I have been considering the implications of Law 21B in situations where MI is revealed by the declaring side during the clarification period.
Under 21B1a, situations where the TD judges that the final call by the NOS "could well have been influenced by misinformation", he/she will allow the call to be replaced "without other rectification for his side". I read this as meaning that 16C1 applies, but does it also preclude any further rectification? The wording in 21B3 suggests that it does, but are there any situations when a TD might consider further rectification even when the NOS has chosen to change their final call and would it be legal to do so?
As far as I can see, 21B1a is the only place that reference is made to "other rectification" so I want to understand how this is different from the much more usual "further rectification".