Law37, Action violating obligation to pass
Law 37 reads:
'If the inadmissible call was a bid or a double or a redouble by a player required by law to pass (......) and offender's LHO calls before the Director has ruled on rectification, that call and all subsequent calls stand........................'
Unlike laws 30,31 and 32, this clause does not contain the phrase '..the option in Law 29A not having been exercised..'
Would it, therefore, be a correct interpretation of this Law that 'that call and subsequent calls' are allowed to stand only if the LHO makes a call BEFORE the Director is called and has ruled on rectification, and that if the Director is called after the offender has called but the LHO has not, then the Director cannot offer the LHO the option of accepting the offending call, as he can in the other cases of calls out of turn?