English Bridge Union Grand Masters 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 1 Section Yellow
Board 1 NS Datum=-10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 20 3C-1 N   -50 -1 1 Keable & Keable Procter & Sanis
4 19 1NT= N   90 3 -3 Davis & Pearce Garthwaite & Hobson
9 14 2H+2 E   -170 -4 4 Davies & Gisborne Capal & Semp
11 12 3C-1 N   -50 -1 1 Crofts & Lucioni Blakey & Blakey
13 10 2C= N   90 3 -3 Scerri & Palmer Porch & Cherry
15 8 3H-1 E   50 2 -2 Squibb & Hall Hedley & Hedley
16 7 4H-1 E   50 2 -2 Littlewood & Musson Willans & Draper
17 6 3C-1 S   -50 -1 1 Teshome & Jagger Guthrie & Barnes
18 5 2H+1 E   -140 -4 4 Auchterlonie & Nelson Hyett & Wolfarth
21 2 2C= N   90 3 -3 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Waxman
22 1 3C-1 N   -50 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Barton
Board 2 NS Datum=-110
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 20 6C-1 E   50 4 -4 Keable & Keable Procter & Sanis
4 19 5C-1 E   50 4 -4 Davis & Pearce Garthwaite & Hobson
9 14 3NT+1 E   -430 -8 8 Davies & Gisborne Capal & Semp
11 12 5C= E   -400 -7 7 Crofts & Lucioni Blakey & Blakey
13 10 3NT+1 E   -430 -8 8 Scerri & Palmer Porch & Cherry
15 8 5C-1 W   50 4 -4 Squibb & Hall Hedley & Hedley
16 7 6C-1 E   50 4 -4 Littlewood & Musson Willans & Draper
17 6 6C-1 W   50 4 -4 Teshome & Jagger Guthrie & Barnes
18 5 6C-1 E   50 4 -4 Auchterlonie & Nelson Hyett & Wolfarth
21 2 3NT+1 E   -430 -8 8 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Waxman
22 1 6C-1 E   50 4 -4 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Barton
Board 3 NS Datum=-70
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 20 3NT-1 N   -50 1 -1 Keable & Keable Procter & Sanis
4 19 3NT-2 N   -100 -1 1 Davis & Pearce Garthwaite & Hobson
9 14 3NT-1 N   -50 1 -1 Davies & Gisborne Capal & Semp
11 12 3S-4 W   400 10 -10 Crofts & Lucioni Blakey & Blakey
13 10 3C-1 S   -50 1 -1 Scerri & Palmer Porch & Cherry
15 8 4C-2 S   -100 -1 1 Squibb & Hall Hedley & Hedley
16 7 3NT-1 N   -50 1 -1 Littlewood & Musson Willans & Draper
17 6 3NT-2 N   -100 -1 1 Teshome & Jagger Guthrie & Barnes
18 5 3NT-3 N   -150 -2 2 Auchterlonie & Nelson Hyett & Wolfarth
21 2 3NT-1 N   -50 1 -1 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Waxman
22 1 3NT-1 N   -50 1 -1 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Barton
Board 4 NS Datum=-80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 20 2S= N   110 5 -5 Keable & Keable Procter & Sanis
4 19 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Davis & Pearce Garthwaite & Hobson
9 14 2S= N   110 5 -5 Davies & Gisborne Capal & Semp
11 12 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Crofts & Lucioni Blakey & Blakey
13 10 1NT+2 E   -150 -2 2 Scerri & Palmer Porch & Cherry
15 8 3C= E   -110 -1 1 Squibb & Hall Hedley & Hedley
16 7 2NT+1 E   -150 -2 2 Littlewood & Musson Willans & Draper
17 6 2C= E   -90 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Guthrie & Barnes
18 5 1NT= W   -90 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Hyett & Wolfarth
21 2 1NT+1 E   -120 -1 1 Hogg & Kelly Pike & Waxman
22 1 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Barton
Board 5 NS Datum=1470
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Pike & Barton Keable & Keable
4 21 6NT+1 N   1470 0 0 Davis & Pearce Hogg & Kelly
5 20 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Procter & Sanis
10 15 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Porch & Cherry Squibb & Hall
12 13 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Blakey & Blakey Scerri & Palmer
14 11 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Capal & Semp Crofts & Lucioni
16 9 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Davies & Gisborne
17 8 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Hedley & Hedley
18 7 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Willans & Draper
19 6 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Garthwaite & Hobson Guthrie & Barnes
22 2 3NT+4 S   720 -13 13 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Waxman
Board 6 NS Datum=-620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3NT+2 W   -660 -1 1 Pike & Barton Keable & Keable
4 21 3D+3 E   -170 10 -10 Davis & Pearce Hogg & Kelly
5 20 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Hyett & Wolfarth Procter & Sanis
10 15 4H= W   -620 0 0 Porch & Cherry Squibb & Hall
12 13 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Blakey & Blakey Scerri & Palmer
14 11 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Capal & Semp Crofts & Lucioni
16 9 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Davies & Gisborne
17 8 3NT+1 E   -630 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Hedley & Hedley
18 7 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Willans & Draper
19 6 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Garthwaite & Hobson Guthrie & Barnes
22 2 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Waxman
Board 7 NS Datum=1360
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 6NT+1 S   1470 3 -3 Pike & Barton Keable & Keable
4 21 6NT+1 S   1470 3 -3 Davis & Pearce Hogg & Kelly
5 20 6NT= N   1440 2 -2 Hyett & Wolfarth Procter & Sanis
10 15 6C+1 N   1390 1 -1 Porch & Cherry Squibb & Hall
12 13 6NT+1 S   1470 3 -3 Blakey & Blakey Scerri & Palmer
14 11 6C+1 N   1390 1 -1 Capal & Semp Crofts & Lucioni
16 9 6NT+1 N   1470 3 -3 Littlewood & Musson Davies & Gisborne
17 8 6C+1 N   1390 1 -1 Teshome & Jagger Hedley & Hedley
18 7 3NT+4 S   720 -12 12 Auchterlonie & Nelson Willans & Draper
19 6 3NT+4 N   720 -12 12 Garthwaite & Hobson Guthrie & Barnes
22 2 6NT+1 N   1470 3 -3 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Waxman
Board 8 NS Datum=120
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 1NT-1 N   -50 -5 5 Pike & Barton Keable & Keable
4 21 1NT= N   90 -1 1 Davis & Pearce Hogg & Kelly
5 20 2H+1 S   140 1 -1 Hyett & Wolfarth Procter & Sanis
10 15 3H= S   140 1 -1 Porch & Cherry Squibb & Hall
12 13 1NT+2 N   150 1 -1 Blakey & Blakey Scerri & Palmer
14 11 2H+2 S   170 2 -2 Capal & Semp Crofts & Lucioni
16 9 3H= N   140 1 -1 Littlewood & Musson Davies & Gisborne
17 8 1NT+1 N   120 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Hedley & Hedley
18 7 3H= S   140 1 -1 Auchterlonie & Nelson Willans & Draper
19 6 2S-1 W   50 -2 2 Garthwaite & Hobson Guthrie & Barnes
22 2 1NT+2 N   150 1 -1 Solomon & Solomon Pike & Waxman
Board 9 NS Datum=-150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 2NT= E   -120 1 -1 Pike & Waxman Davis & Pearce
5 1 2S-1 N   -50 3 -3 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Barton
6 21 3Cx-4 S   -800 -12 12 Guthrie & Barnes Hogg & Kelly
11 16 2D= S   90 6 -6 Crofts & Lucioni Littlewood & Musson
13 14 2S= S   110 6 -6 Scerri & Palmer Capal & Semp
15 12 3Cx-3 S   -500 -8 8 Squibb & Hall Blakey & Blakey
17 10 2S= N   110 6 -6 Teshome & Jagger Porch & Cherry
18 9 3NT= E   -600 -10 10 Auchterlonie & Nelson Davies & Gisborne
19 8 2NT= E   -120 1 -1 Garthwaite & Hobson Hedley & Hedley
20 7 2S-2 N   -100 2 -2 Procter & Sanis Willans & Draper
22 3 3C-2 S   -100 2 -2 Solomon & Solomon Keable & Keable
Board 10 NS Datum=240
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 3NT= S   600 8 -8 Pike & Waxman Davis & Pearce
5 1 3NT-1 S   -100 -8 8 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Barton
6 21 3NT= S   600 8 -8 Guthrie & Barnes Hogg & Kelly
11 16 1NT+1 N   120 -3 3 Crofts & Lucioni Littlewood & Musson
13 14 2C-3 W   300 2 -2 Scerri & Palmer Capal & Semp
15 12 2Sx-1 E   200 -1 1 Squibb & Hall Blakey & Blakey
17 10 2H-1 E   100 -4 4 Teshome & Jagger Porch & Cherry
18 9 1NT+1 S   120 -3 3 Auchterlonie & Nelson Davies & Gisborne
19 8 3H-1 E   100 -4 4 Garthwaite & Hobson Hedley & Hedley
20 7 3S-3 E   300 2 -2 Procter & Sanis Willans & Draper
22 3 2S-3 E   300 2 -2 Solomon & Solomon Keable & Keable
Board 11 NS Datum=20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Pike & Waxman Davis & Pearce
5 1 4S= E   -420 -10 10 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Barton
6 21       50/50 0 0 Guthrie & Barnes Hogg & Kelly
11 16 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Crofts & Lucioni Littlewood & Musson
13 14 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Scerri & Palmer Capal & Semp
15 12 4S-1 W   50 1 -1 Squibb & Hall Blakey & Blakey
17 10 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Teshome & Jagger Porch & Cherry
18 9 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Auchterlonie & Nelson Davies & Gisborne
19 8 2S+2 W   -170 -5 5 Garthwaite & Hobson Hedley & Hedley
20 7 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Procter & Sanis Willans & Draper
22 3 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Solomon & Solomon Keable & Keable
Board 12 NS Datum=-410
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 4S= W   -420 0 0 Pike & Waxman Davis & Pearce
5 1 3NT= E   -400 0 0 Hyett & Wolfarth Pike & Barton
6 21 4S= W   -420 0 0 Guthrie & Barnes Hogg & Kelly
11 16 3NT+1 E   -430 -1 1 Crofts & Lucioni Littlewood & Musson
13 14 5C= W   -400 0 0 Scerri & Palmer Capal & Semp
15 12 3NT+1 E   -430 -1 1 Squibb & Hall Blakey & Blakey
17 10 5C= W   -400 0 0 Teshome & Jagger Porch & Cherry
18 9 3NT= E   -400 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Davies & Gisborne
19 8 5C= W   -400 0 0 Garthwaite & Hobson Hedley & Hedley
20 7 4S= W   -420 0 0 Procter & Sanis Willans & Draper
22 3 5C+1 W   -420 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Keable & Keable
Board 13 NS Datum=-80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 5 4C-1 N   -100 -1 1 Keable & Keable Hyett & Wolfarth
6 2 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Guthrie & Barnes Pike & Waxman
7 1 3H= W   -140 -2 2 Willans & Draper Pike & Barton
12 17 3H= W   -140 -2 2 Blakey & Blakey Teshome & Jagger
14 15 2H+1 W   -140 -2 2 Capal & Semp Squibb & Hall
16 13 3NT-2 N   -200 -3 3 Littlewood & Musson Scerri & Palmer
18 11 3H= W   -140 -2 2 Auchterlonie & Nelson Crofts & Lucioni
19 10 3H-1 W   100 5 -5 Garthwaite & Hobson Porch & Cherry
20 9 5C-1 N   -100 -1 1 Procter & Sanis Davies & Gisborne
21 8 3H= W   -140 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Hedley & Hedley
22 4 3C+1 N   130 5 -5 Solomon & Solomon Davis & Pearce
Board 14 NS Datum=-140
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 5 3S= E   -140 0 0 Keable & Keable Hyett & Wolfarth
6 2 3S= E   -140 0 0 Guthrie & Barnes Pike & Waxman
7 1 3S= E   -140 0 0 Willans & Draper Pike & Barton
12 17 4S-1 W   50 5 -5 Blakey & Blakey Teshome & Jagger
14 15 3S= E   -140 0 0 Capal & Semp Squibb & Hall
16 13 3S= E   -140 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Scerri & Palmer
18 11 3S= E   -140 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Crofts & Lucioni
19 10 3S= E   -140 0 0 Garthwaite & Hobson Porch & Cherry
20 9 3S= E   -140 0 0 Procter & Sanis Davies & Gisborne
21 8 3S= E   -140 0 0 Hogg & Kelly Hedley & Hedley
22 4 3S= E   -140 0 0 Solomon & Solomon Davis & Pearce
Board 15 NS Datum=-390
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 5 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Keable & Keable Hyett & Wolfarth
6 2 5C-1 S   -100 7 -7 Guthrie & Barnes Pike & Waxman
7 1 2S+3 E   -200 5 -5 Willans & Draper Pike & Barton
12 17 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Blakey & Blakey Teshome & Jagger
14 15 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Capal & Semp Squibb & Hall
16 13 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Littlewood & Musson Scerri & Palmer
18 11 3S+2 E   -200 5 -5 Auchterlonie & Nelson Crofts & Lucioni
19 10 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Garthwaite & Hobson Porch & Cherry
20 9 1Dx-3 S   -800 -9 9 Procter & Sanis Davies & Gisborne
21 8 5S= E   -450 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Hedley & Hedley
22 4 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Solomon & Solomon Davis & Pearce
Board 16 NS Datum=170
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 5 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Keable & Keable Hyett & Wolfarth
6 2 2C+1 S   110 -2 2 Guthrie & Barnes Pike & Waxman
7 1 2S+3 S   200 1 -1 Willans & Draper Pike & Barton
12 17 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Blakey & Blakey Teshome & Jagger
14 15 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Capal & Semp Squibb & Hall
16 13 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Littlewood & Musson Scerri & Palmer
18 11 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Auchterlonie & Nelson Crofts & Lucioni
19 10 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Garthwaite & Hobson Porch & Cherry
20 9 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Procter & Sanis Davies & Gisborne
21 8 2S+2 S   170 0 0 Hogg & Kelly Hedley & Hedley
22 4 4S= S   420 6 -6 Solomon & Solomon Davis & Pearce
Board 17 NS Datum=60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 9 5C= N   400 8 -8 Pike & Barton Davies & Gisborne
4 6 5C-1 N   -50 -3 3 Davis & Pearce Guthrie & Barnes
7 3 5C= N   400 8 -8 Willans & Draper Keable & Keable
8 2 5C-1 N   -50 -3 3 Hedley & Hedley Pike & Waxman
13 18 4C+1 N   150 2 -2 Scerri & Palmer Auchterlonie & Nelson
15 16 4S= W   -420 -10 10 Squibb & Hall Littlewood & Musson
17 14       Art 1.4 -1.4 Teshome & Jagger Capal & Semp
19 12 4S= W   -420 -10 10 Garthwaite & Hobson Blakey & Blakey
20 11 5Cx= N   550 10 -10 Procter & Sanis Crofts & Lucioni
21 10 5Sx-1 W   100 1 -1 Hogg & Kelly Porch & Cherry
22 5 5C-1 N   -50 -3 3 Solomon & Solomon Hyett & Wolfarth
Board 18 NS Datum=270
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 9 4H+1 S   650 9 -9 Pike & Barton Davies & Gisborne
4 6 4H-1 S   -100 -9 9 Davis & Pearce Guthrie & Barnes
7 3 4H= S   620 8 -8 Willans & Draper Keable & Keable
8 2 3Sx-2 W   300 1 -1 Hedley & Hedley Pike & Waxman
13 18 4Sx-3 E   500 6 -6 Scerri & Palmer Auchterlonie & Nelson
15 16 2S-1 W   50 -6 6 Squibb & Hall Littlewood & Musson
17 14 4H+1 S   650 9 -9 Teshome & Jagger Capal & Semp
19 12 2H+2 N   170 -3 3 Garthwaite & Hobson Blakey & Blakey
20 11 PASS N   0 -7 7 Procter & Sanis Crofts & Lucioni
21 10 2NT+3 N   210 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Porch & Cherry
22 5 4H-1 S   -100 -9 9 Solomon & Solomon Hyett & Wolfarth
Board 19 NS Datum=290
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 9 2NT+2 N   180 -3 3 Pike & Barton Davies & Gisborne
4 6 2NT+2 N   180 -3 3 Davis & Pearce Guthrie & Barnes
7 3 3NT+1 N   430 4 -4 Willans & Draper Keable & Keable
8 2 2S= E   -110 -9 9 Hedley & Hedley Pike & Waxman
13 18 2S-2 E   200 -3 3 Scerri & Palmer Auchterlonie & Nelson
15 16 3NTx+1 S   650 8 -8 Squibb & Hall Littlewood & Musson
17 14 3NT+1 N   430 4 -4 Teshome & Jagger Capal & Semp
19 12 2H-1 W   100 -5 5 Garthwaite & Hobson Blakey & Blakey
20 11 3NT+1 S   430 4 -4 Procter & Sanis Crofts & Lucioni
21 10 2S-1 E   100 -5 5 Hogg & Kelly Porch & Cherry
22 5 3NTx= S   550 6 -6 Solomon & Solomon Hyett & Wolfarth
Board 20 NS Datum=-440
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 9 3NT+1 W   -630 -5 5 Pike & Barton Davies & Gisborne
4 6 3NT= W   -600 -4 4 Davis & Pearce Guthrie & Barnes
7 3 3NT+1 W   -630 -5 5 Willans & Draper Keable & Keable
8 2 3NT+1 W   -630 -5 5 Hedley & Hedley Pike & Waxman
13 18 3NT+1 W   -630 -5 5 Scerri & Palmer Auchterlonie & Nelson
15 16 3NT+1 W   -630 -5 5 Squibb & Hall Littlewood & Musson
17 14 3Sx= S   730 15 -15 Teshome & Jagger Capal & Semp
19 12 3NT-1 W   100 11 -11 Garthwaite & Hobson Blakey & Blakey
20 11 3D+1 W   -130 7 -7 Procter & Sanis Crofts & Lucioni
21 10 2Sx-1 S   -200 6 -6 Hogg & Kelly Porch & Cherry
22 5 3NT= W   -600 -4 4 Solomon & Solomon Hyett & Wolfarth
Board 21 NS Datum=-420
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 11 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Pike & Barton Crofts & Lucioni
2 10 4H+1 E   -450 -1 1 Pike & Waxman Porch & Cherry
5 7 4H+1 E   -450 -1 1 Hyett & Wolfarth Willans & Draper
8 4 4H= W   -420 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Davis & Pearce
9 3 3H+3 E   -230 5 -5 Davies & Gisborne Keable & Keable
14 19 4S-4 N   -400 1 -1 Capal & Semp Garthwaite & Hobson
16 17 4Sx-4 N   -1100 -12 12 Littlewood & Musson Teshome & Jagger
18 15 4H+2 W   -480 -2 2 Auchterlonie & Nelson Squibb & Hall
20 13 4H+1 W   -450 -1 1 Procter & Sanis Scerri & Palmer
21 12 3H+3 E   -230 5 -5 Hogg & Kelly Blakey & Blakey
22 6 4H+1 E   -450 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Guthrie & Barnes
Board 22 NS Datum=-150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 11 3D= E   -110 1 -1 Pike & Barton Crofts & Lucioni
2 10 2D+2 E   -130 1 -1 Pike & Waxman Porch & Cherry
5 7 3NT-1 E   100 6 -6 Hyett & Wolfarth Willans & Draper
8 4 2NT+1 E   -150 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Davis & Pearce
9 3 3D= E   -110 1 -1 Davies & Gisborne Keable & Keable
14 19 3NT+1 E   -630 -10 10 Capal & Semp Garthwaite & Hobson
16 17 3NT-1 W   100 6 -6 Littlewood & Musson Teshome & Jagger
18 15 2D+1 E   -110 1 -1 Auchterlonie & Nelson Squibb & Hall
20 13 3NT+1 W   -630 -10 10 Procter & Sanis Scerri & Palmer
21 12 2D+2 E   -130 1 -1 Hogg & Kelly Blakey & Blakey
22 6 2D+1 E   -110 1 -1 Solomon & Solomon Guthrie & Barnes
Board 23 NS Datum=210
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 11 4H-2 N   -200 -9 9 Pike & Barton Crofts & Lucioni
2 10 5C= N   600 9 -9 Pike & Waxman Porch & Cherry
5 7 3NT-3 S   -300 -11 11 Hyett & Wolfarth Willans & Draper
8 4 1NT-2 W   200 0 0 Hedley & Hedley Davis & Pearce
9 3 5C= N   600 9 -9 Davies & Gisborne Keable & Keable
14 19 3NT-1 S   -100 -7 7 Capal & Semp Garthwaite & Hobson
16 17 4H-4 N   -400 -12 12 Littlewood & Musson Teshome & Jagger
18 15 5C= S   600 9 -9 Auchterlonie & Nelson Squibb & Hall
20 13 5C= N   600 9 -9 Procter & Sanis Scerri & Palmer
21 12 5C= S   600 9 -9 Hogg & Kelly Blakey & Blakey
22 6 3NT-1 S   -100 -7 7 Solomon & Solomon Guthrie & Barnes
Board 24 NS Datum=-370
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 11 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Pike & Barton Crofts & Lucioni
2 10 4S-1 W   50 9 -9 Pike & Waxman Porch & Cherry
5 7 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Hyett & Wolfarth Willans & Draper
8 4 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Hedley & Hedley Davis & Pearce
9 3 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Davies & Gisborne Keable & Keable
14 19 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Capal & Semp Garthwaite & Hobson
16 17 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Littlewood & Musson Teshome & Jagger
18 15 6S-2 W   100 10 -10 Auchterlonie & Nelson Squibb & Hall
20 13 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Procter & Sanis Scerri & Palmer
21 12 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Hogg & Kelly Blakey & Blakey
22 6 4S= W   -420 -2 2 Solomon & Solomon Guthrie & Barnes
Board 25 NS Datum=260
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 13 3NT+1 S   430 5 -5 Pike & Barton Scerri & Palmer
2 12 3NT= S   400 4 -4 Pike & Waxman Blakey & Blakey
3 11 3NT+1 S   430 5 -5 Keable & Keable Crofts & Lucioni
6 8 1NT+1 N   120 -4 4 Guthrie & Barnes Hedley & Hedley
9 5 2NT= S   120 -4 4 Davies & Gisborne Hyett & Wolfarth
10 4 3NT= N   400 4 -4 Porch & Cherry Davis & Pearce
15 20 3NT-1 N   -50 -7 7 Squibb & Hall Procter & Sanis
17 18 3NT= N   400 4 -4 Teshome & Jagger Auchterlonie & Nelson
19 16 2S-1 W   100 -4 4 Garthwaite & Hobson Littlewood & Musson
21 14 3NT= S   400 4 -4 Hogg & Kelly Capal & Semp
22 7 3NT-1 S   -50 -7 7 Solomon & Solomon Willans & Draper
Board 26 NS Datum=-430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 13 3H= N   140 11 -11 Pike & Barton Scerri & Palmer
2 12 3S= W   -140 7 -7 Pike & Waxman Blakey & Blakey
3 11 5Hx-1 N   -200 6 -6 Keable & Keable Crofts & Lucioni
6 8 4H-2 N   -200 6 -6 Guthrie & Barnes Hedley & Hedley
9 5 3H+1 N   170 12 -12 Davies & Gisborne Hyett & Wolfarth
10 4 4Sx= W   -790 -8 8 Porch & Cherry Davis & Pearce
15 20 4Sx= E   -790 -8 8 Squibb & Hall Procter & Sanis
17 18 4Sx= W   -790 -8 8 Teshome & Jagger Auchterlonie & Nelson
19 16 4Sx= W   -790 -8 8 Garthwaite & Hobson Littlewood & Musson
21 14 4Sx= W   -790 -8 8 Hogg & Kelly Capal & Semp
22 7 5H-3 N   -300 4 -4 Solomon & Solomon Willans & Draper
Board 27 NS Datum=0
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 13 2S-2 S   -100 -3 3 Pike & Barton Scerri & Palmer
2 12 2S= S   110 3 -3 Pike & Waxman Blakey & Blakey
3 11 2S= S   110 3 -3 Keable & Keable Crofts & Lucioni
6 8 2S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Guthrie & Barnes Hedley & Hedley
9 5 3S-3 S   -150 -4 4 Davies & Gisborne Hyett & Wolfarth
10 4 2S= S   110 3 -3 Porch & Cherry Davis & Pearce
15 20 2S= S   110 3 -3 Squibb & Hall Procter & Sanis
17 18 2S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Teshome & Jagger Auchterlonie & Nelson
19 16 2H-1 S   -50 -2 2 Garthwaite & Hobson Littlewood & Musson
21 14 4H-4 N   -200 -5 5 Hogg & Kelly Capal & Semp
22 7 2S= S   110 3 -3 Solomon & Solomon Willans & Draper
Board 28 NS Datum=-50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 13 1NT= W   -90 -1 1 Pike & Barton Scerri & Palmer
2 12 1NT= W   -90 -1 1 Pike & Waxman Blakey & Blakey
3 11 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Keable & Keable Crofts & Lucioni
6 8 2H+1 S   140 5 -5 Guthrie & Barnes Hedley & Hedley
9 5 2H-1 S   -100 -2 2 Davies & Gisborne Hyett & Wolfarth
10 4 1NT+1 W   -120 -2 2 Porch & Cherry Davis & Pearce
15 20 1NT= W   -90 -1 1 Squibb & Hall Procter & Sanis
17 18 2D-1 W   50 3 -3 Teshome & Jagger Auchterlonie & Nelson
19 16 1NT= W   -90 -1 1 Garthwaite & Hobson Littlewood & Musson
21 14 2H+1 S   140 5 -5 Hogg & Kelly Capal & Semp
22 7 1NT= W   -90 -1 1 Solomon & Solomon Willans & Draper
Assigned Scores:
Board 17 NS17 EW14 40% Score = 400 to Both 60% Score = -50 to Both