E B U Premier Life 01/03/2008 Multisession Session 1 Section Green
Board 1 NS Datum=-80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 2H+2 E   -170 -3 3 Harding & Harding Eddleston & Abley
2 4 3NT-3 W   150 6 -6 Bradley & Norman Milman & Stelmashenko
7 14 1NT+1 S   120 5 -5 Wren & Davies Reece & Knight
9 12 2H+2 E   -170 -3 3 Irwin & Kime Dannell & Darby
10 11 2H= E   -110 -1 1 Brain & Stevens Brook & Ackroyd
13 8 2S+1 W   -140 -2 2 Jones & Crack Woodcock & Woodcock
15 6 3C-1 N   -50 1 -1 Pyner & Jones Blackman & Evans
16 3 2H= E   -110 -1 1 Rainsford & Goodwin Oake & Cornell
Board 2 NS Datum=-430
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 5NT-1 E   50 10 -10 Harding & Harding Eddleston & Abley
2 4 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Bradley & Norman Milman & Stelmashenko
7 14 3NT= E   -400 1 -1 Wren & Davies Reece & Knight
9 12 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Irwin & Kime Dannell & Darby
10 11 3NT+2 E   -460 -1 1 Brain & Stevens Brook & Ackroyd
13 8 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Jones & Crack Woodcock & Woodcock
15 6 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Pyner & Jones Blackman & Evans
16 3 3NT+1 E   -430 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Oake & Cornell
Board 3 NS Datum=-80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 3D-1 E   100 5 -5 Harding & Harding Eddleston & Abley
2 4 3NT-2 S   -100 -1 1 Bradley & Norman Milman & Stelmashenko
7 14 3NT-2 N   -100 -1 1 Wren & Davies Reece & Knight
9 12 3NT-1 N   -50 1 -1 Irwin & Kime Dannell & Darby
10 11 3NT-2 N   -100 -1 1 Brain & Stevens Brook & Ackroyd
13 8 3NT-2 N   -100 -1 1 Jones & Crack Woodcock & Woodcock
15 6 3C-1 S   -50 1 -1 Pyner & Jones Blackman & Evans
16 3 3NTx-1 N   -100 -1 1 Rainsford & Goodwin Oake & Cornell
Board 4 NS Datum=-110
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 3D= E   -110 0 0 Harding & Harding Eddleston & Abley
2 4 1NT+1 W   -120 0 0 Bradley & Norman Milman & Stelmashenko
7 14 1NT= E   -90 1 -1 Wren & Davies Reece & Knight
9 12 1NT= E   -90 1 -1 Irwin & Kime Dannell & Darby
10 11 1NT+2 E   -150 -1 1 Brain & Stevens Brook & Ackroyd
13 8 1NT+2 E   -150 -1 1 Jones & Crack Woodcock & Woodcock
15 6 2S= S   110 6 -6 Pyner & Jones Blackman & Evans
16 3 1NT= E   -90 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Oake & Cornell
Board 5 NS Datum=1470
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 3NT+4 S   720 -13 13 Harding & Harding Eddleston & Abley
2 4 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Bradley & Norman Milman & Stelmashenko
7 14 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Wren & Davies Reece & Knight
9 12 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Irwin & Kime Dannell & Darby
10 11 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Brain & Stevens Brook & Ackroyd
13 8 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Jones & Crack Woodcock & Woodcock
15 6 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Pyner & Jones Blackman & Evans
16 3 6NT+1 S   1470 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Oake & Cornell
Board 6 NS Datum=-610
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 5 4H= W   -620 0 0 Harding & Harding Eddleston & Abley
2 4 3NT= W   -600 0 0 Bradley & Norman Milman & Stelmashenko
7 14 4H= W   -620 0 0 Wren & Davies Reece & Knight
9 12 5D= E   -600 0 0 Irwin & Kime Dannell & Darby
10 11 3NT= W   -600 0 0 Brain & Stevens Brook & Ackroyd
13 8 4H-1 W   100 12 -12 Jones & Crack Woodcock & Woodcock
15 6 4H+2 W   -680 -2 2 Pyner & Jones Blackman & Evans
16 3 3NT+1 W   -630 -1 1 Rainsford & Goodwin Oake & Cornell
Board 7 NS Datum=1310
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 6NT+1 S   1470 4 -4 Harding & Harding Wren & Davies
2 6 6NT+1 S   1470 4 -4 Bradley & Norman Blackman & Evans
3 5 3NT+4 N   720 -11 11 Oake & Cornell Eddleston & Abley
8 15 6C+1 N   1390 2 -2 Woodcock & Woodcock Pyner & Jones
10 13 6C+1 S   1390 2 -2 Brain & Stevens Jones & Crack
11 12 4NT+3 S   720 -11 11 Brook & Ackroyd Dannell & Darby
14 9 6NT= N   1440 4 -4 Reece & Knight Irwin & Kime
16 4 6NT+1 S   1470 4 -4 Rainsford & Goodwin Milman & Stelmashenko
Board 8 NS Datum=120
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 1NT-2 N   -100 -6 6 Harding & Harding Wren & Davies
2 6 2H+1 S   140 1 -1 Bradley & Norman Blackman & Evans
3 5 3H+1 N   170 2 -2 Oake & Cornell Eddleston & Abley
8 15 1NT+1 N   120 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Pyner & Jones
10 13 3H= S   140 1 -1 Brain & Stevens Jones & Crack
11 12 2H= S   110 0 0 Brook & Ackroyd Dannell & Darby
14 9 1NT+1 N   120 0 0 Reece & Knight Irwin & Kime
16 4 2H= S   110 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Milman & Stelmashenko
Board 9 NS Datum=-10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 2S-1 S   -50 -1 1 Harding & Harding Wren & Davies
2 6 3NT-1 E   100 3 -3 Bradley & Norman Blackman & Evans
3 5 3Cx-2 S   -300 -7 7 Oake & Cornell Eddleston & Abley
8 15 3NT-1 E   100 3 -3 Woodcock & Woodcock Pyner & Jones
10 13 4Hx-1 N   -100 -3 3 Brain & Stevens Jones & Crack
11 12 3Hx= S   530 11 -11 Brook & Ackroyd Dannell & Darby
14 9 3NT+1 E   -630 -12 12 Reece & Knight Irwin & Kime
16 4 3NT-2 W   200 5 -5 Rainsford & Goodwin Milman & Stelmashenko
Board 10 NS Datum=160
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 1NT+1 S   120 -1 1 Harding & Harding Wren & Davies
2 6 2H-2 W   200 1 -1 Bradley & Norman Blackman & Evans
3 5 3NT-2 N   -200 -8 8 Oake & Cornell Eddleston & Abley
8 15 2Sx-3 E   800 12 -12 Woodcock & Woodcock Pyner & Jones
10 13 3C-1 S   -100 -6 6 Brain & Stevens Jones & Crack
11 12 1NT+2 S   150 0 0 Brook & Ackroyd Dannell & Darby
14 9 2C-2 W   200 1 -1 Reece & Knight Irwin & Kime
16 4 3S-4 E   400 6 -6 Rainsford & Goodwin Milman & Stelmashenko
Board 11 NS Datum=20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Harding & Harding Wren & Davies
2 6 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Bradley & Norman Blackman & Evans
3 5 2S+3 W   -200 -6 6 Oake & Cornell Eddleston & Abley
8 15 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Woodcock & Woodcock Pyner & Jones
10 13 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Brain & Stevens Jones & Crack
11 12 3S= E   -140 -4 4 Brook & Ackroyd Dannell & Darby
14 9 3S-1 E   50 1 -1 Reece & Knight Irwin & Kime
16 4 4S-1 E   50 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Milman & Stelmashenko
Board 12 NS Datum=-260
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 7 4S+1 W   -450 -5 5 Harding & Harding Wren & Davies
2 6 4S= W   -420 -4 4 Bradley & Norman Blackman & Evans
3 5 6C-1 W   50 7 -7 Oake & Cornell Eddleston & Abley
8 15 6C-1 W   50 7 -7 Woodcock & Woodcock Pyner & Jones
10 13 4NT-2 E   100 8 -8 Brain & Stevens Jones & Crack
11 12 3NT= E   -400 -4 4 Brook & Ackroyd Dannell & Darby
14 9 4S= W   -420 -4 4 Reece & Knight Irwin & Kime
16 4 4S= W   -420 -4 4 Rainsford & Goodwin Milman & Stelmashenko
Board 13 NS Datum=-170
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 8 3H= W   -140 1 -1 Bradley & Norman Woodcock & Woodcock
3 7 3Hx= W   -730 -11 11 Oake & Cornell Wren & Davies
4 6 3H= W   -140 1 -1 Milman & Stelmashenko Blackman & Evans
9 1 4C= N   130 7 -7 Irwin & Kime Harding & Harding
11 14 4C= N   130 7 -7 Brook & Ackroyd Reece & Knight
12 13 5C-2 N   -200 -1 1 Dannell & Darby Jones & Crack
15 10 3H= W   -140 1 -1 Pyner & Jones Brain & Stevens
16 5 6Cx-2 N   -500 -8 8 Rainsford & Goodwin Eddleston & Abley
Board 14 NS Datum=-110
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 8 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Bradley & Norman Woodcock & Woodcock
3 7 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Oake & Cornell Wren & Davies
4 6 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Milman & Stelmashenko Blackman & Evans
9 1 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Irwin & Kime Harding & Harding
11 14 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Brook & Ackroyd Reece & Knight
12 13 4S-1 E   50 4 -4 Dannell & Darby Jones & Crack
15 10 4S-1 E   50 4 -4 Pyner & Jones Brain & Stevens
16 5 3S= E   -140 -1 1 Rainsford & Goodwin Eddleston & Abley
Board 15 NS Datum=-400
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 8 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Bradley & Norman Woodcock & Woodcock
3 7 2S+3 E   -200 5 -5 Oake & Cornell Wren & Davies
4 6 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Milman & Stelmashenko Blackman & Evans
9 1 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Irwin & Kime Harding & Harding
11 14 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Brook & Ackroyd Reece & Knight
12 13 4S= E   -420 -1 1 Dannell & Darby Jones & Crack
15 10 3S+2 E   -200 5 -5 Pyner & Jones Brain & Stevens
16 5 4S+1 E   -450 -2 2 Rainsford & Goodwin Eddleston & Abley
Board 16 NS Datum=210
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 8 2S+2 S   170 -1 1 Bradley & Norman Woodcock & Woodcock
3 7 2S+2 S   170 -1 1 Oake & Cornell Wren & Davies
4 6 2S+2 S   170 -1 1 Milman & Stelmashenko Blackman & Evans
9 1 2S+2 S   170 -1 1 Irwin & Kime Harding & Harding
11 14 2S+2 S   170 -1 1 Brook & Ackroyd Reece & Knight
12 13 4H= S   420 5 -5 Dannell & Darby Jones & Crack
15 10 2S+2 S   170 -1 1 Pyner & Jones Brain & Stevens
16 5 4S= S   420 5 -5 Rainsford & Goodwin Eddleston & Abley
Board 17 NS Datum=60
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 8 5Cx-2 N   -300 -8 8 Bradley & Norman Woodcock & Woodcock
3 7 3S= W   -140 -5 5 Oake & Cornell Wren & Davies
4 6 5Sx-2 W   300 6 -6 Milman & Stelmashenko Blackman & Evans
9 1 6C-2 N   -100 -4 4 Irwin & Kime Harding & Harding
11 14 4S= W   -420 -10 10 Brook & Ackroyd Reece & Knight
12 13 5Sx-2 W   300 6 -6 Dannell & Darby Jones & Crack
15 10 5Sx-2 W   300 6 -6 Pyner & Jones Brain & Stevens
16 5 5Sx-2 W   300 6 -6 Rainsford & Goodwin Eddleston & Abley
Board 18 NS Datum=390
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
2 8 2H+3 S   200 -5 5 Bradley & Norman Woodcock & Woodcock
3 7 4H+1 S   650 6 -6 Oake & Cornell Wren & Davies
4 6 4H-1 S   -100 -10 10 Milman & Stelmashenko Blackman & Evans
9 1 4H+1 S   650 6 -6 Irwin & Kime Harding & Harding
11 14 2S= W   -110 -11 11 Brook & Ackroyd Reece & Knight
12 13 4H+1 S   650 6 -6 Dannell & Darby Jones & Crack
15 10 3Sx-2 W   300 -3 3 Pyner & Jones Brain & Stevens
16 5 4H= N   620 6 -6 Rainsford & Goodwin Eddleston & Abley
Board 19 NS Datum=280
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 12 2S-1 E   100 -5 5 Eddleston & Abley Dannell & Darby
7 10 3NT+1 N   430 4 -4 Wren & Davies Brain & Stevens
8 9 1S= E   -80 -8 8 Woodcock & Woodcock Irwin & Kime
11 6 1NT+3 N   180 -3 3 Brook & Ackroyd Blackman & Evans
13 4 4Hx-2 W   500 6 -6 Jones & Crack Milman & Stelmashenko
14 3 3NT+1 S   430 4 -4 Reece & Knight Oake & Cornell
15 2 3NT+1 S   430 4 -4 Pyner & Jones Bradley & Norman
16 1 2S-1 E   100 -5 5 Rainsford & Goodwin Harding & Harding
Board 20 NS Datum=-570
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 12 3NT= W   -600 -1 1 Eddleston & Abley Dannell & Darby
7 10 3NT+1 W   -630 -2 2 Wren & Davies Brain & Stevens
8 9 3NT= W   -600 -1 1 Woodcock & Woodcock Irwin & Kime
11 6 3NT= W   -600 -1 1 Brook & Ackroyd Blackman & Evans
13 4 3Sx-2 S   -500 2 -2 Jones & Crack Milman & Stelmashenko
14 3 3Dx+1 E   -870 -7 7 Reece & Knight Oake & Cornell
15 2 3Sx-2 S   -500 2 -2 Pyner & Jones Bradley & Norman
16 1 2Sx= S   670 15 -15 Rainsford & Goodwin Harding & Harding
Board 21 NS Datum=-320
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 12 4H+1 W   -450 -4 4 Eddleston & Abley Dannell & Darby
7 10 4H+1 W   -450 -4 4 Wren & Davies Brain & Stevens
8 9 4H+2 W   -480 -4 4 Woodcock & Woodcock Irwin & Kime
11 6 3S-3 N   -300 1 -1 Brook & Ackroyd Blackman & Evans
13 4 4H+2 W   -480 -4 4 Jones & Crack Milman & Stelmashenko
14 3 4D-1 W   50 9 -9 Reece & Knight Oake & Cornell
15 2 4D-2 W   100 9 -9 Pyner & Jones Bradley & Norman
16 1 3S-3 N   -300 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Harding & Harding
Board 22 NS Datum=-140
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 12 2D+2 E   -130 0 0 Eddleston & Abley Dannell & Darby
7 10 2D+2 E   -130 0 0 Wren & Davies Brain & Stevens
8 9 2D+3 E   -150 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Irwin & Kime
11 6 2D+2 E   -130 0 0 Brook & Ackroyd Blackman & Evans
13 4 3NT+1 E   -630 -10 10 Jones & Crack Milman & Stelmashenko
14 3 2D+3 E   -150 0 0 Reece & Knight Oake & Cornell
15 2 2D+2 E   -130 0 0 Pyner & Jones Bradley & Norman
16 1 2D+1 E   -110 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Harding & Harding
Board 23 NS Datum=130
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 12 3NT= S   600 10 -10 Eddleston & Abley Dannell & Darby
7 10 2D+1 E   -110 -6 6 Wren & Davies Brain & Stevens
8 9 5C= N   600 10 -10 Woodcock & Woodcock Irwin & Kime
11 6 5C-1 N   -100 -6 6 Brook & Ackroyd Blackman & Evans
13 4 3NT-2 S   -200 -8 8 Jones & Crack Milman & Stelmashenko
14 3 4H-1 N   -100 -6 6 Reece & Knight Oake & Cornell
15 2 5C= N   600 10 -10 Pyner & Jones Bradley & Norman
16 1 6C-1 S   -100 -6 6 Rainsford & Goodwin Harding & Harding
Board 24 NS Datum=-330
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
5 12 4S= W   -420 -3 3 Eddleston & Abley Dannell & Darby
7 10 4S= W   -420 -3 3 Wren & Davies Brain & Stevens
8 9 4S= E   -420 -3 3 Woodcock & Woodcock Irwin & Kime
11 6 3NT= E   -400 -2 2 Brook & Ackroyd Blackman & Evans
13 4 3NT+1 E   -430 -3 3 Jones & Crack Milman & Stelmashenko
14 3 4S= W   -420 -3 3 Reece & Knight Oake & Cornell
15 2 6S-2 W   100 10 -10 Pyner & Jones Bradley & Norman
16 1 6S-2 W   100 10 -10 Rainsford & Goodwin Harding & Harding
Board 25 NS Datum=320
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Harding & Harding Oake & Cornell
6 13 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Blackman & Evans Jones & Crack
8 11 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Woodcock & Woodcock Brook & Ackroyd
9 10 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Irwin & Kime Brain & Stevens
12 7 1NT+2 S   150 -5 5 Dannell & Darby Wren & Davies
14 5 1NT+2 S   150 -5 5 Reece & Knight Eddleston & Abley
15 4 3NT-1 S   -50 -9 9 Pyner & Jones Milman & Stelmashenko
16 2 3NT= S   400 2 -2 Rainsford & Goodwin Bradley & Norman
Board 26 NS Datum=-80
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 4H-1 N   -100 -1 1 Harding & Harding Oake & Cornell
6 13 4H-1 N   -100 -1 1 Blackman & Evans Jones & Crack
8 11 3Sx-2 W   500 11 -11 Woodcock & Woodcock Brook & Ackroyd
9 10 4H-2 N   -200 -3 3 Irwin & Kime Brain & Stevens
12 7 4S-2 W   200 7 -7 Dannell & Darby Wren & Davies
14 5 4H-1 N   -100 -1 1 Reece & Knight Eddleston & Abley
15 4 4H-2 N   -200 -3 3 Pyner & Jones Milman & Stelmashenko
16 2 4H-2 N   -200 -3 3 Rainsford & Goodwin Bradley & Norman
Board 27 NS Datum=-50
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 4D+1 W   -150 -3 3 Harding & Harding Oake & Cornell
6 13 3S-2 S   -100 -2 2 Blackman & Evans Jones & Crack
8 11 4S-3 S   -150 -3 3 Woodcock & Woodcock Brook & Ackroyd
9 10 2S= S   110 4 -4 Irwin & Kime Brain & Stevens
12 7 3D+1 W   -130 -2 2 Dannell & Darby Wren & Davies
14 5 2S-2 S   -100 -2 2 Reece & Knight Eddleston & Abley
15 4 3D-1 W   50 3 -3 Pyner & Jones Milman & Stelmashenko
16 2 2S= S   110 4 -4 Rainsford & Goodwin Bradley & Norman
Board 28 NS Datum=-90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 1NT= W   -90 0 0 Harding & Harding Oake & Cornell
6 13 1NT= W   -90 0 0 Blackman & Evans Jones & Crack
8 11 2D= E   -90 0 0 Woodcock & Woodcock Brook & Ackroyd
9 10 1NT= W   -90 0 0 Irwin & Kime Brain & Stevens
12 7 1NT= W   -90 0 0 Dannell & Darby Wren & Davies
14 5 1NT= E   -90 0 0 Reece & Knight Eddleston & Abley
15 4 1NT+1 E   -120 -1 1 Pyner & Jones Milman & Stelmashenko
16 2 1NT= W   -90 0 0 Rainsford & Goodwin Bradley & Norman
Board 29 NS Datum=90
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 2D+2 S   130 1 -1 Harding & Harding Oake & Cornell
6 13 2D+2 S   130 1 -1 Blackman & Evans Jones & Crack
8 11 1NT+1 S   120 1 -1 Woodcock & Woodcock Brook & Ackroyd
9 10 3D+1 S   130 1 -1 Irwin & Kime Brain & Stevens
12 7 5D-2 S   -200 -7 7 Dannell & Darby Wren & Davies
14 5 2D+2 S   130 1 -1 Reece & Knight Eddleston & Abley
15 4 3C= E   -110 -5 5 Pyner & Jones Milman & Stelmashenko
16 2 3D= S   110 1 -1 Rainsford & Goodwin Bradley & Norman
Board 30 NS Datum=-20
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score IMP IMP NS EW
1 3 1NT+2 E   -150 -4 4 Harding & Harding Oake & Cornell
6 13 1NT= E   -90 -2 2 Blackman & Evans Jones & Crack
8 11 2D= S   90 3 -3 Woodcock & Woodcock Brook & Ackroyd
9 10 2S-2 S   -100 -2 2 Irwin & Kime Brain & Stevens
12 7 1NT-1 E   50 2 -2 Dannell & Darby Wren & Davies
14 5 2D= S   90 3 -3 Reece & Knight Eddleston & Abley
15 4 1NT= E   -90 -2 2 Pyner & Jones Milman & Stelmashenko
16 2 1NT-1 E   50 2 -2 Rainsford & Goodwin Bradley & Norman