcock
3 6 2C-3 W   150 -6 6 Oake & Cornell Blackman & Evans
4 5 3NT+1 N   430 2 -2 Milman & Stelmashenko Eddleston & Abley
7 2 4H= S   420 2 -2 Wren & Davies Bradley & Norman
9 15 4H= S   420 2 -2 Irwin & Kime Pyner & Jones
10 14 4H= S   420 2 -2 Brain & Stevens Reece & Knight
11 13 3NT= N   400 1 -1 Brook & Ackroyd Jones & Crack
16 12 4H-1 E   50 -8 8 Rainsford & Goodwin Dannell & Darby
Board 28 NS Datum=-300
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 8 4S= W   -420 -3 3 Harding & Harding Woodcock & Woodcock
3 6 1NT-2 S   -200 3 -3 Oake & Cornell Blackman & Evans
4 5 2C-3 N   -300 0 0 Milman & Stelmashenko Eddleston & Abley
7 2 2Cx-2 N   -500 -5 5 Wren & Davies Bradley & Norman
9 15 2C-3 N   -300 0 0 Irwin & Kime Pyner & Jones
10 14 1NT+1 W   -120 5 -5 Brain & Stevens Reece & Knight
11 13 2H= W   -110 5 -5 Brook & Ackroyd Jones & Crack
16 12 4S+1 E   -450 -4 4 Rainsford & Goodwin Dannell & Darby
Board 29 NS Datum=-1200
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 8 7H= W   -2210 -14 14 Harding & Harding Woodcock & Woodcock
3 6 5C-4 E   400 17 -17 Oake & Cornell Blackman & Evans
4 5 6NT+1 W   -1470 -7 7 Milman & Stelmashenko Eddleston & Abley
7 2 7H-1 E   100 16 -16 Wren & Davies Bradley & Norman
9 15 6NT= W   -1440 -6 6 Irwin & Kime Pyner & Jones
10 14 6NT+1 W   -1470 -7 7 Brain & Stevens Reece & Knight
11 13 6NT+1 W   -1470 -7 7 Brook & Ackroyd Jones & Crack
16 12 6H= E   -1430 -6 6 Rainsford & Goodwin Dannell & Darby
Board 30 NS Datum=90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 8 4H-2 N   -100 -5 5 Harding & Harding Woodcock & Woodcock
3 6 1H+2 S   140 2 -2 Oake & Cornell Blackman & Evans
4 5 3S-2 E   100 0 0 Milman & Stelmashenko Eddleston & Abley
7 2 3H-1 N   -50 -4 4 Wren & Davies Bradley & Norman
9 15 2H+1 N   140 2 -2 Irwin & Kime Pyner & Jones
10 14 2H+1 S   140 2 -2 Brain & Stevens Reece & Knight
11 13 2H= S   110 1 -1 Brook & Ackroyd Jones & Crack
16 12       60/40 2 -2 Rainsford & Goodwin Dannell & Darby