English Bridge Union National Masters 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 2 Section Green
Board 1 NS Datum=-250
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 5C= E   -400 -4 4 Foster & Prior Hoffman & Hoffman
9 8 3C+2 E   -150 3 -3 Downing & Stretch Abisch & De Mercur
8 6 4S+2 W   -480 -6 6 Rowe & Peters Foster & Liebeschuetz
7 4 4S= W   -420 -5 5 Smith & Willis Goldman & Wernick
6 2 4S= E   -420 -5 5 Feldman & Murray Hillyard & Smith
5 9 4S+1 W   -450 -5 5 Ottley & Radford Taylor & Taylor
4 7 4S-2 W   100 8 -8 Howarth & Howarth Griffiths & Pryor
3 5 4H-3 W   150 9 -9 Gold & Sharff Boss & Johnson
2 3 3S+3 W   -230 1 -1 Lee & Poole Bainbridge & Larkin
Board 2 NS Datum=520
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 3NT+1 N   630 3 -3 Foster & Prior Hoffman & Hoffman
9 8 4NT+1 S   660 4 -4 Downing & Stretch Abisch & De Mercur
8 6 3NT+2 S   660 4 -4 Rowe & Peters Foster & Liebeschuetz
7 4 3NT= N   600 2 -2 Smith & Willis Goldman & Wernick
6 2 6D-1 S   -100 -12 12 Feldman & Murray Hillyard & Smith
5 9 4NT-1 N   -100 -12 12 Ottley & Radford Taylor & Taylor
4 7 3NT+1 S   630 3 -3 Howarth & Howarth Griffiths & Pryor
3 5 4NT+1 S   660 4 -4 Gold & Sharff Boss & Johnson
2 3 3NT+1 S   630 3 -3 Lee & Poole Bainbridge & Larkin
Board 3 NS Datum=10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 1 1NTx-1 W   200 5 -5 Foster & Prior Hoffman & Hoffman
9 8 3C+1 N   130 3 -3 Downing & Stretch Abisch & De Mercur
8 6 3D= N   110 3 -3 Rowe & Peters Foster & Liebeschuetz
7 4 3D= N   110 3 -3 Smith & Willis Goldman & Wernick
6 2 5Cx-2 S   -300 -7 7 Feldman & Murray Hillyard & Smith
5 9 4D-2 N   -100 -3 3 Ottley & Radford Taylor & Taylor
4 7 3D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Howarth & Howarth Griffiths & Pryor
3 5 3D-1 N   -50 -2 2 Gold & Sharff Boss & Johnson
2 3 3D= N   110 3 -3 Lee & Poole Bainbridge & Larkin
Board 4 NS Datum=-1410
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 2 6NT+1 E   -1470 -2 2 Lee & Poole Hillyard & Smith
1 9 6NT+1 E   -1470 -2 2 Foster & Prior Taylor & Taylor
9 7 6C= W   -1370 1 -1 Downing & Stretch Griffiths & Pryor
8 5 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Rowe & Peters Boss & Johnson
7 3 6C= W   -1370 1 -1 Smith & Willis Bainbridge & Larkin
6 1 6D= W   -1370 1 -1 Feldman & Murray Hoffman & Hoffman
5 8 6C= W   -1370 1 -1 Ottley & Radford Abisch & De Mercur
4 6 6NT+1 E   -1470 -2 2 Howarth & Howarth Foster & Liebeschuetz
3 4 6C+1 W   -1390 1 -1 Gold & Sharff Goldman & Wernick
Board 5 NS Datum=-770
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 2 6NT= W   -990 -6 6 Lee & Poole Hillyard & Smith
1 9 6NT= W   -990 -6 6 Foster & Prior Taylor & Taylor
9 7 3NT+4 W   -520 6 -6 Downing & Stretch Griffiths & Pryor
8 5 4H+2 E   -480 7 -7 Rowe & Peters Boss & Johnson
7 3 6NT= W   -990 -6 6 Smith & Willis Bainbridge & Larkin
6 1 3NT+3 W   -490 7 -7 Feldman & Murray Hoffman & Hoffman
5 8 6NT+1 W   -1020 -6 6 Ottley & Radford Abisch & De Mercur
4 6 6D= E   -920 -4 4 Howarth & Howarth Foster & Liebeschuetz
3 4 7NTx-1 W   100 13 -13 Gold & Sharff Goldman & Wernick
Board 6 NS Datum=-330
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 2 4Dx-5 N   -1100 -13 13 Lee & Poole Hillyard & Smith
1 9 4S-2 E   200 11 -11 Foster & Prior Taylor & Taylor
9 7 4S-1 E   100 10 -10 Downing & Stretch Griffiths & Pryor
8 5 4S+1 E   -650 -8 8 Rowe & Peters Boss & Johnson
7 3 4S-2 E   200 11 -11 Smith & Willis Bainbridge & Larkin
6 1 4S= E   -620 -7 7 Feldman & Murray Hoffman & Hoffman
5 8 3NT-2 E   200 11 -11 Ottley & Radford Abisch & De Mercur
4 6 3NT= E   -600 -7 7 Howarth & Howarth Foster & Liebeschuetz
3 4 4Cx-4 S   -800 -10 10 Gold & Sharff Goldman & Wernick
Board 7 NS Datum=-460
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 3 5Hx-2 S   -500 -1 1 Gold & Sharff Bainbridge & Larkin
2 1 5S-1 E   100 11 -11 Lee & Poole Hoffman & Hoffman
1 8 4H-1 S   -100 8 -8 Foster & Prior Abisch & De Mercur
9 6 6S-1 W   100 11 -11 Downing & Stretch Foster & Liebeschuetz
8 4 4S+1 W   -650 -5 5 Rowe & Peters Goldman & Wernick
7 2 4Sx+1 W   -990 -11 11 Smith & Willis Hillyard & Smith
6 9 4S= E   -620 -4 4 Feldman & Murray Taylor & Taylor
5 7 4S= W   -620 -4 4 Ottley & Radford Griffiths & Pryor
4 5 4S+1 E   -650 -5 5 Howarth & Howarth Boss & Johnson
Board 8 NS Datum=440
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 3 5S+1 N   480 1 -1 Gold & Sharff Bainbridge & Larkin
2 1 5S= N   450 0 0 Lee & Poole Hoffman & Hoffman
1 8 6H-1 S   -50 -10 10 Foster & Prior Abisch & De Mercur
9 6 6D-4 E   200 -6 6 Downing & Stretch Foster & Liebeschuetz
8 4 4S+2 N   480 1 -1 Rowe & Peters Goldman & Wernick
7 2 5S+1 N   480 1 -1 Smith & Willis Hillyard & Smith
6 9 4S+2 N   480 1 -1 Feldman & Murray Taylor & Taylor
5 7 5S+1 N   480 1 -1 Ottley & Radford Griffiths & Pryor
4 5 5Dx-2 W   300 -4 4 Howarth & Howarth Boss & Johnson
Board 9 NS Datum=0
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 3 2S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Gold & Sharff Bainbridge & Larkin
2 1 2Sx-1 N   -100 -3 3 Lee & Poole Hoffman & Hoffman
1 8 3NT-1 E   100 3 -3 Foster & Prior Abisch & De Mercur
9 6 PASS N   0 0 0 Downing & Stretch Foster & Liebeschuetz
8 4 2S-1 N   -50 -2 2 Rowe & Peters Goldman & Wernick
7 2 3NT-2 E   200 5 -5 Smith & Willis Hillyard & Smith
6 9 3NT-2 E   200 5 -5 Feldman & Murray Taylor & Taylor
5 7 2S-1 N   -50 -2 2 Ottley & Radford Griffiths & Pryor
4 5 1NT+1 E   -120 -3 3 Howarth & Howarth Boss & Johnson
Board 10 NS Datum=-620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 4 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Howarth & Howarth Goldman & Wernick
3 2 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Gold & Sharff Hillyard & Smith
2 9 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Lee & Poole Taylor & Taylor
1 7 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Foster & Prior Griffiths & Pryor
9 5 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Downing & Stretch Boss & Johnson
8 3 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Rowe & Peters Bainbridge & Larkin
7 1 3NT+2 W   -660 -1 1 Smith & Willis Hoffman & Hoffman
6 8 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Feldman & Murray Abisch & De Mercur
5 6 3NT+2 W   -660 -1 1 Ottley & Radford Foster & Liebeschuetz
Board 11 NS Datum=50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 4 4S-4 E   200 4 -4 Howarth & Howarth Goldman & Wernick
3 2 3NT-2 E   100 2 -2 Gold & Sharff Hillyard & Smith
2 9 2S= N   110 2 -2 Lee & Poole Taylor & Taylor
1 7 3D-2 S   -100 -4 4 Foster & Prior Griffiths & Pryor
9 5 3NT-1 E   50 0 0 Downing & Stretch Boss & Johnson
8 3 3H-1 E   50 0 0 Rowe & Peters Bainbridge & Larkin
7 1 3S-2 E   100 2 -2 Smith & Willis Hoffman & Hoffman
6 8 3S-2 E   100 2 -2 Feldman & Murray Abisch & De Mercur
5 6 3D-2 S   -100 -4 4 Ottley & Radford Foster & Liebeschuetz
Board 12 NS Datum=-430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 4 3NT+1 W   -430 0 0 Howarth & Howarth Goldman & Wernick
3 2 2Sx-4 S   -1100 -12 12 Gold & Sharff Hillyard & Smith
2 9 3NT+1 W   -430 0 0 Lee & Poole Taylor & Taylor
1 7 3NT+1 W   -430 0 0 Foster & Prior Griffiths & Pryor
9 5 3NT+2 W   -460 -1 1 Downing & Stretch Boss & Johnson
8 3 3NT= E   -400 1 -1 Rowe & Peters Bainbridge & Larkin
7 1 3NT= W   -400 1 -1 Smith & Willis Hoffman & Hoffman
6 8 3NT= W   -400 1 -1 Feldman & Murray Abisch & De Mercur
5 6 3NT+2 W   -460 -1 1 Ottley & Radford Foster & Liebeschuetz
Board 13 NS Datum=-460
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 5 4S= E   -620 -4 4 Ottley & Radford Boss & Johnson
4 3 4H= W   -620 -4 4 Howarth & Howarth Bainbridge & Larkin
3 1 4H= W   -620 -4 4 Gold & Sharff Hoffman & Hoffman
2 8 4H= W   -620 -4 4 Lee & Poole Abisch & De Mercur
1 6 3S= E   -140 8 -8 Foster & Prior Foster & Liebeschuetz
9 4 4H-1 W   100 11 -11 Downing & Stretch Goldman & Wernick
8 2 4S= E   -620 -4 4 Rowe & Peters Hillyard & Smith
7 9 4S= E   -620 -4 4 Smith & Willis Taylor & Taylor
6 7 4H-1 W   100 11 -11 Feldman & Murray Griffiths & Pryor
Board 14 NS Datum=560
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 5 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Ottley & Radford Boss & Johnson
4 3 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Howarth & Howarth Bainbridge & Larkin
3 1 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Gold & Sharff Hoffman & Hoffman
2 8 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Lee & Poole Abisch & De Mercur
1 6 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Foster & Prior Foster & Liebeschuetz
9 4 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Downing & Stretch Goldman & Wernick
8 2 6S= S   980 9 -9 Rowe & Peters Hillyard & Smith
7 9 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Smith & Willis Taylor & Taylor
6 7 2Dx-2 W   300 -6 6 Feldman & Murray Griffiths & Pryor
Board 15 NS Datum=-400
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 5 3NT+1 E   -430 -1 1 Ottley & Radford Boss & Johnson
4 3 3NT+1 W   -430 -1 1 Howarth & Howarth Bainbridge & Larkin
3 1 3NT+2 E   -460 -2 2 Gold & Sharff Hoffman & Hoffman
2 8 3NT+2 W   -460 -2 2 Lee & Poole Abisch & De Mercur
1 6 2Sx-3 N   -800 -9 9 Foster & Prior Foster & Liebeschuetz
9 4 1NT+3 E   -180 6 -6 Downing & Stretch Goldman & Wernick
8 2 3NT+2 E   -460 -2 2 Rowe & Peters Hillyard & Smith
7 9 3NT= W   -400 0 0 Smith & Willis Taylor & Taylor
6 7 1NT+4 E   -210 5 -5 Feldman & Murray Griffiths & Pryor
Board 16 NS Datum=-100
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
6 6 1NT+2 W   -150 -2 2 Feldman & Murray Foster & Liebeschuetz
5 4 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Ottley & Radford Goldman & Wernick
4 2 1NT+3 W   -180 -2 2 Howarth & Howarth Hillyard & Smith
3 9 4H= W   -620 -11 11 Gold & Sharff Taylor & Taylor
2 7 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Lee & Poole Griffiths & Pryor
1 5 3NT= E   -600 -11 11 Foster & Prior Boss & Johnson
9 3 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Downing & Stretch Bainbridge & Larkin
8 1 3NT= W   -600 -11 11 Rowe & Peters Hoffman & Hoffman
7 8 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Smith & Willis Abisch & De Mercur
Board 17 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
6 6 2NT-2 E   100 2 -2 Feldman & Murray Foster & Liebeschuetz
5 4 1H-1 N   -50 -2 2 Ottley & Radford Goldman & Wernick
4 2 2S-1 E   50 1 -1 Howarth & Howarth Hillyard & Smith
3 9 2S= E   -110 -4 4 Gold & Sharff Taylor & Taylor
2 7 2H-2 N   -100 -4 4 Lee & Poole Griffiths & Pryor
1 5 2D-2 W   100 2 -2 Foster & Prior Boss & Johnson
9 3 1Sx= E   -160 -5 5 Downing & Stretch Bainbridge & Larkin
8 1 3S-3 E   150 3 -3 Rowe & Peters Hoffman & Hoffman
7 8 2S-1 E   50 1 -1 Smith & Willis Abisch & De Mercur
Board 18 NS Datum=420
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
6 6 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Feldman & Murray Foster & Liebeschuetz
5 4 6C-2 N   -200 -12 12 Ottley & Radford Goldman & Wernick
4 2 2Sx-5 E   1100 12 -12 Howarth & Howarth Hillyard & Smith
3 9 3NT+3 S   690 7 -7 Gold & Sharff Taylor & Taylor
2 7 6H= S   1430 14 -14 Lee & Poole Griffiths & Pryor
1 5 2Sx-6 E   1400 14 -14 Foster & Prior Boss & Johnson
9 3 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Downing & Stretch Bainbridge & Larkin
8 1 6S-3 S   -300 -12 12 Rowe & Peters Hoffman & Hoffman
7 8 6H-2 N   -200 -12 12 Smith & Willis Abisch & De Mercur
Board 19 NS Datum=-30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
7 7 3H= W   -140 -3 3 Smith & Willis Griffiths & Pryor
6 5 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Feldman & Murray Boss & Johnson
5 3 2S= N   110 4 -4 Ottley & Radford Bainbridge & Larkin
4 1 3H= W   -140 -3 3 Howarth & Howarth Hoffman & Hoffman
3 8 3H= W   -140 -3 3 Gold & Sharff Abisch & De Mercur
2 6 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Lee & Poole Foster & Liebeschuetz
1 4 3H= W   -140 -3 3 Foster & Prior Goldman & Wernick
9 2 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Downing & Stretch Hillyard & Smith
8 9 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Rowe & Peters Taylor & Taylor
Board 20 NS Datum=-60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
7 7 1NT+1 E   -120 -2 2 Smith & Willis Griffiths & Pryor
6 5 1NT= W   -90 -1 1 Feldman & Murray Boss & Johnson
5 3 1NT-1 E   100 4 -4 Ottley & Radford Bainbridge & Larkin
4 1 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Howarth & Howarth Hoffman & Hoffman
3 8 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Gold & Sharff Abisch & De Mercur
2 6 1NT+1 E   -120 -2 2 Lee & Poole Foster & Liebeschuetz
1 4 2S= S   110 5 -5 Foster & Prior Goldman & Wernick
9 2 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Downing & Stretch Hillyard & Smith
8 9 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Rowe & Peters Taylor & Taylor
Board 21 NS Datum=-20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
7 7 2H-1 W   50 2 -2 Smith & Willis Griffiths & Pryor
6 5 2H-1 W   50 2 -2 Feldman & Murray Boss & Johnson
5 3 2H-1 W   50 2 -2 Ottley & Radford Bainbridge & Larkin
4 1 2H-1 W   50 2 -2 Howarth & Howarth Hoffman & Hoffman
3 8 2H-1 E   50 2 -2 Gold & Sharff Abisch & De Mercur
2 6 1NT-3 W   150 5 -5 Lee & Poole Foster & Liebeschuetz
1 4 2H= E   -110 -3 3 Foster & Prior Goldman & Wernick
9 2 2H= W   -110 -3 3 Downing & Stretch Hillyard & Smith
8 9 1H= E   -80 -2 2 Rowe & Peters Taylor & Taylor
Board 22 NS Datum=-650
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
8 8 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Rowe & Peters Abisch & De Mercur
7 6 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Smith & Willis Foster & Liebeschuetz
6 4 3NT+1 W   -630 1 -1 Feldman & Murray Goldman & Wernick
5 2 3NT+3 E   -690 -1 1 Ottley & Radford Hillyard & Smith
4 9 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Howarth & Howarth Taylor & Taylor
3 7 4H-1 E   100 13 -13 Gold & Sharff Griffiths & Pryor
2 5 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Lee & Poole Boss & Johnson
1 3 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Foster & Prior Bainbridge & Larkin
9 1 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Downing & Stretch Hoffman & Hoffman
Board 23 NS Datum=-140
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
8 8 2NT-1 S   -100 1 -1 Rowe & Peters Abisch & De Mercur
7 6 3D-1 N   -100 1 -1 Smith & Willis Foster & Liebeschuetz
6 4 3D-2 N   -200 -2 2 Feldman & Murray Goldman & Wernick
5 2 2NT-1 S   -100 1 -1 Ottley & Radford Hillyard & Smith
4 9 2NT-4 S   -400 -6 6 Howarth & Howarth Taylor & Taylor
3 7 4H-1 W   100 6 -6 Gold & Sharff Griffiths & Pryor
2 5 3D-2 N   -200 -2 2 Lee & Poole Boss & Johnson
1 3 1NT= W   -90 2 -2 Foster & Prior Bainbridge & Larkin
9 1 2NT-3 S   -300 -4 4 Downing & Stretch Hoffman & Hoffman
Board 24 NS Datum=430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
8 8 4H= S   420 0 0 Rowe & Peters Abisch & De Mercur
7 6 4Hx= S   590 4 -4 Smith & Willis Foster & Liebeschuetz
6 4 4H= S   420 0 0 Feldman & Murray Goldman & Wernick
5 2 4Hx= S   590 4 -4 Ottley & Radford Hillyard & Smith
4 9 4H= S   420 0 0 Howarth & Howarth Taylor & Taylor
3 7 2H+3 N   200 -6 6 Gold & Sharff Griffiths & Pryor
2 5 4H= S   420 0 0 Lee & Poole Boss & Johnson
1 3 4H= S   420 0 0 Foster & Prior Bainbridge & Larkin
9 1 4H= S   420 0 0 Downing & Stretch Hoffman & Hoffman
Board 25 NS Datum=-630
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
9 9 2S+2 E   -170 10 -10 Downing & Stretch Taylor & Taylor
8 7 4S+1 E   -650 -1 1 Rowe & Peters Griffiths & Pryor
7 5 4S= W   -620 0 0 Smith & Willis Boss & Johnson
6 3 4S= E   -620 0 0 Feldman & Murray Bainbridge & Larkin
5 1 4S+1 E   -650 -1 1 Ottley & Radford Hoffman & Hoffman
4 8 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Howarth & Howarth Abisch & De Mercur
3 6 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Gold & Sharff Foster & Liebeschuetz
2 4 5Dx-5 N   -1100 -10 10 Lee & Poole Goldman & Wernick
1 2 4S+1 E   -650 -1 1 Foster & Prior Hillyard & Smith
Board 26 NS Datum=-340
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
9 9 5D= E   -600 -6 6 Downing & Stretch Taylor & Taylor
8 7 4S+1 W   -650 -7 7 Rowe & Peters Griffiths & Pryor
7 5 4S+1 W   -650 -7 7 Smith & Willis Boss & Johnson
6 3 2D+3 E   -150 5 -5 Feldman & Murray Bainbridge & Larkin
5 1 3S+1 E   -170 5 -5 Ottley & Radford Hoffman & Hoffman
4 8 3D+1 E   -130 5 -5 Howarth & Howarth Abisch & De Mercur
3 6 4S+1 W   -650 -7 7 Gold & Sharff Foster & Liebeschuetz
2 4 4S+1 W   -650 -7 7 Lee & Poole Goldman & Wernick
1 2 3D+1 E   -130 5 -5 Foster & Prior Hillyard & Smith
Board 27 NS Datum=60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
9 9 3S-1 W   50 0 0 Downing & Stretch Taylor & Taylor
8 7 3S-1 W   50 0 0 Rowe & Peters Griffiths & Pryor
7 5 4C= N   130 2 -2 Smith & Willis Boss & Johnson
6 3 3C= N   110 2 -2 Feldman & Murray Bainbridge & Larkin
5 1 3C+1 N   130 2 -2 Ottley & Radford Hoffman & Hoffman
4 8 2S= W   -110 -5 5 Howarth & Howarth Abisch & De Mercur
3 6 3C-1 N   -50 -3 3 Gold & Sharff Foster & Liebeschuetz
2 4 2S= W   -110 -5 5 Lee & Poole Goldman & Wernick
1 2 3S-3 W   150 3 -3 Foster & Prior Hillyard & Smith
Session 2 Section Blue Howell
Board 1 NS Datum=-250
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 3C+2 E   -150 3 -3 Lang & Lang Clarke & White
5 1 3C+1 E   -130 3 -3 Moss & Moss Barker & Wing
3 9 4S-2 W   100 8 -8 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Doran & Thompson
10 8 4S= E   -420 -5 5 Gurney & Harden Lee & Paul
7 6 4S+1 W   -450 -5 5 Cambery & Courtney Love & Tapp
Board 2 NS Datum=520
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 6NT= S   1440 14 -14 Lang & Lang Clarke & White
5 1 3NT+2 S   660 4 -4 Moss & Moss Barker & Wing
3 9 3NT+2 S   660 4 -4 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Doran & Thompson
10 8 3NT= S   600 2 -2 Gurney & Harden Lee & Paul
7 6 6NT-1 S   -100 -12 12 Cambery & Courtney Love & Tapp
Board 3 NS Datum=10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 4 2H-1 E   100 3 -3 Lang & Lang Clarke & White
5 1 3D+3 N   170 4 -4 Moss & Moss Barker & Wing
3 9 1NT= W   -90 -3 3 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Doran & Thompson
10 8 1NTx= W   -180 -5 5 Gurney & Harden Lee & Paul
7 6 5C-2 S   -100 -3 3 Cambery & Courtney Love & Tapp
Board 4 NS Datum=-1410
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
8 7 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Lee & Paul Cambery & Courtney
3 5 6D+1 W   -1390 1 -1 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Moss & Moss
6 2 6C+1 W   -1390 1 -1 Love & Tapp Lang & Lang
4 1 6NT= E   -1440 -1 1 Clarke & White Barker & Wing
10 9 3NT+3 W   -690 12 -12 Gurney & Harden Doran & Thompson
Board 5 NS Datum=-770
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
8 7 6NT= W   -990 -6 6 Lee & Paul Cambery & Courtney
3 5 6NT= W   -990 -6 6 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Moss & Moss
6 2 6NT+1 W   -1020 -6 6 Love & Tapp Lang & Lang
4 1 7NTx-1 E   100 13 -13 Clarke & White Barker & Wing
10 9 6NT= W   -990 -6 6 Gurney & Harden Doran & Thompson
Board 6 NS Datum=-330
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
8 7 5Cx-5 S   -1100 -13 13 Lee & Paul Cambery & Courtney
3 5 4S-1 E   100 10 -10 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Moss & Moss
6 2 4S-1 E   100 10 -10 Love & Tapp Lang & Lang
4 1 5Dx-5 N   -1100 -13 13 Clarke & White Barker & Wing
10 9 4Sx-2 W   500 13 -13 Gurney & Harden Doran & Thompson
Board 7 NS Datum=-460
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
10 1 4S+1 E   -650 -5 5 Gurney & Harden Barker & Wing
9 8 4S+1 W   -650 -5 5 Doran & Thompson Lee & Paul
4 6 3H= S   140 12 -12 Clarke & White Love & Tapp
7 3 4S+1 E   -650 -5 5 Cambery & Courtney Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
5 2 4S= E   -620 -4 4 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang
Board 8 NS Datum=440
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
10 1 6S= N   980 11 -11 Gurney & Harden Barker & Wing
9 8 4S+1 N   450 0 0 Doran & Thompson Lee & Paul
4 6 4S+2 N   480 1 -1 Clarke & White Love & Tapp
7 3 4S+2 N   480 1 -1 Cambery & Courtney Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
5 2 5S+1 N   480 1 -1 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang
Board 9 NS Datum=0
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
10 1 2S-1 S   -50 -2 2 Gurney & Harden Barker & Wing
9 8 3NT-1 E   100 3 -3 Doran & Thompson Lee & Paul
4 6 2S-1 N   -50 -2 2 Clarke & White Love & Tapp
7 3 2C-2 N   -100 -3 3 Cambery & Courtney Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
5 2 3NT-1 E   100 3 -3 Moss & Moss Lang & Lang
Board 10 NS Datum=-620
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
6 3 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Love & Tapp Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
10 2 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Gurney & Harden Lang & Lang
1 9 3NT= W   -600 1 -1 Barker & Wing Doran & Thompson
5 7 2Hx-2 N   -500 3 -3 Moss & Moss Cambery & Courtney
8 4 3NT+1 W   -630 0 0 Lee & Paul Clarke & White
Board 11 NS Datum=50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
6 3 1NT-1 S   -50 -3 3 Love & Tapp Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
10 2 3D= N   110 2 -2 Gurney & Harden Lang & Lang
1 9 3NT-3 E   150 3 -3 Barker & Wing Doran & Thompson
5 7 3H= E   -140 -5 5 Moss & Moss Cambery & Courtney
8 4 4H-1 E   50 0 0 Lee & Paul Clarke & White
Board 12 NS Datum=-430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
6 3 3NT+2 W   -460 -1 1 Love & Tapp Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
10 2 3NT+2 W   -460 -1 1 Gurney & Harden Lang & Lang
1 9 3NT= W   -400 1 -1 Barker & Wing Doran & Thompson
5 7 3NT+1 W   -430 0 0 Moss & Moss Cambery & Courtney
8 4 3NT= W   -400 1 -1 Lee & Paul Clarke & White
Board 13 NS Datum=-460
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
9 5 4H= W   -620 -4 4 Doran & Thompson Moss & Moss
7 4 4H= W   -620 -4 4 Cambery & Courtney Clarke & White
10 3 4S= E   -620 -4 4 Gurney & Harden Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
2 1 4H= W   -620 -4 4 Lang & Lang Barker & Wing
6 8 5Sx-1 E   200 12 -12 Love & Tapp Lee & Paul
Board 14 NS Datum=560
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
9 5 6S= S   980 9 -9 Doran & Thompson Moss & Moss
7 4 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Cambery & Courtney Clarke & White
10 3 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Gurney & Harden Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
2 1 4S+2 S   480 -2 2 Lang & Lang Barker & Wing
6 8 6S= S   980 9 -9 Love & Tapp Lee & Paul
Board 15 NS Datum=-400
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
9 5 3NT+1 W   -430 -1 1 Doran & Thompson Moss & Moss
7 4 5D-1 E   50 10 -10 Cambery & Courtney Clarke & White
10 3 3NT+1 E   -430 -1 1 Gurney & Harden Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
2 1 3NT+3 W   -490 -3 3 Lang & Lang Barker & Wing
6 8 3NT+1 W   -430 -1 1 Love & Tapp Lee & Paul
Board 16 NS Datum=-100
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Barker & Wing Love & Tapp
8 5 1NT+1 W   -120 -1 1 Lee & Paul Moss & Moss
10 4 4H-1 W   100 5 -5 Gurney & Harden Clarke & White
3 2 4H-2 E   200 7 -7 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang
7 9 1NT+2 W   -150 -2 2 Cambery & Courtney Doran & Thompson
Board 17 NS Datum=30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 2S-1 E   50 1 -1 Barker & Wing Love & Tapp
8 5 1NT+1 S   120 3 -3 Lee & Paul Moss & Moss
10 4 2S-1 E   50 1 -1 Gurney & Harden Clarke & White
3 2 3S-1 E   50 1 -1 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang
7 9 2S-2 E   100 2 -2 Cambery & Courtney Doran & Thompson
Board 18 NS Datum=420
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 6 6H-2 S   -200 -12 12 Barker & Wing Love & Tapp
8 5 7H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Lee & Paul Moss & Moss
10 4 6H= S   1430 14 -14 Gurney & Harden Clarke & White
3 2 6H-1 S   -100 -11 11 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lang & Lang
7 9 6H= S   1430 14 -14 Cambery & Courtney Doran & Thompson
Board 19 NS Datum=-30
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 7 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Lang & Lang Cambery & Courtney
9 6 3H-1 W   100 4 -4 Doran & Thompson Love & Tapp
10 5 2S= S   110 4 -4 Gurney & Harden Moss & Moss
4 3 2S-1 N   -50 -1 1 Clarke & White Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
8 1 2S= N   110 4 -4 Lee & Paul Barker & Wing
Board 20 NS Datum=-60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 7 3H-1 N   -100 -1 1 Lang & Lang Cambery & Courtney
9 6 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Doran & Thompson Love & Tapp
10 5 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Gurney & Harden Moss & Moss
4 3 1NT-1 E   100 4 -4 Clarke & White Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
8 1 1NT= E   -90 -1 1 Lee & Paul Barker & Wing
Board 21 NS Datum=-20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 7 2H= E   -110 -3 3 Lang & Lang Cambery & Courtney
9 6 2H-1 E   50 2 -2 Doran & Thompson Love & Tapp
10 5 2H= W   -110 -3 3 Gurney & Harden Moss & Moss
4 3 PASS N   0 1 -1 Clarke & White Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
8 1 2C-1 N   -100 -2 2 Lee & Paul Barker & Wing
Board 22 NS Datum=-650
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 8 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lee & Paul
1 7 3NT+1 E   -630 1 -1 Barker & Wing Cambery & Courtney
10 6 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Gurney & Harden Love & Tapp
5 4 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Moss & Moss Clarke & White
9 2 3NT+2 E   -660 0 0 Doran & Thompson Lang & Lang
Board 23 NS Datum=-140
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 8 3D-1 N   -100 1 -1 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lee & Paul
1 7 2D-1 N   -100 1 -1 Barker & Wing Cambery & Courtney
10 6 3D-1 N   -100 1 -1 Gurney & Harden Love & Tapp
5 4 3H+1 E   -170 -1 1 Moss & Moss Clarke & White
9 2 1C+3 W   -130 0 0 Doran & Thompson Lang & Lang
Board 24 NS Datum=430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
3 8 4H= N   420 0 0 Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh Lee & Paul
1 7 4H= S   420 0 0 Barker & Wing Cambery & Courtney
10 6 4H= N   420 0 0 Gurney & Harden Love & Tapp
5 4 4H= S   420 0 0 Moss & Moss Clarke & White
9 2 4H= S   420 0 0 Doran & Thompson Lang & Lang
Board 25 NS Datum=-630
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 9 4S+1 E   -650 -1 1 Clarke & White Doran & Thompson
2 8 4S= E   -620 0 0 Lang & Lang Lee & Paul
10 7 4S= E   -620 0 0 Gurney & Harden Cambery & Courtney
6 5 4S= E   -620 0 0 Love & Tapp Moss & Moss
1 3 4S= E   -620 0 0 Barker & Wing Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
Board 26 NS Datum=-340
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 9 5D= E   -600 -6 6 Clarke & White Doran & Thompson
2 8 3NT-1 E   100 10 -10 Lang & Lang Lee & Paul
10 7 3Hx+1 N   930 15 -15 Gurney & Harden Cambery & Courtney
6 5 4S+1 W   -650 -7 7 Love & Tapp Moss & Moss
1 3 3H+1 N   170 11 -11 Barker & Wing Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh
Board 27 NS Datum=60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
4 9 3C+1 N   130 2 -2 Clarke & White Doran & Thompson
2 8 4C-1 N   -50 -3 3 Lang & Lang Lee & Paul
10 7 3NT= S   400 8 -8 Gurney & Harden Cambery & Courtney
6 5 3S-2 W   100 1 -1 Love & Tapp Moss & Moss
1 3 3C+1 N   130 2 -2 Barker & Wing Nastaszczuk & Roxburgh