EBU Masters Pairs 05/03/2009 Multisession (printed at 09/03/2009 11:59:07) Session 1 Section Orange BOARD 1 Datum = 440 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4S+1 N 450 0 0 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 5Sx= N 650 5 -5 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4S+1 N 450 0 0 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 4S= N 420 -1 1 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 4S= N 420 -1 1 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 2 Datum = -330 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4S+2 W -480 -4 4 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 4S-1 W 50 9 -9 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4S= W -420 -3 3 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 2S+1 W -140 5 -5 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 4S= W -420 -3 3 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 3 Datum = 70 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4H-1 N -50 -3 3 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 3S-3 S -150 -6 6 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4H= N 420 8 -8 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 5D-3 W 300 6 -6 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 4H-1 N -50 -3 3 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 4 Datum = 640 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4H= N 620 -1 1 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 4H+1 N 650 0 0 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4H+1 N 650 0 0 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 6H-1 N -100 -12 12 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 6H= N 1430 13 -13 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 5 Datum = 120 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 2S= E -110 -6 6 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 2H+3 N 200 2 -2 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4S-2 E 100 -1 1 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 4S-3 E 150 1 -1 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 2D+1 S 110 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 6 Datum = -40 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 3C= W -110 -2 2 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 PASS N 0 1 -1 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 PASS N 0 1 -1 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 2NT-2 E 200 6 -6 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 2C+1 W -110 -2 2 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 7 Datum = -30 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4H-2 N -200 -5 5 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 3NT-1 S -100 -2 2 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4H= N 620 12 -12 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 3H+2 N 200 6 -6 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 2Sx= W -670 -12 12 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 8 Datum = -450 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4S+1 W -450 0 0 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 3NT+2 W -460 0 0 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 4S+1 W -450 0 0 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 4S= W -420 1 -1 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 4S+1 W -450 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 9 Datum = 40 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 1S= S 80 1 -1 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 3H-1 N -50 -3 3 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 1NT= N 90 2 -2 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 3D= E -110 -4 4 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 4H+1 N 450 9 -9 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 10 Datum = -60 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 4Sx-3 N -800 -12 12 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 2S= N 110 5 -5 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 3S-1 N -100 -1 1 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 2S-2 N -200 -4 4 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 2S-2 W 200 6 -6 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 11 Datum = 420 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 7 2H-2 W 100 -8 8 Conway & Gardener Knight & Wernick 6 5 3NT+1 N 430 0 0 Goldwin & Disbury Wallace & Binder 8 3 3NT+1 S 430 0 0 Chapman & Ring Glassborow & Weatherley 9 2 3NT+3 N 490 2 -2 Cheetham & Murtagh Potter & Lucas 10 1 3NT= N 400 -1 1 Chanter & Wildsmith New & Waterhouse BOARD 12 Datum = 30 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 2S+2 S 170 4 -4 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 3H= W -140 -5 5 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 3H-1 W 50 1 -1 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 3S+2 N 200 5 -5 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3H= E -140 -5 5 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 13 Datum = 660 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 4H+1 N 650 0 0 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 3NT+2 S 660 0 0 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 4H+1 N 650 0 0 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 3NT+2 S 660 0 0 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3NT+2 S 660 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 14 Datum = -110 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 2S+1 W -140 -1 1 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 4D-1 S -50 2 -2 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 4S= W -420 -7 7 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 3S= W -140 -1 1 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 5S-2 W 100 5 -5 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 15 Datum = 610 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 5D+1 S 620 0 0 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 3NT-1 N -100 -12 12 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 3NT= N 600 0 0 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 3NT+3 N 690 2 -2 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 5D+1 N 620 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 16 Datum = 130 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 2S+1 N 140 0 0 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 1NT= S 90 -1 1 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 2S+2 N 170 1 -1 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 2S+1 N 140 0 0 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 2NT= S 120 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 17 Datum = -90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 2D-2 E 100 5 -5 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 4H= W -420 -8 8 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 5Cx-3 N -500 -9 9 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 2C+1 N 110 5 -5 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3H-1 W 50 4 -4 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 18 Datum = -270 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 3NT+1 W -430 -4 4 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 3NT+1 W -430 -4 4 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 3NT-1 W 50 8 -8 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 3NT-4 W 200 10 -10 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3NT+1 W -430 -4 4 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 19 Datum = -50 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 3D= W -110 -2 2 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 PASS N 0 2 -2 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 2S-2 E 200 6 -6 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 4C-1 N -50 0 0 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3D= W -110 -2 2 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 20 Datum = -60 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 2S+1 W -140 -2 2 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 3S= W -140 -2 2 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 4H-1 E 100 4 -4 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 2S-1 W 100 4 -4 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 4S+1 W -650 -11 11 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 21 Datum = -250 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 4H= E -420 -5 5 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 3H+1 E -170 2 -2 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 4H= E -420 -5 5 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 2H+2 E -170 2 -2 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3H-1 E 50 7 -7 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 22 Datum = -20 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 3D-2 S -100 -2 2 New & Waterhouse Glassborow & Weatherley 5 8 2S+1 W -140 -3 3 Wallace & Binder Chapman & Ring 7 6 3D-1 N -50 -1 1 Knight & Wernick Goldwin & Disbury 9 4 3D= N 110 4 -4 Cheetham & Murtagh Conway & Gardener 10 2 3S-1 E 100 3 -3 Chanter & Wildsmith Potter & Lucas BOARD 23 Datum = -90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 1NT-1 E 100 5 -5 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 2S+1 E -140 -2 2 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 1NT= E -90 0 0 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 1NT= E -90 0 0 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 1NT= E -90 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 24 Datum = -340 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 3NT= E -400 -2 2 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 4S-1 E 50 9 -9 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 3S+2 W -200 4 -4 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 4S= W -420 -2 2 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 4S+1 W -450 -3 3 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 25 Datum = 90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 3H+1 S 170 2 -2 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 3H= S 140 2 -2 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 4S= S 420 8 -8 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 4H-1 S -50 -4 4 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 4H-1 S -50 -4 4 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 26 Datum = -70 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 2S+1 N 140 5 -5 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 3NT-1 S -100 -1 1 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 5Sx-2 N -500 -10 10 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 3H-1 E 100 5 -5 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 4S-2 N -200 -4 4 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 27 Datum = -100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 3S= E -140 -1 1 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 3H= S 140 6 -6 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 4Hx-2 S -300 -5 5 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 5Hx-2 S -300 -5 5 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 4H= N 420 11 -11 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 28 Datum = 100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 2S+1 N 140 1 -1 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 2H= W -110 -5 5 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 3S= N 140 1 -1 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 3D-1 E 50 -2 2 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 2S= N 110 0 0 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 29 Datum = 0 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 4S+1 S 650 12 -12 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 4S-1 S -100 -3 3 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 3S-1 S -100 -3 3 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 4S-1 S -100 -3 3 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 3Hx-1 E 200 5 -5 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 30 Datum = -410 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 6C= W -920 -11 11 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 5C= W -400 0 0 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 4C+2 W -170 6 -6 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 5Cx+1 W -650 -6 6 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 4S-2 S -100 7 -7 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 31 Datum = -260 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 3NT+1 W -430 -5 5 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 3NT-2 W 100 8 -8 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 3NT= W -400 -4 4 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 3NT+1 W -430 -5 5 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 3NT-1 W 50 7 -7 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 32 Datum = 470 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 5Cx-2 E 500 1 -1 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 3C= E -110 -11 11 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 5Cx-2 E 500 1 -1 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 5Cx-2 E 500 1 -1 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 4H= S 420 -2 2 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley BOARD 33 Datum = -250 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 5 4C+2 E -170 2 -2 New & Waterhouse Wallace & Binder 2 4 4S-2 N -100 4 -4 Potter & Lucas Conway & Gardener 6 9 5C+1 E -420 -5 5 Goldwin & Disbury Cheetham & Murtagh 8 7 4S-3 N -150 3 -3 Chapman & Ring Knight & Wernick 10 3 5H= E -450 -5 5 Chanter & Wildsmith Glassborow & Weatherley