EBU National Masters Pairs 06/03/2009 Multisession (printed at 09/03/2009 10:36:14) Session 2 Section Purple BOARD 1 Datum = 580 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 6S= N 980 9 -9 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 6S= N 980 9 -9 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 4S+2 S 480 -3 3 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 4S+2 N 480 -3 3 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 4S+2 N 480 -3 3 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 4S+1 N 450 -4 4 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 3NT+2 N 460 -3 3 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 2 Datum = -30 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 1NT-2 E 100 4 -4 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 2NT= E -120 -3 3 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 1NT+1 E -120 -3 3 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 1NT-2 E 100 4 -4 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 2NT= E -120 -3 3 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 3NT-2 E 100 4 -4 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 2S= W -110 -2 2 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 3 Datum = 180 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 2C= N 90 -3 3 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 2H+4 S 230 2 -2 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 2S-3 E 300 3 -3 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 1NT+2 S 150 -1 1 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 2H+2 N 170 0 0 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 2H+2 N 170 0 0 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 2H+2 N 170 0 0 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 4 Datum = -790 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 4S+3 W -710 2 -2 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 6C= W -1370 -11 11 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 4C+3 W -190 12 -12 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 5C+1 E -620 5 -5 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 5C+1 W -620 5 -5 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 5C+1 W -620 5 -5 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 6C+1 W -1390 -12 12 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 5 Datum = -90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 1S-3 E 150 6 -6 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 3NT-4 N -400 -7 7 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 2NT-1 N -100 0 0 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 1NT+2 W -150 -2 2 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 3C-1 E 50 4 -4 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 5C-3 E 150 6 -6 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 2NT-4 N -400 -7 7 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 6 Datum = 20 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 2H-1 S -50 -2 2 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 2C= N 90 2 -2 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 3C-3 N -150 -5 5 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 1NT-1 E 100 2 -2 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 1NTx+2 E -580 -12 12 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 2H= S 110 3 -3 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 2H+1 N 140 3 -3 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 7 Datum = 690 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 3 9 4S+2 N 680 0 0 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang 5 7 4S+3 N 710 1 -1 Courtney & Cambery Moss & Moss 8 4 5S= N 650 -1 1 Clarke & White Keogh & Knights 10 2 4S+3 N 710 1 -1 Willis & Smith Ashcroft & Mortlock 11 1 4S+3 N 710 1 -1 Somerville & Somerville Pollack & Pollack 12 13 4S+1 N 650 -1 1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Sherman & Bellinger 14 6 4S+3 N 710 1 -1 Grant & Grant Goddard & Bamford BOARD 8 Datum = -100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 4Sx-3 S -500 -9 9 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 3Hx= W -530 -10 10 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 4H-2 W 100 5 -5 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 3H-3 W 150 6 -6 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 2NT-3 E 150 6 -6 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 2S-2 S -100 0 0 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 3H= W -140 -1 1 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 9 Datum = 140 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 2D-1 E 100 -1 1 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 1NT-2 E 200 2 -2 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 1NT-1 W 100 -1 1 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 1NT-1 E 100 -1 1 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 1NT= E -90 -6 6 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 1NT-2 E 200 2 -2 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 2S-3 E 300 4 -4 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 10 Datum = 400 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 6NT-1 S -100 -11 11 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 3NT+1 S 630 6 -6 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 4Hx-2 N -500 -14 14 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 3NT+3 N 690 7 -7 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 3NT+3 N 690 7 -7 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 3D= S 110 -7 7 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 3NT+3 N 690 7 -7 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 11 Datum = -310 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 3H+3 E -230 2 -2 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 4H+2 W -480 -5 5 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 4H+1 E -450 -4 4 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 2S= S 110 9 -9 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 4Sx= S 590 14 -14 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 5H+1 E -480 -5 5 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 5H+1 E -480 -5 5 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 12 Datum = -50 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 4H-1 N -100 -2 2 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 4H-1 N -100 -2 2 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 6C-2 W 100 4 -4 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 4Hx-1 N -200 -4 4 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 4Hx-1 N -200 -4 4 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 4S-1 W 50 3 -3 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 5C-2 W 100 4 -4 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 13 Datum = 40 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 2H+1 N 140 3 -3 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 2H+1 N 140 3 -3 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 3H-1 N -100 -4 4 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 3H-1 N -100 -4 4 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 1NT+2 N 150 3 -3 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 2NT= N 120 2 -2 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 4H-1 N -100 -4 4 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 14 Datum = 70 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 4 10 2S+2 S 170 3 -3 Keogh & Knights Willis & Smith 6 8 4S-1 S -50 -3 3 Goddard & Bamford Clarke & White 9 5 4S-1 S -50 -3 3 Lang & Lang Courtney & Cambery 11 3 2S+1 S 140 2 -2 Somerville & Somerville Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 12 2 4S-1 S -50 -3 3 Foster & Liebeschuetz Ashcroft & Mortlock 13 1 2S+1 S 140 2 -2 Sherman & Bellinger Pollack & Pollack 14 7 2S+2 S 170 3 -3 Grant & Grant Moss & Moss BOARD 15 Datum = 510 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 3NT= S 600 3 -3 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 3NT+2 S 660 4 -4 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 3NT= S 600 3 -3 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 3NT+1 N 630 3 -3 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 3NT-2 S -200 -12 12 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 1D+2 S 110 -9 9 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 4S= N 620 3 -3 Grant & Grant Clarke & White BOARD 16 Datum = 220 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 4H= E -620 -13 13 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 4S-1 S -50 -7 7 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 4S= S 420 5 -5 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 4S= S 420 5 -5 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 5Hx-1 E 200 -1 1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 4S= S 420 5 -5 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 5H-1 E 100 -3 3 Grant & Grant Clarke & White BOARD 17 Datum = -110 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 4C= W -130 -1 1 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 4C= W -130 -1 1 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 4D-1 S -50 2 -2 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 4C= W -130 -1 1 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 4C= W -130 -1 1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 4C+1 W -150 -1 1 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 4D-1 N -50 2 -2 Grant & Grant Clarke & White BOARD 18 Datum = -100 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 2H= E -110 0 0 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 3NT= N 600 12 -12 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 3H= E -140 -1 1 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 3H= E -140 -1 1 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 2H+1 E -140 -1 1 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 3NT-3 N -300 -5 5 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 4H-1 E 50 4 -4 Grant & Grant Clarke & White BOARD 19 Datum = -20 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 1NT+1 E -120 -3 3 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 1D= N 70 3 -3 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 3D-2 N -100 -2 2 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 3D-2 N -100 -2 2 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 1D+1 N 90 3 -3 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 1D+1 N 90 3 -3 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 1NT-1 N -50 -1 1 Grant & Grant Clarke & White BOARD 20 Datum = -260 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 4C= E -130 4 -4 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 3NT+2 W -660 -9 9 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 3C+3 W -170 3 -3 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 3NT+1 W -630 -9 9 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 3C-1 E 100 8 -8 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 3C+3 W -170 3 -3 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 3H-2 N -200 2 -2 Grant & Grant Clarke & White BOARD 21 Datum = 90 NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- BIMP BIMP NS EW 1 2 2S-1 S -100 -5 5 Pollack & Pollack Ashcroft & Mortlock 5 11 4H-1 N -100 -5 5 Courtney & Cambery Somerville & Somerville 7 9 2H+1 N 140 2 -2 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang 10 6 3H= N 140 2 -2 Willis & Smith Goddard & Bamford 12 4 3Cx-2 W 300 5 -5 Foster & Liebeschuetz Keogh & Knights 13 3 2H+1 N 140 2 -2 Sherman & Bellinger Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh 14 8 3S= S 140 2 -2 Grant & Grant Clarke & White