EBU National Masters Pairs 06/03/2009 Multisession (printed at 09/03/2009 10:35:42) Session 1 Section Purple BOARD 1 Datum = 350 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 4S+1 N 450 3 -3 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 5Cx-2 W 300 -2 2 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 3NT-2 N -100 -10 10 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 4S+1 N 450 3 -3 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 4S+1 N 450 3 -3 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 5H-2 W 100 -6 6 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 4S+1 N 450 3 -3 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 2 Datum = -40 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 4S-1 W 50 3 -3 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 4S-1 W 50 3 -3 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 4S-1 W 50 3 -3 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 4S-1 W 50 3 -3 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 4S-1 W 50 3 -3 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 4S= W -420 -9 9 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 4S= W -420 -9 9 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 3 Datum = 60 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 4D-1 W 100 1 -1 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 3H= N 140 2 -2 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 4Hx-1 N -100 -4 4 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 3H= N 140 2 -2 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 5H-1 N -50 -3 3 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 4H-1 N -50 -3 3 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 4D-2 W 200 4 -4 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 4 Datum = 110 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 4H+2 N 680 11 -11 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 6H-1 S -100 -5 5 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 6H-1 N -100 -5 5 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 3H+2 N 200 3 -3 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 4H+1 N 650 11 -11 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 6H-2 N -200 -7 7 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 6H-1 N -100 -5 5 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 5 Datum = 30 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 2S-1 W 50 1 -1 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 3S-1 E 50 1 -1 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 3S-1 E 50 1 -1 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 4H-1 N -100 -4 4 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 3NT= N 600 11 -11 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 3D= S 110 2 -2 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 4H-1 N -100 -4 4 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 6 Datum = -120 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 1NT-1 S -50 2 -2 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 5C-1 W 100 6 -6 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 3C+2 W -150 -1 1 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 3D-2 S -100 1 -1 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 3C+1 E -130 0 0 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 3C+2 W -150 -1 1 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 2C+3 W -150 -1 1 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 7 Datum = -90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 4 5Hx-1 N -200 -3 3 Ashcroft & Mortlock Keogh & Knights 5 1 3C-2 S -200 -3 3 Courtney & Cambery Pollack & Pollack 7 12 4H-1 N -100 0 0 Moss & Moss Foster & Liebeschuetz 8 11 4H= N 620 12 -12 Clarke & White Somerville & Somerville 9 10 4H-2 N -200 -3 3 Lang & Lang Willis & Smith 13 6 3H+1 S 170 6 -6 Sherman & Bellinger Goddard & Bamford 14 3 4H-1 N -100 0 0 Grant & Grant Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh BOARD 8 Datum = -450 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 4S+1 W -450 0 0 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 4S+1 E -450 0 0 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 4S= W -420 1 -1 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 4S+2 W -480 -1 1 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 4S+1 W -450 0 0 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 4S+1 W -450 0 0 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 3NT+1 W -430 1 -1 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 9 Datum = 110 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 3S-3 S -150 -6 6 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 4H= N 420 7 -7 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 3H-1 N -50 -4 4 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 4H= S 420 7 -7 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 4C= N 130 1 -1 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 3H+1 N 170 2 -2 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 3D= E -110 -6 6 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 10 Datum = -110 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 3D= E -110 0 0 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 2S-1 N -100 0 0 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 3D= E -110 0 0 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 3S-1 N -100 0 0 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 2C-3 W 300 9 -9 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 3D+1 E -130 -1 1 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 3Hx-4 N -1100 -14 14 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 11 Datum = 390 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 4S+1 S 450 2 -2 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 3NT+2 N 460 2 -2 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 3NT+1 N 430 1 -1 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 2S+3 S 200 -5 5 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 3NT+2 N 460 2 -2 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 3NT= S 400 0 0 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 2S+3 S 200 -5 5 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 12 Datum = 80 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 3H= W -140 -6 6 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 2H= W -110 -5 5 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 4H-1 W 50 -1 1 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 2S+2 N 170 3 -3 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 3S+1 N 170 3 -3 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 2S+1 N 140 2 -2 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 3S= N 140 2 -2 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 13 Datum = 660 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 4H+1 N 650 0 0 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 3NT+3 N 690 1 -1 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 3NT+3 S 690 1 -1 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 4H+1 N 650 0 0 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 4H+1 N 650 0 0 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 3NT+2 S 660 0 0 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 4H= N 620 -1 1 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 14 Datum = -230 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 7 5D-2 S -100 4 -4 Pollack & Pollack Moss & Moss 3 5 4S= W -420 -5 5 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Courtney & Cambery 6 2 5Dx-2 S -300 -2 2 Goddard & Bamford Ashcroft & Mortlock 8 13 4S-1 W 50 7 -7 Clarke & White Sherman & Bellinger 9 12 3S+1 W -170 2 -2 Lang & Lang Foster & Liebeschuetz 10 11 3S+1 W -170 2 -2 Willis & Smith Somerville & Somerville 14 4 4S= W -420 -5 5 Grant & Grant Keogh & Knights BOARD 15 Datum = 640 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 5D+1 S 620 -1 1 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 3NT+2 N 660 1 -1 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 3NT= N 600 -1 1 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 3NT+2 N 660 1 -1 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 3NT+1 N 630 0 0 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 5D+1 S 620 -1 1 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 3NT+2 N 660 1 -1 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 16 Datum = 170 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 1NT+3 S 180 0 0 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 2S+1 N 140 -1 1 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 1NT+4 S 210 1 -1 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 2NT= N 120 -2 2 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 3NT+2 S 460 7 -7 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 1NT+2 S 150 -1 1 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 1NT+3 S 180 0 0 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 17 Datum = 90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 2C+1 N 110 1 -1 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 2C+1 N 110 1 -1 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 2C+1 N 110 1 -1 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 2C= N 90 0 0 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 4H-2 W 100 0 0 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 1NT-1 W 50 -1 1 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 4H-1 E 50 -1 1 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 18 Datum = -410 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 3NT-1 W 50 10 -10 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 3NT= W -400 0 0 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 3NT+1 W -430 -1 1 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 3NT= W -400 0 0 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 3NT= W -400 0 0 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 3NT+1 W -430 -1 1 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 3NT= W -400 0 0 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 19 Datum = -100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 3D= W -110 0 0 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 3D+1 W -130 -1 1 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 4C-1 N -50 2 -2 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 3D= W -110 0 0 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 4D-1 W 100 5 -5 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 3H-2 S -100 0 0 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 5C-3 N -150 -2 2 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 20 Datum = -100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 4S-1 W 100 5 -5 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 4S-1 W 100 5 -5 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 2S+2 W -170 -2 2 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 4S-1 W 100 5 -5 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 4S+1 W -650 -11 11 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 4S-1 W 100 5 -5 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 4S= W -620 -11 11 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 21 Datum = -330 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 2 8 4H= W -420 -3 3 Ashcroft & Mortlock Clarke & White 4 6 3NT-2 E 100 10 -10 Keogh & Knights Goddard & Bamford 7 3 4H= E -420 -3 3 Moss & Moss Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 9 1 4H= E -420 -3 3 Lang & Lang Pollack & Pollack 10 13 4H= E -420 -3 3 Willis & Smith Sherman & Bellinger 11 12 4H= E -420 -3 3 Somerville & Somerville Foster & Liebeschuetz 14 5 4H-1 E 50 9 -9 Grant & Grant Courtney & Cambery BOARD 22 Datum = -90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 3D= N 110 5 -5 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 2S+1 E -140 -2 2 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 3D-2 N -100 0 0 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 5D-3 N -150 -2 2 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 3S-1 E 100 5 -5 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 2S+1 E -140 -2 2 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 2Sx+1 W -870 -13 13 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 23 Datum = -50 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 1NT+2 E -150 -3 3 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 2S-5 N -500 -10 10 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 2NT-1 E 100 4 -4 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 2NT+2 E -180 -4 4 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 1NT+1 E -120 -2 2 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 3NT-1 E 100 4 -4 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 3NT-2 E 200 6 -6 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 24 Datum = -340 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 4S= W -420 -2 2 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 6S-1 W 50 9 -9 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 4S+1 W -450 -3 3 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 6S-1 W 50 9 -9 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 3NT+1 W -430 -3 3 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 4S+1 W -450 -3 3 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 4S+1 W -450 -3 3 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 25 Datum = 40 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 4H-1 S -50 -3 3 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 3NT= S 400 8 -8 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 4H-1 S -50 -3 3 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 4H= N 420 9 -9 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 4H-1 S -50 -3 3 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 4H-1 S -50 -3 3 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 3NT-1 N -50 -3 3 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 26 Datum = -110 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 4C-2 S -200 -3 3 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 5S-3 N -300 -5 5 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 3C-1 S -100 0 0 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 4S-2 N -200 -3 3 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 3H= E -140 -1 1 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 3H-1 E 100 5 -5 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 3H-1 E 100 5 -5 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 27 Datum = -100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 5Hx-2 S -300 -5 5 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 5Sx-1 E 100 5 -5 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 4S-1 E 50 4 -4 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 4S= E -420 -8 8 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 5C-1 W 50 4 -4 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 5Cx-1 E 100 5 -5 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 4S+1 E -450 -8 8 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 28 Datum = 30 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 12 2S= S 110 2 -2 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Foster & Liebeschuetz 5 10 2S+1 S 140 3 -3 Courtney & Cambery Willis & Smith 6 9 2D+1 E -110 -4 4 Goddard & Bamford Lang & Lang 7 8 2S= S 110 2 -2 Moss & Moss Clarke & White 11 4 2D= E -90 -3 3 Somerville & Somerville Keogh & Knights 13 2 1NT= E -90 -3 3 Sherman & Bellinger Ashcroft & Mortlock 14 1 2S= S 110 2 -2 Grant & Grant Pollack & Pollack BOARD 29 Datum = -10 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 4S-2 S -200 -5 5 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 4S= S 620 12 -12 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 4S-1 S -100 -3 3 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 6Sx-4 S -1100 -14 14 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 3S+1 S 170 5 -5 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 3Hx-1 E 200 5 -5 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 4S-1 S -100 -3 3 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock BOARD 30 Datum = -270 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 5C+1 W -420 -4 4 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 5D-1 N -50 6 -6 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 4C+2 W -170 3 -3 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 5D-2 N -100 5 -5 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 5C= W -400 -4 4 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 5Dx-2 N -300 -1 1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 5C= W -400 -4 4 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock BOARD 31 Datum = -310 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 6D-2 W 100 9 -9 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 3NT= W -400 -3 3 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 3NT+1 W -430 -3 3 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 3NT= W -400 -3 3 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 3NT= W -400 -3 3 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 3NT-1 W 50 8 -8 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 3NT= W -400 -3 3 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock BOARD 32 Datum = 240 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 4H+1 N 450 5 -5 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 4H+1 N 450 5 -5 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 3C= E -110 -8 8 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 4D-2 N -100 -8 8 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 3H+2 N 200 -1 1 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 5Cx-1 E 200 -1 1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 4Hx+1 N 690 10 -10 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock BOARD 33 Datum = -490 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 5Hx+1 E -750 -6 6 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 5C+1 E -420 2 -2 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 4H+2 E -480 0 0 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 5C+1 E -420 2 -2 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 5H+1 W -480 0 0 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 5Cx+1 E -650 -4 4 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 7H-3 E 150 12 -12 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock BOARD 34 Datum = -460 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 4H+1 E -450 0 0 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 4H+1 E -450 0 0 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 4H+3 E -510 -2 2 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 4H= E -420 1 -1 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 4H+2 E -480 -1 1 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 4H= E -420 1 -1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 4H+3 E -510 -2 2 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock BOARD 35 Datum = -560 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 3 4H= E -620 -2 2 Pollack & Pollack Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 4 13 4Sx-2 N -300 6 -6 Keogh & Knights Sherman & Bellinger 6 11 4H= W -620 -2 2 Goddard & Bamford Somerville & Somerville 7 10 4H= E -620 -2 2 Moss & Moss Willis & Smith 8 9 4H-1 W 100 12 -12 Clarke & White Lang & Lang 12 5 4H= E -620 -2 2 Foster & Liebeschuetz Courtney & Cambery 14 2 4H= E -620 -2 2 Grant & Grant Ashcroft & Mortlock