Search
-
Re: Paper Travellers
The "best" I've seen so far was South on Table 2 calling the TD on round 3, to complain that their row was already completed. Their partner had scored the first two rounds as Pair 4. To make it worse, North had been using the table number as a mat to lean on when scoring. I did wonder about asking the sit-out table to… -
Re: EBUSCore 1.2.1
-
Re: Extraneous information
I started off by liking this answer, then wasn't so sure. If they're no longer scheduled to play it, then presumably neither are the other pair originally scheduled to play it (pair #2 in my scenario above). If they are not scheduled to play it, how can an artificial adjusted score be awarded? I realise this is getting… -
Re: Extraneous information
I think my OP may have been unclear. (if it wasn't then I'm missing something obvious, which is quite possible). Board 6 was played at table 3 by pairs #5 and #10 (Howell movement). They shouldn't have played it, but they did and in fact completed the hand before they realised. The result was counted as per 15B2. Later on,… -
Re: MI / UI / AI: How different can the deemed knowledge of each side be?
Most of the laws references clarify this only by omission, in that they only allow changes/adjustments when the damage is caused by the misinformation, but the White Book is clearer when it says: 8.12.11 Law 12C1: Assigned adjustment – general [WBFLC] When there has been misinformation and a damaged side is to receive an… -
Re: mistaken bid correct system explanation
The spirit of the game is to play fairly to win making as few mistakes as possible. But mistakes at bridge are a major part of the game and it is unnecessary and fairly unworkable to tell your opponents you have made a mistake. Examples: 1 Declarer leads a suit from dummy. You play a high card to show an even number and…