E B U Life Masters 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 2 Section Purple
Board 1 NS Datum=-240
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 4S+1 W   -450 -5 5 Palmer & Coubrough Fleet & Cooper
2 3 2S+4 W   -230 0 0 Pollack & Gronau Brito & Reader
3 5 4S+1 W   -450 -5 5 Lanham & Turpin Duddell & Duddell
4 7 4S= W   -420 -5 5 Lee & Kaban Town & Hrarcus
5 2 4S-1 W   50 7 -7 Millard & Millard Nicholson & Kazmierczak
6 4 6C-1 E   50 7 -7 Hodgson & Bannister Watson & Lapzys
7 6 4S= W   -420 -5 5 Condon & Wilmot Walsh & Gardiner
Board 2 NS Datum=480
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 3NT+1 S   630 4 -4 Palmer & Coubrough Fleet & Cooper
2 3 6NT-1 S   -100 -11 11 Pollack & Gronau Brito & Reader
3 5 3C+1 N   130 -8 8 Lanham & Turpin Duddell & Duddell
4 7 3NT= S   600 3 -3 Lee & Kaban Town & Hrarcus
5 2 3NT+1 N   630 4 -4 Millard & Millard Nicholson & Kazmierczak
6 4 3NT= N   600 3 -3 Hodgson & Bannister Watson & Lapzys
7 6 6NT-1 S   -100 -11 11 Condon & Wilmot Walsh & Gardiner
Board 3 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 4C-1 S   -50 -2 2 Palmer & Coubrough Fleet & Cooper
2 3 2H-1 E   100 2 -2 Pollack & Gronau Brito & Reader
3 5 1D+1 N   90 2 -2 Lanham & Turpin Duddell & Duddell
4 7 1NT= N   90 2 -2 Lee & Kaban Town & Hrarcus
5 2 3D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Millard & Millard Nicholson & Kazmierczak
6 4 2D+1 N   110 2 -2 Hodgson & Bannister Watson & Lapzys
7 6 2D+1 N   110 2 -2 Condon & Wilmot Walsh & Gardiner
Board 4 NS Datum=-1400
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 6D= W   -1370 1 -1 Palmer & Coubrough Fleet & Cooper
2 3 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Pollack & Gronau Brito & Reader
3 5 6NT+1 E   -1470 -2 2 Lanham & Turpin Duddell & Duddell
4 7 6C= W   -1370 1 -1 Lee & Kaban Town & Hrarcus
5 2 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Millard & Millard Nicholson & Kazmierczak
6 4 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Hodgson & Bannister Watson & Lapzys
7 6 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Condon & Wilmot Walsh & Gardiner
Board 5 NS Datum=-820
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3NT+3 W   -490 8 -8 Palmer & Coubrough Town & Hrarcus
2 2 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Pollack & Gronau Nicholson & Kazmierczak
3 4 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Lanham & Turpin Watson & Lapzys
4 6 6D= E   -920 -3 3 Lee & Kaban Walsh & Gardiner
5 1 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Millard & Millard Fleet & Cooper
6 3 3NT+4 W   -520 7 -7 Hodgson & Bannister Brito & Reader
7 5 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Condon & Wilmot Duddell & Duddell
Board 6 NS Datum=-710
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4S= E   -620 3 -3 Palmer & Coubrough Town & Hrarcus
2 2 5Cx-5 S   -1100 -9 9 Pollack & Gronau Nicholson & Kazmierczak
3 4 4S= E   -620 3 -3 Lanham & Turpin Watson & Lapzys
4 6 4S-2 E   200 14 -14 Lee & Kaban Walsh & Gardiner
5 1 3NT+1 E   -630 2 -2 Millard & Millard Fleet & Cooper
6 3 5Cx-5 S   -1100 -9 9 Hodgson & Bannister Brito & Reader
7 5 5Dx-6 N   -1400 -12 12 Condon & Wilmot Duddell & Duddell
Board 7 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4S+2 E   -680 -1 1 Palmer & Coubrough Town & Hrarcus
2 2 4S+1 E   -650 0 0 Pollack & Gronau Nicholson & Kazmierczak
3 4 4Sx+1 E   -990 -8 8 Lanham & Turpin Watson & Lapzys
4 6 4S= E   -620 1 -1 Lee & Kaban Walsh & Gardiner
5 1 4S= E   -620 1 -1 Millard & Millard Fleet & Cooper
6 3 6Sx-1 E   200 13 -13 Hodgson & Bannister Brito & Reader
7 5 4S= W   -620 1 -1 Condon & Wilmot Duddell & Duddell
Board 8 NS Datum=530
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 5S= N   450 -2 2 Palmer & Coubrough Town & Hrarcus
2 2 5S+1 S   480 -2 2 Pollack & Gronau Nicholson & Kazmierczak
3 4 6S= N   980 10 -10 Lanham & Turpin Watson & Lapzys
4 6 5S+1 N   480 -2 2 Lee & Kaban Walsh & Gardiner
5 1 5S+1 N   480 -2 2 Millard & Millard Fleet & Cooper
6 3 5S+1 N   480 -2 2 Hodgson & Bannister Brito & Reader
7 5 5S+1 N   480 -2 2 Condon & Wilmot Duddell & Duddell
Board 9 NS Datum=-30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 3NT-2 S   -100 -2 2 Palmer & Coubrough Walsh & Gardiner
2 1 3H-2 W   200 6 -6 Pollack & Gronau Fleet & Cooper
3 3 2S-1 S   -50 -1 1 Lanham & Turpin Brito & Reader
4 5 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Lee & Kaban Duddell & Duddell
5 7 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Millard & Millard Town & Hrarcus
6 2 3H-4 W   400 10 -10 Hodgson & Bannister Nicholson & Kazmierczak
7 4 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Condon & Wilmot Watson & Lapzys
Board 10 NS Datum=-620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Palmer & Coubrough Walsh & Gardiner
2 1 3NT+3 W   -690 -2 2 Pollack & Gronau Fleet & Cooper
3 3 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Lanham & Turpin Brito & Reader
4 5 3NT-1 W   100 12 -12 Lee & Kaban Duddell & Duddell
5 7 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Millard & Millard Town & Hrarcus
6 2 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Hodgson & Bannister Nicholson & Kazmierczak
7 4 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Condon & Wilmot Watson & Lapzys
Board 11 NS Datum=-40
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 2S-2 N   -100 -2 2 Palmer & Coubrough Walsh & Gardiner
2 1 2S-2 E   100 4 -4 Pollack & Gronau Fleet & Cooper
3 3 3S-3 E   150 5 -5 Lanham & Turpin Brito & Reader
4 5 1NT= S   90 4 -4 Lee & Kaban Duddell & Duddell
5 7 3D-1 S   -50 0 0 Millard & Millard Town & Hrarcus
6 2 4H= E   -420 -9 9 Hodgson & Bannister Nicholson & Kazmierczak
7 4 3NT-2 E   100 4 -4 Condon & Wilmot Watson & Lapzys
Board 12 NS Datum=-350
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Palmer & Coubrough Walsh & Gardiner
2 1 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Pollack & Gronau Fleet & Cooper
3 3 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Lanham & Turpin Brito & Reader
4 5 3NT-1 W   50 9 -9 Lee & Kaban Duddell & Duddell
5 7 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Millard & Millard Town & Hrarcus
6 2 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Hodgson & Bannister Nicholson & Kazmierczak
7 4 3NT-3 E   150 11 -11 Condon & Wilmot Watson & Lapzys
Board 13 NS Datum=-380
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 4H= W   -620 -6 6 Palmer & Coubrough Duddell & Duddell
2 7 4S= E   -620 -6 6 Pollack & Gronau Town & Hrarcus
3 2 4S-1 E   100 10 -10 Lanham & Turpin Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4 4 4H= W   -620 -6 6 Lee & Kaban Watson & Lapzys
5 6 4H= W   -620 -6 6 Millard & Millard Walsh & Gardiner
6 1 4H= W   -620 -6 6 Hodgson & Bannister Fleet & Cooper
7 3 4S-1 E   100 10 -10 Condon & Wilmot Brito & Reader
Board 14 NS Datum=540
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Palmer & Coubrough Duddell & Duddell
2 7 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Pollack & Gronau Town & Hrarcus
3 2 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Lanham & Turpin Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4 4 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Lee & Kaban Watson & Lapzys
5 6 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Millard & Millard Walsh & Gardiner
6 1 6S= S   980 10 -10 Hodgson & Bannister Fleet & Cooper
7 3 6S= S   980 10 -10 Condon & Wilmot Brito & Reader
Board 15 NS Datum=-430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 2H+3 W   -200 6 -6 Palmer & Coubrough Duddell & Duddell
2 7 3NT= E   -400 1 -1 Pollack & Gronau Town & Hrarcus
3 2 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Lanham & Turpin Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4 4 3NT+2 E   -460 -1 1 Lee & Kaban Watson & Lapzys
5 6 3NT+2 E   -460 -1 1 Millard & Millard Walsh & Gardiner
6 1 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Hodgson & Bannister Fleet & Cooper
7 3 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Condon & Wilmot Brito & Reader
Board 16 NS Datum=-250
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 4H-2 W   200 10 -10 Palmer & Coubrough Duddell & Duddell
2 7 3NT+1 E   -630 -9 9 Pollack & Gronau Town & Hrarcus
3 2 3NT= E   -600 -8 8 Lanham & Turpin Nicholson & Kazmierczak
4 4 3NT-1 W   100 8 -8 Lee & Kaban Watson & Lapzys
5 6 1NT+2 W   -150 3 -3 Millard & Millard Walsh & Gardiner
6 1 4H-1 W   100 8 -8 Hodgson & Bannister Fleet & Cooper
7 3 2S= E   -110 4 -4 Condon & Wilmot Brito & Reader
Board 17 NS Datum=0
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 1S-1 E   50 2 -2 Palmer & Coubrough Watson & Lapzys
2 6 2D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Pollack & Gronau Walsh & Gardiner
3 1 1Sx= E   -160 -4 4 Lanham & Turpin Fleet & Cooper
4 3 2D-2 W   100 3 -3 Lee & Kaban Brito & Reader
5 5 2S= E   -110 -3 3 Millard & Millard Duddell & Duddell
6 7 2S-2 E   100 3 -3 Hodgson & Bannister Town & Hrarcus
7 2 2H-2 N   -100 -3 3 Condon & Wilmot Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 18 NS Datum=430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Palmer & Coubrough Watson & Lapzys
2 6 6H= S   1430 14 -14 Pollack & Gronau Walsh & Gardiner
3 1 2Sx-6 E   1400 14 -14 Lanham & Turpin Fleet & Cooper
4 3 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Lee & Kaban Brito & Reader
5 5 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Millard & Millard Duddell & Duddell
6 7 3NT+2 S   660 6 -6 Hodgson & Bannister Town & Hrarcus
7 2 4C+2 N   170 -6 6 Condon & Wilmot Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 19 NS Datum=-10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Palmer & Coubrough Watson & Lapzys
2 6 1S+1 N   110 3 -3 Pollack & Gronau Walsh & Gardiner
3 1 3H= W   -140 -4 4 Lanham & Turpin Fleet & Cooper
4 3 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Lee & Kaban Brito & Reader
5 5 3H= W   -140 -4 4 Millard & Millard Duddell & Duddell
6 7 2S= N   110 3 -3 Hodgson & Bannister Town & Hrarcus
7 2 2S= N   110 3 -3 Condon & Wilmot Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 20 NS Datum=-70
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 3S-2 S   -200 -4 4 Palmer & Coubrough Watson & Lapzys
2 6 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Pollack & Gronau Walsh & Gardiner
3 1 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Lanham & Turpin Fleet & Cooper
4 3 1NT-1 E   100 5 -5 Lee & Kaban Brito & Reader
5 5 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Millard & Millard Duddell & Duddell
6 7 2D= E   -90 -1 1 Hodgson & Bannister Town & Hrarcus
7 2 1NT+1 E   -120 -2 2 Condon & Wilmot Nicholson & Kazmierczak
Board 21 NS Datum=50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 2H-1 W   50 0 0 Palmer & Coubrough Brito & Reader
2 5 2H-1 E   50 0 0 Pollack & Gronau Duddell & Duddell
3 7 1NT-3 W   150 3 -3 Lanham & Turpin Town & Hrarcus
4 2 2H-1 W   50 0 0 Lee & Kaban Nicholson & Kazmierczak
5 4 1NT-2 E   100 2 -2 Millard & Millard Watson & Lapzys
6 6 1NT-2 W   100 2 -2 Hodgson & Bannister Walsh & Gardiner
7 1 3H-2 E   100 2 -2 Condon & Wilmot Fleet & Cooper
Board 22 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Palmer & Coubrough Brito & Reader
2 5 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Pollack & Gronau Duddell & Duddell
3 7 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Lanham & Turpin Town & Hrarcus
4 2 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Lee & Kaban Nicholson & Kazmierczak
5 4 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Millard & Millard Watson & Lapzys
6 6 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Hodgson & Bannister Walsh & Gardiner
7 1 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Condon & Wilmot Fleet & Cooper
Board 23 NS Datum=-160
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3H= E   -140 1 -1 Palmer & Coubrough Brito & Reader
2 5 3H= E   -140 1 -1 Pollack & Gronau Duddell & Duddell
3 7 3H+1 E   -170 0 0 Lanham & Turpin Town & Hrarcus
4 2 3D-2 N   -200 -1 1 Lee & Kaban Nicholson & Kazmierczak
5 4 3H+1 E   -170 0 0 Millard & Millard Watson & Lapzys
6 6 2H+1 E   -140 1 -1 Hodgson & Bannister Walsh & Gardiner
7 1 4D-3 N   -300 -4 4 Condon & Wilmot Fleet & Cooper
Board 24 NS Datum=430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 4H= S   420 0 0 Palmer & Coubrough Brito & Reader
2 5 4H= S   420 0 0 Pollack & Gronau Duddell & Duddell
3 7 4H+1 S   450 1 -1 Lanham & Turpin Town & Hrarcus
4 2 4H= S   420 0 0 Lee & Kaban Nicholson & Kazmierczak
5 4 4H= S   420 0 0 Millard & Millard Watson & Lapzys
6 6 4H+1 S   450 1 -1 Hodgson & Bannister Walsh & Gardiner
7 1 4H= S   420 0 0 Condon & Wilmot Fleet & Cooper
Board 25 NS Datum=-540
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 3S+2 E   -200 8 -8 Palmer & Coubrough Nicholson & Kazmierczak
2 4 4S+1 W   -650 -3 3 Pollack & Gronau Watson & Lapzys
3 6 4S= E   -620 -2 2 Lanham & Turpin Walsh & Gardiner
4 1 4S+1 E   -650 -3 3 Lee & Kaban Fleet & Cooper
5 3 4S+1 E   -650 -3 3 Millard & Millard Brito & Reader
6 5 4S= E   -620 -2 2 Hodgson & Bannister Duddell & Duddell
7 7 3NT+1 W   -630 -3 3 Condon & Wilmot Town & Hrarcus
Board 26 NS Datum=-300
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 3D= E   -110 5 -5 Palmer & Coubrough Nicholson & Kazmierczak
2 4 2D+3 E   -150 4 -4 Pollack & Gronau Watson & Lapzys
3 6 3H-1 N   -100 5 -5 Lanham & Turpin Walsh & Gardiner
4 1 4S= W   -620 -8 8 Lee & Kaban Fleet & Cooper
5 3 4S= W   -620 -8 8 Millard & Millard Brito & Reader
6 5 2D+2 E   -130 5 -5 Hodgson & Bannister Duddell & Duddell
7 7 4S+1 W   -650 -8 8 Condon & Wilmot Town & Hrarcus
Board 27 NS Datum=50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 4C-2 N   -100 -4 4 Palmer & Coubrough Nicholson & Kazmierczak
2 4 4C-1 N   -50 -3 3 Pollack & Gronau Watson & Lapzys
3 6 3NT-1 S   -50 -3 3 Lanham & Turpin Walsh & Gardiner
4 1 3NT-1 S   -50 -3 3 Lee & Kaban Fleet & Cooper
5 3 3S-1 W   50 0 0 Millard & Millard Brito & Reader
6 5 3S-2 W   100 2 -2 Hodgson & Bannister Duddell & Duddell
7 7 3C= N   110 2 -2 Condon & Wilmot Town & Hrarcus
Board 28 NS Datum=-150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 2 4S-1 N   -100 2 -2 Palmer & Coubrough Nicholson & Kazmierczak
2 4 5S-3 N   -300 -4 4 Pollack & Gronau Watson & Lapzys
3 6 6Hx-2 W   300 10 -10 Lanham & Turpin Walsh & Gardiner
4 1 4S-1 N   -100 2 -2 Lee & Kaban Fleet & Cooper
5 3 5S-2 N   -200 -2 2 Millard & Millard Brito & Reader
6 5 4H= W   -420 -7 7 Hodgson & Bannister Duddell & Duddell
7 7 5H-1 E   50 5 -5 Condon & Wilmot Town & Hrarcus
Session 2 Section Orange Howell
Board 1 NS Datum=-240
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 4S-1 W   50 7 -7 Turnham & Wiles Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 6 5C= E   -400 -4 4 Hunt & Featherman Gold & Green
5 7 3NT-2 E   100 8 -8 Webb & Webb Downing & Johnstone
8 4 5C= E   -400 -4 4 Oddie & Robberts Curtis & Seaver
Board 2 NS Datum=480
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 3NT= S   600 3 -3 Turnham & Wiles Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 6 3NT+1 S   630 4 -4 Hunt & Featherman Gold & Green
5 7 3NT= S   600 3 -3 Webb & Webb Downing & Johnstone
8 4 3NT+2 S   660 5 -5 Oddie & Robberts Curtis & Seaver
Board 3 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 3NT-2 N   -100 -4 4 Turnham & Wiles Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 6 3D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Hunt & Featherman Gold & Green
5 7 3D= N   110 2 -2 Webb & Webb Downing & Johnstone
8 4 3NT-1 N   -50 -2 2 Oddie & Robberts Curtis & Seaver
Board 4 NS Datum=-1400
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 1 6C= W   -1370 1 -1 Turnham & Wiles Mcdonald & Caldwell
3 6 3NT+3 E   -690 12 -12 Hunt & Featherman Gold & Green
5 7 6D+1 W   -1390 0 0 Webb & Webb Downing & Johnstone
8 4 6C= W   -1370 1 -1 Oddie & Robberts Curtis & Seaver
Board 5 NS Datum=-820
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Hunt & Featherman Turnham & Wiles
4 7 3NT+4 W   -520 7 -7 Curtis & Seaver Downing & Johnstone
6 1 3NT+3 E   -490 8 -8 Gold & Green Mcdonald & Caldwell
8 5 6NT= W   -990 -5 5 Oddie & Robberts Webb & Webb
Board 6 NS Datum=-710
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 3NT+2 E   -660 2 -2 Hunt & Featherman Turnham & Wiles
4 7 4S-3 W   300 14 -14 Curtis & Seaver Downing & Johnstone
6 1 4Hx-6 N   -1400 -12 12 Gold & Green Mcdonald & Caldwell
8 5 4Cx-3 S   -500 5 -5 Oddie & Robberts Webb & Webb
Board 7 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 4S+1 E   -650 0 0 Hunt & Featherman Turnham & Wiles
4 7 4S+1 W   -650 0 0 Curtis & Seaver Downing & Johnstone
6 1 5Hx-2 N   -500 4 -4 Gold & Green Mcdonald & Caldwell
8 5 4Sx+1 W   -990 -8 8 Oddie & Robberts Webb & Webb
Board 8 NS Datum=530
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 2 5S+1 N   480 -2 2 Hunt & Featherman Turnham & Wiles
4 7 6Dx-3 E   500 -1 1 Curtis & Seaver Downing & Johnstone
6 1 5Dx-2 E   300 -6 6 Gold & Green Mcdonald & Caldwell
8 5 6S= N   980 10 -10 Oddie & Robberts Webb & Webb
Board 9 NS Datum=-30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Curtis & Seaver Hunt & Featherman
5 1 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Webb & Webb Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 2 2NT= E   -120 -3 3 Downing & Johnstone Turnham & Wiles
8 6 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Oddie & Robberts Gold & Green
Board 10 NS Datum=-620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Curtis & Seaver Hunt & Featherman
5 1 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Webb & Webb Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 2 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Downing & Johnstone Turnham & Wiles
8 6 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Oddie & Robberts Gold & Green
Board 11 NS Datum=-40
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 4H+1 W   -450 -9 9 Curtis & Seaver Hunt & Featherman
5 1 3S-2 E   100 4 -4 Webb & Webb Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 2 3C= W   -110 -2 2 Downing & Johnstone Turnham & Wiles
8 6 3D-1 S   -50 0 0 Oddie & Robberts Gold & Green
Board 12 NS Datum=-350
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 3 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Curtis & Seaver Hunt & Featherman
5 1 3NT+1 E   -430 -2 2 Webb & Webb Mcdonald & Caldwell
7 2 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Downing & Johnstone Turnham & Wiles
8 6 3NT= W   -400 -2 2 Oddie & Robberts Gold & Green
Board 13 NS Datum=-380
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 4H= W   -620 -6 6 Mcdonald & Caldwell Hunt & Featherman
5 4 3NT-1 E   100 10 -10 Webb & Webb Curtis & Seaver
6 2 4H= E   -620 -6 6 Gold & Green Turnham & Wiles
8 7 5S-1 E   100 10 -10 Oddie & Robberts Downing & Johnstone
Board 14 NS Datum=540
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Mcdonald & Caldwell Hunt & Featherman
5 4 5S+1 S   480 -2 2 Webb & Webb Curtis & Seaver
6 2 4S+2 N   480 -2 2 Gold & Green Turnham & Wiles
8 7 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Oddie & Robberts Downing & Johnstone
Board 15 NS Datum=-430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3NT+1 W   -430 0 0 Mcdonald & Caldwell Hunt & Featherman
5 4 3NT+2 E   -460 -1 1 Webb & Webb Curtis & Seaver
6 2 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Gold & Green Turnham & Wiles
8 7 3NT+1 W   -430 0 0 Oddie & Robberts Downing & Johnstone
Board 16 NS Datum=-250
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3NT= W   -600 -8 8 Mcdonald & Caldwell Hunt & Featherman
5 4 3NT-2 W   200 10 -10 Webb & Webb Curtis & Seaver
6 2 3NT= E   -600 -8 8 Gold & Green Turnham & Wiles
8 7 3NT= E   -600 -8 8 Oddie & Robberts Downing & Johnstone
Board 17 NS Datum=0
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 2S-1 E   50 2 -2 Turnham & Wiles Curtis & Seaver
6 5 2S-2 E   100 3 -3 Gold & Green Webb & Webb
7 3 2H-2 N   -100 -3 3 Downing & Johnstone Hunt & Featherman
8 1 1NT+1 S   120 3 -3 Oddie & Robberts Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 18 NS Datum=430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Turnham & Wiles Curtis & Seaver
6 5 6H-2 N   -200 -12 12 Gold & Green Webb & Webb
7 3 6H= S   1430 14 -14 Downing & Johnstone Hunt & Featherman
8 1 4S= S   620 5 -5 Oddie & Robberts Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 19 NS Datum=-10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Turnham & Wiles Curtis & Seaver
6 5 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Gold & Green Webb & Webb
7 3 4H-2 W   200 5 -5 Downing & Johnstone Hunt & Featherman
8 1 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Oddie & Robberts Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 20 NS Datum=-70
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Turnham & Wiles Curtis & Seaver
6 5 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Gold & Green Webb & Webb
7 3 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Downing & Johnstone Hunt & Featherman
8 1 1NT-1 E   100 5 -5 Oddie & Robberts Mcdonald & Caldwell
Board 21 NS Datum=50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2H+1 W   -140 -5 5 Mcdonald & Caldwell Curtis & Seaver
3 5 2H-1 W   50 0 0 Hunt & Featherman Webb & Webb
7 6 3C-2 S   -200 -6 6 Downing & Johnstone Gold & Green
8 2 2H-1 W   50 0 0 Oddie & Robberts Turnham & Wiles
Board 22 NS Datum=-660
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Mcdonald & Caldwell Curtis & Seaver
3 5 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Hunt & Featherman Webb & Webb
7 6 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Downing & Johnstone Gold & Green
8 2 4H-2 E   200 13 -13 Oddie & Robberts Turnham & Wiles
Board 23 NS Datum=-160
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 2D-1 N   -100 2 -2 Mcdonald & Caldwell Curtis & Seaver
3 5 4D-2 N   -200 -1 1 Hunt & Featherman Webb & Webb
7 6 3D-2 N   -200 -1 1 Downing & Johnstone Gold & Green
8 2 1NT= W   -90 2 -2 Oddie & Robberts Turnham & Wiles
Board 24 NS Datum=430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 4 4H= S   420 0 0 Mcdonald & Caldwell Curtis & Seaver
3 5 4H= S   420 0 0 Hunt & Featherman Webb & Webb
7 6 4H= S   420 0 0 Downing & Johnstone Gold & Green
8 2 4H+1 S   450 1 -1 Oddie & Robberts Turnham & Wiles
Board 25 NS Datum=-540
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4S+1 E   -650 -3 3 Mcdonald & Caldwell Downing & Johnstone
2 5 4S+1 E   -650 -3 3 Turnham & Wiles Webb & Webb
4 6 2S+3 E   -200 8 -8 Curtis & Seaver Gold & Green
8 3 2S+2 E   -170 9 -9 Oddie & Robberts Hunt & Featherman
Board 26 NS Datum=-300
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4S+1 W   -650 -8 8 Mcdonald & Caldwell Downing & Johnstone
2 5 4C= S   130 10 -10 Turnham & Wiles Webb & Webb
4 6 3D+2 E   -150 4 -4 Curtis & Seaver Gold & Green
8 3 3D+1 E   -130 5 -5 Oddie & Robberts Hunt & Featherman
Board 27 NS Datum=50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 3C+1 N   130 2 -2 Mcdonald & Caldwell Downing & Johnstone
2 5 3C= N   110 2 -2 Turnham & Wiles Webb & Webb
4 6 3C= N   110 2 -2 Curtis & Seaver Gold & Green
8 3 3NT+1 S   430 9 -9 Oddie & Robberts Hunt & Featherman
Board 28 NS Datum=-150
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 5Sx-2 N   -500 -8 8 Mcdonald & Caldwell Downing & Johnstone
2 5 5H-1 W   50 5 -5 Turnham & Wiles Webb & Webb
4 6 4H= W   -420 -7 7 Curtis & Seaver Gold & Green
8 3 5Hx-1 W   100 6 -6 Oddie & Robberts Hunt & Featherman