English Bridge Union Pairs A Final Multisection Session 1 Section A Top = 26
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 10 5Cx= E -550 0 26 Thrower & Miller Wren & Perryman
9 17 4C+1 E -150 10 16 Liew & Grant Lonsdale & Wilkes
8 15 3NT-1 W 50 21 5 Tomlinson & Lawy Smith & Smith
7 13 3NT-1 W 50 21 5 Strachan & Carter Dunn & Ewart
6 11 3C+2 E -150 10 16 Ledger & Hannah Wilson S & Gore
5 18 3D-1 W 50 21 5 Oakford & Oakford Sheehan & Clews
4 16 5C= E -400 4 22 Solomon & Solomon Hedley & Hedley
14 3 3NT-2 E 100 26 0 King & Panahpour Stock & Silverstone
12 2 2S-2 N -100 16 10 Anderson & Martin Moore & Serby
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 10 2H-1 S -100 10 16 Thrower & Miller Wren & Perryman
9 17 2H-2 S -200 4 22 Liew & Grant Lonsdale & Wilkes
8 15 2H-2 S -200 4 22 Tomlinson & Lawy Smith & Smith
7 13 2NT= N 120 18 8 Strachan & Carter Dunn & Ewart
6 11 1NT-1 N -100 10 16 Ledger & Hannah Wilson S & Gore
5 18 2H-2 S -200 4 22 Oakford & Oakford Sheehan & Clews
4 16 2Hx-2 S -500 0 26 Solomon & Solomon Hedley & Hedley
14 3 2H-1 E 50 14 12 King & Panahpour Stock & Silverstone
12 2 2NT+1 N 150 23 3 Anderson & Martin Moore & Serby
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 11 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Moore & Serby Wilson S & Gore
1 18 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Thrower & Miller Sheehan & Clews
9 16 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Liew & Grant Hedley & Hedley
8 14 5C-3 S -150 26 0 Tomlinson & Lawy King & Panahpour
7 12 4S+2 W -680 10 16 Strachan & Carter Anderson & Martin
6 10 5S+1 E -680 10 16 Ledger & Hannah Wren & Perryman
5 17 5Cx-3 S -500 23 3 Oakford & Oakford Lonsdale & Wilkes
15 4 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Smith & Smith Solomon & Solomon
13 3 4S+2 W -680 10 16 Dunn & Ewart Stock & Silverstone
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 11 2S+1 S 140 14 12 Moore & Serby Wilson S & Gore
1 18 2H+1 N 140 14 12 Thrower & Miller Sheehan & Clews
9 16 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Liew & Grant Hedley & Hedley
8 14 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Tomlinson & Lawy King & Panahpour
7 12 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Strachan & Carter Anderson & Martin
6 10 4S-1 N -100 0 26 Ledger & Hannah Wren & Perryman
5 17 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Oakford & Oakford Lonsdale & Wilkes
15 4 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Smith & Smith Solomon & Solomon
13 3 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Dunn & Ewart Stock & Silverstone
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 12 4S-2 E 100 19 7 Stock & Silverstone Anderson & Martin
2 10 4S-1 E 50 15 11 Moore & Serby Wren & Perryman
1 17 5Hx-1 S -200 4 22 Thrower & Miller Lonsdale & Wilkes
9 15 5H-2 S -200 4 22 Liew & Grant Smith & Smith
8 13 4Sx-2 E 300 23 3 Tomlinson & Lawy Dunn & Ewart
7 11 5H-1 S -100 11 15 Strachan & Carter Wilson S & Gore
6 18 4H-1 S -100 11 15 Ledger & Hannah Sheehan & Clews
16 5 5H-2 S -200 4 22 Hedley & Hedley Oakford & Oakford
14 4 5H-2 N -200 4 22 King & Panahpour Solomon & Solomon
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 12 4H= W -620 9 17 Stock & Silverstone Anderson & Martin
2 10 4H= W -620 9 17 Moore & Serby Wren & Perryman
1 17 4H-1 W 100 22 4 Thrower & Miller Lonsdale & Wilkes
9 15 4H-1 W 100 22 4 Liew & Grant Smith & Smith
8 13 4H= W -620 9 17 Tomlinson & Lawy Dunn & Ewart
7 11 6C-3 N -150 18 8 Strachan & Carter Wilson S & Gore
6 18 4H= W -620 9 17 Ledger & Hannah Sheehan & Clews
16 5 4Hx-1 W 200 26 0 Hedley & Hedley Oakford & Oakford
14 4 4H-1 E 100 22 4 King & Panahpour Solomon & Solomon
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 13 3NT+2 E -660 4 22 Solomon & Solomon Dunn & Ewart
3 11 3NT+1 E -630 11 15 Stock & Silverstone Wilson S & Gore
2 18 3NT-1 E 100 24 2 Moore & Serby Sheehan & Clews
1 16 2Hx-2 S -500 20 6 Thrower & Miller Hedley & Hedley
9 14 2Sx-3 S -800 1 25 Liew & Grant King & Panahpour
8 12 2Sx-3 S -800 1 25 Tomlinson & Lawy Anderson & Martin
7 10 3NT+1 E -630 11 15 Strachan & Carter Wren & Perryman
17 6 3NT+1 E -630 11 15 Lonsdale & Wilkes Ledger & Hannah
15 5 3NT+1 E -630 11 15 Smith & Smith Oakford & Oakford
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 13 3D-1 S -50 12 14 Solomon & Solomon Dunn & Ewart
3 11 3C-2 S -100 8 18 Stock & Silverstone Wilson S & Gore
2 18 3D-1 S -50 12 14 Moore & Serby Sheehan & Clews
1 16 2H= W -110 5 21 Thrower & Miller Hedley & Hedley
9 14 3D-1 S -50 12 14 Liew & Grant King & Panahpour
8 12 3S= E -140 2 24 Tomlinson & Lawy Anderson & Martin
7 10 3C= S 110 23 3 Strachan & Carter Wren & Perryman
17 6 4S-2 E 100 20 6 Lonsdale & Wilkes Ledger & Hannah
15 5 3Sx= E -530 0 26 Smith & Smith Oakford & Oakford
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 14 4S= W -620 10 16 Oakford & Oakford King & Panahpour
4 12 4D-1 S -50 24 2 Solomon & Solomon Anderson & Martin
3 10 4S= W -620 10 16 Stock & Silverstone Wren & Perryman
2 17 3D+1 S 130 26 0 Moore & Serby Lonsdale & Wilkes
1 15 3S+1 W -170 21 5 Thrower & Miller Smith & Smith
9 13 3S+1 W -170 21 5 Liew & Grant Dunn & Ewart
8 11 4S= W -620 10 16 Tomlinson & Lawy Wilson S & Gore
18 7 2S+4 W -230 18 8 Sheehan & Clews Strachan & Carter
16 6 4S= W -620 10 16 Hedley & Hedley Ledger & Hannah
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 14 2D-2 S -200 2 24 Oakford & Oakford King & Panahpour
4 12 2D= S 90 25 1 Solomon & Solomon Anderson & Martin
3 10 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Stock & Silverstone Wren & Perryman
2 17 2C-1 S -100 14 12 Moore & Serby Lonsdale & Wilkes
1 15 2S= E -110 4 22 Thrower & Miller Smith & Smith
9 13 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Liew & Grant Dunn & Ewart
8 11 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Tomlinson & Lawy Wilson S & Gore
18 7 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Sheehan & Clews Strachan & Carter
16 6 4D-3 S -300 0 26 Hedley & Hedley Ledger & Hannah
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 15 3NT= N 400 21 5 Ledger & Hannah Smith & Smith
5 13 2NT-1 S -50 4 22 Oakford & Oakford Dunn & Ewart
4 11 3NT= N 400 21 5 Solomon & Solomon Wilson S & Gore
3 18 2S+1 N 140 11 15 Stock & Silverstone Sheehan & Clews
2 16 2NT+2 N 180 16 10 Moore & Serby Hedley & Hedley
1 14 2Sx-3 W 500 25 1 Thrower & Miller King & Panahpour
9 12 2Hx-2 E 300 18 8 Liew & Grant Anderson & Martin
10 8 2NT= N 120 8 18 Wren & Perryman Tomlinson & Lawy
17 7 3S= S 140 11 15 Lonsdale & Wilkes Strachan & Carter
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 15 3NT+2 W -460 0 26 Ledger & Hannah Smith & Smith
5 13 2Sx= N 670 25 1 Oakford & Oakford Dunn & Ewart
4 11 2Sx= N 670 25 1 Solomon & Solomon Wilson S & Gore
3 18 3NT+1 W -430 4 22 Stock & Silverstone Sheehan & Clews
2 16 5C-3 W 150 21 5 Moore & Serby Hedley & Hedley
1 14 3NT= E -400 8 18 Thrower & Miller King & Panahpour
9 12 3S-2 N -200 10 16 Liew & Grant Anderson & Martin
10 8 3NT+1 W -430 4 22 Wren & Perryman Tomlinson & Lawy
17 7 3NT+1 W -430 4 22 Lonsdale & Wilkes Strachan & Carter
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 16 4H-2 E 200 22 4 Strachan & Carter Hedley & Hedley
6 14 1NT+1 E -120 11 15 Ledger & Hannah King & Panahpour
5 12 2H+2 E -170 6 20 Oakford & Oakford Anderson & Martin
4 10 1NT+5 W -240 2 24 Solomon & Solomon Wren & Perryman
3 17 2H+2 E -170 6 20 Stock & Silverstone Lonsdale & Wilkes
2 15 1NT+1 W -120 11 15 Moore & Serby Smith & Smith
1 13 3NT-5 W 500 26 0 Thrower & Miller Dunn & Ewart
11 9 2H+2 E -170 6 20 Wilson S & Gore Liew & Grant
18 8 4H= E -620 0 26 Sheehan & Clews Tomlinson & Lawy
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 16 3NT= E -400 2 24 Strachan & Carter Hedley & Hedley
6 14 3D+2 W -150 12 14 Ledger & Hannah King & Panahpour
5 12 3H-1 N -50 23 3 Oakford & Oakford Anderson & Martin
4 10 3H-1 N -50 23 3 Solomon & Solomon Wren & Perryman
3 17 3D+2 W -150 12 14 Stock & Silverstone Lonsdale & Wilkes
2 15 3S-3 N -150 12 14 Moore & Serby Smith & Smith
1 13 3H-3 S -150 12 14 Thrower & Miller Dunn & Ewart
11 9 3H-3 N -150 12 14 Wilson S & Gore Liew & Grant
18 8 3NT+2 E -460 0 26 Sheehan & Clews Tomlinson & Lawy
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 17 3D+1 S 130 11 15 Tomlinson & Lawy Lonsdale & Wilkes
7 15 2S-2 W 100 6 20 Strachan & Carter Smith & Smith
6 13 2S-1 E 50 4 22 Ledger & Hannah Dunn & Ewart
5 11 2D+3 N 150 19 7 Oakford & Oakford Wilson S & Gore
4 18 3C-1 N -100 2 24 Solomon & Solomon Sheehan & Clews
3 16 3D+2 N 150 19 7 Stock & Silverstone Hedley & Hedley
2 14 3D+1 S 130 11 15 Moore & Serby King & Panahpour
12 1 3Sx-3 E 500 26 0 Anderson & Martin Thrower & Miller
10 9 3D= N 110 8 18 Wren & Perryman Liew & Grant
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 17 3NT+1 W -630 11 15 Tomlinson & Lawy Lonsdale & Wilkes
7 15 3NT+2 W -660 3 23 Strachan & Carter Smith & Smith
6 13 4Hx-4 N -800 0 26 Ledger & Hannah Dunn & Ewart
5 11 2NT+2 W -180 25 1 Oakford & Oakford Wilson S & Gore
4 18 5C= W -600 18 8 Solomon & Solomon Sheehan & Clews
3 16 3NT+1 W -630 11 15 Stock & Silverstone Hedley & Hedley
2 14 2NT+2 W -180 25 1 Moore & Serby King & Panahpour
12 1 3NT+1 E -630 11 15 Anderson & Martin Thrower & Miller
10 9 3NT+1 W -630 11 15 Wren & Perryman Liew & Grant
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 18 4S-2 E 100 20 6 Liew & Grant Sheehan & Clews
8 16 2S= W -110 7 19 Tomlinson & Lawy Hedley & Hedley
7 14 2S= E -110 7 19 Strachan & Carter King & Panahpour
6 12 4S= E -420 0 26 Ledger & Hannah Anderson & Martin
5 10 4S-1 E 50 13 13 Oakford & Oakford Wren & Perryman
4 17 4S-2 E 100 20 6 Solomon & Solomon Lonsdale & Wilkes
3 15 4S-1 E 50 13 13 Stock & Silverstone Smith & Smith
13 2 4S-1 E 50 13 13 Dunn & Ewart Moore & Serby
11 1 4Sx-1 E 100 20 6 Wilson S & Gore Thrower & Miller
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 18 6H= E -980 0 26 Liew & Grant Sheehan & Clews
8 16 4H+1 E -450 14 12 Tomlinson & Lawy Hedley & Hedley
7 14 4H+2 E -480 4 22 Strachan & Carter King & Panahpour
6 12 4H+2 W -480 4 22 Ledger & Hannah Anderson & Martin
5 10 3Sx= S 730 26 0 Oakford & Oakford Wren & Perryman
4 17 4H+1 E -450 14 12 Solomon & Solomon Lonsdale & Wilkes
3 15 4H+1 E -450 14 12 Stock & Silverstone Smith & Smith
13 2 6H-1 E 50 23 3 Dunn & Ewart Moore & Serby
11 1 6H-1 W 50 23 3 Wilson S & Gore Thrower & Miller
Session 1 Section B Top = 26
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 4 5C= E -400 4 22 Smith & Maggs Harper & Hoffman
5 1 4H-3 N -150 10 16 Burrows & Burrows Woo & Woo
3 9 3NT-1 E 50 21 5 Schogger & Paul Stelmashenko & Milman
10 8 3D+1 W -130 14 12 Thomas & Goodman Pryor & Pryor
7 6 3NT= W -400 4 22 Lee & Poole Willis & Lewis
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 4 1NT+1 S 120 18 8 Smith & Maggs Harper & Hoffman
5 1 2NT= N 120 18 8 Burrows & Burrows Woo & Woo
3 9 2H-1 S -100 10 16 Schogger & Paul Stelmashenko & Milman
10 8 1NT+2 S 150 23 3 Thomas & Goodman Pryor & Pryor
7 6 3NT= S 600 26 0 Lee & Poole Willis & Lewis
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 7 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Pryor & Pryor Lee & Poole
3 5 5Cx-3 S -500 23 3 Schogger & Paul Burrows & Burrows
6 2 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Willis & Lewis Smith & Maggs
4 1 4S+2 E -680 10 16 Harper & Hoffman Woo & Woo
10 9 4S+2 W -680 10 16 Thomas & Goodman Stelmashenko & Milman
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 7 2S= N 110 2 24 Pryor & Pryor Lee & Poole
3 5 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Schogger & Paul Burrows & Burrows
6 2 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Willis & Lewis Smith & Maggs
4 1 1NT+3 N 180 26 0 Harper & Hoffman Woo & Woo
10 9 2S+1 N 140 14 12 Thomas & Goodman Stelmashenko & Milman
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 1 4Sx-2 E 300 23 3 Thomas & Goodman Woo & Woo
9 8 3S-2 E 100 19 7 Stelmashenko & Milman Pryor & Pryor
4 6 5H= N 650 26 0 Harper & Hoffman Willis & Lewis
7 3 4C-2 N -200 4 22 Lee & Poole Schogger & Paul
5 2 4S-1 E 50 15 11 Burrows & Burrows Smith & Maggs
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
10 1 5S-5 S -250 16 10 Thomas & Goodman Woo & Woo
9 8 4Hx= W -790 3 23 Stelmashenko & Milman Pryor & Pryor
4 6 4Sx-3 N -500 14 12 Harper & Hoffman Willis & Lewis
7 3 4Sx-5 S -1100 0 26 Lee & Poole Schogger & Paul
5 2 4Hx= W -790 3 23 Burrows & Burrows Smith & Maggs
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 3 3NT+1 E -630 11 15 Willis & Lewis Schogger & Paul
10 2 3C-1 E 100 24 2 Thomas & Goodman Smith & Maggs
1 9 3NT= E -600 18 8 Woo & Woo Stelmashenko & Milman
5 7 3NT-1 E 100 24 2 Burrows & Burrows Lee & Poole
8 4 3NT+1 W -630 11 15 Pryor & Pryor Harper & Hoffman
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 3 3D= S 110 23 3 Willis & Lewis Schogger & Paul
10 2 3Hx-2 W 300 26 0 Thomas & Goodman Smith & Maggs
1 9 3S-1 E 50 17 9 Woo & Woo Stelmashenko & Milman
5 7 3S-1 E 50 17 9 Burrows & Burrows Lee & Poole
8 4 2S= E -110 5 21 Pryor & Pryor Harper & Hoffman
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 5 4S= W -620 10 16 Stelmashenko & Milman Burrows & Burrows
7 4 4S+2 W -680 1 25 Lee & Poole Harper & Hoffman
10 3 4S= W -620 10 16 Thomas & Goodman Schogger & Paul
2 1 4S= W -620 10 16 Smith & Maggs Woo & Woo
6 8 4S+2 E -680 1 25 Willis & Lewis Pryor & Pryor
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 5 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Stelmashenko & Milman Burrows & Burrows
7 4 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Lee & Poole Harper & Hoffman
10 3 1NT-1 S -100 14 12 Thomas & Goodman Schogger & Paul
2 1 2D= S 90 25 1 Smith & Maggs Woo & Woo
6 8 2D-1 S -100 14 12 Willis & Lewis Pryor & Pryor
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 6 2NT+1 S 150 14 12 Woo & Woo Willis & Lewis
8 5 3NT-2 S -100 0 26 Pryor & Pryor Burrows & Burrows
10 4 3C-1 N -50 4 22 Thomas & Goodman Harper & Hoffman
3 2 3Hx-3 E 500 25 1 Schogger & Paul Smith & Maggs
7 9 3NT-1 S -50 4 22 Lee & Poole Stelmashenko & Milman
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 6 4D+1 E -150 14 12 Woo & Woo Willis & Lewis
8 5 5D-2 E 100 17 9 Pryor & Pryor Burrows & Burrows
10 4 2NT+2 W -180 12 14 Thomas & Goodman Harper & Hoffman
3 2 5D-2 E 100 17 9 Schogger & Paul Smith & Maggs
7 9 5C-3 W 150 21 5 Lee & Poole Stelmashenko & Milman
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 7 1NT-1 W 100 17 9 Smith & Maggs Lee & Poole
9 6 3H-1 E 100 17 9 Stelmashenko & Milman Willis & Lewis
10 5 3NT-2 W 200 22 4 Thomas & Goodman Burrows & Burrows
4 3 2H= E -110 14 12 Harper & Hoffman Schogger & Paul
8 1 4H-2 E 200 22 4 Pryor & Pryor Woo & Woo
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 7 3D+2 W -150 12 14 Smith & Maggs Lee & Poole
9 6 2NT+2 E -180 4 22 Stelmashenko & Milman Willis & Lewis
10 5 4H-2 N -100 20 6 Thomas & Goodman Burrows & Burrows
4 3 3D+2 E -150 12 14 Harper & Hoffman Schogger & Paul
8 1 3NT-2 E 100 26 0 Pryor & Pryor Woo & Woo
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 8 3D+2 S 150 19 7 Schogger & Paul Pryor & Pryor
1 7 3D+2 N 150 19 7 Woo & Woo Lee & Poole
10 6 2D+3 S 150 19 7 Thomas & Goodman Willis & Lewis
5 4 2S= E -110 0 26 Burrows & Burrows Harper & Hoffman
9 2 3D+2 S 150 19 7 Stelmashenko & Milman Smith & Maggs
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 8 3NT+1 W -630 11 15 Schogger & Paul Pryor & Pryor
1 7 3Hx-2 S -300 21 5 Woo & Woo Lee & Poole
10 6 3Hx-2 S -300 21 5 Thomas & Goodman Willis & Lewis
5 4 3NT+2 E -660 3 23 Burrows & Burrows Harper & Hoffman
9 2 3NT+1 W -630 11 15 Stelmashenko & Milman Smith & Maggs
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 9 3NT-3 E 150 24 2 Harper & Hoffman Stelmashenko & Milman
2 8 2NTx-2 N -300 4 22 Smith & Maggs Pryor & Pryor
10 7 3NT= E -400 2 24 Thomas & Goodman Lee & Poole
6 5 4S-1 E 50 13 13 Willis & Lewis Burrows & Burrows
1 3 4Sx-2 E 300 26 0 Woo & Woo Schogger & Paul
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 9 4H+1 E -450 14 12 Harper & Hoffman Stelmashenko & Milman
2 8 4H+1 E -450 14 12 Smith & Maggs Pryor & Pryor
10 7 4H+1 W -450 14 12 Thomas & Goodman Lee & Poole
6 5 5H+1 E -480 4 22 Willis & Lewis Burrows & Burrows
1 3 4H+1 W -450 14 12 Woo & Woo Schogger & Paul